13:53:33 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #dwbp
13:53:33 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/12/11-dwbp-irc
13:53:35 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs 351
13:53:35 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #dwbp
13:53:37 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be DWBP
13:53:37 <Zakim> I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot
13:53:38 <trackbot> Meeting: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference
13:53:38 <trackbot> Date: 11 December 2015
13:53:47 <phila> chair: Yaso
13:53:52 <phila> agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20151211
13:54:15 <phila> zakim, code?
13:54:15 <Zakim> I have been told this is https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m0642b1c7ce49018a07ffec17ea136ae6 or +1-617-324-0000 US Toll Number, Access code: 645 096 989
13:58:00 <riccardoAlbertoni> riccardoAlbertoni has joined #DWBP
13:59:26 <Eric_Kauz> Eric_Kauz has joined #dwbp
13:59:28 <PWinstanley> PWinstanley has joined #dwbp
13:59:35 <PWinstanley> present+ PWinstanley
13:59:45 <yaso> present+ yaso
13:59:49 <newtoncalegari> newtoncalegari has joined #dwbp
14:01:22 <gatemezi> gatemezi has joined #dwbp
14:01:30 <phila> present+ phila
14:01:33 <phila> scribe: phila
14:01:37 <phila> scribeNick: phila
14:01:58 <newtoncalegari> present+ newtoncalegari
14:02:33 <riccardoAlbertoni> \me could you anyone remind me the webex URL please ?
14:02:50 <yaso> I think is this one, riccardoAlbertoni  https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m0642b1c7ce49018a07ffec17ea136ae
14:03:15 <riccardoAlbertoni> \me thanks ..
14:03:16 <yaso> oh I missed an 6 at the end of url. Sorry,  https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m0642b1c7ce49018a07ffec17ea136ae6
14:03:29 <yaso> \me :-)
14:03:49 <phila> zakim, code?
14:03:49 <Zakim> I have been told this is https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m0642b1c7ce49018a07ffec17ea136ae6 or +1-617-324-0000 US Toll Number, Access code: 645 096 989
14:04:08 <yaso> great. tks phila
14:04:12 <phila> riccardoAlbertoni, you can always type that command (zakim, code?) and get the info
14:05:12 <riccardoAlbertoni> \me Thanks phil,
14:05:17 <yaso> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20151211
14:05:26 <laufer> laufer has joined #dwbp
14:05:46 <riccardoAlbertoni> present+ riccardoAlbertoni
14:05:51 <phila> yaso: Lots of stuff to get through today
14:05:53 <phila> PROPOSAL: Accept last week's minutes http://www.w3.org/2015/12/04-dwbp-minutes
14:05:58 <yaso> +1
14:06:01 <phila> +1
14:06:02 <Eric_Kauz> +1
14:06:06 <gatemezi> +1
14:06:09 <laufer> present+ laufer
14:06:10 <riccardoAlbertoni> +1
14:06:19 <phila> RESOLUTION: Accept last week's minutes http://www.w3.org/2015/12/04-dwbp-minutes
14:06:26 <laufer> +1
14:06:34 <phila> Topic: BP Document
14:06:53 <phila> -> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html BP Doc Editors' Draft
14:07:01 <BernadetteLoscio> BernadetteLoscio has joined #dwbp
14:07:37 <phila> newtoncalegari: I can start to explain...
14:08:17 <phila> newtoncalegari: We have made a lot of changes in the doc but I'll talk about some specifics. One on APIs and Conneg
14:08:25 <phila> ... Those BPs are not 100% completed yet
14:08:40 <phila> ... We put some notes and issues in the doc to let readers know that we are still improving those BPs
14:09:00 <Caroline_> Caroline_ has joined #DWBP
14:09:07 <Caroline_> Present+ Caroline_
14:09:08 <BernadetteLoscio> present+ BernadetteLoscio
14:09:13 <BernadetteLoscio> :)
14:09:29 <newtoncalegari> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#Conneg
14:09:44 <phila> phila: Start here? http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#bp-summary
14:09:47 <newtoncalegari> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#useanAPI
14:10:15 <phila> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#versionsForAPI
14:10:32 <Eric_Kauz> present+ Eric_Kauz
14:10:58 <phila> newtoncalegari: I think we need to change the text a little
14:11:00 <yaso> q?
