16:09:20 RRSAgent has joined #html-media 16:09:20 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/11/10-html-media-irc 16:09:22 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:09:22 Zakim has joined #html-media 16:09:24 Zakim, this will be 63342 16:09:24 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 16:09:25 Meeting: HTML Media Task Force Teleconference 16:09:25 Date: 10 November 2015 16:09:32 present+ paulc 16:09:39 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:09:39 Present: paulc 16:09:54 zakim, who is here? 16:09:54 Present: paulc 16:09:56 On IRC I see RRSAgent, paulc, joesteele, MattWolenetz, davide, markw, Josh_Soref, timeless, robink, cwilso, slightlyoff, adrianba, trackbot 16:09:59 plh has joined #html-media 16:10:22 jdsmith has joined #html-media 16:10:30 present+ jdsmith 16:10:53 present+ plh 16:10:56 present+ davide 16:11:22 present+ MattWolenetz 16:11:39 scribe: joesteele 16:11:40 present+ Joe 16:11:45 chair: paulc 16:12:05 present+ joesteele 16:12:11 paulc has joined #html-media 16:12:16 Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2015Nov/0014.html 16:12:25 Chair: paulc 16:12:36 Scribe: joesteele 16:12:50 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:12:50 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/10-html-media-minutes.html joesteele 16:13:05 BobLund has joined #html-media 16:13:07 topic: Status of MSE heartbeat 16:13:09 RRSAgent, make logs world 16:13:29 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:13:29 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/10-html-media-minutes.html timeless 16:13:39 ACTION-98? 16:13:39 ACTION-98 -- Jerry Smith to Publish heartbeat by nov 15 for mse -- due 2015-11-15 -- OPEN 16:13:39 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/media/track/actions/98 16:13:50 paulc: Jerry you have ACTION-98 to get us ready — please give us status. What are the editors planning? 16:14:09 jdsmith: haven’t sorted which issues we want to pickup for the heartbea, but have talked to PLH about how to proceed 16:14:22 … he needs a summary of the changes since the last heartbeat 16:14:42 plh: I need that list to go to the director for approval — if not substantive changes we dont need approval 16:14:52 jdsmith: how is substantive changes defined? 16:14:58 s/dont/don't/ 16:15:04 plh: no formal deifnition — anything not editorial 16:15:12 s/heartbea,/heartbeat, 16:15:21 jdsmith: I will make a pass since its been a while 16:15:33 ??1: I can help you Jerry 16:15:45 paulc: does MSE have a changelog where we have been tracking? 16:15:55 ??1: all the changes I have made are in there 16:16:06 jdsmith: listed by issue 16:16:36 paulc: even if there arent substantive changes, if we had a section that directed readers to that list of items and ptrs to the most important that would be useful 16:16:38 joesteele: ??1 is MattWolenetz 16:16:52 s/??1/MattWolenetz/ 16:17:02 jdsmith: I don’t think any are substantive 16:17:06 Tr page change log: http://www.w3.org/TR/media-source/#revision-history 16:17:15 s/Tr/TR/ 16:17:19 https://w3c.github.io/media-source/#revision-history 16:17:23 paulc: does somone have link to the editors draft? 16:17:50 … so lets move on to the ones you need to do 16:18:05 … can just point the reader to the recent history 16:18:15 MSE issues ready for implementation (13): https://github.com/w3c/media-source/labels/needs%20implementation 16:18:29 … so will we go ahead with the heartbeat? or do the editors feel that one or more of the outstanding items should be included? 16:18:44 … we can always publish right away and then publish again later 16:18:57 MattWolenetz: would prefer to publish frequently 16:19:17 paulc: given that we have 6 weeks — lets publish as quickly as we can 16:19:28 … there is a moratorium during THkanisgivng week? 16:19:39 plh: if you give me Thursday I can publish this week 16:19:46 paulc: Ok we will try to give to you today 16:19:51 http://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2Fmedia-source%2F&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fmedia-source%2F 16:19:59 plh: I don’t blieve there are substantive changes either 16:20:08 s/blieve/believe/ 16:20:15 plh: just one step in an algorithm 16:20:31 MattWolenetz: there are more bugs like that on the docket for implementation 16:20:44 … is substantive something that would put us bakc to last call? 16:20:53 plh: no — just look at the link I gave you 16:21:02 … I don;t see any changes there 16:21:10 … just give me the go ahead and I will do the rest 16:21:38 MattWolenetz: one piece that there is no issue tracking is that some references are wrong in the document — in the ReSpec script 16:21:54 … might not be in the editors draft but in the previous heartbeat 16:22:03 … we are still operating under the old process 16:22:08 plh: I will look into it 16:22:22 … do we want to inbound the registrys at the same time? 16:22:30 paulc: dont think there have been any changes at all there 16:22:34 … editors confirm? 16:22:41 jdsmith: no changes I know of 16:22:59 jdsmith: are you talking about the link to the policy? 16:23:16 MattWolenetz: yes I think we are operating under the older policy — the editors draft is incorrect about the process 16:23:17 Resolved by the Media TF to publish an MSE update ASAP and possibly this week. No changes have been made to the registries. The published document needs to process to the old W3C Process. 