17:03:30 RRSAgent has joined #social 17:03:30 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/05/17-social-irc 17:03:32 RRSAgent, make logs public 17:03:32 Zakim has joined #social 17:03:34 Zakim, this will be SOCL 17:03:34 ok, trackbot 17:03:35 Meeting: Social Web Working Group Teleconference 17:03:35 Date: 17 May 2016 17:03:37 present+ 17:03:39 present+ 17:03:42 present+ 17:03:42 present+ 17:03:45 present+ 17:03:49 present+ 17:03:51 present+ 17:03:58 present+ 17:04:50 scribenick: annbass 17:04:56 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2016-05-10-minutes 17:05:14 chair: tantek 17:05:34 tantek: seeking approval of minutes .. 17:05:40 +1 17:05:45 +1 17:05:50 +1 17:06:01 Zakim, who is here? 17:06:01 Present: tantek, aaronpk, shevski, sandro, eprodrom, ben_thatmust, annbass, Arnaud 17:06:04 On IRC I see RRSAgent, eprodrom, shepazu, annbass, shevski, tantek, jasnell, ben_thatmustbeme, KevinMarks, Loqi, Arnaud, cwebber2, bigbluehat, strugee, aaronpk, raucao, wilkie, 17:06:04 ... wseltzer, sandro, trackbot, rrika, rhiaro, jet, tsyesika, dwhly, ElijahLynn, tessierashpool_, bitbear 17:06:18 17:06:24 +1 17:06:51 +1 17:06:58 s/ben_thatmustbeme is/cwebber2 is/ 17:06:59 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2016-06-06 17:07:26 ... upcoming F2F .. note the dates changed to Mon-Tues 17:07:52 ... due to flights, changed ending time on Tues to 5pm 17:07:56 q+ 17:08:08 scribenick: tantek 17:08:17 annbass: looks like I cannot come to the meeting 17:08:24 annbass: not totally confirmed, but likely 17:08:38 present+ 17:08:45 scribenick: annbass 17:09:05 tantek: F2F logistics .. 17:09:33 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2016-06-06#Participants 17:09:37 ... attendees should add their food preferences, arrival info, hotels, etc 17:09:57 zakim, who is here? 17:09:57 Present: tantek, aaronpk, shevski, sandro, eprodrom, ben_thatmust, annbass, Arnaud, KevinMarks 17:09:59 On IRC I see RRSAgent, eprodrom, shepazu, annbass, shevski, tantek, jasnell, ben_thatmustbeme, KevinMarks, Loqi, Arnaud, cwebber2, bigbluehat, strugee, aaronpk, raucao, wilkie, 17:09:59 ... wseltzer, sandro, trackbot, rrika, rhiaro, jet, tsyesika, dwhly, ElijahLynn, tessierashpool_, bitbear 17:09:59 sorry we will miss you ann! 17:10:17 (I know .. I was really looking to come; easy trip for me) 17:10:29 I'll be remote I think 17:10:34 I don't think I will 17:10:41 tantek: asking shevski, arnaud and kevin if they're coming to F2F 17:10:42 don't have funding fro travel at the moment 17:10:42 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2016-06-06#Remote_Participation 17:10:54 me neither :-/ 17:11:16 ... sorry to hear that kevin and shevski... 17:11:46 shevski -- let me know if anyone has funding to provide! (from London) 17:11:58 q? 17:12:01 ack annbass 17:12:16 tantek ... that's it for F2F .. everyone should add their info to planning page 17:12:28 topic: Webmention CR status update 17:12:35 tantek: I added an AS2.0 update 17:12:43 sandro: sort of 2 agenda items 17:12:51 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Webmention_CR_Transition_Request 17:12:58 ... A) shevski and I worked together to make transition request 17:13:02 ... mostly good 17:13:07 s/shevski and/aaronpk and 17:13:22 (oh! soory) 17:13:56 ... salmention ... 17:14:18 https://github.com/aaronpk/webmention/issues/37 17:14:20 ... Issue 37 on this .. 17:14:53 tantek: were you here (early meetings) when we talked about normative references? 17:14:57 sandro: not sure 17:15:08 ... what happened? 17:15:21 tantek: same question .. re: referring to external specs 17:15:52 ... started as mailing list discussion .. HarryHalpin took to TimBL .. had lunch discussion 17:16:27 ... upshot: OK to normatively reference spec, if you identify which parts are stable and which parts are under discussion 17:16:37 ... OK to reference "Living Specs" 17:16:55 ... need to give enough info so that people can figure out what to do 17:17:32 q? 17:17:43 q+ 17:17:44 (wondering if tantek has a link?) 17:18:19 sandro: one option is to take out the ref to salmention 17:18:35 ... you're saying a new idea .. identify stable / not stable 17:18:38 ack aaronpk 17:18:51 aaronpk: I updated the Editor's Draft 17:19:00 FYI annbass https://www.w3.org/2013/09/normative-references 17:20:00 ... salmention is no longer a normative ref .. 