12:06:30 RRSAgent has joined #wot 12:06:30 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/06/01-wot-irc 12:07:17 kaz has joined #wot 12:07:30 sebastian has joined #wot 12:09:00 Zakim has joined #wot 12:09:06 zakim, pick a scribe 12:09:06 I don't who is present, kaz 12:09:54 present+ Kaz, Dave, Michael, Achille, Daniel, Katsuyoshi, Sebastian, Joerg, Johannes, Kazuaki, Masato, Matthias, Ryuichi, Takuki, Toru, Victor, Yingying, Yun 12:09:58 zakim, pick a scribe 12:09:58 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Toru 12:10:23 victor has joined #wot 12:10:23 present+ Sebastian_Kaebisch 12:10:35 zakim, pick a scribe 12:10:35 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Daniel 12:10:49 scribe: dape 12:10:55 scribeNick: DP 12:11:17 TOPIC: Quick Status Updates 12:11:27 MK: Any quick issue? 12:11:43 .. none heard 12:11:50 TOPIC: F2F Beijing 12:11:58 michael has joined #wot 12:12:03 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/IG_WebConf#Agenda_of_next_WoT_IG_WebConf:_1_Jun_2016 12:12:10 YY: Send out information for F2F 12:12:24 -> https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_Page#Face-to-Face_Meetings f2f wiki 12:12:42 YY: Email contains all information about registering 12:13:09 ->https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_July_2016,_China,_Beijing#Room_Reservation 12:13:11 ... please fill in form.. deadline is 24th June 12:13:23 ... there is limited number of rooms 12:13:37 ... also, please register for meeting 12:13:58 ... moreover, for VISA there is information as well on wiki page 12:14:10 s|https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_Page#Face-to-Face_Meetings|https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_July_2016,_China,_Beijing| 12:14:16 ... detailed agenda for first 2 days is on wiki also 12:14:32 jhund has joined #wot 12:14:39 MK: Any more information w.r.t network setup? 12:15:03 YY: network should be OK, no credentials needed 12:15:22 ... we still need to test our requirements 12:15:29 with support for wifi and cabled Ethernet 12:15:31 YY: Daniel proposed test tool 12:15:44 present+ Carsten 12:16:08 q? 12:16:10 q+ 12:16:17 DP: will provide test tool tool 12:16:28 s/tool tool/tool soon/ 12:16:31 MK: looked into VPN as well.. 12:16:48 s/MK/Koster 12:17:23 ... need to check whether VPN is possible as well? could send pre-configured RASPI 12:17:43 ... could I send the device or is it blocked? 12:18:15 YY: There are some website outside China which we can't access 12:18:46 Koster: we should check whether some webpages work as well... 12:18:49 q+ 12:19:56 Koster: should have fallback... e.g., with VPN 12:20:34 MK: should also try router and connect it to the network... 12:20:42 YY: Switch? 12:20:55 MK: a basic Wifi router 12:21:35 Koster: local network maybe better also 12:21:57 https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_July_2016,_China,_Beijing#Requirements 12:22:12 s|https:|-> https:| 12:22:24 ack dsr 12:22:29 s|Requirements|Requirements PlugFest Requirements wiki| 12:22:30 DP: should collect requirements on wiki 12:22:33 rrsagent, make log public 12:22:36 q? 12:22:37 rrsagent, draft mintues 12:22:37 I'm logging. I don't understand 'draft mintues', kaz. Try /msg RRSAgent help 12:22:42 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:22:42 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/06/01-wot-minutes.html kaz 12:22:53 s|rrsagent, draft mintues|| 12:23:04 DR: peer-to-peer messaging also important! Does tool handle that? 12:23:17 Koster: local network could be a solution 12:23:35 q+ 12:23:37 cabo has joined #wot 12:24:16 DP: p2p might be more tricky... 12:24:28 YY: guideline might be good 12:25:09 Kaz: Daniel could work on guideline... 12:25:20 Daniel: Will try... 12:25:48 Kaz: Should fix requirements table as soon as possible 12:25:57 q? 12:26:10 q- 12:26:11 ack dape 12:26:17 ack kaz 12:26:48 Kaz: Soumya plans remote plugfest participation.. 