15:01:09 RRSAgent has joined #sdwbp 15:01:09 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/03/23-sdwbp-irc 15:01:11 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:01:11 Zakim has joined #sdwbp 15:01:13 Zakim, this will be SDW 15:01:13 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 15:01:14 Meeting: Spatial Data on the Web Working Group Teleconference 15:01:14 Date: 23 March 2016 15:01:34 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:01:54 ClemensPortele you should be able to get the code now 15:01:55 Linda has joined #sdwbp 15:02:15 billroberts has joined #sdwbp 15:02:35 present+ billroberts 15:02:43 present+ ClemensPortele 15:02:51 present+ eparsons 15:04:10 present+ Linda 15:04:34 present+ phila 15:04:50 joshlieberman has joined #sdwbp 15:05:10 ClausStadler has joined #sdwbp 15:05:18 MattPerry has joined #sdwbp 15:06:42 zakim, code? 15:06:42 I have been told this is SDW BP https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m21f337caa6fb0e9933f1663cadc10141 pw: sdwbp or Dial +1-617-324-0000, access code 643 407 318 15:07:19 present+ ClausStadler 15:08:05 AndreaPerego has joined #sdwbp 15:08:50 present+ MattPerry 15:09:24 zakim, code? 15:09:24 I have been told this is SDW BP https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m21f337caa6fb0e9933f1663cadc10141 pw: sdwbp or Dial +1-617-324-0000, access code 643 407 318 15:10:34 jtandy has joined #sdwbp 15:10:48 present+ jtandy 15:12:07 yep 15:12:19 present+ joshlieberman 15:13:11 regrets+ Rachel, Bart 15:13:11 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:13:17 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:13:17 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/03/23-sdwbp-minutes.html phila 15:13:41 scribe: ClemensPortele 15:13:43 Chair: jtandy 15:14:05 PROPOSED: approve last week's minutes https://www.w3.org/2016/03/09-sdwbp-minutes 15:14:09 +1 15:14:12 +1 15:14:15 +1 15:14:17 +1 15:14:23 +0 (missed the meeting) 15:14:23 +1 15:14:30 RESOLVED 15:14:33 +1 15:14:38 RESOLUTION: approve last week's minutes https://www.w3.org/2016/03/09-sdwbp-minutes 15:14:38 +1 15:14:52 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:14:52 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/03/23-sdwbp-minutes.html phila 15:14:53 Topic: Patent Call 15:15:03 https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Patent_Call 15:15:26 AndreaPerego has joined #sdwbp 15:16:03 Linda: wants to discuss meeting time when DST starts in Europe 15:16:19 present+ AndreaPerego 15:16:23 Linda: Would be 5-6pm and 1-2 hours earlier would be better 15:16:29 UTC? 15:17:02 PROPOSED: new meeting time @ Wed 13:00 UTC 15:17:10 +1 15:17:11 +1 15:17:15 +1 15:17:18 +1 15:17:20 +1 15:17:24 +1 15:17:24 +1 15:17:25 0 - can do either time equally 15:17:25 +1 15:17:30 Any potential West Coasters? 15:17:42 RESOLUTION: new meeting time @ Wed 13:00 UTC 15:17:42 (of US) 15:19:46 TOPIC: Work through flooding scenario from an actor perspective 15:19:58 For each of the actors, work through the flooding scenario (see BP Narrative) to determine how they interact with spatial information - as a publisher or consumer - in order to flesh out the scenario further and [begin to] define the examples we will need 15:20:15 agenda: www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:BP-Telecon20160323 15:20:40 My sense from the last meeting minutes is that use of the Web in the scenario has not been sufficiently explicit. 15:20:53 jtandy: at the previous call, there was general agreement to use the scenario to restructure the best practices 15:21:16 jtandy: ... potentially merging some of the best practices 15:21:22 +1 15:21:23 q+ 15:21:29 jtandy: do we all agree about this approach? 15:21:50 eparsons: not completely convinced about the merging 15:22:30 eparsons: ... narrative and the best practices could also be read separately in isolation 15:22:47 ScottSimmons has joined #sdwbp 15:23:00 present+ ScottSimmons 15:23:19 jtandy: so the primer may tell a story from a perspective that links bps 15:23:38 (seems to be agreed) 15:24:10 q+ 15:24:30 jtandy: we probably do not need to make a decision now 15:24:31 ack next 15:24:35 ack jtandy 15:24:39 ack joshlieberman 15:25:08 zakim, code? 15:25:08 I have been told this is SDW BP https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m21f337caa6fb0e9933f1663cadc10141 pw: sdwbp or Dial +1-617-324-0000, access code 643 407 318 15:25:17 joshlieberman: I agree that merging doesn't necessarily make sense. We can work on the narrative and make reference to the BPs as we go along. 15:25:57 joshlieberman: agrees that the idea of merging does not make sense, but working on the narrative with links to the bp will provide context to a bp to see if it works (going from the narrative to the practice) 15:26:26 jtandy: ok, so we may end up with two different sections in the document 15:26:47 joshlieberman: another quibble is that the Web is not really part of the narrative 15:27:32 jtandy: agrees about this, the narrative is currently lightweight 15:27:56 jtandy: ... with more text the Web aspect should be included, too 15:28:40 Linda: Bart could not join today 15:29:13 jtandy: Let's follow up with Bart 15:29:43 joshlieberman: time and uncertainty aspects related to predictions should be added 15:30:20 joshlieberman: also proximity to the predicted flood extent 15:30:30 https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/BP_Narrative 15:31:05 ACTION: joshlieberman to add thoughts about flood prediction to the narrative at https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/BP_Narrative 15:31:05 Created ACTION-151 - Add thoughts about flood prediction to the narrative at https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/bp_narrative [on Joshua Lieberman - due 2016-03-30]. 