15:32:04 RRSAgent has joined #wai-wcag 15:32:04 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/01/19-wai-wcag-irc 15:32:06 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:32:08 Zakim, this will be WAI_WCAG 15:32:08 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 15:32:09 Meeting: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference 15:32:09 Date: 19 January 2016 15:32:19 zakim, agenda? 15:32:19 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda: 15:32:20 1. Virtual FtF planning (duration? Video?) [from Joshue108] 15:32:20 2. TPAC meeting planning [from Joshue108] 15:32:20 3. UAAG/ATAG update [from Joshue108] 15:32:21 4. Survey (Same one as last week, but the first question has been changed and a final question added): https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20161stSurvey/ [from Joshue108] 15:32:21 5. Github issues walkthru. https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues [from Joshue108] 15:32:37 zakim, clear agenda 15:32:37 agenda cleared 15:32:50 agenda+ Extension document comment survey (https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/Ext_req_comments/) 15:33:00 agenda+ Survey (Items 3-5 only): https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20161stSurvey/ 15:33:09 agenda+ Github issues walkthru. https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues 15:36:09 Chair: Joshue 15:37:28 david_000 has joined #wai-wcag 15:41:12 david_000_ has joined #wai-wcag 15:49:45 Scribe list: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Scribe_List 15:56:17 laura has joined #wai-wcag 16:02:37 Kathy has joined #wai-wcag 16:03:07 Sarah_Swierenga has joined #wai-wcag 16:03:07 adam_solomon has joined #wai-wcag 16:03:51 present +Kathy 16:03:54 jon_avila has joined #wai-wcag 16:06:27 Mike_Elledge has joined #wai-wcag 16:07:35 present+ Laura 16:07:40 Scribe: Laura 16:07:46 Zakim, next item 16:07:46 agendum 1. "Extension document comment survey (https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/Ext_req_comments/)" taken up [from Joshue108] 16:08:38 +1 16:08:45 jamesn has joined #wai-wcag 16:08:55 JOC: Extensions being optional has caused some controversy. 16:09:03 rrsagent, make minutes 16:09:03 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/01/19-wai-wcag-minutes.html jamesn 16:10:05 +1 16:10:23 JOC: Reads proposed replcement form the survey. 16:10:35 +1 16:10:37 +1 16:10:45 …it removes “optoional”. 16:11:28 Adam: Is there a risk that people may be confused and think extensions are required? 16:11:37 JOC: Maybe. 16:12:59 q+ 16:13:01 JOC: we need to review verbiage. Recent twitter storm. 16:13:01 q+ 16:13:29 ack mike 16:14:46 Mike: When talk about extensions and tightening them is it a requirement or optional? 16:15:35 q+ 16:15:53 …depends on intention. 16:16:28 JOC: Indended as a modular bridging technology. 16:16:30 ack james 16:17:22 +1 to James and Adam 16:17:42 James: Risk of removing “optional” with policy makers. 16:18:20 ack dav 16:18:35 JOC: Potentially an overhead. 16:19:05 q? 16:19:07 David: explains history from 2014. 16:19:10 Srinivasu has joined #wai-wcag 16:19:18 q+ 16:19:31 }Srini 16:19:40 +Srini 16:21:08 David: Twitterstorm with “optional” versus 2.1. Doesn’t think it will solve the complete twitterstorm. 16:21:53 Though we don't say it's NOT optional, but somewhere we may need to clarify it's required or optional... Else people keep asking. 16:21:53 JOC: People want WCAG 3. But we work in a deliberate way. 16:22:06 …More food for thought. 16:22:39 RESOLUTION: Leave open. 16:23:33 q+ 16:23:55 JOC: Asks MichaelC opinion 16:24:29 MichaelC: Can live with dropping it. 16:25:01 Kathy: Dropping the word doesn’t make it required. 16:25:22 +1 16:25:28 …doesn’t disagree with anyone. 16:25:53 I'd like to see some formal comments rather than just conjecture on twitter 16:27:10 Kathy: How we label the extensions may be the problem. 16:27:24 q? 16:27:40 …who are your audiences an who are we trying to reach? 16:27:53 JOC: This is the draft. 16:28:02 I'm OK if we want extensions to be optional but there is someway we need to tell community that extensions are in addition to WCAG and they are really needed to consider. if not all, some of them are sort of required. 16:28:25 JOC: What is going to be the driver for people to adopt the extensions? 16:28:27 ack adam 16:28:55 Reason I am a bit worried about "optional" is if we say optional, folks don't use it to most... then all the work being done by task forces may not get enough value. 16:29:21 Adam: Not against removing word “optional” if we have a replacement. 16:29:30 …needs to be documented. 16:29:49 ack dav 16:30:37 David: The word optional isn’t the best word. 16:30:50 marcjohlic has joined #wai-wcag 16:31:18 …would like to remove the word. 16:32:37 JOC: Happy to see the term removed and replaced with other nomenclature. 16:32:39 q? 16:33:29 Adam: agree with Davis. Needs to be clearer. 16:33:44 '"Extensions are stand alone standards modules that build on the existing requirements for WCAG 2.0, and extensions are designed to work in harmony with the WCAG 2.0 standard." 16:35:19 Adam: Extensions build on WCAG. 16:35:26 https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-wcag2-ext-req-20160105/ 16:36:29 '"Extensions are stand alone standards modules that build on the existing requirements for WCAG 2.0, and extensions are designed to work in harmony with the WCAG 2.0 standard." 16:36:44 q+ 16:37:26 q+ 16:38:06 ack mike 16:38:10 Adam: would work for him. Replace the word. 16:38:13 It sets requirements for WCAG 2.0 extensions, which are modules that add accessibility guidance to the base of WCAG 2.0 for those who claim conformance to WCAG plus the extension.. 