15:57:24 RRSAgent has joined #coga 15:57:24 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/01/11-coga-irc 16:04:23 regrets:Chaohai Ding , E.A. Draffan, Ayelet seeman,john 16:04:30 agenda: this 16:04:32 agenda+ review actions, and timelines 16:04:33 agenda+ Next ftf ideas (TPAC and Katie suggestion) 16:04:35 agenda+ Issue papers - GA 16:04:36 agenda+ Techniques - GA 16:04:38 agenda+ Other issue papers 16:04:39 agenda+ be done 16:04:46 regrets:Chaohai Ding , E.A. Draffan, Ayelet seeman,John Rochford 16:59:08 EA has joined #coga 17:04:02 ddahl has joined #coga 17:04:25 Mike_Pluke has joined #coga 17:06:06 maryjom has joined #coga 17:07:25 scribe: EA 17:07:43 next items: 17:07:48 next item: 17:07:51 Review of timeline 17:08:24 Deadlined end of Month Jan 2016 freeze all the content going into the gap analysis - first working draft 17:08:25 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #coga 17:08:35 present+ Rich_Schwerdtfeger 17:08:47 Stop working on it whilst content is ported by Lisa and Michael 17:09:16 Still go on working on issue papers that are outstanding whilst this porting is occurring 17:10:01 need to have enough in the working draft that people can see what we are working on 17:10:32 Lisa hopes that by July 2016 all the issue papers will be complete 17:11:27 Issue papers, summary of those papers and the table of user needs plus techniques completed and draft of extension proposal 17:11:58 present+ janina 17:13:01 EA: slide project will be a great implmention and will identify gaps in what we are doing 17:13:27 present+ Debbie_Dahl 17:14:13 Lisa suggested that we also need to discuss epub and the extension for ARIA - need to add to techniques 17:15:30 Lisa is moving now to the sub groups - Mike to give a summary of WCAG proposal 17:15:45 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Proposal_for_WCAG 17:16:21 Mike said that they had completed a full overview of the document - may need revisiting 17:16:50 Lisa said they were checking for the notion of making it testable and widely adaptible 17:17:15 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Gap_Analysis_Summary 17:17:39 Other two subgroups - next on summary Janina and Rich - nearly fiinished this task - say 70% complete 17:18:18 Kurt_M has joined #coga 17:18:59 Mary Jo to add some solutions... Rich has made some comments but still feels more needs to be done to make it easier for others to read. 17:20:10 Layout issues arose - positioning of techniques and issues cropped up 17:20:29 q+ 17:21:25 hi kurt - we are looking at https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Gap_Analysis_Summary#Overview_of_techniques 17:21:41 Thanks 17:25:13 Rich said we need to 'paint a picture of the problem' lack of research, lack of 'personalisable' web at this stage, content modification, lack of standards for these and other aspects, build services to support needs - gaps shown and then offer techniques - People on the whole do not grasp the whole problem 17:25:16 q? 17:25:25 q 17:25:27 ack rich 17:26:35 Mike agreed with much of what had been said - offer alternate options but can offer low tech fall back options - not all or nothing and Rich agreed 17:28:09 Lisa pointed out that this was a summary of issues and the techniques with a table of the user needs 17:32:49 ea: should we write the introduction now 17:32:59 or fiurst finihsh the summary 17:33:30 q? 17:35:09 Janina suggested finishing the draft and then consider writing the draft of the overall picture 17:35:52 Michael feels it is important to have an introduction - Lisa has Rich to help at the moment 17:36:01 action: Lisa and Rich write a introduction for gap annalisis 17:36:01 Created ACTION-149 - And rich write a introduction for gap annalisis [on Lisa Seeman - due 2016-01-18]. 17:38:04 Lisa asked whether we should keep the papers as issue papers rather than topics? 17:39:13 Issues paper are exploratory items - Michael felt that the name was not a problem and Rich agreed 17:41:49 Rich commented that we need to make things more easily found - bring solutions higher up the order and not have to deal with all the research. 17:42:16 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Gap_Analysis_Summary 17:46:13 Discussion about cross links and the need to summarise the main points and then people go out to get extra information. 17:49:45 Rich commented that more needs to be brought into the section but it is not easy to make consumable 17:51:06 Lisa suggested that some headings are confusing with some that are repeated - needs to be revisited. 17:52:39 Lisa went on to look at the poll regarding the meetings to be help - Austin USA seems to be the only one that has 6 people which is not quorum - need 8 + people. 17:52:53 http://doodle.com/poll/yfhxc4qx3bxku47g 17:54:13 chaals has joined #coga 17:55:17 Janina and Michael felt that it was more about who was going to be attending the most important factor 17:57:34 ddahl has left #coga 17:58:32 Lisa went on to the development of a table of user needs - Kurt and Tony - time pressures not so great as the summary. 17:59:29 q? 18:00:22 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Proposal_for_WCAG 18:00:41 is it perscriptive? 18:01:09 Lisa asked everyone to look at the Proposal for WCAG to check that it is sufficiently prescriptive. 18:01:12 rrsagent, make logs public 18:01:23 rrsagent, create minutes 18:01:23 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/01/11-coga-minutes.html Lisa_Seeman 18:01:57 zakim, please part 18:01:57 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been Rich_Schwerdtfeger, janina, Debbie_Dahl 18:01:57 Zakim has left #coga 18:05:45 rrsagent, please part 18:05:45 I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2016/01/11-coga-actions.rdf : 18:05:45 ACTION: Lisa and Rich write a introduction for gap annalisis [1] 18:05:45 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/01/11-coga-irc#T17-36-01