15:54:23 RRSAgent has joined #dpub 15:54:23 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/10/10-dpub-irc 15:54:25 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:54:25 Zakim has joined #dpub 15:54:27 Zakim, this will be dpub 15:54:27 ok, trackbot 15:54:28 Meeting: Digital Publishing Interest Group Teleconference 15:54:28 Date: 10 October 2016 15:54:30 Chair: Tzviya 15:54:52 Agenda: http://www.w3.org/mid/d849865f2f96448eb49fecadf65e3a33@AUS-WNMBP-005-n.wiley.com 15:55:07 ivan has changed the topic to: agenda 2016-10-10: http://www.w3.org/mid/d849865f2f96448eb49fecadf65e3a33@AUS-WNMBP-005-n.wiley.com> 15:55:51 Regrets: Vlad, David_Wood, Karen, Alan, Daniel 15:57:04 present+ 15:57:10 Ivan, you are very faint; I am on a land line. 15:57:22 laudrain has joined #dpub 15:57:49 ayla_stein has joined #dpub 15:58:47 HeatherF has joined #dpub 15:58:58 present+ Heather_Flanagan 15:58:58 Present+ 15:59:09 dauwhe_ has joined #dpub 16:00:02 present+ Leonard_Rosenthol 16:00:27 rdeltour has joined #dpub 16:00:32 clapierre has joined #DPUB 16:00:46 Present+ 16:01:56 present+ Charles_LaPierre 16:02:08 dauwhe__ has joined #dpub 16:02:27 scribenick: laudrain 16:02:33 present+ 16:02:33 present+ 16:02:47 https://www.w3.org/2016/10/03-dpub-minutes.html 16:02:48 pkra has joined #dpub 16:02:54 Minutes : no comments 16:02:58 present+ Peter Krautzberger 16:02:59 present+ dauwhe 16:03:01 Minutes approved 16:03:18 Ivan : message from Karen 16:03:46 cmaden2 has joined #dpub 16:03:47 reminder to join Felix at Franfurt bookfair booth 16:03:53 https://www.w3.org/2016/10/W3CPosteratFrankfurt2016.pdf 16:04:08 garth has joined #dpub 16:04:14 dauwhe has joined #dpub 16:04:17 small slider : call for comment 16:04:39 Bill_Kasdorf has joined #dpub 16:04:51 present+ Bill_Kasdorf 16:04:58 brady_duga has joined #dpub 16:05:05 present+ duga 16:05:07 dauwhe__ has joined #dpub 16:05:17 present+ Chris_Maden 16:05:23 present+ garth 16:05:25 next week : meeting cancelled 16:05:43 24th October next meeting 16:06:00 https://rawgit.com/w3c/dpub-pwp-ucr/dedupe/index.html 16:06:15 https://github.com/w3c/dpub-pwp-ucr/tree/dedupe 16:06:16 New branch for UCR docuement from Leonard 16:07:06 bjdmeest has joined #dpub 16:07:17 Present+ Ben_De_Meester 16:07:23 Leonard : goal of that banch : remove duplicates 16:07:35 david_stroup has joined #dpub 16:07:40 and cleaning, merging related things 16:08:17 grammar cleaning, phrases tagged in issue tracker 16:08:46 dauwhe_ has joined #dpub 16:08:55 nothing contreversial added, and not in my own opinions 16:09:20 q? 16:10:14 ivan raised issues, let’s start with 16:11:35 ivan : general things, requirements very close or identical 16:11:52 Leonard added Ivan suggestions 16:12:09 ivan's comments: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-digipub-ig/2016Oct/0089.html 16:12:30 ivan : to be discussed : issue on versioning 4.1 16:13:02 didn’t understand the first phrase 16:13:18 what do we mean by « versioning »? 16:13:26 https://rawgit.com/w3c/dpub-pwp-ucr/dedupe/index.html#distro-vers 16:14:00 in section 4.1 Distribuiton and Versioning 16:14:04 q+ 16:14:21 vesrion as a publisher. 