16:38:13 q+ 16:38:31 q+ 16:38:39 Mike suggests text - not mandatory but strongly recommended. 16:38:42 ack mich 16:39:24 MichaelC: 2 instances of the word optional. Not worth the heartburn. 16:39:44 …we need to come up with wording. 16:41:05 ack kathy 16:41:11 …only worry about the abstract. 16:41:17 ack me 16:41:51 ack dav 16:42:48 q? 16:42:54 "Extensions are standards modules that build on the existing requirements for WCAG 2.0, and extensions are designed to work in harmony with the WCAG 2.0 standard." 16:42:55 and 16:42:55 "It sets requirements for WCAG 2.0 extensions, modules that add accessibility guidance to the base of WCAG 2.0." 16:43:39 Mike: we need some kind of language regarding conformance. 16:43:58 JOC: Leave open for now. 16:43:59 q 16:44:01 q? 16:44:20 Zakim, next item 16:44:20 agendum 2. "Survey (Items 3-5 only): https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20161stSurvey/" taken up [from Joshue108] 16:45:06 Extensions are standards modules that build on the existing requirements for WCAG 2.0, and extensions are designed to work in harmony with the WCAG 2.0. standard, for those who claim conformance to them. 16:45:13 adam_solomon has joined #wai-wcag 16:47:37 Issue 99 16:47:53 https://github.com/DavidMacDonald/wcag/commit/e0c2bb38578ebd35f6f5071b0752c73435251c77 16:47:54 TOPIC: ISSUE 99 16:48:20 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20161stSurvey/results#xi99 16:48:54 David: Trying to do some harmonization 16:49:10 David: Has a pull request. 16:49:25 https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/99 16:49:47 …basically a failure. 16:50:34 q? 16:52:36 Mike: Okay with 14 and 17. 16:54:19 JOC: Reads AWK survey comment. 16:54:23 q? 16:54:57 David: no recommendations in the failure tech. 16:56:40 David: each page is marked up separately. 16:56:53 q? 16:57:05 David: we have 23 techniques. 16:58:22 q? 16:58:42 TOPIC: Issue 108 16:58:45 https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/108 16:59:04 ACTION: David to add related tech and verify artifact in Fauilure. 16:59:04 'David' is an ambiguous username. Please try a different identifier, such as family name or username (e.g., dmacdona, dsloan). 17:00:21 https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/108 17:00:39 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20161stSurvey/results#xi108 17:01:31 SCR37: Creating Custom Dialogs in a Device Independent Way 17:01:35 https://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20081211/SCR37 17:01:44 https://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20081211/SCR36 17:01:49 SCR36: Providing a mechanism to allow users to display moving, scrolling, or auto-updating text in a static window or area 17:01:55 Jon: WE need to make sure we are focused. 17:02:13 https://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20081211/SCR26 17:02:17 SCR26: Inserting dynamic content into the Document Object Model immediately following its trigger element 17:04:22 James: Seems like busy work. 17:05:19 JOC: not seeing compelling reason to merge them. 17:07:38 Jon: We could improve situations more. 17:07:54 …Technique needs updating if to be kept separate. There are differences when there are one dialog on a page, or multiple dialog. Focus management need may vary depending on how the dialog is open. So this could describe those situations better. 17:08:40 RESOLUTION: Leave open. 17:09:12 TOPIC: Issue 109 17:09:21 https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/109 17:09:31 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20161stSurvey/results#xi109 17:10:38 https://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20081211/SCR19 17:11:07 Adam: Explains background. 17:11:30 …Proposed response: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/109#issuecomment-136608790 17:14:24 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:14:24 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/01/19-wai-wcag-minutes.html yatil 17:15:16 Jon: Test procedure limited. Does not apply to dynamic content. 17:15:28 https://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20081211/SCR19 17:15:35 q? 17:16:38 Adam: Re-reads procedure. no mention of focus. 17:17:04 Jon: Test procedure needs to be updated. 17:17:52 JOC: Adam may need to update. 17:18:21 ACTION: Adam Solomon to create updated technique for SCR19 17:18:21 'Adam' is an ambiguous username. Please try a different identifier, such as family name or username (e.g., padam2, asolomon, azerner). 17:19:02 TOPIC: ISSUE 133 17:19:04 https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/133 17:19:15 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20161stSurvey/results#xi133 17:20:47 MichaelC: Would prefer if we are going to change, we should do it in a blanket way. 17:22:08 MichaelC: Can live with it going though. 17:22:52 JOC: Thanks everyone. 17:22:58 zakim, agenda? 17:22:58 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda: 17:22:59 2. Survey (Items 3-5 only): https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20161stSurvey/ [from Joshue108] 17:22:59 3. Github issues walkthru. https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues [from Joshue108] 17:23:19 bye! Feel better! 17:24:44 rrsagent, make minutes 17:24:44 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/01/19-wai-wcag-minutes.html laura 17:26:48 s/Davis./David./ 17:27:11 rrsagent, make minutes 17:27:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/01/19-wai-wcag-minutes.html laura 18:17:04 yatil has joined #wai-wcag