13:25:17 RRSAgent has joined #dwbp 13:25:17 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/03/04-dwbp-irc 13:25:19 RRSAgent, make logs 351 13:25:19 Zakim has joined #dwbp 13:25:21 Zakim, this will be DWBP 13:25:21 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 13:25:22 Meeting: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference 13:25:22 Date: 04 March 2016 13:55:11 riccardoAlbertoni has joined #DWBP 13:58:03 riccardoAlbertoni has joined #DWBP 13:58:40 present+ deirdre 14:00:21 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20160304 14:00:41 chair: deirdrelee 14:01:27 antoine has joined #dwbp 14:02:20 present+ antoine 14:02:50 annette_g has joined #dwbp 14:03:23 present+ annette_g 14:03:29 present+ riccardoAlbertoni 14:03:36 present+ newton 14:04:02 present+ phila 14:04:06 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:04:09 chair: Dee 14:05:18 ericstephan has joined #dwbp 14:05:28 present+ ericstephan 14:05:36 BernadetteLoscio has joined #dwbp 14:06:11 laufer has joined #dwbp 14:07:05 present+ hadleybeeman 14:07:08 zakim, pick a victim 14:07:08 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose newton 14:07:11 present+ laufer 14:07:41 present+ BernadetteLoscio 14:07:49 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20160304 14:07:52 Me too, hadleybeeman :-/ tryong to webex 14:08:08 deirdrelee: showing agenda. we're focusing today in our f2f meeting in Zagreb 14:08:28 ... the meeting will be our last f2f meeting 14:08:58 ... it will be an opportunity share and exchange information with SharePSI group 14:09:07 PROPOSED: Approve minutes of last week's meeting https://www.w3.org/2016/02/26-dwbp-minutes 14:09:10 +1 14:09:13 +1 14:09:14 +1 14:09:14 +1 14:09:17 +1 14:09:20 +0 absent 14:09:30 RESOLVED: Approve minutes of last week's meeting https://www.w3.org/2016/02/26-dwbp-minutes 14:09:31 +1 14:09:49 my name is missing .. 14:09:58 but it is not a big probelm 14:10:00 yes 14:10:06 +1 14:10:11 it could be .. 14:10:12 present+ antoine 14:10:15 I was absent 14:11:06 deirdrelee: get updates from each of the vocabularies 14:11:09 present+ yaso 14:11:20 ... where we are, the plans for the coming weeks 14:11:32 ... let's discuss DUV vocabulary first 14:12:19 ericstephan: our goal to next weeks is to make sure that we have the issues resolved before the f2f 14:12:22 q+ 14:12:41 open issues https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/open 14:12:45 scribe: yaso 14:13:06 changing scribing role to yaso (thanks yaso!) 14:13:19 ericstephan: we received a lot of comments on the citation model 14:13:26 no problem, newton 14:13:47 ack newton 14:13:51 :-) 14:14:07 deirdrelee: on the data usage vocab, any comments? 14:14:42 deirdrelee: if we can get a final version of these issues closed to zagreb, that would be awesome 14:14:45 http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html 14:15:19 I had a FB exchange with Robin Berjon this week... who was looking at https://research.science.ai/article/web-first-data-citations . Said he'd seen DUV but didn't really understand it. 14:15:32 riccardoAlbertoni: the issues that are open, I tried to write a proposal on this 14:15:57 Robin also said he'd talked to the editors, but still didn't get it. I'm not sure how to help sort this out? 14:16:13 q+ 14:16:16 ... I dont think we will close all the issues by then 14:16:27 ack antoine 14:17:02 antoine: I would like to raise the point of some external comments that we have 14:17:16 ... the issues that came from external people, 14:17:30 q+ 14:17:37 ... this way we may close some of issues, at least the day of the face to face 14:17:38 ack phila 14:17:59 q+ 14:18:06 phila: by the time we leave zagreb all the issues on the 3 docs have to be closed 14:18:22 ... so antoine, please write to that people so we can close the issues 14:19:16 antoine: we received one e-mail that we did not touched yet, there also a couple of discussions that are extremely long 14:20:02 ... the discussion we have was extremely constructive, so that where we are now 14:20:03 q? 14:20:09 ack deirdrelee 14:20:26 deirdrelee: makes sense to address the issues during the week 14:20:37 ... so we can get them on their way before the meeting 14:21:04 ericstephan_ has joined #dwbp 14:21:35 deirdrelee: thinking in terms of the agenda for zagreb, we can focus on the best practices as well, but on the time dedicated to the vocabs, 14:21:35 ] 14:22:01 q+ 14:22:01 ... we have to work on the vocabs because they have more issues open 14:22:12 ack phila 14:22:29 q+ 14:22:31 q+ 14:22:53 phila: the share psi people will be there on Tuesday, so we can think in terms of a day and a half 