17:31:40 RRSAgent has joined #aria 17:31:40 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/01/28-aria-irc 17:31:42 RRSAgent, make logs world 17:31:42 Zakim has joined #aria 17:31:44 Zakim, this will be 17:31:44 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 17:31:45 Meeting: Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group Teleconference 17:31:45 Date: 28 January 2016 17:31:49 chair: Rich 17:31:59 Meeting: W3C ARIA Working Group 17:32:06 RRSAgent, make log public 17:32:22 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Jan/0146.html 17:33:36 jamesn has joined #aria 17:33:46 present+ Rich_Schwerdtfeger 17:33:52 JF has joined #aria 17:34:00 Present+ JF 17:35:23 present+ AmeliaBR 17:35:38 present+ LJWatson 17:37:16 jongund has joined #aria 17:39:46 present+ jongund 17:41:22 present+ fesch 17:41:51 mck has joined #aria 17:42:08 scribe: janina 17:42:23 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Jan/0146.html 17:42:47 https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/decision-policy 17:42:49 topic: Draft Decision Policy 17:42:57 rs: Will be issuing a CfC 17:43:08 rs: ARIA policy is in sync with APA's 17:43:26 topic: Testing 17:43:43 public-aria-test@w3.org 17:43:45 rs: More coordination still needed but 17:43:56 rs: Above is a test email list/archive for ARIA 17:44:17 rs: Will try to keep test meetings at a minimum 17:44:38 rs: Looking to coordinate with Steve Faulkner and with SVG 17:45:05 bgaraventa1979 has joined #aria 17:45:16 rs: We will not be applying host language restrictions in our testing 17:45:24 present+ Bryan_Garaventa 17:46:30 present+ Joanmarie_Diggs 17:47:02 Stefan has joined #aria 17:47:03 mk: Is email list also for those writing test cases? 17:47:05 rs: Yes 17:48:36 topic: Action 1380 & 1700 17:48:46 action-1380? 17:48:46 action-1380 -- Richard Schwerdtfeger to #presentation should mention aria-hidden vs presentation role on raster and vector images in relation to ACTION-1379 -- due 2016-01-28 -- OPEN 17:48:46 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/1380 17:48:51 action-1700? 17:48:51 Sorry, but action-1700 does not exist. 17:49:06 Q+ to ask about subscribing to that new mailing list - details? 17:49:21 rs: What happens with ARIA-Hidden vs Role=None or =Presentation 17:49:42 rs: Webkit handles differently 17:50:19 rs: Tried adding TAB Index inside an SVG; Didn't work 17:50:48 rs: For now we will treat as a single graphic 17:50:54 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Jan/0136.html 17:51:12 rs: Please consider if OK 17:51:14 q+ 17:51:37 q? 17:52:26 jf: Asking about test list -- how to subscribe ... 17:52:32 mc: I will get it documented 17:52:40 ack JF 17:52:40 JF, you wanted to ask about subscribing to that new mailing list - details? 17:52:49 Amelia's detailed comments: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Jan/0148.html 17:52:53 q+ 17:53:03 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria-test/ 17:54:00 ab: Wondering whether belongs in HTML Mapping? 17:54:21 ab: HTML clear that image is different from object/iframe 17:54:39 ab: No api for HTML image 17:55:12 q+ 17:56:12 ab: Suggesting adding recommendations for UAs to do smart things when authors haven't fully marked up 17:56:39 ab: Would be good to know up front whether an image is supposedly a11y 17:57:09 rs: That would be an HTML-WG responsibility 17:57:11 q? 17:57:23 ack me 17:57:33 q+ 17:57:58 rs: Perhaps some guidance rs: Is there timeline for next HTML spec? 17:58:03 lw: no 17:59:14 jn: Noting a language nit on vector graphics -- which could be raster 17:59:18 LJWatson has joined #aria 18:00:13 ab: Treated as object regardless 18:00:30 RESOLUTION: Accept RS' text with some editorial changes so not specific to SVG image 18:00:40 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Jan/0136.html 18:01:38 mk: Still looking at the language -- "refer" seems ambiguous -- Phps ... 18:01:50 mk: We need Amelia's point to be more clearly made 18:02:15 mk: e.g. why all child elements of SVG ignored ?? 18:02:38 rs: Didn't note no keyboard because it's an inert object 18:02:56 rs: We can't get at the children because of how browsers treat the object 18:03:07 cyns has joined #aria 18:03:49 mk: Aren't we saying all children of an object become a static string? 18:04:08 rs: No, because other browsers don't expose -- so you get nothing 18:04:33 mk: Can we say what the effect is? Seems so complex now. 18:06:08 q+ 18:06:44 mk: Why not simply say "an image is treated as a single object regardless whether it contains child elements" 18:06:55 rs: That would work 18:07:32 mk: What do we do with the inverse/ When you want children accessible? 18:07:38 rs: Read further into the text ... 18:08:17 mk: Not seeing the text ... 18:08:21 When the is used to refer to either a raster image (e.g. ) or a vector graphics image it is treated as a single entity with all descendant elements being presentational. This is regardless of whether the target graphic has descendant elements that would normally be exposed to assistive technologies, such as with an SVG document. Consequently, using a role=“presentation” or 18:08:21 role=“none” on an element is equivalent to using aria-hidden=“true”. If it is possible to make the descendant elements accessible the author SHOULD embed the document directly within the host document without it being referred to by . 18:09:04 rs: Suggest word smithing on telecon is not best use of our time ... 18:09:08 mk: Can take to list 18:09:17 rrsagent, make minutes 18:09:17 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/01/28-aria-minutes.html janina 18:10:41 Two main points to cover: an img is a single entity, regardless of type of image file; if you want an image's contents to be accessible, embed using ,