17:01:19 RRSAgent has joined #dnt 17:01:19 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/01/23-dnt-irc 17:01:21 RRSAgent, make logs world 17:01:21 Zakim has joined #dnt 17:01:23 Zakim, this will be TRACK 17:01:23 ok, trackbot 17:01:24 Meeting: Tracking Protection Working Group Teleconference 17:01:24 Date: 23 January 2017 17:01:36 present+ 17:02:28 present+ 17:03:30 wileys has joined #dnt 17:13:26 schunter has joined #dnt 17:17:10 Bert. Interesting observation was that this is fully public (no member only content). 17:18:03 -Web-page needs updating once charter is done 17:19:07 We have David Singer as the second editor of TPE. 17:23:16 baycloud.com/bouncerDownload 17:23:43 Mike says he has over 3000 implementors, correct? 17:24:11 q? 17:24:52 Only HTTP-equiv? No standard header implementations? 17:26:43 http://irc.w3c.org/ 17:27:49 https://github.com/w3c/dnt/issues 17:27:58 wileys, we have sites that return Tk headers directly, also medium.com 17:28:27 Great - sad news about medium.com business model proving to be a failure (no tracking / personalizaiton of ads) 17:30:25 wiley, more like an early pivot 17:34:31 Time will tell... 17:34:32 +q 17:35:50 This breaks the intendended purpose of the well-known resource 17:36:12 Now you wouldn’t be able to PREVIEW a site’s DNT status prior to visiting the site 17:36:23 This is why it was created in the first place 17:37:10 Would be better to have a sub-domain policy structure display 17:37:55 You could have multiple well-known resources for the same page this way as well. Which one rules? 17:39:05 In the large site / one place scenario - a site could CNAME the sub-sites all to the same well-known resource 17:40:24 I’d rather look at solutions that all for sub-site listings within the parent domain well-konwn resource 17:40:37 s/ all /allow 17:41:47 q? 17:41:52 ack wil 17:43:38 Shane: Concerns that having http-equv and being able to set tracking status resources per page will make transparency obsolete. 17:49:29 I think I dropped. 17:50:23 You did - please join again 17:51:47 trying 17:52:05 Let us end the call and continue discussing issue 15 next time. 17:52:11 I will send a summary to the list. 17:52:29 I think I have all info to send a summary to the list. 17:52:43 OK, that's Feb 6 then. 17:52:49 Okay - Thank you Matthias! 17:52:55 Bert: Is there a way to ensure that an email discussion is somehow linked to the github issues? 17:53:09 (like tracker that collected the related email and auto-attached it to an issue)? 17:53:49 wileys has left #dnt 17:54:26 The only way I know is to ask Github to send you e-mail when an issue is chnaged and then when you reply to that mail, the reply is added to the issue thread. 17:56:36 ok. thanks 17:59:09 moneill has joined #dnt