14:06:37 RRSAgent has joined #xproc 14:06:37 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/09/09-xproc-irc 14:06:39 rrsagent, set logs world-visible 14:06:39 Meeting: XML Processing Model WG 14:06:39 Date: 9 September 2015 14:06:39 Meeting: 277 14:06:41 Chair: Norm 14:06:43 Scribe: Norm 14:06:45 ScribeNick: Norm 14:06:54 Present: Norm, Henry, Alex 14:06:55 Agenda: http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/09/09-agenda 14:08:29 Topic: Accept this agenda? 14:08:29 -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/09/09-agenda 14:08:39 Accepted. 14:08:49 Topic: Accept minutes from the previous meeting? 14:08:49 -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2015/09/02-minutes 14:08:54 Accepted. 14:09:08 unfortunately - solar panel man arrived ... will try to jump on minute after I am done with him 14:09:19 Topic: Next meeting, 23 September 2015 14:09:43 Henry gives possible regrets 14:10:10 Topic: The latest “flowchart” branch (section 5.10, p:inline “flowchart”). 14:10:25 -> https://ndw.github.io/specification/langspec/flowchart/head/xproc20/ 14:12:12 Henry: I think this looks better. 14:13:44 Henry: What about the text/* story? Isn't that missing? 14:13:48 Norm: Right. Yes it is. 14:14:04 Norm: Back to the editor it goes. 14:16:22 Some discussion of non-text/* media types that are in fact text. 14:16:30 Consensus: Maybe but we're not going to try to handle those. 14:17:00 Alex: What about application/json? 14:17:07 Norm: You have to mislabel that or encode it, I think. 14:19:41 More discussion leads to the conclusion that it's just characters. 14:19:51 ...You lose if it's not just a sequence of characters. 14:21:00 Henry: If it's an XML media type, we're done. 14:21:39 ... If it's not XML, it must a single text node. 14:21:52 ...anything else is an error. 14:22:15 ...The characters in that text node are then available as the data in the specified content type. 14:22:57 Topic: The “variables” anywhere branch. (Completes ACTION A-273-01 on Norm.) 14:23:07 -> https://ndw.github.io/specification/langspec/variables/head/xproc20/ 14:25:19 Henry: In 2.6, there's nothing that says where the scope ends. 14:25:23 ...I think I want a link to "lexically scoped." 14:31:23 Henry: I'd remove in-scope bindings from the environment alltogether. The environment is just the readable ports story. 14:31:56 ...Remove (3) from the first list in 2.6. 14:32:19 ...Maybe call it the 'port environment'. And then you don't say anything about variables and options in this section at all. 14:34:19 Norm muses about the boundary of nested p:declare-steps. 14:34:35 Henry: Something like p:pipeline/p:declare-step define a scope and inherit nothing. 14:38:06 Henry: I would hope that In-scope variables in 2.7.1, could read "because V & O are lexically scoped, the in-scope variables are the union of the in-scope specified options and the in-scope variable bindings. 14:41:28 Henry: I wonder if 2.11 needs to be Variables & Options and have subsections for each. 14:42:53 Norm: Ok, that's plenty to work on for a new draft. 14:42:57 Topic: Any other business? 14:45:07 Alex: We should try to work on getting a new public working draft out after Sapporo. 14:45:31 Norm: I think that makes sense. 14:45:49 Norm: I'll try to get something ready to talk about in two weeks. 14:46:27 Henry: Can you put the meeting number in the agendas and get the password from L iam? 14:46:29 Norm: Yes. 14:52:49 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:52:49 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/09/09-xproc-minutes.html Norm