12:54:20 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #dwbp
12:54:20 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/10/09-dwbp-irc
12:54:22 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs 351
12:54:22 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #dwbp
12:54:24 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be DWBP
12:54:24 <Zakim> I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot
12:54:25 <trackbot> Meeting: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference
12:54:25 <trackbot> Date: 09 October 2015
12:54:36 <phila> zakim, code?
12:54:36 <Zakim> I have been told this is DWBP, WebEx: https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m2c0af451188e3c2177f8d56453c588e9 or +1-617-324-0000 (US Toll Number) Access code: 645 329 153, Password
12:54:39 <Zakim> ... dwbp. Host Key: 641444
12:55:05 <PeterWinstanley> PeterWinstanley has joined #dwbp
12:55:22 <PeterWinstanley> present+ PeterWinstanley
12:56:03 <Caroline_> Caroline_ has joined #DWBP
12:57:12 <MTCarrasco> MTCarrasco has joined #dwbp
12:58:28 <riccardoAlbertoni> riccardoAlbertoni has joined #DWBP
13:00:26 <MTCarrasco> present+  MTCarrasco
13:00:31 <phila> present+ phila
13:00:51 <annette_g> annette_g has joined #dwbp
13:01:14 <phila> agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20151009
13:01:21 <phila> chair: hadley
13:01:28 <hadleybeeman> Hello!
13:01:51 <hadleybeeman> Uh oh… the webex link is gone.
13:01:56 <phila> zakim, code?
13:01:56 <Zakim> I have been told this is DWBP, WebEx: https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m2c0af451188e3c2177f8d56453c588e9 or +1-617-324-0000 (US Toll Number) Access code: 645 329 153, Password
13:01:56 <Caroline_> hello!
13:01:59 <Zakim> ... dwbp. Host Key: 641444
13:02:14 <PeterWinstanley__> PeterWinstanley__ has joined #dwbp
13:02:17 <riccardoAlbertoni> present+ riccardoAlbertoni
13:02:27 <Caroline_> Present+ Caroline_
13:02:38 <phila> zakim, who is here?
13:02:38 <Zakim> Present: PeterWinstanley, MTCarrasco, phila, riccardoAlbertoni, Caroline_
13:02:40 <Zakim> On IRC I see PeterWinstanley__, annette_g, riccardoAlbertoni, MTCarrasco, Caroline_, Zakim, RRSAgent, fradulov, nandana, phila, hadleybeeman, rhiaro, trackbot
13:02:46 <riccardoAlbertoni> hi everyone
13:03:19 <phila> zakim, who is here?
13:03:19 <Zakim> Present: PeterWinstanley, MTCarrasco, phila, riccardoAlbertoni, Caroline_
13:03:21 <Zakim> On IRC I see PeterWinstanley__, annette_g, riccardoAlbertoni, MTCarrasco, Caroline_, Zakim, RRSAgent, fradulov, nandana, phila, hadleybeeman, rhiaro, trackbot
13:03:23 <hadleybeeman> present+ hadleybeeman
13:03:46 <nandana> present+ nandana
13:04:00 <fradulov> present+ fradulov
13:04:23 <annette_g> I'm not in to the webex yet. It's asking for a meeting, event, or session number?
13:04:31 <PeterWinstanley__> present+ PeterWinstanley
13:04:55 <hadleybeeman> annette_g: paste in the webex link
13:05:04 <hadleybeeman> https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m2c0af451188e3c2177f8d56453c588e9
13:05:07 <annette_g> I did, same as ever
13:05:14 <hadleybeeman> how strange
13:05:24 <phila> zakim, code?
