14:26:47 RRSAgent has joined #silver 14:26:47 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-irc 14:26:49 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:26:52 Zakim, this will be 14:26:52 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 14:26:52 Meeting: Silver Task Force Teleconference 14:26:52 Date: 16 December 2016 14:27:42 agenda? 14:27:50 zakim, close item 5 14:27:50 agendum 5, task force structure and tooling, closed 14:27:51 I see nothing remaining on the agenda 14:28:01 agenda: 14:28:35 agenda+ Stakeholder Map 14:28:35 agenda+ review updates to the Research Design page 14:28:35 agenda+ CSUN "Town Hall" description and catchy name brainstorm 14:29:42 jemma has joined #silver 14:30:49 Lauriat has joined #silver 14:32:01 SarahHorton has joined #silver 14:32:26 trackbot, start meeting 14:32:29 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:32:32 Zakim, this will be 14:32:32 Meeting: Silver Task Force Teleconference 14:32:32 Date: 16 December 2016 14:32:32 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 14:32:48 agenda+ Stakeholder Map 14:33:02 zakim, clear agenda 14:33:02 agenda cleared 14:33:08 agenda+ Stakeholder Map 14:33:12 agenda+ review updates to the Research Design page 14:33:18 agenda+ CSUN "Town Hall" description and catchy name brainstorm 14:34:34 present+ Jeanne, Jan, Jemma, Shawn 14:34:52 Scribe: Sarah 14:35:40 present+ Judy 14:36:41 zakim, take up item 6 14:36:41 I only see 3 items on the agenda 14:36:45 Shawn: Stakeholder map and stakeholder responses 14:36:51 zakim, take up next 14:36:51 agendum 1. "Stakeholder Map" taken up [from SarahHorton] 14:37:17 Link to stakeholder map doc: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XK_evYulIaLsYOlMjuDOC763xWL2TOM9SvPjRX_d9ag/edit?usp=sharing 14:37:51 present+ David 14:37:52 present+ Dave 14:38:04 present- David 14:38:25 sloandr has joined #silver 14:39:01 Shawn: Next step is to review the stakeholder map and stakeholder submissions, turn map into wiki page 14:39:59 Shawn: Send to working group once wiki page, request suggestions for roles that aren't on the map 14:40:42 Shawn: Take names from stakeholder submissions and fill in roles 14:41:10 action: Jeanne will create wiki page of map 14:41:10 Created ACTION-16 - Will create wiki page of map [on Jeanne F Spellman - due 2016-12-23]. 14:41:26 action: Shawn and Jemma will work on mapping names and roles 14:41:27 Created ACTION-17 - And jemma will work on mapping names and roles [on Shawn Lauriat - due 2016-12-23]. 14:42:23 Jeanne: Need to be cautious of names that are multiple roles, don't want to make too many contacts when people have multiple roles 14:43:08 q+ 14:43:34 Shawn: Verify roles when mapping 14:44:16 Shawn: Will be emailing people and listing roles, which is another opportunity to verify accuracy of roles 14:44:28 Judy: What is concern of multiple roles? 14:44:46 Jeanne: People would get too many surveys 14:45:50 Judy: Surveys are different by role? Might want to find out primary role. Might not want to exclude people from surveys because they have perspectives 14:46:23 Shawn: Want to make sure people have a voice for different roles 14:46:41 Shawn: People helping with surveys will have ideas on how to do it 14:48:22 Jeanne: Received two contacts from screen reader vendors 14:51:42 Shawn: Areas to expand stakeholder submissions: Accessibility designers and developers, AT developers 14:51:58 Shawn: content providers/producers, designers, developers 14:52:34 Shawn: Disability organizations (need more diversity), IT managers, lawyers 14:53:05 These are listed on the Stakeholder Roles and Activiites spreadsheet in the "Action" column 14:53:18 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XK_evYulIaLsYOlMjuDOC763xWL2TOM9SvPjRX_d9ag/edit?usp=sharing 14:54:20 Judy: Will help with identifying global representatives frin disability organizations 14:54:41 s/frin/from 14:56:03 Shawn: Also more representation of people with disabilities 14:56:15 q+ 14:56:24 And platform developers, product managers, QA specialists 14:57:07 Shawn: 260 submissions so far, not too many duplicates 14:58:50 Judy: want to make sure there's a role for regulators, might be policy makers? How are you populating 14:59:09 Judy: How are you populating lawyers role? 14:59:47 Jeanne: Have only had survey to have people submit names. Have only just starting reaching out to fill gaps 15:01:01 Judy: Will help out identifying international lawyers 15:01:34 Judy: Also policy makers role 15:02:02 zakim, take up next 15:02:02 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, SarahHorton 15:02:03 s/policy makers/regulators/ 15:02:24 https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Research_Projects 15:02:54 I think having "regulator' specifically in the stakeholder map is very important as Judy addressed. 15:03:24 q? 15:03:27 ack j 15:03:48 zakim, take up next 15:03:48 agendum 2. "review updates to the Research Design page" taken up [from SarahHorton] 15:06:06 Jeanne: Does the research data clarification work? 15:07:03 Dave: Yes, it answers the key questions, and address any issues that arise. 15:08:47 Jemma: Data is raw data, not the analysis? 15:09:23 Jeanne: Most of data is surveys, doing in partnership with task force 15:09:57 Jeanne: Is there a way we can make that more clear? 15:11:24 q+ 15:11:32 action: Jeanne and Jemma to clarify language under expectations related to data 15:11:32 Created ACTION-18 - And jemma to clarify language under expectations related to data [on Jeanne F Spellman - due 2016-12-23]. 