14:23:12 -> https://www.w3.org/2013/share-psi/wiki/Zagreb/social 14:23:21 ack BernadetteLoscio 14:23:33 BernadetteLoscio: wanted to talk about zagreb 14:23:44 antoine: to talk about vocabs and zagreb 14:23:57 deirdrelee: topic: ZAGREB 14:24:20 phila: look at the link so you can acknowledge when people are arriving and leaving 14:24:57 ... there'll be some external interest, and my expectation for this afternoon is talking about evidence of implementation 14:25:00 q+ 14:25:26 ... the motivation to put sharepsi and dwbp together is to ease the evidence of implementation talk 14:25:41 BernadetteLoscio: we can also estimate how long we will be in the discussion 14:26:02 q+ 14:26:11 deirdrelee: our focus should be about closing issues, the more ready we can be until zagreb better 14:26:18 https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Comment_tracker_status 14:26:22 ... tks BernadetteLoscio for the idea 14:27:02 BernadetteLoscio: I made a table at wiki, w/ the tracker comments, so the idea is to have an ideia of how long discussions will take 14:27:14 .. and I think qwe could do the same for the vocabs 14:27:23 s/qwe/we/g 14:28:09 lots of noise, someone typing really hard 14:28:11 +1 to antoine 14:28:26 +1 14:28:31 antoine, can you write down what you've sair? I lost it 14:28:37 Sorry :-/ 14:28:39 s/sair/said 14:28:58 ack antoine 14:28:59 I said it would be good to have some parallel sessions to start the F2F to be sure we can have prepared plenary 14:29:01 ack deirdrelee 14:29:19 thanks, antoine ! 14:29:20 Having the plenary discss everything may be counter-productive as we've got very diverse issues 14:29:56 phila: we can have an extra room if we need it 14:30:00 ack laufer 14:30:01 q? 14:30:11 laufer: what we expect from zagreb 14:30:28 ... I want to know from phila if we still have time for a new bp 14:30:55 phila: if you it ready before the zagreb, and the editors acknowledge that 14:31:06 q+ 14:31:09 laufer: but we would not have comments from public 14:31:35 phila: if you got the evidence, examples and all, then the group can have a look at it, and theres no process that says you can't 14:31:48 ack deirdrelee 14:31:54 deirdrelee: is something straightforward? 14:32:16 laufer: we have some best practices that talk about specific domains, for example specs for timetables, or feeds 14:32:46 ... when people want to publish a dataset, don't know if this can be a " data set type" 14:33:08 ... for example, the open transport is a way to distribute timetables 14:33:16 q+ 14:33:40 deirdrelee: so laufer you should send an email today, so we can see and analyze to solve this quickly 14:33:51 q+ 14:34:00 q+ 14:34:02 phila: I think we already got a BP for this, is "use standardized terms" 14:34:29 ... maybe you should include this on the use standardized terms, instead of a new BP for this 14:34:36 ack phila 14:34:46 q+ 14:34:47 ... SDW is a specialization of what this group is doing 14:35:09 deirdrelee: i don't want go down on this topic now... 14:35:13 ack laufer 14:35:16 laufer, 14:35:27 standard data model 14:35:39 laufer: its more than only using the terms. Is about an specific way of distributing the files 14:35:51 q- 14:35:55 q? 14:35:57 deirdrelee: we should move on to the BP doc 14:36:08 ack antoine 14:36:30 q+ 14:36:33 q+ 14:37:12 deirdrelee: for zagreb, what are our goals, BernadetteLoscio 14:37:13 ack BernadetteLoscio 14:38:04 BernadetteLoscio: what the SDW is doing is an extension, I think we should include their work in ours 14:38:05 q? 14:38:18 q- 14:38:20 phila: you got a lot of introductory material 14:38:23 q+ to talk about implementation report 14:38:33 open knowledge discussion on APIs and GTFS.... https://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-transport/2016-February/thread.html 14:38:45 ... you can just write "this doc is generic, please bare in mind" 14:39:01 ack newton 14:39:01 newton, you wanted to talk about implementation report 14:39:32 newton: about the BP doc, we need implementation, I'd like to know when we are going to start the implementation report 14:40:01 phila: I have to do this, and I'll do. What you need is people trying to use it 14:40:11 q? 14:40:12 ... i'll probably will do a google form for it 14:40:26 deirdrelee: coming back to the BP doc and editors plan 14:40:42 phila, should create an action to that? 14:40:56 I already have one 14:41:03 ... from the table that you've prepared, do you see that those are adressable? 