14:33:06 RRSAgent has joined #silver 14:33:06 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/02/17-silver-irc 14:33:08 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:33:08 Zakim has joined #silver 14:33:10 Zakim, this will be 14:33:10 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 14:33:11 Meeting: Silver Task Force Teleconference 14:33:11 Date: 17 February 2017 14:33:13 agenda? 14:33:18 agenda+ Researcher outreach update 14:33:22 agenda+ Literature review update 14:33:23 agenda+ Research project management 14:34:06 jemma has joined #silver 14:38:16 scribe: jeanne 14:38:35 https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Research_Projects#Proposed_Research_Questions 14:38:51 Shawn: Dave had updates. I've entended the list of research questions to include the ones recieved from researchers 14:39:17 Jeanne: Do we want to accept every question from a researcher? 14:39:40 Shawn: Let's review wiki page history 14:39:45 https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/index.php?title=Research_Projects&diff=172&oldid=139 14:42:31 Question 1: "* How well do W3C Accessibility Guidelines communicate that accessibility supports business goals by expanding customer reach/growing revenue?" 14:43:26 Shawn: We discussed this last week and agreed that this was valuable research but not directly related to what we are trying to do for Silver. 14:43:37 Added question #2: "What are the main reasons why accessibility is not seen as on the critical path for product success?" 14:43:42 Jeanne: Should we mark it or delete it? 14:43:49 Added question #2: "What could W3C do to communicate the importance of accessibility to the business community?" 14:43:56 Added question #3: "What could W3C do to communicate the importance of accessibility to the business community?" 14:44:20 Shawn: Let's create a separate section for research questions proposed but not directly related to the Silver project. 14:45:21 ... the business reasoning fits into the effectiveness of the supporting materials. 14:45:53 Added section: "Understanding the guideline development process" 14:46:06 Shawn: David added a new section of questions: "Understanding the guideline development process" 14:46:09 Category under that: "When organizations choose to produce adaptations of WCAG:" 14:46:38 Added question: "What aspects of WCAG do people drop?" 14:46:42 Jeanne: These questions look really good. 14:47:05 Added question: "What aspects of WCAG are most important and why?" 14:47:34 Added question: "What aspects of WCAG do people think are missing?" 14:47:40 Shawn: I have seen adaptations drop the line length requirements 14:47:56 Added question: "What do people change about WCAG?" 14:48:06 Added question: "What things are reworded for clarity?" 14:48:09 Jeanne: I have seen adaptations that drop the live captioning and audio description requirements 14:48:33 Jemma: These are more around WCAG itself. 14:48:58 Jeanne: I think these are some really good questions for the interviews. 14:49:10 Added question: "How have guideline development initiatives outside the field of accessibility engaged and solicited feedback from all relevant stakeholders? What methods have been particularly effective or ineffective?" 14:49:11 Shawn: Let's make a new section for WCAG adaptations. 14:49:46 Added question: "For guideline development initiatives, what have been the key drivers of the timeline (whether lag or potential speed efficiencies)?" 14:49:49 Jemma: I have different categories for the literature review 14:50:00 regrets: Sarah, Dave 14:50:08 Added question: "What are the factors that determine effective (i.e. widespread) adoption of and compliance with a new set of guidelines?" 14:50:35 Jeanne: IMportant question 14:50:45 Shawn: That seems like a category of questions 14:50:58 s/IMportant question/Important question 14:51:41 zakim, take up item 1 14:51:41 agendum 1. "Researcher outreach update" taken up [from Lauriat] 14:52:00 [scribe notes that all the prior discussion belongs in this topic] 14:54:06 Shawn: We still have to work out how to talk with people who are under Non Disclosure. 15:02:52 zakim, take up next 15:02:52 agendum 2. "Literature review update" taken up [from Lauriat] 15:03:14 Jemma: I have talked with Sarah about what I can share in the Zotaro library. 15:03:34 Shawn: I haven't had a chance to work on my contribution to the progress. 15:04:28 Jemma: I talked with the librarian at my University on "fair use" information 15:05:23 ... she thought that we could share more information that Jeanne thought 15:05:59 Jeanne: I am confident that we can quote relevant results of the research (properly cited) in Zotaro as fair use 15:06:20 http://guides.library.illinois.edu/coursematerialsandcopyrightforprofessors/fairuse 15:06:37 Jemma: We have a librarian who specializes in fair use. 15:06:50 ... this link is what she shared with me. 15:12:19 Here's what the WAI-AGE literature review published in 2008 15:12:28 https://www.w3.org/TR/wai-age-literature/ 15:20:37 Jemma: This is a interesting idea for a template 15:21:07 Jeanne: We could consider publishing the literature review in W3C. But not in two months. 15:21:57 ... the resources referenced in the literature review seem to mostly be publicly available, so these will be useful for Shawn's project. 15:33:23 agenda? 15:33:44 zakim, take up item 3 15:33:44 agendum 3. "Research project management" taken up [from Lauriat] 15:34:56 Shawn: I will make a new sheet that is more project management oriented. So as the projects solidify, we will have a place to keep more management issues. 15:35:45 Jemma: Can you contact Andrew Arch and introduce me about literature review? 15:36:26 action: Jeanne to introduce Jemma and Andrew Arch about literature reviews at W3C. 15:36:27 Created ACTION-64 - Introduce jemma and andrew arch about literature reviews at w3c. [on Jeanne F Spellman - due 2017-02-24]. 15:36:40 rrsagent: Make minutes 15:36:40 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/02/17-silver-minutes.html jeanne 15:38:15 present+ jeanne, Jemma, Shawn 15:38:28 chair: Shawn 15:41:32 rrsagent, make minutes 15:41:32 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/02/17-silver-minutes.html jeanne 15:43:15 Jemma: Can we review the milestone for the Literature Review? We cannot finish in two months. 15:43:22 Shawn: Yes. 15:43:30 rrsagent, make minutes 15:43:30 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/02/17-silver-minutes.html jeanne 17:53:43 MichaelC has joined #silver 19:22:22 MichaelC has joined #silver