See also: IRC log
jh: checks the agenda points
zk: mentions his updates on GitHub pullrequests
jh: will check that
... one question on rationale doc
... how to handle it?
... any more comments?
ka: has just create a dedicated list for Editors
zk: would suggest we associate GitHub messages to the list
jh: will check GitHub repo and
check the configuration
... for the scripting repo
... any other questions on GitHub?
zk: we should wait for the editors briefing?
ka: will send a reminder of that briefing meeting to the Editors list
kn: focus on scripting api and current practice?
jh: focus on normative
documents
... but we need a rationale document
... in current practice maybe?
zk: yes, we need a document on why we chose the current setting
ka: if you want, we can create a separate repo
kn: developers want to read WG deliverables, so having the rationale description as a part of the current document is fine
jh: ok with me
... I have 2 more points
... we made some conclusions from the f2f meeting
... Results from F2F: resulting actions of consented points,
volunteers to take on actions
... copying the current document to the new repos
zk: IG documents belong to the IG
jh: so should we create new Editor's draft?
zk: would do the new work at a
new place
... the IG contents have history
jh: we should have one specific repo for maintenance
ka: we can copy/import the old IG
content to the new repo
... and after that, we can add a note saying "this content is
moved to the new repo, and not maintained any more"
jh: new edit should be added to
the new repo
... I'm open with any proposals, though
kn: should we keep the old content within the IG repo?
jh: IG repo is for keeping the
history
... and the new work should be done on the WG repo (separate
repo) side
zk: we need to create an Editor's draft first. right?
jh: yes
zk: will do the first version this week
jh: tx
... we can start with some skeleton and put content later
zk: yes
... and we can decide who to work for which part
jh: yes, we can glow the document gradually
jh: another topic is the time for
this Scripting call
... do you prefer some other time?
... is the current slot acceptable?
kn: fine by me
jh: ok
... let's continue this slot for a while
... btw, I have actions from the f2f
... any other points for today?
(none)
jh: is the new webex coordinate for this call weekly?
ka: yes
... and the wiki page (https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WoT_Scripting_API_WebConf#WebEx)
has been also updated with the new coordinate
jh: ok
[ adjourned ]