14:11:07 <phila> ... keep the smae meaning but change the structure ofhte text
14:11:16 <ericstephan> ericstephan has joined #dwbp
14:11:26 <phila> yaso: So the necessary reqs to complete this BP is to provide examples and the structure of the text
14:11:43 <phila> newtoncalegari: Yes, that's why I put those notes in the text. I don't think it's a barrier to publication
14:11:48 <phila> yaso: I agree it's not a barrier
14:11:55 <phila> yaso: Anything else to say?
14:12:04 <phila> newtoncalegari: No, but BernadetteLoscio might have
14:12:50 <phila> BernadetteLoscio: We added a lot to the doc. See the change history sedction
14:13:16 <phila> ... We have 2 new sections. We also have a glossary with the main sections of the doc and we have the benefits associated with each BP
14:13:17 <ericstephan> present + ericstephan
14:13:28 <phila> ... Thanks to Phil for scripting
14:13:33 <phila> phila: NP
14:13:47 <phila> BernadetteLoscio: We also have many more examples. They still need to be completed and I think we made a lot of progress
14:14:16 <phila> ... I think the doc is more mature. It has more content and we have discussed a lot about this period about identifiers.
14:14:31 <phila> ... We had a lot of discussion about the data vocab section and we made some progress and some agreement
14:14:43 <phila> ... We still have things to do concerning the data access section
14:14:54 <phila> ... We need more examples and need some more discussion about the new BPs
14:15:03 <phila> ... But now we have a more concrete stuff to discuss
14:15:22 <phila> ... During the F2F we had a lot of important discussions and we tried to reflect these doscussions in the new version
14:15:40 <phila> yaso: Anything to add Caroline_
14:15:49 <phila> Caroline_: No, that's it... Bernadette has explained
14:15:50 <yaso> q?
14:16:04 <laufer> q+
14:16:08 <phila> ack l
14:16:12 <yaso> ack laufer
14:16:45 <phila> laufer: I missed a summary of each section of the doc
14:17:01 <phila> ... Something after the Intro but before the main content. I miss that.
14:17:14 <phila> laufer: I think the structure of the sections is inconsistent
14:17:29 <phila> ... Sections 9, 10 and 11 seem inconsistent in style
14:17:33 <BernadetteLoscio> +q
14:17:52 <phila> ... Section 11.4 is a conclusion, that's not in the otehr sections
14:18:06 <phila> BernadetteLoscio: There is a mistake in the table of contents - it's not correct
14:18:16 <phila> laufer: No, not in the ToC
14:18:24 <phila> BernadetteLoscio: 11.4 is not inside 11
14:18:36 <phila> BernadetteLoscio: There's a mistake in the HTML, that's all
14:18:44 <phila> ... That newton is going to correct.
14:19:01 <phila> laufer: I don't think we have section 9 BP and then section 10 for Sensitive data
14:19:08 <phila> newtoncalegari: I'm going to check the open elements
14:19:10 <yaso> ack BernadetteLoscio
14:19:25 <phila> laufer: I think the glossary, benefits, UCR etc can be appendices, not sections
14:20:01 <phila> laufer: And we have 3 indexes - section 5,6 and 8
14:20:05 <yaso> q?
14:20:07 <phila> ... I think that needs explaining
14:20:28 <phila> ... And the separate section about the template can be in the BPs. It's just a matter of rearanging things
14:20:40 <phila> laufer: And I thought we decided on reuse, not re-use
14:21:06 <phila> yaso: So what do you suggest?
14:21:31 <phila> laufer: I think we need just one section called Best practice and then all the BPs are in that section (as sub sections)
14:21:47 <phila> ... The other solution is not to have a section called Best Practices
14:21:55 <phila> yaso: So are you against publishing?
14:22:05 <phila> q+
14:22:18 <yaso> ack phila
14:24:10 <newtoncalegari> I'm already checking and fixing the HTML
14:24:17 <phila> phila: Talks about publication steps, validation etc.
14:24:29 <BernadetteLoscio> q+
14:24:35 <yaso> ack BernadetteLoscio
14:24:47 <laufer> q+
14:24:47 <yaso> q?
