14:29:31 RRSAgent has joined #dpub 14:29:31 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/10/03-dpub-irc 14:29:33 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:29:33 Zakim has joined #dpub 14:29:35 Zakim, this will be dpub 14:29:35 ok, trackbot 14:29:36 Meeting: Digital Publishing Interest Group Teleconference 14:29:36 Date: 03 October 2016 14:29:41 Chair: Garth 14:30:01 Agenda: http://www.w3.org/mid/0d020343decf41b586d268a87b2ef741@AUS-WNMBP-005-n.wiley.com 14:30:15 ivan has changed the topic to: agenda: http://www.w3.org/mid/0d020343decf41b586d268a87b2ef741@AUS-WNMBP-005-n.wiley.com 14:30:36 ivan has changed the topic to: agenda 2016-10-03: http://www.w3.org/mid/0d020343decf41b586d268a87b2ef741@AUS-WNMBP-005-n.wiley.com 14:31:00 Regrets: Tzviya, Leonard, Ayla, Romain, Peter 14:41:30 garth has joined #dpub 14:41:36 q? 14:50:27 Rebeca has joined #DPUB 14:52:33 Avneesh has joined #dpub 14:56:00 boris_anthony has joined #dpub 14:58:23 Present+ 14:58:44 brady_duga has joined #dpub 14:58:59 present+ 14:59:03 HeatherF has joined #dpub 14:59:53 laudrain has joined #dpub 15:00:19 present+ 15:00:19 present+ Avneesh 15:00:21 present+ duga 15:00:22 Present+ Luc 15:00:24 present+ dauwhe 15:00:40 clapierre has joined #DPUB 15:00:59 present+ Charles_LaPierre 15:01:20 present+ Rebeca 15:01:21 present+ 15:01:23 present+ Bert 15:02:23 scribenick: HeatherF 15:02:35 present+ Heather_Flanagan 15:02:46 Approving the minutes - yay or nay? 15:03:03 Yay! 15:03:16 cmaden2 has joined #dpub 15:03:17 present+ Benjamin_Young 15:03:26 Agenda bash: adding topic - progress on the kumbaya of the IGTF and the W3C 15:03:27 Topic: merger of IDPF + W3C 15:03:37 Bill_Kasdorf has joined #dpub 15:03:46 Present+ Bill_Kasdorf 15:03:46 s/IGTF/IDPF/ 15:04:06 brady_duga: Last week the W3C sent out an update on the merger; this also went out to the IDPF 15:04:22 s/brady_duga/Garth/ 15:04:35 Hello, how can I join WebEx? 15:04:59 present+ Chris_Maden 15:05:15 @dauwhe I need a pass 15:05:17 laurentlemeur has joined #dpub 15:05:54 Garth: next steps will be discussion and voting by the AC reps. 15:05:58 q+ 15:06:03 dauwhe: thanks! 15:06:09 Q? 15:06:46 karen: remember these are member confidential communications 15:06:58 q+ 15:07:07 q- 15:07:28 ack Karen 15:09:02 q+ 15:09:28 q? 15:10:20 ack boris_anthony 15:10:45 q+ 15:11:55 q? 15:13:50 q? 15:13:55 ack ivan 15:14:01 @clapierre my understanding was that mostly no, this isn't to be minuted 15:14:27 garth: the merger is proceeding apace 15:14:47 topic: New Meeting time next week 15:14:47 Topic: change of call timing 15:15:14 garth: we will be meeting one hour later than we have been, starting next week (October 10) 15:15:27 q+ 15:15:44 Bill_Kasdorf: When is daylight savings confusion? 15:15:59 Sunday, November 6, 2016 15:16:05 q? 15:16:09 ivan: generally end of October. Note that the WebEx number shouldn't change. 15:16:21 [Europe changes to winter time on 30 Oct, the US on 6 Nov, I believe] 15:16:56 Rebeca: Cannot join at 6pm 15:17:17 garth: there are no perfect, good times. This choice came out of a poll. 15:17:33 http://www.timeanddate.com/time/change/usa/washington-dc 15:17:33 q+ 15:17:45 US sets clock back on 6 November 2016 15:17:59 q+ 15:18:10 ivan: second best time was Tuesday, at 15:00 UTC, but that missed a lot of people 15:18:29 ack reb 15:19:01 brady_duga: The W3C does by time in Massachusets, so time will change at DST 15:19:13 q? 15:19:17 ivan: there will be a period of confusion when the US and Europe will be on different timing 15:19:19 ack br 15:19:58 garth: 18:00 CET is not ideal for family hour in Europe, but this is what we ended up with as a result of the poll. We will revisit in the future. 