13:05:24 <Zakim> I have been told this is DWBP, WebEx: https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m2c0af451188e3c2177f8d56453c588e9 or +1-617-324-0000 (US Toll Number) Access code: 645 329 153, Password
13:05:26 <annette_g> Ah, yours works better
13:05:28 <Zakim> ... dwbp. Host Key: 641444
13:06:23 <laufer> laufer has joined #dwbp
13:06:46 <annette_g> present + annette_g
13:06:51 <antoine> antoine has joined #dwbp
13:06:58 <annette_g> I can scribe
13:07:03 <hadleybeeman> scribe: annette_g
13:07:17 <hadleybeeman> http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-09-18
13:07:20 <antoine> present+ antoine
13:07:27 <annette_g> PROPOSED: accept last week's minutes
13:07:31 <hadleybeeman> +0 (wasn't here)
13:07:37 <Caroline_> +1
13:07:39 <MTCarrasco> +1
13:07:43 <annette_g> +1
13:07:44 <nandana> +1
13:07:48 <antoine> +1
13:07:48 <riccardoAlbertoni> +1
13:07:48 <phila> +1
13:08:19 <fradulov> +1
13:08:28 <phila> RESOLVED: Minutes from http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-09-18 accepted
13:08:28 <annette_g> RESOLVED: approve last week's minutes
13:08:35 <hadleybeeman> http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-09-24
13:08:40 <ericstephan> ericstephan has joined #dwbp
13:08:40 <laufer> present+ laufer
13:08:58 <phila> That's harder - we talked for a long time!
13:09:01 <annette_g> PROPOSED: accept minutes from F2F
13:09:06 <laufer> +1 (delayed)
13:09:12 <antoine> +1 I've just re-read them entirely, they're good :-)
13:09:13 <MTCarrasco> 0
13:09:13 <adler1> adler1 has joined #dwbp
13:09:14 <hadleybeeman> http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-09-25
13:09:17 <Caroline_> +1
13:09:18 <PeterWinstanley__> +1
13:09:25 <riccardoAlbertoni> +1
13:09:26 <hadleybeeman> +0 (wasn't there :( )
13:09:26 <nandana> +1
13:09:34 <fradulov> +0
13:09:48 <annette_g> +1
13:09:50 <laufer> +1
13:10:01 <antoine> +1
13:10:03 <phila> +1 But I can see I need to clean those minutes up
13:10:08 <annette_g> RESOLVED: accept minutes from F2F
13:10:33 <adler1> gm
13:11:10 <annette_g> hadleybeeman:  goes over the agenda
13:11:19 <ericstephan> ericstephan present+
13:11:28 <phila> zakim, who is here?
13:11:28 <Zakim> Present: PeterWinstanley, MTCarrasco, phila, riccardoAlbertoni, Caroline_, hadleybeeman, nandana, fradulov, antoine, laufer
13:11:30 <Zakim> On IRC I see adler1, ericstephan, antoine, laufer, PeterWinstanley__, annette_g, riccardoAlbertoni, MTCarrasco, Caroline_, Zakim, RRSAgent, fradulov, nandana, phila, hadleybeeman,
13:11:30 <Zakim> ... rhiaro, trackbot
13:11:48 <annette_g> hadleybeeman:  can you review where we are on the DUV, ericstephan?
13:12:04 <annette_g> ericstephan:  we met to review and see if we can get a request for comments
13:12:38 <phila> present+ Steve, Eric S, Annette, Riccardo
13:12:40 <annette_g> we are developing ideas around DUV feedback and citation, trying to make them more clearly spelled out
13:13:13 <annette_g> hadleybeeman:  any questions?
13:13:27 <annette_g> silence ensues
13:13:51 <annette_g> Caroline_:  Newton and Bernadette send regrets
13:13:56 <Caroline_> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/F2F_S%C3%A3o_Paulo_-_Agenda_Proposal_DWBP
13:14:10 <annette_g> It would be nice to close some of the last issues from the F2F
13:14:17 <Caroline_> Other Open Issues - To be discussed/closed before the F2F or if we have time during the F2F
13:14:23 <annette_g> the only ones we couldnt are the ones at the end of the list
13:14:43 <phila> The meeting has moved on but I wanted to note the work at http://www.sparontologies.net/ which shows more organisational support for CITO etc.
13:14:53 <phila> issue-93?
13:14:53 <trackbot> issue-93 -- Free Open Data SLAs for Open Data publishing -- open
13:14:53 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/93
13:14:54 <Caroline_> ISSUE-93: Free Open Data SLAs for Open Data publishing
13:14:54 <trackbot> Notes added to ISSUE-93 Free Open Data SLAs for Open Data publishing.