14:24:52 <phila> BernadetteLoscio: There is an issue about the three indexes, I raised that
14:25:16 <phila> laufer: I see no problem with the three indexes, I just think we need to explain them and say that the user can access them in 3 differnet ways
14:25:24 <riccardoAlbertoni> please  phil send the same check list l to me and Antoine as well
14:25:25 <phila> yaso: So if there are no other questions?
14:25:31 <yaso> q?
14:25:33 <Caroline_> q+
14:25:41 <yaso> ack laufer
14:25:41 <phila> ack l
14:25:41 <laufer> q-
14:25:44 <phila> acl c
14:25:46 <phila> ack c
14:25:56 <yaso> ack Caroline_
14:26:27 <yaso> hahahah, sorry. It's my keyboard crazy sound for "repeated letter"
14:26:29 <BernadetteLoscio> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/227
14:26:29 <phila> Caroline_: Thanks laufer, Newton is fixing that now, and I think we could add a new issue about the indexes
14:26:36 <phila> phila: That's been raised already
14:26:42 <phila> Thanks BernadetteLoscio
14:27:02 <laufer> q+
14:27:20 <yaso> ack laufer
14:27:48 <phila> That the Editors' Draft of the BP Doc at http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html be published as a next Working Draft on 17 December subject to the section numbers being sorted (through HTML validation)
14:27:53 <riccardoAlbertoni> I tend to agree with laufer :(
14:28:25 <yaso> phila: next pub date: january
14:28:35 <yaso> ... if we decide to not vote today
14:29:13 <laufer> we have to vote to not vote?  we will have the same problem
14:29:32 <phila> PROPOSED: That we have sufficient people present to vote through a publication
14:29:39 <yaso> +1
14:29:44 <BernadetteLoscio> +1
14:29:55 <riccardoAlbertoni> +1
14:29:58 <Caroline_> +1
14:30:01 <ericstephan> q+
14:30:01 <newtoncalegari> +1
14:30:07 <laufer> I vote... What I want to know is if there is a minimum quorum for that...
14:30:10 <yaso> ack ericstephan
14:31:06 <phila> ericstephan: If we wait until 6 Jan, will we have more or fewer people?
14:31:20 <phila> yaso: I'm afarid that people will be on holidayt in January
14:31:28 <phila> ... Newton and I won't be here 6 Jan
14:31:31 <laufer> we have the call saying that there will be a voting...
14:31:40 <Caroline_> I will be in January until the 19th
14:31:41 <phila> yaso: I thinkw e should vote now
14:31:47 <Caroline_> ops! on Holliday!
14:31:49 <ericstephan> +1
14:31:58 <phila> yaso: I think you're right...
14:32:20 <phila> ericstephan: I'll vote +1 just becausze I don't think the numebrs will be great this time of year and it seems that things won't be any better in early January
14:32:26 <Caroline_> I think we have a chance to send emails before January and try to get some external feedback
14:32:32 <Caroline_> if we vote today! :)
14:32:34 <phila> phila: gets his head around January being summer holiday/carnival time
14:32:42 <newtoncalegari> I think today is the last reasonable date to vote.
14:32:49 <phila> yaso: It's external feedback we want
14:33:05 <phila> ... And Caroline_ is right, we should publish now and get the feedback
14:33:15 <phila> q=
14:33:23 <phila> q?
14:33:27 <yaso> q?
14:33:36 <ericstephan> yaso you also gave sufficient notice about this
14:33:36 <phila> RESOLUTION: That we have sufficient people present to vote through a publication
14:33:39 <laufer> let´s vote
14:34:03 <ericstephan> What is summer?
14:34:24 <laufer> is the guy that sums...
14:34:44 <ericstephan> laufer :-)
14:34:58 <ericstephan> q+
14:35:08 <yaso> ack ericstephan
14:35:08 <Caroline_> come to Brazil, ericstephan to understand what is summer! :)
14:35:14 <phila> phila: Goes on about summer holidays etc
14:35:47 <phila> ericstephan: I just want to say that I've not had a chance to look at the BP doc as much as I'd like, but through all the dicsussion that we've had, this is one of the most mature docs we have
14:36:01 <riccardoAlbertoni> I agree with ericstephan ..