15:20:29 q? 15:20:43 ... Next week is Columbus Day in the US; it's not a major holiday, so we will keep the call on the calendar 15:21:16 ... The following week is the Frankfurt Book Fair; Garth will definitely be out, as will others. TBD as to whether we have the call. 15:21:31 Topic: Post-TPAC Action Items 15:21:59 Garth: WCAG action items 15:22:06 Regrets+ George 15:22:12 @ivan Bill McCoy is having issues connecting 15:22:30 ... There are four action items in the WCAG list 15:22:49 Avneesh: most of the things listed here are in the plan. There will be a call in the second part of October to talk about them. 15:23:26 ... The WCAG group has told us that the biggest obstruction to get in success criteria is the language. 15:23:56 ... Everything in the EPUB accessibility spec may not get into WCAB 2.1; they may end up in 3.0 instead. Initial items will be the easy ones. 15:24:10 ... Things like media overlays will end up in 3.0 (which will take a few years) 15:24:22 garth: any updates on the EPUB accessibility work from the IDPF? 15:24:45 Avneesh: Work is almost finished. Waiting for the schema.org metadata approvals. 15:24:56 q? 15:25:04 q+ 15:25:11 ack ivan 15:25:48 ivan: What is the situation with schema.org? Are there still open technical things, or is this mostly administrative? 15:26:10 Avneesh: It is mostly the timeline issue. At TPAC, we clarified definitions and terms that were causing delays. 15:26:48 garth: CSS action items, don't have a listed owner for all of them 15:27:24 dauwhe: Regarding tables. Hopefully the web knows that tables are useful; the question is more about decimal alignment in tables. 15:27:31 garth: Should we clarify the action item? 15:27:44 q+ 15:27:51 dauwhe: Yes. And people are supposed to send dauwhe examples. 15:28:27 ack ivan 15:28:30 Bill_Kasdorf: tzviya and Bill have the action item to do this (getting the examples of decimal alignent to Dave) 15:29:02 ivan: Tzviya promised to send an official statement to Dean Jackson as to why this requirement is official. 15:29:25 q? 15:29:38 Florian has joined #dpub 15:29:47 garth: next on the CSS discussion is MathML 15:30:17 ... there was discussion of adding media queries and discussion around whether browsers should support MathML, and there was agreement that something should be supported 15:30:48 https://www.peterkrautzberger.org/0190/ 15:31:03 ... Peter K's take is that this was a bad idea (see Garth's link) 15:31:04 Mail of Florian: http://www.w3.org/mid/0D614A8F-B6FD-4877-8F51-C83FA670D702@rivoal.net 15:31:31 q- 15:31:32 ... so we have different motivations on handling MathML (Math constituency, accessibility constituency, publisher constituency) 15:31:33 q+ 15:32:01 -> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-digipub-ig/2016Oct/0004.html Florian's mail 15:32:48 ivan: Florian had the action item to draft the media query. He reacted to Peter's email by saying with that input, doesn't plan to write the specification. 15:33:04 ... this is a discussion that should happen on mailing lists. 15:33:47 garth: So, let that group discussion progresses, and returns as a discussion point to this group in the next week or two to see where it has settled 15:34:03 ... media query helps publishers and accessibility communities, but we need to chat further 15:34:38 garth: looking at the next action items (InDesign, table samplse, XSL-FO) 15:35:02 dauwhe: I am supposed to collect examples to inform CSS text level 3. 15:35:17 q? 15:35:20 ... David Wood also said he'd look for examples of decimal alignments in tables 15:35:22 ack ivan 15:35:37 ... the XSL-FO and CSS-FO was a gap analysis task; liam has been working on this. 15:36:26 garth: for the PWP UCR, there are several action items assigned out 15:36:43 ... If you have issues assigned to you, please do them 15:37:18 ... Next major step is for Leonard to de-duplicate use cases, then Heather would do the re-org of the spec. 15:38:01 ... the spec would be divided into the Web Publication, and then the Portable components. 