16:23:42 plh: are we under the latest process? or 2014? 16:24:39 Respec puts in a link to the 2014 process but MSE is under the old process. 16:24:41 paulc: respec puts in a link to the 2014 process but MSE is under the old process 16:24:48 plh: I will fix 16:25:11 paulc: can Matt and ?? get the information to PLH be EOD? 16:25:20 jdsmith: I think he should have the go ahead 16:25:21 We are ready to go to publish the document. 16:25:31 plh: you will get an email from me if there are issues 16:25:54 MattWolenetz: the links to the registry are all from March of this year — no update needed 16:26:10 ACTION: plh to publish the heartbeat 16:26:10 Created ACTION-107 - Publish the heartbeat [on Philippe Le Hégaret - due 2015-11-17]. 16:26:12 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:26:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/10-html-media-minutes.html joesteele 16:26:27 plh: I think we can close action-98 at this point 16:26:35 close ACTION-98 16:26:35 Closed ACTION-98. 16:27:11 paulc: wont go through the 13 issues the editors need to implement, but make sure they notice pull request 9 is anchored on bug 2933 16:27:17 jdsmith: believe that is done 16:27:24 s/wont/won’t/ 16:27:38 paulc: does not seem to be marked as done 16:27:53 jdsmith: says that it is merged and closed but no timestamp 16:28:10 s/jdsmith: says/MattWolenetz: says/ 16:28:30 topic: MattWolenetz 16:28:40 topic: Recent new MSE bugs and issues (4) 16:28:47 paulc: 3 new issue since the F2F 16:29:07 paulc: have you looked at 35, 36 and 37 yet? 16:29:19 MattWolenetz: have not looked yet 16:29:34 paulc: ok editors — will take a pass over issues 35-37 and respond in the issues 16:30:23 https://github.com/w3c/media-source/issues/35 16:30:27 https://github.com/w3c/media-source/issues/35 16:30:29 https://github.com/w3c/media-source/issues/36 16:30:30 https://github.com/w3c/media-source/issues/37 16:31:18 topic: ISSUES 10, 14, 15, 24 16:31:21 https://github.com/w3c/media-source/issues/10 16:31:24 https://github.com/w3c/media-source/issues/14 16:31:27 paulc: have not seen progress — where do we stand? 16:31:27 https://github.com/w3c/media-source/issues/15 16:31:30 https://github.com/w3c/media-source/issues/24 16:31:51 ISSUE-10 - createObjectURL() not up-to-date with File API (Matt) 16:32:07 MattWolenetz: there is not an immeidate answer, looks like it would be a breaking change 16:32:11 F2F discussion: http://www.w3.org/2015/10/29-html-media-minutes.html#item04 16:32:20 s/immeidate/immediate/ 16:32:43 paulc: looks like we went offline after this discussion — no followup 16:32:57 MattWolenetz: I put something in the actual issue — need to figure out what to do with the issue 16:33:14 … think it would be a breaking change as current apps assume auto-revocation 16:33:23 … if we change the implementation could break those apos 16:33:27 s/apos/apps/ 16:33:35 paulc: could editors propose what they would like to do? 16:33:40 … we can get feedback 16:33:51 jdsmith: I assume we must line up with the latest spec 16:34:04 … can we keep an obselete definition? 16:34:18 paulc: PLH were you in the room for this discussion? do you have an opinion? 16:34:26 plh: … 16:34:33 plh: I can take a look offline 16:34:45 paulc: lets get advice from the team here then 16:34:55 … PLH if you can repsond on the bug that would help 16:35:05 topic: ISSUE 14 16:35:08 issue-14? 16:35:08 Sorry, but issue-14 does not exist. 16:35:36 paulc: if we can define a stable implementaitonon on the new API we can proceed 16:35:53 MattWolenetz: we need to get that stable reference from Dominik — something we can rely on 16:36:13 … this is in the needs followup/need implementation limbo 16:36:30 paulc: beleiebe the new technical impelemntation refers to the stable stream API 16:36:41 MattWolenetz:need to make sure stuff confirms to the new stable reference 16:36:45 Next: https://github.com/w3c/media-source/issues/15 16:36:51 topic: ISSUE-15 16:36:58 paulc: Matt you have an action on this 16:37:09 https://github.com/w3c/media-source/issues/15 16:37:13 ACTION-99? 16:37:13 ACTION-99 -- Paul Cotton to Action mattwolenetz to split bug27242 into issues -- due 2015-11-05 -- OPEN 16:37:13 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/media/track/actions/99 16:37:21 MattWolenetz:have a question about that 16:37:35 … for Jerry around which example was being referred to with the long frame display 16:37:54 jdsmith: I was having trouble recllaing at the F2F I can comment in the issue 16:38:03 s/recllaing/recalling/ 16:38:31 MattWolenetz:3 issues were identified in one issue — I will split out 2 of the issues and comment on the original bug 16:38:37 … Jerry will make the original response 16:39:06 s/make the original response/comment on the oroginal bug/ 16:39:12 topic: ISSUE-24 16:39:30 MattWolenetz: this is pending the impleemntaiont of issue-11 to look for side effects 16:39:38 https://github.com/w3c/media-source/issues/24 16:39:52 paulc: so 11 is at the front of the to be implemented list 16:40:03 MattWolenetz: in addition to foloowing up on appendStreams 16:40:23 topic: CFCs on V.Next features 16:40:42 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2015Nov/0012.html 16:40:51 