<Lauriat> For the introduction: we could have an overall statement of the goal of the process, the high-level points of focus for each stage of the process, and a paragraph speaking to how the process incorporates feedback from the survey.

<scribe> ACTION: Jeanne to draft the comparison document [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/09/06-silver-minutes.html#action01]

SL: Make the Phase 1 Objectives more consise, using the model for Phase 2.

JS & SL: Review of the Faster Progress option including:

scribe: change the Introduction to add more context on the goal of the Faster Progress option (model that across all the options).
... Add a sentence to the other research methods (Secondary Research and WCAG Adaptations) to specifically say that the data from the research feeds at least one persona that will be a standards person writing Silver.
... Add a sentence to the Personas to include at least one persona that will be a standards person writing Silver.

JS: I am concerned that there is a minimum of 8 weeks from the publication of the List of Topics in Interpretation phase and holding the W3C Workshop in the start of the Ideation phase. I don't want to waste those 8 weeks. I want to move the List of Topics to the end of the Research phase, so that we can spend the 8 weeks before the Workshop writing Personas and User Stories.

SL: Add a Communication method at the end of Resesarch with the List of Topics. The topics will have to be high level and broad because it will not include the insights from creating the Personas and User Stories.

JS: We will need to get the first draft Personas and User Stories done quickly because we want people writing papers for the W3C Workshop to have access to that information if they want to include it in their paper.

SL: Jeanne gave a number of options under Production section, but did not recommend any one of them.

JS: I think all of them are options that we can follow -- although we probably wouldn't get funding for both and editor AND a project manager -- but other than that we probably should do all of them. I think that we don't know the best options to take until we get through the W3C Workshop (the Experimentation Prototyping phase).
... we have the Experimentation User Research phase to decide the Production options, recruit members to contribute time and/or money toward the different options, before we get to final Experimentation Choosing phase, leading into the Production Resourcing phase.

<scribe> ACTION: Lauriet will write the Flexibility option for Friday's meeting. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/09/06-silver-minutes.html#action02]

JS: Sarah proposed in an email to have a large document with all the options to avoid the duplication of text in the phases.

SL: I think it will be confusing for people to keep reading all the options in one document. I like the idea Sarah proposed last week of writing up the 4 options as individual papers and then a comparison chart between each one.

JS: +1.

actionL Lauriet will respond to Sarah's email.

s/actionL Lauriet will respond to Sarah's email. //

<scribe> ACTION: Lauriet will respond to Sarah's email. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/09/06-silver-minutes.html#action03]

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.144  of Date: 2015/11/17 08:39:34  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

FAILED: s/actionL Lauriet will respond to Sarah's email. //
No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: jeanne
Inferring Scribes: jeanne

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.

Present: jeanne Shawn

WARNING: Fewer than 3 people found for Present list!

Regrets: Sarah

WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Got date from IRC log name: 06 Sep 2016
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2016/09/06-silver-minutes.html
People with action items: jeanne lauriet respond will

WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report