13:15:02 <annette_g> Caroline_:  let's see if we can close this issue.
13:15:09 <ericstephan> thank you I look forward to seeing this @phila!
13:16:06 <adler1> q+
13:16:59 <annette_g> phila: in Sao Paolo, there was a lot of discussion around what an SLA is. It's a kind of pledge. It fits into all sorts of places. I think it's useful to have, but I have to do more thinking. We have to support making comments on the publisher rather than the data itself
13:17:03 <phila> ack adler1
13:17:14 <hadleybeeman> Q?
13:17:17 <phila> ack a
13:17:41 <annette_g> adler1: at IBM we talk about a content level agreement, which is a little different from an SLA.
13:18:07 <annette_g> hadleybeeman:  where does that leave you, Caroline?
13:18:22 <annette_g> Caroline_:  not sure if we can close the issue. Phil?
13:18:56 <annette_g> phila:  ODS certificates certify that the data was produced according to a pipeline, no comment on the quality itself. "Data produced in accordance with..."
13:19:24 <laufer> q+
13:19:35 <annette_g> phila:  it's up to the DQV folks to decide to include it if it makes sense to them. In the BP doc, we can say it's useful to say that it's useful
13:19:41 <adler1> agree
13:19:41 <phila> s/ODS/ODI/
13:19:51 <annette_g> hadleybeeman:  does that close the issue?
13:20:29 <hadleybeeman> ack lau
13:20:31 <annette_g> Caroline_:  I think Antoine and Riccardo should weigh in
13:21:48 <annette_g> laufer:  we have assertions about the quality of a thing, we have a vocab for that. We have intentions of things to be done about the process, and then we have an SLA, a commitment to do a thing in a certain way. These are two different things.
13:22:06 <riccardoAlbertoni> q+
13:22:07 <ericstephan> Here is an interesting vocab efforts that includes a vocabulary for SLA http://linked-usdl.org/  http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/usdl/
13:22:17 <hadleybeeman> ack riccardo
13:22:53 <annette_g> riccardoAlbertoni:  we have an action on DQV to figure out in which terms we will address this in the vocab.
13:22:56 <Caroline_> q+
13:23:11 <hadleybeeman> ack caro
13:23:28 <annette_g> Caroline_:  maybe it can wait to see what riccardoAlbertoni and antoine decide.
13:23:39 <annette_g> hadleybeeman:  anyone against?
13:23:43 <annette_g> silence ensues
13:23:51 <phila> action-203?
13:23:51 <trackbot> action-203 -- Riccardo Albertoni to Add an example with an sla as quality policy, trying to use the same dimensions as metrics and annotations -- due 2015-10-01 -- OPEN
13:23:51 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/203
13:24:07 <antoine> there's also https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/199
13:24:14 <annette_g> phila:  we have action 203 that can be closed and defer to the DQV action.
13:24:47 <annette_g> Caroline_:  I think we can close the issue and create an action to decide how to implement in the BP doc.
13:25:20 <annette_g> ACTION: Caroline_ to check what DQV has done about SLAs.
13:25:20 <trackbot> Error finding 'Caroline_'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/users>.
13:25:27 <phila> action: burle to check what DQV folks have done about issue-93
13:25:27 <trackbot> Created ACTION-211 - Check what dqv folks have done about issue-93 [on Caroline Burle - due 2015-10-16].
13:26:11 <phila> close issue-93
13:26:11 <trackbot> Closed issue-93.
13:26:16 <PeterWinstanley__> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2729758/  the 'Terminology Review Criteria' might be helpful in the discussion
13:26:32 <hadleybeeman> issue-94?
13:26:32 <trackbot> issue-94 -- Dataset versioning and dataset replication -- open
13:26:32 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/94
13:26:40 <annette_g> Caroline_:  next issue, data set versioning. can it be closed?
