19:39:26 RRSAgent has joined #sdw 19:39:26 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/11/04-sdw-irc 19:39:28 RRSAgent, make logs world 19:39:28 Zakim has joined #sdw 19:39:30 Zakim, this will be SDW 19:39:30 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 19:39:31 Meeting: Spatial Data on the Web Working Group Teleconference 19:39:31 Date: 04 November 2015 19:39:43 zakim, code? 19:39:43 I have been told this is https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m57409f4a882794f437fc8ca01a46ba45 +1-617-324-0000 US Toll Number Access code: 648 510 221, pw: vrh6qs24 Host key: 19:39:46 ... 703609 19:54:20 regrets+ Ed 19:55:30 kerry has joined #sdw 19:56:55 ahaller2 has joined #sdw 19:57:00 ahaller2_ has joined #sdw 19:57:19 present+ kerry 19:57:43 zakim, code? 19:57:43 I have been told this is https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m57409f4a882794f437fc8ca01a46ba45 +1-617-324-0000 US Toll Number Access code: 648 510 221, pw: vrh6qs24 Host key: 19:57:46 ... 703609 19:58:26 Linda has joined #sdw 19:58:41 frans has joined #sdw 19:58:46 SimonCox has joined #sdw 19:59:13 jtandy has joined #sdw 19:59:16 present+ BartvanLeeuwen 19:59:29 present+ jtandy 19:59:41 zakim, code? 19:59:41 I have been told this is https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m57409f4a882794f437fc8ca01a46ba45 +1-617-324-0000 US Toll Number Access code: 648 510 221, pw: vrh6qs24 Host key: 19:59:44 ... 703609 20:00:42 present+ Linda 20:00:55 present+ frans 20:01:27 I am not hearing much at the moment 20:02:01 it was no one talking 20:02:34 chair: kerry 20:03:24 MattPerry has joined #sdw 20:03:30 billroberts has joined #sdw 20:03:30 scribe: simon 20:03:36 present+ billroberts 20:03:47 some help for scribes: http://www.w3.org/2008/04/scribe.html 20:03:48 present+ MattPerry 20:03:53 scribenick: simoncox 20:04:10 Apologies from me, I can't dial in (I'm next to a municipal swimming pool and about to leave to go home) Normal service should be resumed next week 20:04:17 present+ SimonCox 20:04:22 present+ ahaller2 20:04:28 The agenda is: 20:04:29 1. Sapporo F2F Update and discussion 2. Future work plan 3. UCR second public draft and remaining issues 4. Candidate best practice topics for BP doc 20:04:39 ChrisLittle has joined #sdw 20:04:57 present + 20:05:32 present_ ChrisLittle 20:05:34 present+ 20:05:38 present+ ChrisLittle 20:06:02 http://www.w3.org/2015/10/14-sdw-minutes.html 20:06:04 Ian_Holt has joined #sdw 20:06:14 Has TimBL really joined this meeting? 20:06:35 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20151104 20:06:49 AndreaPerego has joined #sdw 20:07:14 Bart, were you able to be in a photograph with him? 20:07:29 https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20151021 20:07:39 http://www.w3.org/2015/10/21-sdw-minutes 20:08:22 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20151104 20:08:28 +1 20:08:32 +1 20:08:32 +1 20:08:33 +1 20:08:33 Motion: approve minutes 20:08:35 sorry, missed the 21 Oct call 20:09:05 +2 20:09:06 No objections (but wasn't there 20:09:07 +1 20:09:19 missed 21st too 20:09:19 resolved: minutes approved 20:09:34 s/resolved/resolution/ 20:09:40 patent call 20:10:02 resolution: minutes approved 20:10:56 http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Patent_Call 20:11:37 Topic: Sapporo update 20:13:15 Discussion on candidate best practices for BP document 20:13:46 5-6 non-regular people, one new face offered testing and implementation 20:14:17 Significant offer of resources 20:14:38 (name not known) 20:15:02 http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/ 20:15:09 * was it Tanagi-san? 20:15:20 1. Linking data 20:15:26 2. publishing with clear semantics 20:15:30 3. anabling discovery 20:15:36 4. assignment of identifiers 20:15:40 5. large datasets 20:15:49 not addressed: exposing through APIs 20:15:59 not discussed - spatial, observations 20:16:32 kolchinmax has joined #sdw 20:16:48 (also help from data on the web best practice group) 20:17:03 