15:13:18 Jemma: May need an IRB (institutional review board) review if we are doing research through universities 15:13:36 [JB: Whether IRB applies would depend on where the survey is conducted from] 15:13:43 Jeanne: Will need to consider that when we start setting up surveys 15:15:01 Judy: What are the timelines for developing survey questions? Typically most difficult part is developing questions and getting feedback on how they are asked 15:16:04 Judy: Quality of result depends on quality of questions 15:17:03 Jeanne: Agree completely, validity is extremely important, research partners are important to help design the surveys 15:19:15 Jeanne: Anyone who has IP or patents on any part that's written into W3C specs will relinquish so that specs can be property of W3C, thinking about this in advance so we don't get blocked moving forward 15:20:35 Jeanne: Have been discussing creating a community group for researchers, gives us ability to ensure the patent/IP requirements are set from the start of research 15:21:08 Jeanne: Not decided, just under consideration 15:23:17 Judy: Might want to make sure it has clear purpose, make clear coordination, Charter still under discussion, courteous to wait until those issues are settled 15:25:06 Jeanne: Community group agreement, no restriction on faculty except attribution if on spec 15:26:12 Dave: Good to be up front allows people to take part with understanding, motivation is to contribute to developing standards, significant impact, demonstrate work helped influence development of standard 15:27:51 Jeanne: Would it help to describe how we will acknowledge their work? 15:29:08 Dave: Academic review, looks a number of pubs, number of citations, others include work that influences standards, would be helpful to describe acknowledgement 15:29:34 action: Jeanne to determine how we can acknowledge contributions 15:29:34 Created ACTION-19 - Determine how we can acknowledge contributions [on Jeanne F Spellman - due 2016-12-23]. 15:33:52 This is the design plan document: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Design_Plan_for_Silver 15:37:11 action: Jeanne will put each research activity in its own row in the timeline so we can track the activities separately 15:37:11 Created ACTION-20 - Will put each research activity in its own row in the timeline so we can track the activities separately [on Jeanne F Spellman - due 2016-12-23]. 15:37:26 Dave: Next steps for research partners 15:38:34 Dave: Lots of positive response to in way research community has been asked to be involved 15:39:07 s/to in/to the 15:40:53 Dave: Some people have identified specific activities that they are interested in 15:42:21 Dave: Next step could be to review areas of interest/expertise to see how they map to research activities 15:43:37 Sarah: Some people have specific topics they want to make sure are part of thinking for accessibility guidelines, might be stakeholders 15:43:59 Dave: Might be good to create a short survey to identify how people would be willing to be involved 15:47:10 Jeanne: Isn't that better to do one to one? 15:47:49 Dave: There are quite a few respondents, survey provides list of options and provides option to provide more information 15:48:13 Shawn: Talking about having a generic response, making some things targeted to specific background 15:49:24 Dave: Preference would be to have online form, allows people to respond to taskforce rather than individual 15:49:39 Dave: Taskforce partner could do follow-up 15:50:05 Jeanne: Dave, draft questions, Jeanne can turn into survey 15:52:13 action: Dave will draft questions and share with taskforce 15:52:13 Error finding 'Dave'. You can review and register nicknames at . 15:52:24 action: David will draft questions and share with taskforce 15:52:25 Created ACTION-21 - Will draft questions and share with taskforce [on David Sloan - due 2016-12-23]. 15:53:31 zakim, take up next 15:53:31 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, SarahHorton 15:53:39 q? 15:53:39 ack j 15:53:49 zakim, take up next 15:53:49 agendum 3. "CSUN "Town Hall" description and catchy name brainstorm" taken up [from SarahHorton] 15:54:43 Jeanne: Have CSUN session Friday at 3:20 in the Google room 15:55:00 Jeanne: Need session name and description 15:56:34 Shawn: Adapt blurb from other session, reversed so it's "we want your feedback" 15:58:27 …brainstorming names ensued 16:01:59 rrsagent, make minutes 16:01:59 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html SarahHorton 16:01:59 rrsagent, make minutes 16:01:59 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html jeanne 16:05:07 rrsagent, make logs public 16:08:16 Type rrsagent, bye 16:08:22 rrsagent, bye 16:08:22 I see 7 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-actions.rdf : 16:08:22 ACTION: Jeanne will create wiki page of map [1] 16:08:22 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-irc#T14-41-10 16:08:22 ACTION: Shawn and Jemma will work on mapping names and roles [2] 16:08:22 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-irc#T14-41-26 16:08:22 ACTION: Jeanne and Jemma to clarify language under expectations related to data [3] 16:08:22 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-irc#T15-11-32 16:08:22 ACTION: Jeanne to determine how we can acknowledge contributions [4] 16:08:22 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-irc#T15-29-34 16:08:22 ACTION: Jeanne will put each research activity in its own row in the timeline so we can track the activities separately [5] 16:08:22 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-irc#T15-37-11 16:08:22 ACTION: Dave will draft questions and share with taskforce [6] 16:08:22 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-irc#T15-52-13 16:08:22 ACTION: David will draft questions and share with taskforce [7] 16:08:22 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-irc#T15-52-24