14:36:03 <phila> ... So unless there's somethign really horribly wrong, I'd advocate a vote to have it reviewed externally
14:36:25 <phila> That the Editors' Draft of the BP Doc at http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html be published as a next Working Draft on 17 December subject to the section numbers being sorted (through HTML validation)
14:36:49 <phila> That the Editors' Draft of the BP Doc at http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html be published as a next Working Draft on 17 December subject to the section numbers being sorted (through HTML validation) and PhilA updating the SVG diagram
14:37:08 <phila> PROPOSED: That the Editors' Draft of the BP Doc at http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html be published as a next Working Draft on 17 December subject to the section numbers being sorted (through HTML validation) and PhilA updating the SVG diagram
14:37:11 <laufer> +1
14:37:14 <riccardoAlbertoni> +1
14:37:16 <yaso> +1
14:37:22 <BernadetteLoscio> +1
14:37:22 <ericstephan> +1
14:37:29 <Caroline_> +1
14:37:33 <newtoncalegari> +1
14:37:44 <Eric_Kauz> +1
14:38:01 <phila> RESOLUTION: That the Editors' Draft of the BP Doc at http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html be published as a next Working Draft on 17 December subject to the section numbers being sorted (through HTML validation) and PhilA updating the SVG diagram
14:38:08 <BernadetteLoscio> :)
14:38:12 <riccardoAlbertoni> congrats!
14:38:15 <ericstephan> congrats BP team
14:38:22 <yaso> Data Quality Vocabulary
14:38:25 <phila> Topic: Data Quality Vocabulary
14:38:26 <BernadetteLoscio> congrats everyone!
14:38:27 <riccardoAlbertoni> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html
14:38:36 <Caroline_> congrats everyone! Specially Berna! :)
14:38:50 <phila> riccardoAlbertoni: If you click on the link... you can see the latest version of our DQV
14:39:03 <phila> ... I'll go through the doc and highlight the main changes since the last publication
14:39:26 <phila> ... First 3 sections haven't changed much. Thanks Phil for producing the Turtle
14:39:40 <phila> riccardoAlbertoni: In the vocab overview, you can see the classes in the diagram
14:39:43 <phila> ... There are 3 sections
14:39:57 <phila> ... bascially the part of the vocab that allow us to state the quality assessment
14:40:15 <phila> ... Upper Right is on dataset is compliant to a standard or policy
14:40:23 <phila> ... Bottom Right to express quality annotation
14:40:33 <yaso> q?
14:40:34 <phila> ... has a quality certificiate
14:41:10 <phila> riccardoAlbertoni: There are some new constraints, dimensions, quality feedback...
14:41:18 <phila> ... During this period there has been plenty of discussion
14:41:50 <phila> ... We have kept the discussion up to date.
14:42:02 <phila> riccardoAlbertoni: In section http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html#examples we have included some earlier examples and added 4 new examples
14:42:12 <phila> ... in particular an example that received an ODI certificate
14:42:15 <yaso> q?
14:42:16 <phila> ... setion 6.5
14:42:41 <phila> ... And there's another example of expressing the quality of a Skos scheme and of a linkset
14:42:58 <phila> ... And there's stuff on expressing conformance of a dataset to a standard
14:43:05 <phila> ... That came from a discussion with Phil
14:43:10 <phila> ... and Andrea perego
14:43:44 <phila> riccardoAlbertoni: Only the dimension and metric section hasn't changed bevcause we already decided that we want to align with ISO 200512
14:44:00 <phila> ... blocked a little by the discussion that we're having on issue 204 and 205
14:44:08 <phila> ... So we have explained this in the doc.
14:44:25 <yaso> q?
14:44:31 <gatemezi> gatemezi has joined #dwbp
14:44:35 <phila> riccardoAlbertoni: And we added a change history section
14:44:52 <phila> ... I think we made a lot of progress. More to do of course but the doc shows the direction that we're following
14:45:02 <phila> ... SO I think it's the right time to make a snapshot
14:45:11 <yaso> q?
14:45:13 <laufer> q+
14:45:15 <phila> riccardoAlbertoni: Any questions?
