19:54:55 RRSAgent has joined #sdw 19:54:55 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/11/25-sdw-irc 19:54:57 RRSAgent, make logs world 19:54:57 Zakim has joined #sdw 19:54:59 Zakim, this will be SDW 19:54:59 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 19:55:00 Meeting: Spatial Data on the Web Working Group Teleconference 19:55:00 Date: 25 November 2015 19:55:05 zakim, code 19:55:05 I don't understand 'code', kerry 19:55:13 zakim, code? 19:55:13 I have been told this is SDW WG Weekly. https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=mc96ab6583bd632deef4bf778ff424d78 Or :+1-617-324-0000, Meeting: 642 235 291 19:57:13 jtandy has joined #sdw 19:57:44 present+ jtandy 19:58:36 zakim, make logs public 19:58:36 I don't understand 'make logs public', kerry 19:58:50 rrsagent, make logs public 19:59:12 regrets+ Jon Blower 19:59:22 regrets+ Andrea Perego 19:59:30 regrets+ Lars Svensson 19:59:56 Present+ Payam 19:59:58 ClemensPortele has joined #sdw 20:00:12 Linda has joined #sdw 20:00:30 present +ClemensPortele 20:02:07 billroberts has joined #sdw 20:02:42 present+ billroberts 20:02:59 http://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/WebEx 20:03:08 ahaller2 has joined #sdw 20:03:18 DanhLePhuoc has joined #sdw 20:03:24 present+ Linda 20:03:29 present+ kerry 20:03:29 present+ DanhLePhuoc 20:04:46 regrets+ phila 20:04:54 regrets+ ed parsons 20:05:11 ChrisLittle has joined #Sdw 20:05:16 zakim, who is here 20:05:16 jtandy, you need to end that query with '?' 20:05:21 KJanowicz has joined #sdw 20:05:21 zakim, who is here? 20:05:21 Present: jtandy, Payam, billroberts, Linda, kerry, DanhLePhuoc 20:05:23 On IRC I see KJanowicz, ChrisLittle, DanhLePhuoc, ahaller2, billroberts, Linda, ClemensPortele, jtandy, Zakim, RRSAgent, Payam, kerry, trackbot 20:05:34 present+ ChrisLittle 20:05:36 present+ ClemensPortele 20:05:41 present+ ahaller2 20:05:53 present+ KJanowicz 20:06:50 q+ 20:07:02 I can give it a try 20:08:45 kerry_ has joined #sdw 20:08:50 fetches glass of wine - been one of those days 20:08:53 q? 20:09:13 yes 20:09:30 scribe: KJanowicz 20:09:43 scribenick: KJanowicz 20:09:47 scribeNick: KJ 20:10:25 http://www.w3.org/2015/11/18-sdw-minutes.html 20:10:36 +1 20:10:39 +1 ... (wasn't at the meeting - but they made sense to me) 20:10:39 +1 20:10:41 +1 20:10:42 +1 20:10:42 +1 20:10:49 +0 (wasn't there) 20:10:49 +1 minutes 20:10:54 resolved: Minutes have been approved 20:10:55 +1 20:11:13 http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Patent_Call 20:11:17 kerry_ : next item on agenda: patent call 20:11:43 +1 20:12:18 next item on the agenda: BP Editors' F2F 20:12:28 topic: BP Editors call 20:13:05 q? 20:13:56 * if lunch Iranian very awesome 20:14:14 BP will be written in a tutorial style 20:14:19 +1 to on line help style 20:15:18 BP document will crossreference other best practice documents 20:16:03 This will create a common document that links to other relevant materials thus making them accessible at a common place. 20:16:13 Examples will be included in a second stage 20:16:48 ack KJanowicz 20:17:07 kerry_ : Plan was to release first draft on Dec. 10th 20:17:44 (or 9-Dec for those of us in EU and USA) 20:17:45 Q+ 20:17:46 next meeting is the last one to go over open issues 20:18:02 same for the use case document 20:18:06 q? 20:18:11 ack ChrisLittle 20:18:49 ChrisLittle: How do we define a quorum in our case? 20:19:07 q? 20:19:17 kerry_: key issue is not to exclude anybody 20:19:47 We need to check this with the OGC and their procedures 20:19:55 q+ 20:19:57 ACTION: ChrisLittle to determine the rules for OGC quorum 20:19:57 Created ACTION-104 - Determine the rules for ogc quorum [on Chris Little - due 2015-12-02]. 20:20:48 q- 20:20:53 topic: review BP actions 20:21:20 http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/94 20:21:22 q- 20:22:23 http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/96 20:23:53 Linking out to some common sources such as DBpedia, GeoNames, etc. This leads to interesting challenges, e.g., entity resolution. 