14:41:17 BernadetteLoscio: the table is for the comment tracker 14:41:27 ok, let me know if I can help you with that 14:41:54 ... for external comments. Most of them are ok, I saw that annette_g sent a messagem about eric's comments, and I really hope that we can close this comments 14:41:56 It's my action-229, newton https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/229 14:42:08 ... because I should discuss the open issues at the f2f 14:42:20 q+ to offer some advice on time boxing 14:42:34 q+ 14:43:35 phila: the wg csv has been closed, and in their f2f they had a closed time to each issue 14:43:50 ack phila 14:43:50 phila, you wanted to offer some advice on time boxing 14:44:01 ... and if they don't resolve that in the closed minutes that goes to the end of the day 14:44:13 ... and it is a great way to work on issues 14:44:13 +1 to phila's recommendation.... that worked well with cvs on the web 14:44:22 +1 to phila 14:44:24 s/cvs/csv 14:44:41 q+ 14:44:49 ack deirdrelee 14:45:06 q+ 14:45:26 q- 14:45:39 deirdrelee: we have 27 open issues, and we will not have time at the f2f to solve all of them there, so we can try to close them and resolve the issues and comments in the next week 14:45:52 q+ 14:46:01 ... I know it's easier said than done, but 14:46:05 q- 14:46:15 ack annette_g 14:46:19 ... so giving resolutions should be priority to the editors 14:46:45 https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/open 14:46:52 q+ 14:46:58 deirdrelee: we have kind of putting aside the open actions 14:47:01 q- 14:47:16 ... but as the chairs of the group we are going thru that actions and see what can be closed or not 14:47:20 q? 14:47:38 deirdrelee: +1 to the idea :-) 14:47:56 its ok! 14:48:07 I'm gonna work full time on the BP doc next week 14:48:09 deirdrelee: we have to try to have as much as possible of things prepared to the f2f 14:49:00 yaso: there's nobody from the InWeb (data enrichment guys) on the call today 14:49:36 -> http://www.inweb.org.br/w3c/dataenrichment/ Draft Member Submission from InWeb 14:49:37 ... InWeb sent us an email asking if they could send to group a Member Submission with BP related to data enrichment 14:49:57 ... I don't know if we should talk about it without them on the meeting 14:50:29 deirdrelee: nobody feels very strong on it 14:50:32 q+ 14:50:45 -1 for dropping it 14:50:48 yaso: I would like to know what the group think 14:51:19 phila: to get this document to rec, we should proof that every BP is implemented 14:51:32 +1 14:51:34 ack phila 14:51:54 ... we might struggle to get the BPs of data enrichment implemented 14:51:57 phila: we might struggle to prove that it's been done in more that 1 place (about that BP) 14:52:04 q+ 14:52:14 ... we can flag that as "at risk" 14:53:18 deirdrelee: realistically, the inweb team has to provide examples, and take ownership on that 14:53:22 +1 Dee 14:53:24 agree 14:53:26 +1 14:53:33 q+ 14:53:39 ack deirdrelee 14:53:59 ack antoine 14:54:03 ack antoine 14:54:17 antoine: I can provide some examples of implementation on the data enrichment 14:54:51 .. the BP itself is alright, maybe a bit generic 14:55:26 deirdrelee: maybe is about removing the link between the member submission and the BP 14:55:43 ... and we can refer to the MS, but not necessarily 14:55:50 ... does that makes sense? 14:55:52 +1 14:55:56 q+ 14:56:00 BernadetteLoscio: I'm not sure 14:56:27 BernadetteLoscio: maybe the BP needs to be rewritten 14:56:30 ack BernadetteLoscio 14:56:35 q+ 14:56:39 deirdrelee: more comments? 14:56:40 ack antoine 14:56:41 ack antoine 14:56:57 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JvjrWMTpMIH7WnuieNqcT0zpJAXUPo6x4uMBj1pEx0Y/ 14:57:57 Ok, perfect, deirdrelee ! 14:58:11 q+ 14:58:16 ack BernadetteLoscio 14:58:37 BernadetteLoscio: I think that this should not be a decision of the editors 14:58:40 q+ 14:59:03 +1 to BernadetteLoscio 14:59:29 +1 BernadetteLoscio 15:00:18 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:00:18 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/03/04-dwbp-minutes.html phila 15:00:39 deirdrelee: next friday: preps for zagreb 15:01:08 :) 15:01:10 :) 15:01:11 cool!!! 15:01:12 phila: people told me that they like what they are doing 15:01:15 :-) 15:01:19 :):) 15:01:23 :) 15:01:24 nice :) 15:01:25 cool!!! 15:01:29 ... so I'm optimistic and happy etc 15:01:29 bye 15:01:31 :-) 15:01:32 thanks yaso for scribing and deirdre for chairing :) 15:01:32 bye 1 15:01:33 bye!! 15:01:34 bye all... 15:01:35 bye 15:01:35 Bye all!!! 15:01:37 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:01:37 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/03/04-dwbp-minutes.html phila 15:01:38 bye all! 16:59:32 annette_g has joined #dwbp 17:26:16 Zakim has left #dwbp 18:44:37 yaso has joined #dwbp 19:04:13 annette_g has joined #dwbp 19:07:21 annette_g has left #dwbp