13:26:41 <Caroline_> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/94
13:27:45 <annette_g> phila:  this is pretty old, trying to recall the meaning of it
13:28:31 <annette_g> hadleybeeman:  quotes a note pointing out that it might be good to avoid tying ourselves to specific tools
13:28:38 <phila> q+ to talk about http://www.w3.org/2013/share-psi/bp/ec/
13:28:48 <hadleybeeman> I was looking at this: http://www.w3.org/mid/8CE0D584-8E19-4881-9C87-D0BB98F48A55%2540lbl.gov
13:28:56 <phila> ack me
13:28:56 <Zakim> phila, you wanted to talk about http://www.w3.org/2013/share-psi/bp/ec/
13:29:35 <phila> -> http://www.w3.org/2013/share-psi/bp/ec/ Crowdsourcing BP
13:29:53 <annette_g> phila:  one issue in SharePSI is around crowdsourcing, saying it's a really good idea. It talks about using GitHub.
13:30:30 <hadleybeeman> q?
13:30:35 <annette_g> phila:  if this group is not happy about making a rec about policy stuff, we can at least know that SharePSI is covering it.
13:31:06 <annette_g> hadleybeeman:  to me crowdsourcing is more about collection of data than publishing it. Glad that SharePSI is doing that.
13:31:17 <annette_g> Caroline_:  still not sure if we can close this
13:31:51 <annette_g> hadleybeeman: we can add a note to the issue
13:32:53 <annette_g> hadleybeeman:  adds a note
13:33:24 <annette_g> hadleybeeman:  now what do we do with the issue? somebody needs to get back to Peter Hanacek.
13:33:46 <annette_g> hadleybeeman:  we have to be able to show that we've resolved all the issues.
13:34:21 <annette_g> phila:  notes a way to contact Peter via a common project with Deirdre.
13:34:38 <phila> action: Deirdre to follow up on issue-94 with COMSODE project
13:34:41 <trackbot> Created ACTION-212 - Follow up on issue-94 with comsode project [on Deirdre Lee - due 2015-10-16].
13:34:59 <annette_g> * phila, you rock on Zakim
13:35:11 <annette_g> Caroline_:  we can close this one
13:35:18 <hadleybeeman> issue-148?
13:35:18 <trackbot> issue-148 -- Can we use the five star rating system as a BP document metric to describe Open Data instead of a path to LD? -- open
13:35:18 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/148
13:36:51 <annette_g> ericstephan:  we were grappling with whether there is a way we can characterize open data. Let me dig through earlier meeting notes and look at it again next week.
13:37:15 <annette_g> Caroline_:  can we close it and reopen by email if needed?
13:37:18 <phila> q+
13:37:32 <phila> Dee https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Mar/0102.html
13:37:55 <annette_g> so what's the action??
13:38:36 <phila> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#DataIdentifiers
13:39:33 <annette_g> phila:  a big hole has been pointed out in the BP doc. in the section on identifiers, we say use persistent IDs and another one says you should assign URIs to datasets. We need something that says you should make use of URIs as identifiers *within* datasets
13:39:55 <annette_g> phila:  I'm hoping that will help address Eric Wilde's issue.
13:40:15 <annette_g> hadleybeeman:  that can help us get away from the contentious discussion about linked data.
13:41:10 <annette_g> ACTION: ericstephan to look into issue 148 and restart the conversion or close the issue
13:41:11 <trackbot> Created ACTION-213 - Look into issue 148 and restart the conversion or close the issue [on Eric Stephan - due 2015-10-16].
13:41:21 <ericstephan> Yes I'll send out an email
13:41:34 <Caroline_> thank you, ericstephan!
13:41:47 <annette_g> Caroline_:  issue-149
13:41:54 <phila> issue-149?
13:41:54 <trackbot> issue-149 -- How to handle metadata that is embedded in the document? -- open
13:41:54 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/149
13:42:11 <phila> issue-150?
13:42:11 <trackbot> issue-150 -- Decide how examples are included in bp doc -- open
13:42:11 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/150
13:42:28 <annette_g> Caroline_:  the editors are open to discussion on this one.
13:42:46 <annette_g> we'd like to get some ideas
13:42:55 <annette_g> hadleybeeman:  what specific questions are you asking?
