12:57:22 RRSAgent has joined #dpub-aria 12:57:22 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/09/24-dpub-aria-irc 12:58:12 present+ janina 12:58:32 present+ tzviya 12:59:04 agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dpub-aria/2015Sep/0010.html 12:59:14 this is DPUB-ARIA 12:59:47 chair: Tzviya 13:00:50 present+ Janina 13:00:55 mgylling has joined #dpub-aria 13:02:03 Present+ ivan 13:02:33 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #dpub-aria 13:02:58 Present+ Markus 13:03:15 scribenick mgylling 13:03:50 present+ Rich_Schwerdtfeger 13:04:40 topic: open issues 13:04:47 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/87 13:04:53 tzviya: proposal to change prefix from dpub to doc 13:05:27 … the general thought is that using dpub limits audience, broaden exposure by more general prefix 13:05:39 rich: we might get pushback from other people 13:05:49 … is it floated to html5 wg, microsoft? 13:05:54 tzviya: not yet 13:07:20 tzivya: other than a possible microsoft objection, are we comfortable with the new prefix? 13:07:46 janina: why generalize it? 13:07:52 q+ 13:08:00 … seems to me there is value to associated with digital publishing as a brand 13:08:17 ack ivan 13:08:56 ivan: the other issue however is that it is not necessarily good to keep digital publishing in its own silo 13:09:14 … it has been that way, and it does not necessarily help 13:09:25 … not something no the side, but that is relevant for core web usage 13:09:43 … I would be pleased if somebody produced vanilla html5 doc with these terms 13:11:12 … we have to run the idea through others and see if we get pushbacks… its not the end of the world 13:11:26 janina: spending a lot of time on this is probably not worthwhile 13:11:41 rich: who from DPIG is going to raise this with microsoft 13:12:15 rich: suggest tzviya send an email to cynthia 13:12:26 tzviya: is ms the only organization we need comments from? 13:12:35 rich: you can post to public-pf 13:13:13 tzviya: and lets bring this up again on our next meeting 13:13:28 topic: additional terms 13:13:56 tzviya: we dont need to go through all additional terms now, we have some questions about them 13:14:08 … is the role term in ARIA? 13:14:21 rich: no it does not, we have definitions and things like that 13:14:50 https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/aria/aria.html#term 13:15:08 https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/aria/aria.html#definition 13:15:22 s/no it does not/yes it is 13:15:40 tzviya: this is going to affect how we do glossaries etc 13:16:41 tzviya: next questions: we put in a new role “errata” or “erratum”, if we put this on an li, how does that affect list based semantics 13:17:09 rich: why do you need erratum? 13:17:20 tzviya: think we only want the plural 13:17:41 tzviya: somebody in PF recommended using both container and individual item 13:18:23 tzviya: there are a few things that can be done individually or in group, like footnotes, not always standalone section 13:19:12 rich: can an erratum land elsewhere as well? 13:19:29 tzviya: probably no 13:20:16 … the first issue we wanted to clarify is whether listness is overriden, the answer to that is yes 13:20:42 rich: but then you will have an issue with each of the list items in an errata 13:21:28 tzviya: second issue is bloat caused by plural and singular, some of these are because they are sometimes in standalone sections, sometimes not. 13:21:58 tzviya: moving on to the mappings, terms that are implicit 13:22:39 ShaneM has joined #dpub-aria 13:23:08 https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/aria/aria.html#listitem 13:23:34 rich: listitem says its on the context of a group or a list, the question is for erratum, is it a group, a landmark or what? 13:25:25 tzviya: the reason we had both, is that on some of the early calls, this was recommended because implication does not work in aria 13:26:28 rich: we need to come back to the taxonomy, its largely for modelling purposes, we have another spec that wants to override like a list with a different role, we need to figure out how to handle that in the aria spec 13:27:21 … if it subclasses list, do we know if it can have listitems 13:27:46 … normally dealing with inheritance of states and properties, we haven’t dealt with descendants 13:28:03 … because some things are multiple inheritance 13:28:11 s/are mult/have mult 13:29:13 rich: another way to do this: if someone iz extending the aria spec, we’ve talked about extending objects, but extending list etc needs to be worked out 13:29:45 rich: the other big thing I think is whether something is a landmark or just a group of items, its not clear which things you consider to be landmarks 13:30:11 http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/dpub-aam/dpub-aam.html 13:30:33 … if you view the mapping spec, go down to role mappings view as table, you can see which things are landmarks, groups or panels 13:31:20 rich: is dpub-locator a link? 13:31:23 markus: yes 13:31:38 rich: why wouldnt we just have link? 13:35:08 markus: [explains locator] 13:35:21 rich: this reminds me about what we are looking at for cognitive 13:35:50 rich: this is a function rather than a role 13:36:41 … cognitive wants to say e.g. that a button accesses the help system or makes a purchase, used also for styling 13:37:27 rich: its almost like you want a new attribute 13:39:45 rich: look at the api mappings: on mac, role is link and subrole locator, but if you land on it and it says locator that is confusing, we are going to say one or the other to the user 13:41:24 … for UI automation they only give you one vehicle to tell you, if we have another attribute, its a way to convey information 13:41:48 tzviya: it doesnt duplicate the generic back function 13:42:08 … and it is activatable 13:43:35 markus: these are 13:44:09 rich: you definitely want to say role ="link", because AT does not know what locators are 13:44:34 ...we almost need an ARIA function that we can use for Cognitive and DPUB 13:44:50 ...I will talk to Lisa Seaman 13:45:13 13:45:14 tzviya: anything that ends with *ref is a link 13:46:17 . … 13:47:16 . … 13:48:05 rich: recommends last of listed options. This would be a property 13:48:24 tzviya: are you recommending removing these roles from DPUB? 13:48:55 rich: don't change anything yet. Will get back to you shortly 13:49:12 rich: I also need to know which roles are landmarks and which are groups 13:49:58 ...I am asking Cynthia if the strings should have the prefix or not 13:50:44 rich: One would expect AT to expose landmarks in a hierachical view of page 13:51:41 tzviya: we'll take a look at the existing landmarks and assess 13:52:55 topic: TPAC 13:55:26 tzviya: DPUB meets on Thu/Fri. Afternoon so that Markus can call 14:01:40 tzviya: tentative meeting for Thursday afternoon 2pm 14:02:02 rrsagents, make minutes public 14:02:10 rrsagent, make logs public 14:02:18 rrsagent, make minutes 14:02:18 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/09/24-dpub-aria-minutes.html tzviya 14:51:03 janina has joined #dpub-aria 14:52:55 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #dpub-aria 15:32:08 Zakim has left #dpub-aria