15:38:05 -> https://github.com/w3c/dpub-pwp-ucr/wiki/Jotting-down-ideas-for-the-discussions-@-TPAC-F2F-on-%3F%3F-Web-Publications For those who were not at TPAC 15:38:37 ivan: There were some issues that led to a proposed solution. After talkign with Leonard and Heather, Ivan took care of those (though Leonard did not agree with all the changes) 15:38:54 ... Heather and Ivan are now waiting on Leonard. 15:39:20 garth: Leonard is not late on this; this task is expected to take some time. 15:39:54 q+ 15:39:58 q? 15:40:31 ivan: I don't know whether the dividing the UCR into review chunks is Brady's job; when we assign sections for review, it would be good if we could also associate those with the Open Issues 15:40:48 ... we have loads of open issues, and many of those will (hopefully, probably) become moot after the reorg of the doc 15:41:30 garth: there were a number of issues that I commented on, trying to wrap up the conversations. 15:41:48 ivan: there are 43 open issues. 15:42:27 garth: there are only 43! Yay! 15:43:16 ... does anyone have more info on the Object Model for WP? 15:43:28 ivan: there were two object model kind of things coming up. 15:43:56 q? 15:43:57 ... one was an older story on POM (Publication Object Model); not sure what's going on with that. 15:44:24 ... independently of that, there is the idea of Mike's that we need a layer on top of the DOM dealing with the collection of documents 15:44:31 q+ 15:44:36 ... It sounds like a good idea, but I have no idea how to specify that. 15:44:56 q? 15:44:56 ... Is this really a topic that is important for developers of reading systems and/or content with javascript? 15:45:10 ... Something like that should be part of the WG charter. 15:45:43 q? 15:45:47 ack ivan 15:45:48 garth: the development of a WG charter will be a topic for us soon 15:45:49 ack iv 15:46:02 ack dau 15:46:20 dauwhe: Was talking to other web folks who were 'beyond skeptical' because it changes the foundations of the web. 15:46:54 garth: last on the agenda - POE 15:47:12 Bill_Kasdorf: not much to report here. They are looking for further use cases. 15:47:43 ... One of the key issues is the use of ODRL as a sort of hub format to allow different publishing sectors to express their unique rights expressions. 15:48:04 q? 15:48:26 ... the idea would be that if each sector could provide an ODRL expression on what it means by it's unique rights expressions, that would be helpful 15:48:32 q+ 15:48:42 ... Tzviya and Bill_Kasdorf agreed to look at the scholarly publication side of things to see if/how that could be enabled 15:49:11 ivan: question came up earlier today on a POE call; when do you think that you can finalize the use cases for them? 15:49:35 ... they would like to close their use case doc once and for all. They are hoping for the use cases within a week. 15:50:18 Bill_Kasdorf: The book industry feedback won't be that fast. We can do an initial submission from the book sector, but not from the other sectors within a week. 15:50:29 ... Will do what can be done within the week. 15:50:31 q? 15:50:38 ack ivan 15:50:43 garth: Any other agenda items today? 15:51:06 ... no additional items 15:51:14 ... Next call in seven days and 9 minutes! 15:51:17 laudrain has left #dpub 15:51:25 cmaden2 has left #dpub 15:51:30 trackbot, end telcon 15:51:30 Zakim, list attendees 15:51:30 As of this point the attendees have been ivan, boris_anthony, garth, Avneesh, duga, Luc, dauwhe, Charles_LaPierre, Rebeca, astearns, Bert, Heather_Flanagan, Benjamin_Young, 15:51:33 ... Bill_Kasdorf, Chris_Maden 15:51:38 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 15:51:38 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/10/03-dpub-minutes.html trackbot 15:51:39 RRSAgent, bye 15:51:39 I see no action items