16:14:34 s/vesrion/version/ 16:14:59 ack le 16:15:16 Leonard : another issue with archiving versioning 16:16:02 +1 to consider distribution and versioning as separate issues 16:16:21 q+ 16:16:31 Tzviya : publisher need to update a book an develpment language because a new release 16:17:00 ack bi 16:17:16 in digital publication, no new publicaiton for that, a minor update just editing a minor version number 16:17:24 Agreed 16:17:31 BillK : separate versioning from distribution 16:17:45 q+ 16:17:54 ack le 16:18:03 in archiving, an authoritative version is important 16:18:04 +1 Bill 16:18:55 Leonard : minor updates doesn’t change the canonical identifier but a change of a chapter change the identifier 16:19:04 in scientific publishing, the version of record is very important 16:19:17 BillK : 2 classes of changes : updates and corrections 16:19:53 q+ 16:19:54 Leonard : versioning and uniqueness from a publisher point of view 16:20:07 ack iv 16:20:22 Tzviya : several point of view on that subject among publishers 16:21:16 Ivan: separate between changes done by the publishers from annotation, but identical from the user’s point of view 16:21:32 terms meaining different things in the community 16:21:59 for instance : a new version in CSV, in Git 16:22:50 Tzviya: same issue also on updates and corrections 16:22:52 q+ 16:23:17 Ivan: req 18 : does not make sense 16:23:55 Leonard: see also 3.8 that sorts it 16:23:59 would it be possible to have definitions of "version" in different sections of the document? 16:24:10 ack bi 16:24:21 Ivan: there should be a way of tracking changes 16:25:12 BillK: a stable ID that doesn’t change in EPUB across minor correction, plus a time stamp 16:25:31 Ivan: it goes to implementation direction 16:25:41 BillK: is it the same thing? 16:25:58 rdeltour: can we use the word "edition"? 16:26:08 Tzviya: we need the word version to something else 16:26:18 q? 16:26:20 Ivan: do we need to keep 4.1? 16:26:34 BillK: verioning is done elsewhere? 16:26:46 q+ 16:26:52 Q+ 16:26:54 ack rd 16:27:00 Ivan: essentialy « I should be able to track changes » 16:27:23 Romain: « track changes » mean a lot in software dev 16:27:37 can we use teh word « edition » ? 16:27:42 laurentlemeur has joined #dpub 16:27:43 ack ga 16:27:46 Tzviya: means a lot 2 16:28:44 q+ 16:28:55 Garth: package version isn’t changed by the distribution 16:29:14 Brady: doesn’t matter if all is in the same package 16:29:30 so maybe the method of distribution? 16:29:31 a publisher, a librarian, or a standards developer 16:29:38 ack le 16:29:57 Leonard to fix versioning 16:30:35 current examples: 2 and 3, do we agree they stand in the same area? 16:30:50 BillK: they are different 16:31:10 Ivan: the 2nd work if we mean what Garth said 16:31:35 Leonard: they don’t say anything on package 16:32:08 Passing along isn’t necesseraly in the package way 16:32:43 Tzviya: keep these 2 examples to be rewritten 16:33:19 Ivan: one more thing in referencing to schema.org 16:33:32 For accessibility metadata 16:33:45 s/they are different/example 3 contains two separate issues 16:34:01 George or Romain: shema.org vocabulary 16:34:22 Charles: it is in progress 16:34:59 Avneesh: formal definition in the wiki page 16:35:15 q? 16:35:38 Leonard: some clean up in the next round 16:36:16 Tzviya: definition of a PWP? Portable or Packaged 16:36:28 q+ 16:36:32 ack iv 16:36:40 s/Tzviya/Leonard 16:37:29 ivan: Web publication and Packaged Web Publication? in the minutes of TPAC meeting 16:38:22 second day more than the first 16:38:26 Garth: in the second day 16:38:37 dauwhe has joined #dpub 16:38:43 first day was sort of hashing things out, second day was bringing it all together. 16:39:12 https://github.com/w3c/dpub-pwp-ucr/wiki/Jotting-down-ideas-for-the-discussions-@-TPAC-F2F-on-%3F%3F-Web-Publications 16:39:30 "A Web Publication is a collection of one or more Web resources in standard formats, organized together into a uniquely identifiable grouping." 