20:24:10 Semantics of links is important but not always clear. 20:24:34 Combination of owl:sameAs, seeAlso, and various SKOS links. 20:25:20 http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/97 20:25:20 First notes will be published by Nov 26th 20:25:30 q+ 20:25:41 ack KJanowicz 20:25:45 ack kerry_ 20:26:13 ack kerry_ 20:26:16 q? 20:26:24 http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/98 20:28:31 q? 20:28:35 ClemensPortele: Working on list of common formats, looked at BP task, this will need additional text but so far we will consider about 10 formats and make sure to come up with a list of characteristics that are relevant for our group. Table of characteristics was distributed today. 20:29:09 ClemensPortele: We already see discussions on the mailinglist but we still need to agree on the direction this is going. 20:31:04 The preferred format will depend heavily on your home community (e.g., GML for OGC). Thus we need to link the format overview to the BP and use cases. This will allow us to recommend formats for specific needs and communities. 20:31:27 q? 20:32:00 A more meta question, how should we edit this? On the wiki, using github? 20:32:25 KJanowicz would recommend to use the W3 wiki. 20:32:51 q+ 20:33:10 q? 20:33:18 action: jtandy to provide ClemensPortele a list of further attributes required to describe each data format (relates to ACTION 98) 20:33:18 Created ACTION-105 - Provide clemensportele a list of further attributes required to describe each data format (relates to action 98) [on Jeremy Tandy - due 2015-12-02]. 20:33:19 ack KJanowicz 20:33:27 +1 to wiki 20:33:46 +1 for wiki 20:33:51 q- 20:34:45 Copy and paste, not cut! 20:35:29 http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/99 20:35:55 http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/100 20:36:37 q+ 20:36:51 q? 20:36:53 ack ClemensPortele 20:36:56 ack ClemensPortele 20:37:17 ClemensPortele: What is the relationship between actions 100 and 99? 20:37:54 answer: data encoding formats versus rdf vocabularies 20:39:01 KJanowicz: I think we are already talking about action 101/103 20:39:22 s/99?/98?/ 20:40:06 q? 20:40:06 action: jtandy to deconflict actions 98 (clemens and 100 (ed) - they both seem to be about formats 20:40:07 Created ACTION-106 - Deconflict actions 98 (clemens and 100 (ed) - they both seem to be about formats [on Jeremy Tandy - due 2015-12-02]. 20:40:19 q+ 20:40:32 jtandy, we have the same on 101 and 103 20:40:33 ack ChrisLittle 20:41:37 perhaps, as KJ has just pointed out, this is a result of where we allocated an action to 2 people - the tracker may have issued two identical actions, because only one action per person? 20:41:57 @billroberts: yes, this is exactly the issue 20:42:13 yes, at least it seems something went wrong with allocating actions. 20:42:23 q? 20:42:34 @billroberts: I am not sure, 98 was created two weeks ago and 100 was created last week 20:43:23 q? 20:44:04 http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/101 and http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/103 20:44:07 rdf vocabularites (not formats) 20:44:45 s/vocabularites/vocabularies 20:44:54 q? 20:45:45 billroberts: task for 101/103 will be more than just a list of vocabularies. The real value comes from recommendations. 20:46:15 jtandy: we need the recommendations to be durable but vocabularies come and go. 20:47:17 jtandy: thus we need a method to inform users about which criteria to use to select a particular vocabulary. 