21:05:02 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #webfonts
21:05:02 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/02/10-webfonts-irc
21:05:04 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
21:05:04 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #webfonts
21:05:06 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 3668
21:05:06 <Zakim> I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot
21:05:07 <trackbot> Meeting: WebFonts Working Group Teleconference
21:05:07 <trackbot> Date: 10 February 2016
21:05:14 <ChrisL> ChrisL has joined #webfonts
21:05:21 <Vlad> scribenick: RSheeter
21:05:24 <RSheeter> Enter The Chris
21:06:39 <ChrisL> https://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/DoC/issues-2015.html
21:06:47 <RSheeter> Topic: disposition of comments on WOFF 2.0
21:07:11 <RSheeter> https://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/DoC/issues-2015.html
21:10:05 <Phill> Phill has joined #webfonts
21:10:13 <ChrisL> https://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/DoC/issues-2015.html#issue-6
21:10:28 <ChrisL> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2015May/0041.html
21:12:27 <RSheeter> Topic: CTS Review
21:12:48 <RSheeter> Wherein the colors of text may be changed
21:13:10 <RSheeter> (red – need WG review/input, grey – not yet implemented, black – done)
21:14:28 <RSheeter> https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#mustRejectInvalidBase128
21:14:47 <RSheeter> Rod: not entirely sure tests cover all specified scenarios. We do have some tests here.
21:17:48 <ChrisL> oh, oops sorry!
21:17:49 <RSheeter> action rsheeter Check UA test https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#mustRejectInvalidBase128
21:17:50 <trackbot> Created ACTION-195 - Check ua test https://www.w3.org/fonts/wg/wiki/testplan20-useragent#mustrejectinvalidbase128 [on Roderick Sheeter - due 2016-02-17].
21:19:05 <RSheeter> https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#mustAcceptAllTransforms
21:20:38 <RSheeter> https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#mustLoadFontCollection
21:20:44 <RSheeter> Vlad: contingent on browser support
21:21:28 <RSheeter> ChrisL: they don't and it hasn't been entirely clear how they should to date
21:25:05 <ChrisL> ah okay, good that OTS has the support
21:26:37 <Phill> Phill has left #webfonts
21:26:44 <RSheeter> (discussion of whether any browser supports, what might be needed to make it happen)
21:27:01 <RSheeter> ChrisL: I have created a normative reference for how to refer to fonts in a collection
21:27:04 <RSheeter> (link?)
21:27:57 <ChrisL> https://github.com/svgeesus/ietf-justfont/commit/b47e71a16040ea7d4e837287b968dd80f61caa71
21:28:03 <kuettel_> kuettel_ has joined #webfonts
21:28:29 <RSheeter> (pause for reduction in wishy washy)
21:31:38 <ChrisL> <t hangText="Fragment Identifiers">Optional, for collections encoded as WOFF 2.0. A positive integer.
21:31:38 <ChrisL> +    For example, #2 refers to the second font
21:31:38 <ChrisL> +    in the collection. If a fragment is not specified, it is the same as #1 i.e. the first font
21:31:38 <ChrisL> +    in the collection (or the only font, if it is not a collection). If a fragment is specified, and
21:31:39 <ChrisL> +    the WOFF does not encode a collection, the fragment is ignored.</t>
21:32:50 <RSheeter> https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#mustBeRejected-FailTransform
21:34:33 <RSheeter> (needs revision; refers to transform 3 as invalid but 3 is now valid)
21:34:43 <RSheeter> Vlad: points out that 1 and 2 are undefined still and thus usable
21:37:48 <RSheeter> https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#mustCheckLSBFlags
21:41:52 <RSheeter> https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-AuthoringTool#mustClearEmptyBBox, needs description
21:44:22 <RSheeter> action vlad Review treatment of empty glyphs vs 0-contour glyphs
21:44:22 <trackbot> Created ACTION-196 - Review treatment of empty glyphs vs 0-contour glyphs [on Vladimir Levantovsky - due 2016-02-17].
21:44:54 <KenLundeAdobe> Adobe Blank: https://github.com/adobe-fonts/adobe-blank
21:45:18 <KenLundeAdobe> Adobe Blank 2 (uses the Format 13 'cmap' subtable): https://github.com/adobe-fonts/adobe-blank-2
21:47:20 <RSheeter> (discussion of AT LSB tests)
21:47:51 <RSheeter> Vlad: test verifies collections with hmtx shared are handled intelligently (only xform if valid for all pairings)
21:51:36 <RSheeter> action sergeym Investigate font collections; how are glyf/hmtx shared in practice
21:51:36 <trackbot> Created ACTION-197 - Investigate font collections; how are glyf/hmtx shared in practice [on Sergey Malkin - due 2016-02-17].
21:53:59 <RSheeter> Topic: Action Items
21:55:37 <RSheeter> action-186?
21:55:37 <trackbot> action-186 -- Roderick Sheeter to Try time (decode) and size for null glyf/loca xform vs regular vs woff1 -- due 2016-03-02 -- OPEN
21:55:37 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/186
21:55:50 <RSheeter> (kicked date out a few weeks)
21:57:16 <RSheeter> Vlad: There was some question of face to face. After discussion, no immediate need for face to face
21:57:25 <RSheeter> Topic: Other Topics
21:57:44 <RSheeter> zakim, list attendees
21:57:44 <Zakim> As of this point the attendees have been (no one)
21:57:49 <Vlad> Regrets: Khaled
21:57:58 <RSheeter> present+ sergeym
21:58:01 <RSheeter> present+ kuettel
21:58:01 <Vlad> present+
21:58:03 <RSheeter> present+
21:58:07 <RSheeter> present+ chrisl
21:58:18 <RSheeter> present+ kenlundeadobe, jfkthame
21:58:21 <RSheeter> zakim, list attendees
21:58:21 <Zakim> As of this point the attendees have been sergeym, kuettel, Vlad, RSheeter, chrisl, kenlundeadobe, jfkthame
21:58:32 <RSheeter> present+ MysteryObservers
21:58:44 <RSheeter> chair: vlad
21:58:45 <RSheeter> rrsagent, make minutes
21:58:45 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/02/10-webfonts-minutes.html RSheeter
21:59:05 <jfkthame> jfkthame has left #webfonts