12:01:02 RRSAgent has joined #shapes 12:01:02 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/03/15-shapes-irc 12:01:04 RRSAgent, make logs rdf-data-shapes 12:01:04 Zakim has joined #shapes 12:01:06 Zakim, this will be SHAPES 12:01:06 ok, trackbot 12:01:07 Meeting: RDF Data Shapes Working Group Teleconference 12:01:07 Date: 15 March 2017 12:01:37 Dimitris has joined #shapes 12:01:42 RRSAgent, draft minutes 12:01:42 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/03/15-shapes-minutes.html TallTed 12:01:47 RRSAgent, make logs public 12:01:47 scribenick: hknublau 12:01:58 present+ 12:02:04 present+ 12:02:10 present+ 12:02:17 chair: TallTed 12:02:25 regrets for the meeting, unfortunately I won't make it today 12:02:54 regrets: Dimitris 12:03:24 dallemang has joined #shapes 12:05:12 ipolikof has joined #shapes 12:05:19 present+ 12:06:13 present+ 12:07:03 https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/issues 12:08:01 https://www.w3.org/TR/webmention/ 12:09:27 https://github.com/w3c/webmention/blob/master/draft/index.html 12:11:34 TOPIC: admin 12:11:34 PROPOSED: Approve minutes of the 08 Mar 2017 Telecon: https://www.w3.org/2017/03/08-shapes-minutes.html 12:11:42 +1 12:11:53 +1 12:12:02 +1 12:12:03 +1 12:12:11 RESOLVED: Approve minutes of the 08 Mar 2017 Telecon: https://www.w3.org/2017/03/08-shapes-minutes.html 12:14:46 TOPIC: Open Issues 12:14:54 issue-234? 12:14:54 issue-234 -- Public comment https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/2017Feb/0165.html -- open 12:14:54 http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/234 12:16:20 TallTed: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/2017Mar/0004.html 12:17:12 present+ dallemang 12:17:14 PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-234 as addressed by https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/2017Mar/0004.html ; any continuing concerns to be raised as independent issues via github 12:17:24 +1 12:17:26 +1 12:17:34 +1 12:18:11 +! 12:18:13 +1 12:18:25 +1 12:18:27 RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-234 as addressed by https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/2017Mar/0004.html ; any continuing concerns to be raised as independent issues via github 12:19:31 TOPIC: GitHub Issues https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/issues 12:19:39 TOPIC: Problems editing SHACL with Protégé - https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/issues/32 12:22:14 hknublau: Protege stores RDF using OWLAPI, so if you load RDF and save it again, often it's changed 12:22:34 dallemang: what about modifying protege? 12:22:49 hknublau: There were some attempts 6 months ago 12:23:49 hknublau: I spoke to maintainter, and they acknowledged the issue, but were not committing to addressing it 12:24:11 dallemang: I've come across this problem with OWLAPI apart from SHACL, too 12:24:27 TallTed: Maybe we can add a disclaimer 12:24:27 hknublau: Yes, problem with OWLAPI, when they switched away from frames 12:25:05 dallemang: From an adoption perspective this doesn't really help 12:25:33 "I would recommend making all the properties that attach to Classes and Properties be annotation properties." 12:25:43 (from commenter) 12:25:51 ... by turning them into annotation properties we can tell OWL to be quiet 12:27:00 hknublau: any 3rd party can make a file like this for protege; it will never load our namespace file 12:27:09 q+ 12:27:39 dallemang: We could turn that hint into a note to implementers 12:28:34 @sandro: why not put these changes into our own TTL file? 12:28:56 dallemang: I am concerned we are making adjustments to a standard just for one tool. 12:30:19 hknublau: We'd have to remove domain & range, so it would be a change 12:30:55 TallTed: The use of RDFS/inferencing was topic of very long discussions in the past. 12:31:23 Dimitris has left #shapes 12:31:36 ack @sandro 12:33:22 @sandro: The commenter on GitHub should close the issue when satisfied, i.e. we should ask him 12:33:51 http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/ 12:34:16 TOPIC: Inclusion of sh:phase and sh:Phase - https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/issues/35 12:34:55 I have a hard stop today, will have to leave by 9am 12:35:57 pano: Shapes can be validated in different phases, e.g. test, production 12:36:59 @sandro: Workflow could also be handled via different files/graphs 12:38:07 hknublau: There could also be other dimensions, e.g. authors 12:38:49 TallTed: A possible response would be to "you can achieve this by doing XY", RDF allows combination of different namespaces. 12:40:55 TOPIC: Ambiguity in examples - https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/issues/36 12:42:44 hknublau: this is about avoiding self-references, e.g. replace Person with School, Company or Address 12:43:27 TallTed: seems like a viable fix to just switch to something else 12:45:23 https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/pulls 12:47:48 hknublau: I'll reject the two pull requests - filter shapes are outdated, Eric's change is tricky to merge at this stage and not essential. 12:48:37 TOPIC: Public comments 12:49:10 @sandro: Test methodology questions don't need to be addressed before CR 12:50:57 @sandro: We should collect the endorsements on a wiki page, and link it from CR transition 12:57:32 "Intent to Implement" emails 12:58:30 have to leave 12:59:17 https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Main_Page#Implementations 13:01:54 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/2017Mar/0034.html 13:03:15 @sandro: My impression is that different implementations may indeed produce different results 13:03:56 hknublau: I'm keen on interop here, that's why we have test cases 13:05:33 Nicky has joined #shapes 13:06:17 TallTed: What is interoperability. 13:06:33 ... the validation report is primarily for humans, less for machine actions 13:07:24 ... therefore doesn't need to be 100% identical 13:07:30 present+ 13:07:37 @sandro: The syntax at least needs to be interoperable 13:09:59 dallemang: Expect Protege plugins etc to work with violation reports 13:11:06 @sandro: with a command line tool, you'd want "line numbers" in the TTL file 13:13:24 dallemang: I would use SPARQL to query data and results graph together 13:17:20 (Discussion about test format) 13:30:03 TOPIC: tracking comments 13:33:28 TOPIC: process toward CR 13:33:30 https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/CR-Transition-Request 13:35:29 @sandro: Dependencies met is often forgotten, but they look OK in SHACL. 13:36:15 ... looks good overall 13:38:06 RRSAgent, draft minutes 13:38:06 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/03/15-shapes-minutes.html TallTed 13:38:13 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:38:41 trackbot, end meeting 13:38:41 Zakim, list attendees 13:38:41 As of this point the attendees have been hknublau, TallTed, pano, ipolikof, sandro, dallemang, !, Nicky 13:38:49 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 13:38:49 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/03/15-shapes-minutes.html trackbot 13:38:50 RRSAgent, bye 13:38:50 I see no action items