13:43:27 <ericstephan> q+
13:43:28 <annette_g> Caroline_:  input about how the examples should be included in the BP doc. right now they're in a very simple form.
13:43:39 <annette_g> … also, if you have examples to contribute, that would help.
13:43:39 <hadleybeeman> ack phil
13:43:55 <annette_g> phila:  I don't think an example can be too simple
13:44:13 <hadleybeeman> q+ to talk about how people use examples in specs
13:44:25 <annette_g> phila:  it shouldn't be too hard to talk about metadata that's embedded. It doesn't seem like a big issue.
13:44:43 <hadleybeeman> ack eric
13:44:45 <annette_g> phila:  you can have more than one example for an issue that's complex
13:44:46 <newtoncalegari> newtoncalegari has joined #dwbp
13:45:14 <annette_g> ericstephan: was thinking about going back to the use case doc to glean examples
13:45:26 <hadleybeeman> q?
13:45:52 <phila> ack h
13:45:52 <Zakim> hadleybeeman, you wanted to talk about how people use examples in specs
13:46:03 <annette_g> hadleybeeman:  makes sense to me. Phil taught me that most people when they look at a spec, they look at examples and pictures rather than reading the words.
13:46:14 <ericstephan> key point here about examples
13:46:28 <annette_g> hadleybeeman:  they help people learn what they need. Keeping them simple is great.
13:46:44 <annette_g> Caroline_:  I agree 100%.
13:46:49 <hadleybeeman> q?
13:47:10 <annette_g> Caroline_:  would anyone like to help us make examples, try to write about it as well?
13:47:12 <ericstephan> I can help write some that relate to the data usage vocab
13:47:17 <phila> The mind is willing but not this side of TPAC
13:47:20 <ericstephan> q+
13:47:30 <hadleybeeman> ack eric
13:48:06 <annette_g> ericstephan:  in developing the DUV, that might help us tie things back to the BP doc.
13:48:20 <annette_g> Caroline_:  we can close the issue.
13:48:25 <ericstephan> maybe make an assignment table?
13:48:45 <annette_g> Caroline_:  not sure if we should make an action
13:49:06 <annette_g> ericstephan:  we could make a table for people to fill in examples
13:49:25 <newtoncalegari> action to create the assignment table to fill examples
13:49:25 <trackbot> Error finding 'to'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/users>.
13:50:00 <annette_g> ericstephan:  I'd be happy to help
13:50:46 <newtoncalegari> action newtoncalegari to create the assignment table for relate people to work on examples
13:50:46 <trackbot> Created ACTION-214 - Create the assignment table for relate people to work on examples [on Newton Calegari - due 2015-10-16].
13:51:15 <hadleybeeman> close issue-150?
13:51:15 <trackbot> Closed issue-150.
13:51:40 <antoine> q+
13:51:50 <annette_g> hadleybeeman:  we are running short on time. do we want to spend time on open issues or talk about DQV?
13:51:54 <hadleybeeman> ack antoine
13:52:22 <annette_g> antoine:  I'd like to do some basic discussion about DQV instead of open issues
13:52:46 <phila> phila has joined #dwbp
13:52:48 <adler1> gotta drop
13:53:04 <hadleybeeman> topic: Data Quality Vocab
13:53:16 <annette_g> antoine:  there are some issues from the F2F that maybe we can close.
13:53:26 <hadleybeeman> issue-185?
13:53:26 <trackbot> issue-185 -- dqv:QualityAnnotation modeling issues -- open
13:53:26 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/185
13:54:16 <annette_g> hadleybeeman:  did the issue come from you?
13:54:19 <phila> That issue has a recorded resolution - that means it should probably be closed
13:54:30 <annette_g> antoine: yes, driven by a specific modeling question
13:54:40 <hadleybeeman> close issue-185
13:54:40 <trackbot> Closed issue-185.
13:54:54 <annette_g> hadleybeeman: we have a recorded resolution on this
13:54:56 <hadleybeeman> issue-184?