17:20:06 ... now more explicit about updates 17:20:23 http://webmention.net/draft/#sending-webmentions-for-updated-posts 17:20:28 "If a response to the source URL is shown on the source URL page, then sender should treat that as an update of the source URL and re-send any previously sent Webmentions." 17:20:33 http://webmention.net/draft/#updating-existing-webmentions 17:22:15 aaronpk: essentially changes from "it must support it" to "it may wish to support it" 17:22:35 ... not a "should", not even a "may" 17:22:56 tantek: any feedback, reactions, objections? 17:23:06 sandro: this looks good to me 17:23:09 ... OK, not hearing anything .. 17:23:22 ... moving on 17:23:22 This seems like the right response 17:24:02 sandro: can we get a formal resolution, since this is a normative change? just for the record 17:24:31 tantek: yes, write a proposal 17:24:55 aaronpk: I just added tantek's comment re: "e.g., " 17:25:08 PROPOSED: Publish updated Webmention WD and revise CR draft, with Salmention no longer being normative, as per current editors draft 17:25:20 +1 17:25:22 +1 17:25:23 +1 17:25:25 +1 17:25:27 +1 17:25:27 +1 17:25:29 +1 17:25:32 +1 17:25:43 RESOLVED: Publish updated Webmention WD and revise CR draft, with Salmention no longer being normative, as per current editors draft 17:25:59 \o/ 17:26:12 tantek: ok, we can go ahead with Transition Request 17:26:19 ... next step is phone call with the Director 17:26:34 sandro: typically takes ~1 week, but depends on schedules 17:26:42 tantek: who needs to be on that call/ 17:26:58 I can be on it too 17:26:59 sandro: at least 1 chair, also aaronpk .. 17:27:18 sandro: I'll propose some times, make a doodle poll 17:28:07 ... have to find out who is acting as "Director" .. either Ralph or Philippe 17:28:21 q? 17:28:25 ... need to find out their schedules; should take me a day or two 17:28:38 topic: Activity Streams 2.0 update 17:28:48 (Ralph Swick and Philippe le Hegaret) 17:29:09 http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams-vocabulary/ 17:29:15 http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams-core/ 17:29:20 eprodrom: last week we cleared out most issues, but had a couple more come up 17:29:37 ... Editors' Drafts have been edited .. new versions out there 17:29:44 http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams-core/#activitystreams-1.0 17:30:13 ... new section: description of motivations re changes for moving to AS2 17:30:31 ... followed some suggestions by tantek for reformatting 17:30:52 http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams-vocabulary/index.html#changelog 17:30:55 ... now have change logs on both docs 17:31:04 \o/ change logs! 17:31:07 👍 17:31:09 ... covers major changes, not minor editorial bits 17:31:14 eprodrom++ 17:31:16 eprodrom has 32 karma 17:31:18 http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams-core/#changelog 17:31:28 ... for both vocabulary and for core 17:31:46 ... hoping that suffices, without going all the way back to beginning 17:31:51 ... no more outstanding issues 17:32:24 ... would like to have this Editors Draft open for ~1 week, then go to Working Draft 17:32:30 q? 17:32:50 ... alternative, make this WD and then go straight to Candidate Rec 17:32:56 tantek: preferences? 17:33:01 ... no responses 17:33:09 ... therefore I'll defer to Editor 17:33:21 Working Draft++ 17:33:43 PROPOSED: Publish updated working drafts of Activity Streams specifications based on current Editor's Draft. 17:33:52 +1 17:33:53 +1 17:33:58 +1 17:34:00 +1 both documents I assume 17:34:05 aaronpk: yes 17:34:20 +1 17:34:24 (that proposal captures eprodrom's preference, that I didn't capture in minutes above) 17:34:46 +1 17:34:57 RESOLVED: Publish updated working drafts of Activity Streams specifications based on current Editor's Draft. 