12:26:58 YY: will check with Soumya 12:26:59 q? 12:27:05 s/plans/might be planning/ 12:27:24 TOPIC: Architecture document 12:27:39 -> http://w3c.github.io/wot/architecture/wot-architecture.html WoT Architecture 12:28:10 Toru shows Architecture document 12:28:50 Toru: document is on github and has 7 chapters 12:28:56 .... 1. introduction 12:29:01 joerg has joined #wot 12:29:09 ... 2. Terminology 12:29:53 ... 3. chapter is about requirements... general info about flexibility, compatibiliyt, and safety 12:30:03 .. please comment if you have issues 12:30:08 q+ 12:30:15 ... 4. chapter is about scenarios 12:30:31 .... Nimurasan worked on those scenarios 12:30:48 .. inside home but also outside home 12:31:16 ... also variations whether to have home hub instead of direct connection 12:31:36 q+ to ask about clarifying role of firewall for smart homes in the architecture 12:31:43 ... other scenarios through proxy in cloud 12:32:27 ... other scenario is about factory and connected car ... both need gateway 12:33:02 ... finally thing-to-thing scenario (e.g, sensor to air conditioner) 12:33:17 Karen has joined #wot 12:33:19 ... 5. chapter is about "mapping variations" 12:33:51 ... similar to 4... but more detailed behavior is explained 12:34:22 ..e.g. fig 14, between gateway and cloud 12:34:45 ...6. chapter is about WoT servient 12:35:10 ... also handles interfaces... discovery, server, .. 12:35:14 q+ to clarify whether we expect electronic appliances to be WoT servients, or not? 12:35:24 ... also propitiatory API 12:35:38 ... 7. Conclusion 12:36:04 q? 12:36:17 q+ k_nimura 12:36:17 ack k_nimura 12:36:31 Nimurasan: based on scenario section I updated use-case document.. 12:36:41 -> http://w3c.github.io/wot/wot-ucr.html Use Case document 12:36:47 q+ to ask if we want to include sensor networks which often talked about for the IoT 12:36:54 ... I added smart home scenario 12:37:35 q? 12:37:35 q? 12:38:15 ack kaz 12:38:20 Kaz: we should clarify relationship between use-case and architecture document 12:38:29 .. could simple merge them 12:38:46 ... or have separate documents ... 12:39:11 ... use-case scenario section should be before requirements section 12:39:41 q+ 12:40:06 ... use-cases in architecture document could go right after terminology 12:40:52 q? 12:41:00 Toru: use-cases more user perspective while scenarios more deployment 12:43:03 Kaz: scenario should be part of use-case description.. unless it is really about deployment 12:43:19 Toru: could you make pull-request Kaz? 12:43:46 Kaz: Also, content of Section 4 should appear before requirements section 12:44:19 s/unless it is really about deployment/if it's rather description on concrete deployed systems, the title here (which is currently "Scenarios") should be something like that (deployed system images)/ 12:44:19 q? 12:44:26 ack dsr 12:44:26 dsr, you wanted to ask about clarifying role of firewall for smart homes in the architecture and to clarify whether we expect electronic appliances to be WoT servients, or not? and 12:44:29 ... to ask if we want to include sensor networks which often talked about for the IoT 12:44:56 Dave: document shows firewall... 12:45:17 ... what about smart meters ... clarify firewall role 12:46:08 .. Fig1. shows WoT Server ... WoT should show that we also support devices that not support WoT per se 12:46:31 ... lots of discussion about sensor networks... 12:46:55 ... also home health care .. where to put it, in the arch-document or use-cases? 12:47:33 q+ 12:47:39 Toru: w.r.t. scenario we don't want to exclude non WoT devices... there are just examples 12:47:57 q+ to ask if "firewall" is really a necessarily component of the system architecture 12:48:04 Dave: could say "each example illustrates ..." 12:48:30 Toru: do you propose referencing use-case documents.. 