13:54:56 <trackbot> issue-184 -- Is an dqv:ServiceLevelAgreement a kind of certificate, or a standard? -- open
13:54:56 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/184
13:55:13 <annette_g> antoine: we have two resolutions for this one, and we opened a new issue
13:55:29 <phila> issue-199
13:55:29 <trackbot> issue-199 -- Is dqv:QualityPolicy a subclass of dcterms:Standard? -- open
13:55:29 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/199
13:55:39 <hadleybeeman> close issue-184
13:55:39 <trackbot> Closed issue-184.
13:55:44 <phila> So I'd say that 184 can be closed and handed to 199
13:56:18 <annette_g> antoine: I was the one who raised this
13:56:19 <phila> action-201?
13:56:19 <trackbot> action-201 -- Antoine Isaac to Add note to dqv document seeking examples from external reviewers -- due 2015-10-01 -- OPEN
13:56:19 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/201
13:56:33 <antoine> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Sep/0093.html
13:56:46 <hadleybeeman> closer action-201
13:56:49 <annette_g> antoine: that was an action on me, I sent an email to the list.
13:56:51 <hadleybeeman> close action-201
13:56:51 <trackbot> Closed action-201.
13:57:15 <antoine> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/201
13:57:44 <annette_g> antoine: new editorial issue Riccardo has raised about using instances of OA:motivation
13:58:06 <hadleybeeman> issue-201?
13:58:06 <trackbot> issue-201 -- Should we exploit predefined instances of oa:Motivation to further characterize the UserQualityFeedback purposes? -- raised
13:58:06 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/201
13:58:12 <annette_g> antoine: the action is currently only raised as an issue.
13:58:41 <annette_g> antoine: riccardoAlbertoni has put some text asking feedback from readers.
13:59:06 <antoine> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Aug/0146.html
13:59:07 <annette_g> antoine:  we need to come back to it with whatever feedback we receive
13:59:56 <PeterWinstanley> PeterWinstanley has joined #dwbp
14:00:08 <antoine> Relation between DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP
14:00:08 <annette_g> antoine:  ISO and DQV, I'd like to not loose track of these things
14:00:19 <hadleybeeman> issue: relation between DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP
14:00:19 <trackbot> Created ISSUE-202 - Relation between dqv, iso 19115/19157 and geodcat-ap.  Please complete additional details at <http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/202/edit>.
14:00:57 <annette_g> antoine:  there was a lot of discussion on this, but we are out of time now.
14:01:14 <annette_g> hadleybeeman:  puts the email into the issue
14:01:20 <annette_g> hadleybeeman: \a\n
14:01:21 <annette_g> y
14:01:27 <annette_g> any other comments?
14:01:34 <annette_g> silence reigns
14:01:41 <phila> Regrets for next Friday (moving house)
14:01:50 <annette_g> hadleybeeman: reviews next week's agenda
14:02:00 <phila> I'll try and have something to offer on the Erik W issues for next week
14:02:19 <antoine> q+
14:02:24 <annette_g> hadleybeeman:  if people want to suggest agenda items, feel free
14:02:26 <Caroline_> q+
14:02:53 <annette_g> antoine: can you take care of carrying on nandana and phila's items?
14:02:56 <annette_g> hadleybeeman:  yep
14:02:58 <hadleybeeman> ack antoine
14:03:20 <annette_g> Caroline_:  let's keep talking about issues on email. editors will try to prioritize.
14:03:24 <MTCarrasco> bye
14:03:29 <riccardoAlbertoni>  have a good weekend!
14:03:29 <laufer> bye all...  nice to see you...
14:03:32 <annette_g> bye all!
14:03:38 <Caroline_> bye! Thank you!!
14:03:40 <antoine> s/phila/fadi
14:04:16 <annette_g> annette_g has left #dwbp
14:06:28 <annette_g> annette_g has joined #dwbp
14:06:34 <annette_g> annette_g has left #dwbp
14:09:04 <phila> RRSAgent, make logs public
14:09:12 <phila> RRSAgent, draft minutes
14:09:12 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/10/09-dwbp-minutes.html phila
17:14:17 <JoaoPauloAlmeida> JoaoPauloAlmeida has joined #dwbp
17:20:18 <Zakim> Zakim has left #dwbp
18:44:45 <phila> phila has joined #dwbp