14:45:20 <phila> yaso: Thank you Riccardo
14:45:22 <yaso> ack laufer
14:45:23 <phila> ack l
14:46:07 <phila> laufer: Thank you for excellent work. I've comment on how you've enhanced the comprehension. Antoine desceribed the diagram very well,. What I miss is the serialisation of the diagram
14:46:19 <phila> ... I think some sentences to help understand the diagram
14:46:28 <phila> ... Easier with text to explain the image
14:46:56 <phila> riccardoAlbertoni: You may have noticed that at the beginning of the vocab overview there is a short summary. but there are still a lot of technical issues pending
14:47:27 <phila> ... The parts I have described are more or less stable, but soem parts are not. If you have some specific suggestions, they'd be welcome
14:47:49 <phila> laufer: I saw the intro. But I think we can have a more informal description of what the idea of quality is
14:48:14 <yaso> q?
14:48:19 <phila> Laufer and Riccardo discuss the issue further
14:48:25 <yaso> ok
14:48:46 <phila> riccardoAlbertoni: So we could put an intro about the diagram, rephrasing things in more general terms
14:48:51 <phila> laufer: That would work...
14:49:04 <phila> yaso: Can you discuss this later by mail?
14:49:15 <phila> laufer: It's not an issue, I;m OK with this
14:49:16 <yaso> q?
14:49:35 <laufer> ok
14:49:45 <riccardoAlbertoni> fine
14:50:04 <riccardoAlbertoni> ok
14:50:30 <phila> PROPOSED: That the document at http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html be published as the next WD of the Data Quality Vocabulary, subject to a Note being added that a textual description of the diagram will be added.
14:50:40 <yaso> its ok!
14:50:52 <yaso> +1
14:50:56 <gatemezi> +1
14:50:59 <ericstephan> +1
14:50:59 <BernadetteLoscio> +1
14:51:01 <laufer> +1
14:51:03 <Caroline_> +1
14:51:04 <Eric_Kauz> +1
14:51:05 <riccardoAlbertoni> +1
14:51:10 <PWinstanley> +1
14:51:13 <newtoncalegari> +1
14:51:21 <phila> RESOLUTION: That the document at http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html be published as the next WD of the Data Quality Vocabulary, subject to a Note being added that a textual description of the diagram will be added.
14:51:34 <phila> Topic: Dataset Usage Vocabulary
14:51:44 <phila> yaso: Do we have time to go through the DUV?
14:52:00 <PWinstanley> q+
14:52:04 <phila> ericstephan: Let me explain where we are
14:52:08 <laufer> q+
14:52:24 <phila> ericstephan: I can go over really quickly. Thanks to Bernadette for the much cleaner model
14:52:31 <BernadetteLoscio> ;)
14:52:32 <phila> ... The issues 214-218 have been resolved
14:52:48 <phila> ericstephan: Thanks to Phil for improvementes to get ready for publication and the TTL file
14:52:52 <phila> phila: NP
14:53:13 <phila> ericstephan: Sumit went back in and improved the turtle file with major improvements made in the last 24 hours
14:53:20 <phila> ... and we've had comments from Phil
14:53:33 <yaso> q?
14:53:40 <phila> ... What's missing are some properties that need to be added, and there are some changes Phil has suggested that I agree with
14:54:03 <phila> ... We need stronger refs to external vocabs and there are issues that need to be added before it's published
14:54:09 <phila> ericstephan: Is that it Berna?
14:54:27 <phila> BernadetteLoscio: Yes, I agree. We needed to make changes to the model. We had a lot of discussions about the citations
14:54:32 <yaso> q?
14:54:40 <yaso> ack PWinstanley
14:55:05 <phila> PWinstanley: The image in section 7 (vocab overview) works very micely in my Firefox but in my coroprate IE11 it's not supported
14:55:20 <phila> ... It's an embedded SVG that causes me a problem on my corporate desktop
14:55:23 <phila> q
14:55:26 <yaso> q?
14:55:27 <phila> q+
14:55:52 <yaso> ack laufer
14:55:52 <ericstephan> thank you for bringing that to our attention!