OPPORTUNITY! control our scope 20:17:27 drop topics that are general as they are already under control in dwwg 20:17:37 q+ 20:17:49 incl. discovery, assignment of identifiers 20:18:25 Cite solutions from DWBP where they have a scope that matches SDWWG requirements and expectations 20:18:40 e.g. 20:19:00 1. publishing data with clear semantics - focus on semantics of spatial relationships 20:19:57 2. enabling discovery, 3. linking data - Ed not enamoured of current SDIs - catalog ... service endpoint ... query endpoint - this is NOT 'data on the web' 20:20:07 +1 to Ed's reported opinion. I generally lose the will to live before finding anything useful from INSPIRE 20:20:09 can't trawl endpiints, leverage links - have to *query* 20:20:46 Browsing not supported. 20:20:54 +1 20:21:02 (this was consensus in meeting) 20:21:05 +1 20:21:11 +1 20:21:20 q+ 20:21:53 what is this catalogue thing? 20:22:02 +q? 20:22:21 ack frans 20:22:54 present+ AndreaPerego 20:22:59 -q? 20:23:15 frans: reduce scope will have big impact on BP document 20:23:24 ack next 20:25:02 SImonCOx: clarify distinction being made between catalogues and search-engines 20:25:13 Kerry: it was findability 20:25:30 q+ 20:25:48 q? 20:26:03 ack SimonCox 20:26:30 +1 to Simon's comment 20:26:38 ack ChrisLittle 20:26:45 things being harvested into catalogue/index need to be more link rich and support finding atomic items, not just datasets 20:27:06 q+ 20:28:02 ack AndreaPerego 20:28:21 http://geodcat-ap.semic.eu:8890/api/ 20:28:27 andrea: geodcat-ap - has API for CSW 20:28:51 convert from ISO 19115/19139 -> RDF/RDFa 20:29:16 optimise what is exposed through catalogues 20:29:39 can embed metadata in HTML pages, more findable 20:29:49 but not enough links! 20:30:04 findable but still not _linked_ 20:30:41 Yes, promoting assigning URIs to thing will be a big step forward 20:30:54 q+ 20:30:59 s/thing will/things will/ 20:31:14 ack next 20:31:15 simon: Capabilities response needs to include links, not lists! 20:31:18 +1 to AndreaPerego 's comment 20:31:40 billroberts: difficult to link to a specific item 20:32:07 q+ to explain about the bug in your ear at TPAC 20:32:11 ahaller2 has joined #sdw 20:32:17 billroberts: want boundary of Edinburgh, not shapefile of all LGA boundaries 20:32:22 +1 to granularity 20:32:41 In favour of INSPIRE: it has semantics that are harmonized in Europe. Quite an achievement! 20:32:43 ack BartvanLeeuwen 20:32:43 BartvanLeeuwen, you wanted to explain about the bug in your ear at TPAC 20:32:53 (THat looks like a strong requirement) 20:33:29 also +1 to getting the granularity of linking right 20:34:01 Bartvanleeuwen: ? spatial properties shoudl be links ? 20:35:00 s/shoudl/should/ 20:35:08 Bart: need adapter to expose existing services (WFS) as linked data 20:35:23 Bart: started work in context of Dutch fire services 20:35:30 Bart: demo later this month? 20:36:04 Jeremy: timbl keen that we cover OpenStreetMap 20:36:21 Do we have a liaison with OSM? 20:36:23 +1 to OSM UC 20:36:39 OSM - great adoption, must be doing something right 20:36:45 https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/BP_Theme_-_BPs_to_hand_over_to_other_WGs_in_W3C_or_OGC 20:36:46 SImon: tools? 20:37:12 Or a contact with linkedgeodata.org (which is based on OSM)? 20:37:34 @frans ... no liaison yet - but I think we can chase up some links to those orgs 20:37:54 Kerry: proposed new item, joint not w DWWP group 20:38:05 Hadley Beeman, Dan Brickley 20:38:53 They will be glad to hear TimBL supports their efforts 20:39:07 TOPIC: future work plan 20:39:22 Kerry: main Wiki page updated w updated workplan 20:40:09 https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Main_Page#Deliverables 20:40:23 ahaller2_ has joined #sdw 20:40:28 I am not screaming 20:40:54 BP to be published December 20:41:14 q+ to note about proximity between BP FPWD and OGC TC 20:43:58 q? 20:44:33 OGC WGs can issue drafts easily 20:44:57 SimonCox: OGC working drafts are just posted to pending documents - no review period 20:45:21 QUestion around how OGC can publish 'public working drafts' 20:45:30 and how fast 20:45:36 ack jtandy 20:45:36 jtandy, you wanted to note about proximity between BP FPWD and OGC TC 20:45:39 +1 to simon corrcting Jermey 20:46:17 OGC TC in Sydney week commencing 30 November 20:47:34 SimonCox: can you reverse the order of starting Time and SSN work? 20:47:52 Future meetings will consider SSN, Time for half of meeting 20:48:05 alternating weeks, approx. 