15:03:49 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #i18n
15:03:49 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/05/26-i18n-irc
15:04:13 <azaroth> trackbot, start meeting
15:04:15 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
15:04:15 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #i18n
15:04:16 <JcK> present+ JcK
15:04:17 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 4186
15:04:17 <Zakim> ok, trackbot
15:04:18 <trackbot> Meeting: Internationalization Working Group Teleconference
15:04:18 <trackbot> Date: 26 May 2016
15:04:23 <azaroth> present+ Rob_Sanderson
15:04:34 <TimCole> present+ Tim_Cole
15:04:42 <r12a> present+
15:04:51 <Steve_Atkin> present+
15:05:02 <azaroth> Regrets+ Felix_Sasaki
15:05:16 <ivan> Present+ Ivan_Herman
15:06:46 <takeshi> takeshi has joined #i18n
15:06:57 <r12a> 213,206,224
15:07:07 <r12a> 221,220
15:07:43 <r12a> 227
15:07:59 <ivan> https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Ai18n-review+-label%3Aeditor_action
15:09:04 <bigbluehat> bigbluehat has joined #i18n
15:09:48 <azaroth> Link: http://w3c.github.io/web-annotation/model/wd2/#external-web-resources
15:09:52 <r12a> https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/224
15:10:29 <ivan> -> WG decision https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/224#issuecomment-219953153
15:12:16 <r12a> agreed: use direction property as currently described
15:12:40 <ivan> Proposal comment: On the meeting with the I18N WG (2016-05-26) the Anno WG reiterated that it intends to follow the direction as advised by the I18N WG. The decision in https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/224#issuecomment-219953153 sticks.
15:12:52 <azaroth> +1
15:12:55 <r12a> +1
15:12:57 <ivan> +1
15:13:10 <ivan> rrsagent, pointer?
15:13:10 <RRSAgent> See http://www.w3.org/2016/05/26-i18n-irc#T15-13-10
15:13:21 <takeshi> +1
15:13:21 <TimCole> +1
15:13:45 <r12a> scribenick r12a
15:13:51 <r12a> scribenick: r12a
15:14:13 <azaroth> proposal: https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/213#issuecomment-221098949
15:14:22 <r12a> https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/213
15:17:32 <ivan> Comment of Hugo: https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/213#issuecomment-221530850
15:24:21 <ivan> rrsagent, pointer?
15:24:21 <RRSAgent> See http://www.w3.org/2016/05/26-i18n-irc#T15-24-21
15:29:54 <azaroth> +1 to my proposal :)
15:30:29 <ivan> +1
15:30:39 <r12a> +1
15:30:41 <Steve_Atkin> +1
15:30:50 <TimCole> +1
15:30:51 <takeshi> +1
15:31:40 <ivan> https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/206
15:31:42 <r12a> https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/206
15:37:29 <azaroth> code units: https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/206#issuecomment-219893634
15:39:29 <r12a> zakim, who's here?
15:39:29 <Zakim> Present: JcK, Rob_Sanderson, Tim_Cole, r12a, Steve_Atkin, Ivan_Herman
15:39:31 <Zakim> On IRC I see bigbluehat, takeshi, Zakim, RRSAgent, JcK, azaroth, TimCole, Steve_Atkin, ivan, r12a, koji, trackbot
15:40:07 <azaroth> proposal is to continue to use code points (still)
15:40:14 <ivan> +1
15:40:21 <Steve_Atkin> +1
15:40:24 <r12a> +1
15:40:38 <takeshi> +1
15:40:41 <TimCole> +1
15:40:45 <ivan> rrsagent, pointer?
15:40:45 <RRSAgent> See http://www.w3.org/2016/05/26-i18n-irc#T15-40-45
15:41:01 <r12a> https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/221
15:42:37 <JcK> On 206, I continue to be concerned that using code points without further qualification will create opportunities for serious user confusion, introduce normalization issues, etc.,  But I'm not expert enough in this particular area to feel comfortable blocking a decision.
15:44:11 <azaroth> Proposal for 221 is to remove the recommendation to normalize whitespace
15:44:27 <TimCole> +1
15:44:28 <r12a> +1
15:44:29 <ivan> +1
15:44:29 <Steve_Atkin> +1
15:44:30 <takeshi> +1
15:44:31 <JcK> +1
15:44:36 <ivan> rrsagent, pointer?
15:44:36 <RRSAgent> See http://www.w3.org/2016/05/26-i18n-irc#T15-44-36
15:44:55 <azaroth> And that if the client cannot find the unnormalized text, it can easily normalize the whitespace internally and then search again
15:50:05 <r12a> ACTION: Richard to provide note text to indicate that selection tools should take care in selecting boundaries
15:50:05 <trackbot> Created ACTION-526 - Provide note text to indicate that selection tools should take care in selecting boundaries [on Richard Ishida - due 2016-06-02].
15:50:25 <ivan> rrsagent, pointer?
15:50:25 <RRSAgent> See http://www.w3.org/2016/05/26-i18n-irc#T15-50-25
15:56:58 <azaroth> Proposal is to record, in a note, that clients may use the value of the Content-Location header to record the target of the annotation, to ensure that server specific content negotiation is taken into account (e.g. IP address geo-location, rather than Accept-Language header)
15:57:27 <ivan> +1
15:57:31 <r12a> +1
15:57:35 <Steve_Atkin> +1
15:57:36 <TimCole> +1
15:58:25 <takeshi> +0
15:58:46 <ivan> rrsagent, pointer?
15:58:46 <RRSAgent> See http://www.w3.org/2016/05/26-i18n-irc#T15-58-46
15:59:15 <r12a> https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/227
16:01:58 <azaroth> Link: http://w3c.github.io/web-annotation/model/wd2/#text-quote-selector
16:02:08 <azaroth> And then scroll to the paragraph following the table in model
16:12:58 <azaroth> Micro proposal to change should to SHOULD
16:13:11 <ivan> +1
16:19:01 <r12a> ACTION: Addison to review Web Annotation #227 and reply asap with advice on Unicode normalization
16:19:01 <trackbot> Created ACTION-527 - Review web annotation #227 and reply asap with advice on unicode normalization [on Addison Phillips - due 2016-06-02].
16:19:40 <azaroth> i18n++ :)
16:20:23 <azaroth> +1 to r12a :)
16:22:18 <azaroth> Thank you i18n folks :)
16:22:39 <JcK> JcK has left #i18n
16:24:27 <r12a> rrsagent, draft minutes
16:24:27 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/05/26-i18n-minutes.html r12a
17:44:52 <Zakim> Zakim has left #i18n
18:44:32 <r12a> r12a has joined #i18n
19:26:35 <r12a> r12a has joined #i18n
20:01:00 <r12a> r12a has joined #i18n
21:15:47 <r12a> r12a has joined #i18n
23:33:11 <r12a> r12a has joined #i18n