20:47:20 +1 20:47:42 jtandy: we also need robust mappings 20:48:16 billroberts: I agree with this appraoch 20:48:46 s/appraoch/approach/ 20:48:48 regrets+ Andreas Harth 20:48:59 regrets+ Rachel Heaven 20:49:06 billroberts: value in a crosswalk between different vocabularies 20:49:12 regrets+ Bart van Leeuwen 20:49:23 regrets+ Alejandro Llaves 20:49:56 q? 20:49:59 q+ 20:50:26 ack Linda 20:50:28 kerry_: let us move on to SSN 20:50:41 I am okay with what bill said. 20:50:54 q? 20:51:14 Kerry was right. Jeremy talked a lot 20:51:18 topic: SSN kickoff 20:52:00 kerry_: SSN editors will be ahaller2, kerry_, DanhLePhuoc, KJanowicz 20:52:12 I can speak about the usage 20:52:18 +1 to Bill 20:52:20 q+ 20:52:30 ack KJanowicz 20:52:44 kJ: Usage of SSN 20:53:02 ....looked at papers using ssn 20:53:15 ............describing sensors, observations and deployments 20:53:22 ...not much linked data 20:53:46 .... 2-3 years IoT is big uptake 20:54:11 ...reference to 20:54:25 ... one third develop new ontologies based on SSN 20:54:39 ... sso part is widely used for extension 20:54:55 ...data integration and data infrastrucutre e.g. earthcube 20:55:09 ... accessibility, preservation, interoperability 20:55:22 .... provenance 20:55:53 ... academic use for the sake of ssn .e.g. aligning or ontology design 20:56:04 ...documenting on wiki 20:56:13 q? 20:56:18 +1 great summary KJanowicz 20:56:19 https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/SSN_usage 20:56:23 will complete this later 20:56:34 S/infrastrucutre/infrastructure/ 20:57:07 I only looked at 10 papers per year so this is rather anecdotal at this stage. 20:57:36 kerry_: DUL needs to be discussed, O&M relation, more on location 20:58:01 kerry: more on encoding values 20:58:40 kerry_: modularization 20:58:49 q+ 21:00:07 devices and sensors : http://www.w3.org/2015/11/DeviceSensorsCharter.html 21:00:15 KJanowicz: important to keep in mind: SSN is the result of a W3C XG so the focus was heavily on experimental work and new methods . This time (for the SDW) we will focus on standardization so we will need to be more conservative. 21:01:13 q+ to suggest a 'vocab' document and a primer for SSN 21:01:16 kerry_: more discussion needed on the ontological issues as such and how it relates to the BP documents. 21:02:45 kerry_: we will report back to the geosemantics group at OGC (for their meeting in Sydney) 21:03:17 Bye and thank you 21:03:19 thanks, bye 21:03:19 ok thanks all - bye 21:03:27 bye, thanks 21:03:43 rrsagent draft minutes 21:04:51 rrsagent, draft minutes 21:04:51 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/25-sdw-minutes.html kerry_ 21:05:01 KJanowicz has left #sdw 21:05:41 ChrisLittle has left #sdw 21:06:00 bye! 21:06:14 rrsagent, make logs public 21:06:21 rrsagent, draft minutes 21:06:21 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/25-sdw-minutes.html kerry_ 21:13:07 zakim, code? 21:13:07 I have been told this is SDW WG Weekly. https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=mc96ab6583bd632deef4bf778ff424d78 Or :+1-617-324-0000, Meeting: 642 235 291 22:20:57 trackbot, end meeting 22:20:57 Zakim, list attendees 22:20:57 As of this point the attendees have been jtandy, Payam, billroberts, Linda, kerry, DanhLePhuoc, ChrisLittle, ClemensPortele, ahaller2, KJanowicz 22:21:05 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 22:21:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/25-sdw-minutes.html trackbot 22:21:06 RRSAgent, bye 22:21:06 I see 3 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2015/11/25-sdw-actions.rdf : 22:21:06 ACTION: ChrisLittle to determine the rules for OGC quorum [1] 22:21:06 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/11/25-sdw-irc#T20-19-57 22:21:06 ACTION: jtandy to provide ClemensPortele a list of further attributes required to describe each data format (relates to ACTION 98) [2] 22:21:06 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/11/25-sdw-irc#T20-33-18 22:21:06 ACTION: jtandy to deconflict actions 98 (clemens and 100 (ed) - they both seem to be about formats [3] 22:21:06 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/11/25-sdw-irc#T20-40-06-1