12:48:49 Dave: Yes, .. need to say why we have those scenarios and not others in arch document 12:48:57 ack dsr 12:49:01 q? 12:49:06 q 12:49:25 q+ k_nimura 12:49:39 Johannes: use.cases speaks about domains.. while arch-document talks about deployment 12:50:04 ... need to clarify this difference 12:50:13 we need to explain the criteria for including the examples in the architecture document, to say that we are not excluding other kinds of examples, but these are covered in the use cases document 12:50:17 q? 12:50:18 s/use.cases/use cases/ 12:50:24 ack jhund 12:50:40 ack k 12:50:43 ack k 12:50:43 kaz, you wanted to ask if "firewall" is really a necessarily component of the system architecture 12:51:01 q? 12:51:18 Kaz: wonder whether terminology "firewall" is needed.. suggest removing it 12:51:35 .. rather think about security and privacy separately. 12:52:06 Dave: IPv4 and IPv6 ... and firewall.. important for architecture.. 12:52:42 Kaz: currently we have just one statement about firewall ... detailed explanation should go into dedicated section 12:52:58 q? 12:53:25 some possible additions include healthcare, smart meters, sensor network examples and telemetry 12:54:16 Nimurasan: Fig14 tries to show combination of servient 12:54:47 ... firewall is not tackled here... should remove it 12:55:06 Torusan: can remove "firewall" here 12:55:25 Kaz: need more information somewhere else 12:55:44 Dave: Also IPv4, IPV6 issues et cetera 12:56:19 Dave: who are we targeting with this document? 12:56:36 q+ 12:56:39 ... technical audience. not sure.. not enough technical details 12:56:45 present+ Kazuo 12:57:18 kaz: would suggest we talk with Kajimoto-san :) 12:57:20 Kaijmoto: security is important 12:58:42 q 12:58:43 q? 12:58:43 .. we should add deliverable to WG ... continue to discuss it in WG 12:58:46 q+ 12:58:54 q+ k_nimura 12:59:23 Kaijmoto: Security seems an endless issue 12:59:24 I need to drop off for board meeting, thanks 12:59:57 Dave: yes, but people will look at W3C how we handle it 13:00:11 kajimoto has joined #wot 13:00:11 ... agree, we don't need to handle it in this document 13:00:23 q? 13:00:31 I agree that we don’t need to handle security and privacy in this document, at least not now 13:00:51 ack taki 13:01:21 Taki: order of chapters: definition of WoT serviant in terminology section.. in section 6 the details are given 13:01:38 ... information should come earlier 13:02:18 Toru: I agree 13:02:27 Kaijmoto: makes sense 13:02:49 Taki: will create issue or PR 13:03:33 ack 13:03:39 q? 13:03:44 MK: level of details is OK... more should come later... maybe in other WG document 13:03:49 ack m 13:04:35 Nimurasan: propose closing document in IG... and work in WG again 13:05:13 MK: yes, plan to release document soon... 13:05:30 s/plan/we plan 13:05:32 q? 13:06:01 MK: please add issues to github... so that editors can work on the final comments... 13:06:10 .... release planned for mid of June 13:06:27 TOPIC: Current Practices document 13:06:43 MK: Johannes updated scripting API 13:06:52 -> http://w3c.github.io/wot/current-practices/wot-practices.html current practices document 13:07:05 ... also talked with Sebastian... w.r.t. to new type system 13:07:12 q+ 13:07:22 ack k_nimura 13:07:23 ack k 13:07:26 MK: are there any issue / comment w.r.t. to this document? 13:08:17 Kaz: got MMI wg request? Should we have github PRs? 13:08:38 MK: Yes, can discuss PR? 13:08:49 .. direct commit should be avoided 13:09:18 MK: fixed critical issues in charters 13:09:25 .. no todos left 13:09:36 .. think ready to share with others 13:09:57 i/fixed critical/topic: Charters/ 13:10:23 ... one remaining issue: missing text for figure (relation between WG and IG) 13:10:32 -> http://w3c.github.io/wot/charters/wot-ig-2016.html draft IG Charter 13:10:37 -> http://w3c.github.io/wot/charters/wot-wg-2016.html draft WG Charter 13:10:54 ... we have figure in IG charter... and we have also text there 13:11:09 ... should we have text in WG charter as well 13:11:39 Dave: Payment wg had similar issue... lets refer from WG to IG text 13:11:42 MK: Will do so.. 13:11:46 s/as well/as well?