13:59:53 RRSAgent has joined #dpub-aria 13:59:53 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/01/07-dpub-aria-irc 14:00:04 zakim, this is DPUB-ARIA 14:00:04 got it, tzviya 14:00:21 rrsagent, make logs public 14:00:33 present+ tzviya 14:01:05 present+ janina 14:01:44 agenda 14:01:53 s/agenda/agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dpub-aria/2016Jan/0000.html 14:01:59 chair: tzviya 14:06:20 mgylling has joined #dpub-aria 14:07:47 topic: publication schedule 14:08:40 tzviya: current schedule is DPUB-ARIA goes to CR in Feb 14:08:49 -> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/project ARIA publication planning 14:10:08 michael: pushing DPUB out a few months is not much of an issue 14:10:35 markus: we want another WD before CR 14:11:14 markus: we are hoping to adopt @role in 3.1 wholesale. 3.1 comes to a close later this year 14:11:32 ...DPUB-ARIA does not need to be rec at that point, but it needs to be close 14:11:43 ...What is minimum time for WD? 14:11:53 michael: we try to give 6-8 weeks 14:12:57 markus: If we get new WD out in March, +2 months for review, and CR work in May 14:13:35 micahel: WD in March would be psuedo last call, so we should be cautious with it 14:13:57 markus: we need to be sure that all the uses of epub:type are covered 14:14:32 michael: do you expect that you'll be able to meet CR exit requirements with new roles? 14:14:48 markus: same as all the other roles 14:15:12 ivan: How does this connect to mapping? 14:16:02 michael: for now the mapping document is tied to core testing 14:16:24 tzviya: changes to DPUB-ARIA need to be reflected in DPUB-AAM 14:17:00 michael: assign actions to joseph/rich. May resurrect some sanity checking tools to automate the process 14:18:04 tzviya: talk to rich about AAM schedule 14:19:07 topic: Additional roles essential to the future of EPUB 14:20:29 tzviya: We will add a few roles to ensure that epub:type can be comfortably replaced 14:23:56 matt: we need some clarity on best move forward for *ref 14:24:47 mgylling_ has joined #dpub-aria 14:24:56 ivan: I haven't seen discussion about rel vs. links since TPAC. Where has this been discussed? 14:25:51 micahel: discuss with HTML TF or APA 14:27:01 tzviya: there is an issue on DPUB GH requesting yet more *ref (tableref etc). Hesitate to add more, but we need more 14:27:15 Janina: Need to look at support for rel 14:27:31 Ivan: That is one issue, but also look at who owns the registry 14:28:03 ...and look at clashes 14:29:28 michael: there is concern about overloading as well 14:34:53 markus: please add us to an APA call so that we can raise this issue once and for all 14:36:17 janina: set for APA on 20 Jan and HTML TF on 21 Jan 14:36:48 ...it would be useful due forensic reading in advance 14:37:31 topic: moving "doc-footnote" into core 14:38:05 markus: let's not worry about it for ARIA 1.1 14:38:45 ...We can deal with it in ARIA 1.2 and create an aliasing scheme in DPUB-ARIA if need be 14:44:59 rrsagent, make minutes 14:44:59 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/01/07-dpub-aria-minutes.html tzviya 14:52:34 tzviya has joined #dpub-aria