08:51:15 RRSAgent has joined #wot 08:51:15 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/02/22-wot-irc 09:02:09 Meeting: WoT Chairs 09:02:16 present+ Kaz, Michael 09:02:22 regrets+ Matthias 09:06:21 present+ Yongjing 09:07:15 Chair: McCool 09:07:32 topic: Agenda 09:08:52 yongjing has joined #wot 13:05:30 RRSAgent has joined #wot 13:05:30 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/02/22-wot-irc 13:05:36 Zakim has joined #wot 13:05:50 chair: Matthias 13:05:59 https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_WoT_WebConf#22_Feb_2017 13:06:04 meeting: WoT IG telecon 13:06:22 agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_WoT_WebConf#22_Feb_2017 13:06:23 cvelasco_Fraunhofer has joined #wot 13:06:29 present+ Kaz 13:06:44 s/WoT IG/Joint WoT IG-WG/ 13:06:47 mjkoster has joined #wot 13:07:02 present+ Matthias_Kovatsch 13:07:34 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:07:34 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/02/22-wot-minutes.html kaz 13:08:37 q? 13:08:37 scribe: DarkoAnicic 13:08:52 jhund has joined #wot 13:09:04 present+ Johannes_Hund 13:09:16 Present+ McCool 13:09:33 rrsagent, make log public 13:09:35 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:09:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/02/22-wot-minutes.html kaz 13:10:01 Kaz: maybe send a quick email reminder to Fernando? 13:10:23 Matthias: today we have two external presentations: one from Konca Minolta and another one related to the WoT ontology 13:10:57 philipackermann has joined #wot 13:11:53 Matthias: we need a press realise and a blog post etc. to show the WG started to work - there will be a meeting organized 13:14:03 q+ 13:15:16 never mind, audio not working 13:15:17 carry on 13:15:26 Matthias: there exist 4 mailing lists at the moment. We need to reduce a number of emails by organizing the communication. 13:15:39 [ present: Kaz, Carlos, Darko, Dave, Fent, Kajimoto, Naka, Nimura, Toumura, Ohura, Matej, Matthias, MKoster, McCool, Philip, Yamada, Taki, Tokuyama, Victor, Yongjing ] 13:16:18 anyhow, I was going to say we discussing creating an Editor's mailing list (actually, will have Editors and Chairs) 13:16:39 specifically to cover organizational topics related to editing the drafts 13:17:20 Matthias: for instance we can publish first on the members-only WG list, and once we have an agreement or a proposal, then we can publish it on the public mailing list. 13:17:33 yingying has joined #wot 13:17:46 generally better to use github issues for "sticky" topics 13:17:59 kajimoto: I would like to create a mailing list for the architecture deliverable. 13:18:06 present+ Yingying_Chen 13:18:21 Matthias: this is an old issue: mailing list vs. GitHub issue 13:18:38 Topic: Presentation from Konica Minolta 13:19:42 Presenter: Matej Dusik 13:20:11 Presenter II: Carlos A Velasco 13:22:47 [ present+ Nan_Wang ] 13:25:12 project "Cognitive Hub" presented 13:26:43 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:26:43 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/02/22-wot-minutes.html kaz 13:27:03 q+ 13:27:05 q? 13:27:18 ack McCool 13:28:10 jhund: very interesting presentation. What kind of protocols do you support? What kind of Things can be connected to? 13:28:11 q+ 13:28:25 ack jhund 13:28:31 q? 13:28:37 Matej Dusik: we would like to support the W3C WoT 13:28:41 McCool_ has joined #wot 13:28:45 present+ McCool 13:29:16 Matej Dusik: different Things can be connected over our semantic platform 13:29:34 q+ to ask if Matej can send these slides to the group list 13:29:51 q+ 13:29:58 Matej Dusik: we are currently driven by different use cases 13:29:59 q? 13:30:04 ack cvel 13:30:59 Carlos: introducing himself, we are working on topics like semantics, WoT 13:31:41 Matthias: you are invited to give a short presentation on your work, activities etc. 13:31:43 ack kaz 13:31:43 kaz, you wanted to ask if Matej can send these slides to the group list 13:32:08 ack Mc 13:32:13 kaz: Matej, could you please send the presented slides? 13:32:27 Matej: yes. 13:33:01 Matthias: why did you choose Lora. 13:33:46 Matej: Low maintenance, low power 13:34:25 McCool has joined #wot 13:34:33 present+ McCool 13:34:44 jhund: you are invited to participate in our Plug Fests to test the interoperability 13:34:57 q? 13:35:13 q? 13:35:14 never mind, stupid network 13:35:44 Topic: The WoT Ontology 13:35:57 Yongjing_ has joined #wot 13:36:15 Matthias:Since Fernando is not present, we will skip the presentation 13:36:54 Jhund: we have a new repo. Zoltan will provide the access. Email notification will be provided. 