/ 13:12:29 ... IG charter issue: test interoperability issue (discussion on mailinglist) 13:12:43 Is the following “take part in interoperability experiments across implementations for ideas at different levels of maturity” 13:12:57 Dave: Jonathan wanted some explanation.. 13:13:11 Dave: is the proposed text OK? 13:13:24 MK: Good for me 13:13:39 q+ 13:13:44 Dave: will reach out to Jonathan and check 13:14:23 Dave: plan to show IG charter next Wednesday.. make comments quickly.. 13:14:32 q? 13:14:33 q? 13:14:45 ack kaz 13:15:22 Kaz: there are 2 locations IG charter mentions testing... should try to converge on mailinglist 13:15:48 MK: we still take comments... this might be still revised 13:15:56 q? 13:16:09 TOPIC: Proposals 13:16:23 aq+ 13:16:34 q+ 13:17:06 Johannes: proposed scripting API updates... 13:17:24 https://github.com/w3c/wot/issues/173 13:17:43 s|https|-> https| 13:17:51 .. plan is to discuss it on Github.. will merge later in Current Practices document 13:18:05 https://github.com/w3c/wot/tree/master/proposals/restructured-scripting-api 13:18:08 ... please comment and discuss 13:18:10 s|173|173 Issue on Structure/concretisation of the Scripting API| 13:18:30 s|https:|-> https:| 13:18:51 s|scripting-api|scripting-api actual proposal on scripting API| 13:18:57 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:18:57 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/06/01-wot-minutes.html kaz 13:19:38 Dave: Last week I was in Spain... next Thursday I am talking with OPC ... about Semantics... also Industry 4.0 folks ... 13:19:43 i/Quick Status Updates/scribenick: dape/ 13:19:45 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:19:45 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/06/01-wot-minutes.html kaz 13:19:56 q+ 13:19:59 q+ 13:20:09 ack dsr 13:20:29 Meeting: WoT IG 13:20:32 Chair: Matthias 13:20:34 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:20:34 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/06/01-wot-minutes.html kaz 13:20:44 Sebastian: Would like to see more technical discussions? PlugFest is rather soon 13:21:04 ... can we reserve some time ? 13:21:10 MK: Indeed... 13:21:22 i/Last week/topic: AOB/ 13:21:24 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:21:24 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/06/01-wot-minutes.html kaz 13:21:37 q? 13:21:40 q? 13:21:47 ack Yingying 13:22:28 Yingying: for F2F meeting: CETC would like to give some demos... can we have a slot for this as well 13:22:39 ... would like to explain demo 13:23:07 ... 15th of June could be a good date.. 13:23:57 s/this as well/this as well?/ 13:25:08 Bryan Sullivan of AT&T 13:25:48 Yingying: should get in touch with Bryan Sullivan... will try to give a presentation 13:26:43 Dave: Yes... should get updates from OMA and other groups as well 13:27:12 Dave: How do we manage it? 13:27:26 -> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wot-comms/2016Feb/0006.html wot comm mintues 13:27:41 Joerg: Need to understand how to incorporate it topic-wise 13:28:00 ... we need context (discussed also before) 13:28:59 ... need person(s) who takes care of each liaison 13:29:33 q? 13:29:37 Dave: let's discuss this during next comm call 13:29:53 ack dape 13:31:13 DP: wanted to talk about "call for implementations" .. will do next week 13:31:57 [ adjourned ] 13:32:00 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:32:00 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/06/01-wot-minutes.html kaz 13:54:59 dsr has joined #wot 14:27:24 dsr has joined #wot 15:22:48 dfr has joined #wot 15:52:21 kaz has joined #wot 15:58:22 Zakim has left #wot 16:30:16 dsr has joined #wot