16:39:59 Here are the other two pending accessibility Pending metadata properties. https://pending.schema.org/accessibilitySummary and https://pending.schema.org/accessModeSufficient 16:40:01 Ivan: workng definitions (see link above) 16:40:01 +1 to @ivan 16:40:13 q+ 16:40:34 ack le 16:41:13 present+ 16:41:20 Leonard: great def, we want also games 16:42:02 Tzviya: hope for a very braod umbrella spec, and also EPUB4 in it 16:42:23 q? 16:42:25 Ivan: that introduction can be used as a start 16:42:35 q+ 16:43:06 Leonard: next issue capabiliies of discovery under security 16:43:37 permission APIs, preserving integrity 16:43:41 ack da 16:44:53 Dave: section 2.6 on collections, usage examples not clear that it describes collection of Web collections 16:45:01 q+ 16:45:06 just collecting some stuff 16:45:33 Leonard: old version « bunch of stuff orgnised together" 16:45:50 conceptual publicaiotn gathered togethre 16:45:57 Now in a logicla unit 16:46:08 s/logicla/logical 16:46:08 ack iv 16:46:49 Dave: the 2nb usage, multiple paths to the publication 16:46:58 s/2nb/2nd 16:47:25 Ivan: is it a fondamental req? 16:47:40 q+ 16:47:52 open the door to meta publication 16:48:02 q+ 16:48:13 Tzviya: this was the issue I wanted to raise 16:48:41 We need to clarify what that means 16:48:56 ack le 16:49:02 Dave: metadata betwenn the pub and the content itself 16:49:42 q+ 16:50:03 ack bi 16:50:03 Leanard: from the doc perspective : combining multiple sources together to a new document 16:50:26 q+ 16:50:43 BiilK: fundamental definition : publicaiotn is a recource of resources 16:50:49 ack iv 16:51:34 Ivan: this is part of the production of a publication 16:51:47 ack da 16:51:59 nuke the whole thing 16:52:11 I agree with @Bill_Kasdorf and @Ivan - a publication is just another type of resource. And would be fine nuking the section. 16:52:24 Dave: individual items need to be a publication? 16:52:42 BillK it can be but not necessarily 16:52:48 q? 16:53:04 Dave: complicaiotn will be a mess 16:53:27 Ivan: nuclear option 16:53:40 +1 Nuke it 16:53:58 Remove section 2.6 16:54:09 Tzviay metadata associated with sub resources 16:54:18 Yay for Leonard! 16:54:30 Tzviya: thank you Leonard! 16:54:33 you are welcome. 16:55:01 Tzviya: document reorg 16:55:02 q+ 16:55:05 yes, some of them are very good, @Ivan 16:55:06 ack iv 16:55:41 Ivan: one more task to do 16:56:21 discussion with Markus, « there is a use case we should add » 16:56:47 q+ 16:57:06 example: for the packaged version, a way to ensure integrity of the package 16:57:10 ack le 16:57:21 after Heather is done with teh cleanup 16:57:34 s/teh/the 16:58:00 Heather: get started this week, something for the 24 16:58:04 q+ 16:58:10 ack le 16:58:52 Ivan: merging Leonard branch is the simpliest thing to do 16:59:22 Tzviya: Charles any objection 16:59:37 Charles: i’ll take a look after the merge 16:59:54 Leonard: i’ll do it 17:00:01 q+ 17:00:04 ack iv 17:00:52 Ivan: we will ping Markus when the doc is in review 17:01:03 s/Markus/Marcos/ 17:01:14 pkra has left #dpub 17:01:18 laudrain has left #dpub 17:01:20 cmaden2 has left #dpub 17:01:29 clapierre has left #dpub 17:01:58 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:01:58 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/10/10-dpub-minutes.html ivan 17:02:08 trackbot, end telcon 17:02:08 Zakim, list attendees 17:02:08 As of this point the attendees have been tzviya, Heather_Flanagan, ivan, Leonard_Rosenthol, laudrain, Charles_LaPierre, rdeltour, ayla_stein, Peter, Krautzberger, dauwhe, 17:02:11 ... Bill_Kasdorf, duga, Chris_Maden, garth, Ben_De_Meester, liam 17:02:16 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 17:02:16 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/10/10-dpub-minutes.html trackbot 17:02:17 RRSAgent, bye 17:02:17 I see no action items