13:37:01 -> https://www.w3.org/2017/02/20-wot-minutes.html Scripting minutes 13:37:39 q? 13:37:41 q+ 13:38:35 [ present+ Fernando ] 13:38:49 [ present+ Maria ] 13:39:21 jhund: IG space will be merged with the new repo and the current content will be freezed, and a visitor will be forwarded to the new repo. 13:39:54 q+ 13:40:00 s/ Zoltan will provide the access/ Zoltan will provide a strawman for the ED, we still no access yet/ 13:40:10 Matthias: we should delete the old (current) content in order not to confuse visitors (it will not be deleted anyway, in case it is needed). 13:40:42 ryuichi has joined #wot 13:43:41 McCool: beside moving "normative" details out, I think we also need to work on outlines for each document 13:45:41 ack k 13:46:38 I have updateed the architecture document (from the IG work) to be used in the WG 13:46:56 s/I have updateed the architecture document (from the IG work) to be used in the WG/ kajimoto: I have updateed the architecture document (from the IG work) to be used in the WG 13:48:25 Matthias: we should ensure that the most recent template is used in docs 13:48:33 -> https://github.com/w3c/wotwg/tree/master/architecture wot architecture tentative area 13:48:50 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture wot architecture final area 13:50:00 mpoveda has joined #wot 13:52:10 Matthias: in the work on the architecture we want to cover, apart from device to clould comm., also other scenarious, e.g., Thing to Thing interactions etc. Currently we don't have a separate call for the architecture work, email communication is crrently used. 13:54:02 Carlos: could we organize the work more clearly regarding where and how to contribute? 13:54:34 Matthias: the input has been inhereted from the IG. We now use the WG list. 13:54:59 q? 13:55:06 Topic: The WoT Ontology 13:55:07 ack mkovatsc 13:55:27 Presenters: Maria and Fernando 13:55:49 sebastian has joined #wot 13:55:57 i|Ontology|[ all the 4 deliverable documents are WG deliverables, so should be handle on the WG side. ]| 13:56:27 present+ sebastian_kaebisch 13:56:34 s/documents/documents (WoT Architecture, TD, Scripting, Binding Templates)/ 13:59:15 [ present+ Matsukura, Yingying ] 14:05:50 Maria: we extracted requirements from the Current Practise document, and provided an OWL ontology and HTML documentation for the ontology 14:06:19 Maria: the outcome is online and avilable for comments 14:07:29 q? 14:07:52 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:07:52 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/02/22-wot-minutes.html kaz 14:09:21 q+ 14:09:26 q+ 14:09:40 mjkoster: how to link this ontology with other domain specific ontologies? 14:10:21 victor has joined #wot 14:10:31 q+ 14:10:39 Maria: we will work on showing how to use the ontology w.r.t example use cases 14:13:16 q+ 14:13:33 ack mkovatsc 14:13:37 ack sebastian 14:15:01 sebastian: small modifications are needed to be align with the current TD model. 14:15:08 q+ 14:15:52 sebastian: shell we consider the work as a starting work for the model representation? 14:17:24 sebastian: Maria, you are invited to the TD discussion on the basic model. 14:17:37 q? 14:17:38 ack sebastian 14:17:46 ack sebastian 14:17:51 ack victor 14:18:38 q+ 14:25:06 naka_ has joined #wot 14:26:18 s/shell we/shall we/ 14:27:15 q? 14:27:20 ack Yongjing 14:28:16 Sorry, I have to leave 14:28:32 q+ 14:29:16 I don't think there is any particular reason to try to divorce things from RDF 14:29:34 at least its basic "triples" methodology 14:29:47 Yongjing: if take this as a starting work on the basic model representation, then we should be aware that this representation is bound to RDF 14:30:22 q? 14:30:28 but not really to any specific serialization; that indeed should not matter, but I don't see evidence it does 14:30:53 s/Fent/Feng/ 14:30:57 anyhow, I don't think we want to reinvent semantic technologies; we want to build on what's there already 14:34:15 ack DarkoAnicic 14:34:54 useful <-> what are the use cases? 14:35:12 eg. validation, bridging, etc. 14:38:02 ack mkovatsc 14:38:08 ack mjkoster 14:39:14 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:39:14 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/02/22-wot-minutes.html kaz