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2015Nov/0013.html 16:41:02 MattWolenetz: I saw the CFC yesterday 16:41:15 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:41:15 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/10-html-media-minutes.html joesteele 16:41:25 paulc: these close next Monday 16:42:02 … there are actually 4 issues marked as feature requests 16:42:07 … we dealt with 14 earlier 16:42:26 … 7 the BMFF byte stream format should support layered encodings is marked a s afeature request done on Sept 10th 16:42:39 … have we ever confirmed with Jerry or Matt? 16:43:04 MattWolenetz: in the advance telecom prior to F2F we went over all of these issues 16:43:15 … this one seems to be V.Next and we marked it as such at the time 16:43:22 … does not support scalable codecs 16:43:29 … was never meant to be v1 16:43:52 … Mark had also made this request on behalf of Google — we should have clarified that up front 16:44:20 … since it is filed, in my opinion basd on previous discussions, this doesnt appear to be something we can do in V1 16:44:24 … without breaking things 16:44:35 paulc: no further action for now then 16:44:51 … trying to get out of CR and want to clean up things this might be resolved at that time 16:45:21 markw: what Matt says is correct — this should be V.Next 16:45:36 topic: Test Suite Status 16:45:47 http://www.w3.org/2015/10/29-html-media-minutes.html#item17 16:45:54 paulc: when should e see progress on this? 16:46:13 MattWolenetz: driving down “needs implementation” issues right now 16:46:31 paulc: any other questions on this? 16:46:36 topic: next meeting 16:47:03 … Tuesday before the holiday? 16:47:18 Tue Nov 24th 16:47:25 … not hearing any objections 16:47:29 s/holiday/USA holiday/ 16:47:31 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:47:31 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/10-html-media-minutes.html joesteele 16:47:42 paulc: that seems like it for today 16:48:01 … disucss EME in two weeks 16:48:14 s/disucss/discuss/ 16:48:16 davide has left #html-media 16:48:20 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:48:20 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/10-html-media-minutes.html joesteele 16:48:44 present+ markw 16:48:52 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:48:52 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/10-html-media-minutes.html joesteele 16:49:16 s/deifnition/definition/ 16:49:35 s/??1: /MattWolenetz: / 16:49:44 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:49:44 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/10-html-media-minutes.html joesteele 16:50:17 s/you give me Thursday/you give them to me by Thursday/ 16:50:27 s/bakc/back/ 16:50:37 s/respec/ReSpec/ 16:50:58 s/inbound the registrys/include the registries/ 16:51:06 s/dont/don’t/ 16:51:17 s/editors confirm?/can editors confirm?/ 16:51:42 s/Respec/ReSpec/ 16:52:01 s/and ?? get/and Jerry get/ 16:52:07 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:52:07 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/10-html-media-minutes.html joesteele 16:52:57 s/ISSUES 10, 14, 15, 24/ISSUE 10/ 16:53:10 s/obselete/obsolete/ 16:53:19 s/repsond/respond/ 16:55:01 s/implementaitonon on/reference to/ 16:55:06 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:55:06 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/10-html-media-minutes.html joesteele 16:55:20 s/impelemntation/implementation/ 16:55:46 s/on the oroginal bug/on the original bug/ 16:55:55 s/foloowing/following/ 16:56:12 s/with 14/with ISSUE-14/ 16:56:23 s/7 the/ISSUE-7 the/ 16:56:30 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:56:30 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/10-html-media-minutes.html joesteele 16:56:55 s/should e see/should we see/ 16:57:20 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:57:20 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/10-html-media-minutes.html joesteele 16:58:05 s/??1: I can help you Jerry/MattWolenetz: I can help you Jerry/ 16:58:12 rrsagent: draft minutes 16:58:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/10-html-media-minutes.html joesteele 16:58:23 s/lets/let’s/ 16:58:35 s/THkanisgivng/US Thanksgiving/ 16:58:43 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:58:43 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/10-html-media-minutes.html joesteele 16:59:08 s/don;t/don’t/ 16:59:14 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:59:14 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/10-html-media-minutes.html joesteele 17:00:07 s| joesteele: MattWolenetz is MattWolenetz|| 17:00:13 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:00:13 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/10-html-media-minutes.html joesteele 17:01:05 s|issue-14?|https://github.com/w3c/media-source/issues/14| 17:01:11 : rrsagent, draft minutes 17:01:22 s| Sorry, but issue-14 does not exist.|| 17:01:29 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:01:29 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/10-html-media-minutes.html joesteele 17:02:00 rrsagent, bye 17:02:00 I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2015/11/10-html-media-actions.rdf : 17:02:00 ACTION: plh to publish the heartbeat [1] 17:02:00 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/11/10-html-media-irc#T16-26-10