14:56:03 <phila> yaso: I think we can add an issue about that, thanks PWinstanley
14:56:28 <ericstephan> +1 laufer I agree
14:56:31 <phila> laufer: I have the same comment as for DQV - we could do with a textual decription of the diagram
14:56:44 <phila> ... and the order of sections might be improved
14:57:05 <phila> ... And we have a ref to a class of duvFeedback that was changed to duv:userfeedback
14:57:21 <phila> ... And we have several terms i the diagram that aren't in the spec and vice versa
14:57:47 <phila> yaso: I don't think it's an issue about the diagram/list issue
14:57:49 <yaso> q?
14:57:51 <ericstephan> q+
14:57:56 <yaso> ack phila
14:58:03 <phila> -> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#challenges
14:59:24 <ericstephan> q-
14:59:31 <BernadetteLoscio> q+
14:59:39 <BernadetteLoscio> q-
14:59:51 <phila> phila: Checked with PWinstanley that the SVG at http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#challenges is visible to him (it is)
14:59:52 <yaso> q?
15:00:04 <newtoncalegari> q+
15:00:10 <phila> ack n
15:00:13 <yaso> ack newtoncalegari
15:00:24 <laufer> q+
15:00:25 <phila> newtoncalegari: I have updated the doc and ToC, i think it's right now
15:00:29 <phila> ack l
15:00:36 <yaso> ack laufer
15:00:53 <BernadetteLoscio> q+
15:00:55 <phila> laufer: Agaiun, we have around 10 terms in the vocab overview andnot in the spec - I think the spec is the main thing of the doc
15:01:06 <phila> ... I think we need all the terms decsribed
15:01:12 <yaso> q?
15:01:34 <phila> ack b
15:01:48 <yaso> q?
15:01:52 <phila> BernadetteLoscio: There more that needs to be included, Laufer is right, and we need to address Phil's last comment
15:02:06 <phila> yaso: So maybe the DUV shouldn't be published yet
15:02:10 <phila> ericstephan: I tend to agree
15:02:38 <BernadetteLoscio> q+
15:02:42 <phila> ... I am usually very proactive about getting things out and there are some editorial things that we need to work through. I'm disappointed but that's where we are I think
15:02:50 <BernadetteLoscio> q-
15:02:53 <phila> laufer: I can send some text to help the editors
15:03:15 <yaso> q?
15:03:20 <phila> action: laufer to send a list of things to be added to/addressed in the DUV document
15:03:20 <trackbot> Created ACTION-224 - Send a list of things to be added to/addressed in the duv document [on Carlos Laufer - due 2015-12-18].
15:03:33 <phila> BernadetteLoscio: And about the4 Bp doc please laufer
15:03:48 <phila> yaso: Although we doidn't vote on the DUV, I think we had a successful meeting
15:03:52 <riccardoAlbertoni> thanks all
15:03:58 <BernadetteLoscio> thanks all!
15:04:05 <phila> ... Congratulations to the editors of the docs that wuill be published. I suggest next week we talk about DUV
15:04:19 <laufer> congrats to the editors of the three docs...
15:04:22 <phila> ericstephan: I would ecnourage everyone to read through, comment etc. so that we can get it ready
15:04:23 <phila> q+
15:04:46 <ericstephan> wow
15:04:53 <BernadetteLoscio> wow wow
15:05:09 <riccardoAlbertoni> Thanks phil ..
15:05:13 <phila> ack p
15:05:13 <laufer> bye all...  nice weekend...
15:05:17 <BernadetteLoscio> yes Phil! Thanks a lot!
15:05:19 <PWinstanley> bye
15:05:22 <phila> phila: Goes on about PubRules
15:05:23 <gatemezi> bye
15:05:24 <Caroline_> thank you!! Bye!
15:05:34 <phila> RRSAgent, draft minutes
15:05:34 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/12/11-dwbp-minutes.html phila
15:05:37 <yaso> rssagent, draft minutes
15:05:41 <yaso> ops
15:05:44 <yaso> tks phil
15:09:12 <phila> RRSAgent, make logs public
15:09:15 <phila> RRSAgent, draft minutes
15:09:15 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/12/11-dwbp-minutes.html phila
15:09:28 <newtoncalegari> newtoncalegari has left #dwbp
16:54:57 <yaso> yaso has joined #dwbp
18:01:55 <Zakim> Zakim has left #dwbp
18:06:45 <yaso> yaso has joined #dwbp