15:31:23 ACTORS: 15:31:25 professional spatial data publisher 15:31:25 other professionals using this data 15:31:25 citizens using social media 15:31:25 web/app developers 15:31:26 journalists 15:31:26 emergecny responders 15:31:27 citizens who are in danger of being flooded 15:31:43 jtandy: look at the narrative from the actor's perspective 15:32:05 7 actors 15:32:46 jtandy: 7 actors, eparsons and Rachel offered to take one role 15:33:04 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yVvmwK7kcT9PN7ai2unhvQH_hINGaQBIst4P9WTe4UM/edit?usp=sharing 15:33:31 eparsons: is this the right approach to take? 15:34:26 jtandy: keep it snappy and do not make a long story, just to provide context so readers can emphasize 15:34:47 in terms of level of detail: "does the narrative provide enough information to see if my problem is the same as the one described in the BP" 15:35:09 q+ 15:35:28 "can you recognise these problems as your problems" 15:35:39 ack Linda 15:35:49 jtandy: question is whether the connection between the narrative, the problem and the bp is understandable 15:36:21 Linda: looking at eparsons's text, maybe take some parts out and rather put it in the bp text 15:36:39 Linda: ... examples are good, looks good in general 15:36:51 jtandy: any other thoughts? 15:37:09 [eparsons also said that we need to have the narrative and best practices grounded in reality] 15:37:16 Some info could fit into the 'why' section of one of the BP's. But as editor I don't mind cutting and pasting. 15:37:34 eparsons: this will be more complicated for some of the other actors 15:38:42 jtandy: what is described how information could be found via search engines - in contrast how it works today in sdis 15:39:24 jtandy: ... or in unstructured text only 15:39:58 jtandy: in one of the last meetings we discussed how do we talk about "less than 5 star data" 15:40:11 jtandy: ... this is probably two star 15:40:43 eparsons: yes, and we should not require everyone to jump to 5 stars directly 15:40:50 q+ 15:41:12 eparsons: ... eg without the need to develop an ontology first 15:41:18 ack billroberts 15:42:21 billroberts: likes the idea of web pages, but a lot of the time the location of all of the schools may be needed 15:42:45 billroberts: ... so different ways are useful for different types of use cases 15:43:24 billroberts: ... support multiple ways to support multiple use cases 15:44:18 jtandy: one bp is to support (multiple) formats for multiple user communities 15:44:22 +1 15:44:38 joshlieberman: but it does not go far enough 15:45:39 q+ 15:45:41 joshlieberman: ... format does not differentiate the different representations and service interfaces 15:45:52 q+ 15:46:14 joshlieberman: ... eg an image from a WMS vs data from a SOS or SensorThings API 15:46:44 ack eparsons 15:47:24 eparsons: agrees with joshlieberman and billroberts. Another actor: the data integrator which does heavy lifting. 15:48:08 eparsons: ... this should not be the task of the data publisher so the we do not overload them and need to take the motivation into account 15:48:51 jtandy: do you think there are sets of best practices for data integrators or "power data publishers"? 15:49:00 q+ to talk briefly about http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#MultipleFormats 15:49:27 eparsons: yes, but focus on the narrative now and see who is missing 15:49:33 q+ 15:50:27 joshlieberman: need to work out from the narrative that something on the map image is the same thing as some JSON-LD object 15:51:05 joshlieberman: in WMS: GetFeatureInfo makes the link 15:51:19 jtandy: currently nothing in the narrative that ties things together? 15:52:18 jtandy: joshlieberman, could you add something about this in the narrative? 15:53:09 jtandy: billroberts, would you be able to add something about spatial analysis (ie another professional user) into the narrative? 15:53:31 sure, will do 15:54:18 ack Linda 15:54:44 jtandy: to clarify joshlieberman's action: professional user to reconcile information in a map with some crowd-sourced data 15:55:52 Linda: will provide an update on the Geonovum testbed with recommended practices 15:56:02 ack phila 15:56:02 phila, you wanted to talk briefly about http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#MultipleFormats 15:56:09 -> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#MultipleFormats 15:56:11 Linda: ... and content negotiation is not always the answer 15:56:31 q? 15:56:55 phila: the dwbp covers the general topic (see the link above) 15:57:29 phila: I have another topic for the next call [which the scribe has missed ;)] 15:57:41 ack billroberts 15:57:44 -> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#EnableDataSubsetting Draft subsetting BP 15:57:52 billroberts: subsetting will discussed in the coverage call 15:59:02 billroberts: metadata in a web page will work for certain use cases (like a school director), but may work less good for others eg the director of a railway company that wants to publish all their railway stations 15:59:44 jtandy: two types of professional users - one with single entities and one with many entities 15:59:54 eparsons: and the answer is never a spreadsheet 16:00:16 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:00:16 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/03/23-sdwbp-minutes.html phila 16:00:58 thanks all 16:01:02 bye 16:01:03 Thanks, and bye! 16:01:04 jtandy: please indicate on the wiki if you can take the role of an actor 16:01:09 bye 16:01:10 bye 16:01:10 thanks, bye 16:01:13 bye 16:01:13 joshlieberman has left #sdwbp 16:01:27 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:01:27 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/03/23-sdwbp-minutes.html phila 16:04:06 Agenda: www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:BP-Telecon20160323 16:04:26 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:BP-Telecon20160323 16:04:34 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:04:34 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/03/23-sdwbp-minutes.html phila