17:35:08 tantek: thanks eprodrom! 17:35:11 ... hard work 17:35:13 Great news 17:35:34 sorry, what's the plan for CR? 17:35:44 ... one point: this is the first time I'll be publishing a WD on my own, have a few questions for sandro 17:36:18 tantek: goal is to get wider review, via WD .. then act accordingly 17:36:27 ... hopefully next week 17:36:37 ... if no issues are raised, then try to take this to CR 17:36:57 arnaud: thanks; good to have timeframe 17:36:58 Agreed! 17:37:18 zakim, who is here? 17:37:18 Present: tantek, aaronpk, shevski, sandro, eprodrom, ben_thatmust, annbass, Arnaud, KevinMarks 17:37:21 On IRC I see RRSAgent, eprodrom, shepazu, annbass, shevski, tantek, jasnell, ben_thatmustbeme, KevinMarks, Loqi, Arnaud, cwebber2, bigbluehat, strugee, aaronpk, raucao, wilkie, 17:37:21 ... wseltzer, sandro, trackbot, rrika, rhiaro, jet, tsyesika, dwhly, ElijahLynn, tessierashpool_, bitbear 17:37:28 tantek: social web protocols .. is rhiaro on call? 17:37:39 aaany second now 17:37:53 sandro: she says she's on really low bandwidth 17:37:59 ... she's traveling 17:38:08 tantek: ok .. we'll go on 17:38:25 ... ActivityPub? ChrisWebber? 17:38:41 cwebber2: I'm just moving house, therefore all of this is in boxes 17:39:14 ... if I recall, we requested people to review Editors Draft .. unclear 17:39:37 ... Let's ask people to review it this week 17:39:49 http://w3c-social.github.io/activitypub/ 17:39:59 ... hope that's the correct link 17:39:59 thats it 17:40:17 q+ 17:40:22 ack aaronpk 17:40:31 REQUEST: review that work, we will discuss next week if it's in good shape to publish 17:40:53 aaronpk: that page has January date .. is that actually the most current one? 17:41:21 present+ rhiaro 17:41:23 cwebber2: (only on phone; can't check right now) .. I'll check it later.. I suspect it's up-to-date, and we forgot to update the date 17:41:32 tantek: 2 requests: 17:41:50 ... 1. link to XYZ 17:41:58 ... 2. add change log? 17:42:03 s/XYZ/editor's draft 17:42:16 q? 17:42:45 cwebber2 will send email if there is actually a different link 17:42:58 tantek: appears rhiaro is now on .. what's up? 17:43:21 rhiaro: sorry, not caught up yet .. should have updated Editor's Draft by next week 17:43:28 ... then have week to review 17:43:39 tantek: Micropub? aaronpk? 17:44:08 aaronpk: last draft dated May 4 .. I still have some bits to update 17:44:29 ... but also testing "media type", that we discussed awhile ago .. thin 17:44:43 ... thinking about adding that to the next Editors Draft 17:44:45 s/"media type"/"media endpoint" 17:45:01 ... plan to have that available by our call next week 17:45:11 tantek: great; 17:45:19 nice 17:45:45 ... last document is mine .. haven't gotten to it 17:45:58 ... hoping to work on it either right before, or during F2F 17:46:04 ... any new agenda items? 17:46:16 http://doodle.com/poll/7m36c38q5rgrtgi5 17:46:22 sandro++ 17:46:24 sandro has 31 karma 17:46:29 sandro: I made doodle poll, for chairs and aaron .. for that meeting 17:47:22 s/7m36c38q5rgrtgi5/hidden/ 17:47:27 ... it will be Ralph or Philippe as Director, and Wendy Seltzer as manager responsible for this work 17:47:46 tantek: OK, looks like the end 17:47:57 q? 17:48:10 tantek++ 17:48:12 tantek has 291 karma 17:48:15 annbass++ 17:48:16 annbass has 2 karma 17:48:17 Thanks everyone 17:48:22 thanks tantek & annbass & all (woo) 17:48:29 :-) 17:48:31 annbass++ thanks for minuting! 17:48:32 annbass has 3 karma 17:48:49 remind me (100th time) what's the command to get the minutes? 17:49:39 thanks .. 17:49:43 trackbot, end meeting 17:49:43 Zakim, list attendees 17:49:43 As of this point the attendees have been tantek, aaronpk, shevski, sandro, eprodrom, ben_thatmust, annbass, Arnaud, KevinMarks, rhiaro 17:49:45 rrsagent, make minutes 17:49:45 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/05/17-social-minutes.html annbass 17:49:51 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 17:49:51 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/05/17-social-minutes.html trackbot 17:49:52 RRSAgent, bye 17:49:52 I see no action items