ISSUE-105: ssn:hasProperty and ssn:produces lost
frustration with specgen
ssn:hasProperty and ssn:produces lost
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Semantic Sensor Network Ontology
- Raised by:
- Kerry Taylor
- Opened on:
- 2016-12-09
- Description:
- Specgen has entirely lost ssn:hasProperty and ssn:produces in the ssn spec.
It might have lost other things too. This needs to be checked closely.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: [Minutes SSN] 2017 03 15 (from phila@w3.org on 2017-03-20)
- RE: [Minutes SSN] 2017 03 15 (from Simon.Cox@csiro.au on 2017-03-20)
- RE: [Minutes SSN] 2017 03 15 (from kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au on 2017-03-20)
- [Minutes SSN] 2017 03 15 (from phila@w3.org on 2017-03-15)
- Re: [public-sdw-wg] <none> (from jlieberman@tumblingwalls.com on 2017-03-14)
- Re: [public-sdw-wg] <none> (from jeremy.tandy@gmail.com on 2017-03-14)
- RE: [public-sdw-wg] <none> (from chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk on 2017-03-14)
- [public-sdw-wg] <none> (from Simon.Cox@csiro.au on 2017-03-14)
- Re: Agenda SSN meeting this week - 14-03-17 20:00 - 22:00 UTC (from ssimmons@opengeospatial.org on 2017-03-13)
- Agenda SSN meeting this week - 14-03-17 20:00 - 22:00 UTC (from armin.haller@anu.edu.au on 2017-03-13)
- RE: ssn ready for review (from kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au on 2016-12-15)
- Re: ssn ready for review (from rgarcia@fi.upm.es on 2016-12-14)
- Re: ssn ready for review (from janowicz@ucsb.edu on 2016-12-13)
- RE: ssn ready for review (from Simon.Cox@csiro.au on 2016-12-13)
- Re: ssn ready for review (from janowicz@ucsb.edu on 2016-12-13)
- Re: ssn ready for review (from rgarcia@fi.upm.es on 2016-12-13)
- RE: ssn ready for review (from Simon.Cox@csiro.au on 2016-12-13)
- Re: ssn ready for review (from danh.lephuoc@tu-berlin.de on 2016-12-13)
- Pull-request - some comments on SSN RE: ssn ready for review (from Simon.Cox@csiro.au on 2016-12-13)
- RE: ssn ready for review (from Simon.Cox@csiro.au on 2016-12-13)
- RE: ssn ready for review (from Simon.Cox@csiro.au on 2016-12-13)
- RE: ssn ready for review (from Simon.Cox@csiro.au on 2016-12-13)
- Re: ssn ready for review (from janowicz@ucsb.edu on 2016-12-12)
- Re: ssn ready for review (from janowicz@ucsb.edu on 2016-12-12)
- ssn ready for review (from kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au on 2016-12-12)
Related notes:
turns out it was not specgen's fault -- it has more to do with the provenance of the version of ssn that was used to generate the FPWD. I have updated issue 105 for the second PWD as follows
"Object properties ssn:isValueOf, ssn:produces and ssn:featureinObservation, along with a propertychain subproperty of produces and another propertychain subproperty of hasProperty, were introduced unintentionally in the FPWD. These have been removed here but could be reinstated if there is demand. "
Display change log