20:48:10 q+ 20:48:16 Coverage deliverable - work to start in March 20:48:19 q- 20:48:38 q+ to talk about F2F 20:49:16 TOPIC: UCR document 20:49:31 can we add a hopefully very brief item to today's agenda: confirmation of date/location of next F2F? 20:50:26 6-8 February meeting at Geonovum, on Best Practices 20:50:30 6/7 Feb is Sat/Sun - that's ok for me, but just to check no mistake? 20:50:34 It's 8 - 10, right? 20:50:54 3-day meeting (lined up with local linked-data meeting) 20:51:15 8-10 February meeting at Geonovum, on Best Practices 20:51:38 ... and other topics for SDDWG 20:51:53 s/SDDWG/SDWWG/ 20:52:20 OGC TC in SYdney - report to GeoSemantics domain working group 20:52:44 (the final day of the next F2F, 10th Feb, should include interactions with the Linked Data community to validate our work so far) 20:52:45 1/2 hour 20:53:34 will proceed with regular teleconference anyway (7am Sydney time) 20:53:47 TOPIC: UCR document 20:54:20 https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/17) 20:54:38 Motion: issue 17 - medium resolution global grid? 20:54:42 PROPOSAL: The candidate requirement "It should be possible to represent a medium resolution global grid, e.g. 90m raster data across the globe." will not be included in the UCR document. 20:54:57 -1 20:55:27 sorry - +1 20:55:30 +1 not include 20:55:31 +1 ... not include this requirement 20:55:35 +1 20:55:35 +1 20:55:36 +1 20:55:36 +1 20:55:37 +1 20:55:41 +1 20:55:57 https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/27 20:56:01 Resolution: no 90m global grid 20:56:17 PROPOSAL: Add a note to the description of the "Coverage in Linked Data" deliverable in the UCR document: "The OGC is currently working on refinements of ISO 19123 (in particular, the OGC Coverage Implementation Schema 1.1), which could result in specifications that allow a higher level of interoperability of implementations. The Working Group will also consider these forthcoming standards." 20:56:36 Motion: issue 27 - add note that new OGC work is in scope 20:56:47 rrsagent, make logs public 20:56:55 rrsagent, draft minutes 20:56:55 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/04-sdw-minutes.html kerry 20:57:00 +1 20:57:00 (can't change charter, but can point it out in UCR document) 20:57:08 +1 20:57:13 +1 20:57:13 +1 20:57:16 +1 20:57:16 +1 20:57:17 +1 20:57:17 +1 20:57:19 +0 20:58:01 q? 20:58:09 ack jtandy 20:58:09 jtandy, you wanted to talk about F2F 20:58:32 Jeremy: OGC CIS is too closely coupled to GML approach? 20:59:33 q- 20:59:35 +1 to looser rather than tighter coupling 20:59:38 Jeremy: must avoid close coupling with implementation choice. 20:59:48 +1 to considering them 20:59:55 Resolution: can consider new OGC work 21:00:04 on coverage implementations 21:00:25 Next meeting: 2015-11-11 21:00:49 thx bye 21:00:57 bye and thank you 21:00:57 thanks. bye 21:00:57 Thanks, and bye! 21:00:57 Bye! 21:01:00 thx bye 21:01:02 bye 21:01:02 thx! 21:01:02 kolchinmax has left #sdw 21:01:08 bye! And thanks Kerry & Simon 21:01:08 rrsagent, draft minutes 21:01:08 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/04-sdw-minutes.html kerry 21:01:11 rrsagent , draft minutes 21:01:28 rrsagent, generate minutes 21:01:28 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/04-sdw-minutes.html SimonCox 21:01:44 exit 21:15:33 ahaller2 has joined #sdw 21:37:00 ahaller2 has joined #sdw 22:11:06 ahaller2 has joined #sdw 23:00:11 ahaller2 has joined #sdw 23:26:45 Zakim has left #sdw 23:48:40 ahaller2 has joined #sdw 23:49:19 ahaller2 has joined #sdw