12:55:30 RRSAgent has joined #dpub-aria 12:55:30 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/09/03-dpub-aria-irc 12:58:51 zakim, this will be DPUB-ARIA 12:58:51 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, tzviya 12:59:46 agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dpub-aria/2015Sep/0000.html 13:01:41 present+ janina 13:02:11 mgylling has joined #dpub-aria 13:02:39 present+ Tzviya 13:02:43 Agenda: 13:02:43 * DPUB roles in ARIA Core - yes or no, prefix or no 13:02:44 * Link roles: in ARIA or @rel registry? 13:02:45 * update on timeline for additional dpub roles to be added to draft 13:02:46 * update on DPUB AAM progress 13:02:53 Present+ Markus 13:03:30 present+ Ivan 13:03:37 scribenick: mgylling 13:03:57 zakim, this will be DPUB ARIA 13:03:57 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, tzviya 13:05:32 ShaneM_ has joined #dpub-aria 13:06:28 zakim, this is dpub-aria https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=mf2cde14c5140de2a3a9a333212ab1cc9 code 641 181 126 13:06:28 got it, ivan_ 13:06:30 mgarrish has joined #dpub-aria 13:06:33 zakim, code? 13:06:33 I have been told this is dpub-aria https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=mf2cde14c5140de2a3a9a333212ab1cc9 code 641 181 126 13:06:42 topic: DPUB roles in ARIA Core 13:07:48 chair: markus 13:08:16 chair: tzviya 13:08:35 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #dpub-aria 13:08:47 tzviya: whether we should shift some of the DPUB roles into aria core, and whether to use the prefix 13:11:03 markus: this is a double-edged sword. adding to core would increase uptake, but splitting the vocab could lead to confusion 13:11:21 markus: in the worst case, we would have properties in DPUB, ARIA, and @rel registry 13:11:51 tzviya: think this will come again up as other modules are added 13:12:40 … on the one hand you could say that people are already looking at ARIA for document structure, if we have glossary as part of core, and glossary-reference as part of DPUB, its kind of dissonant 13:13:26 ivan: janina, markus raised the issue that if a value goes into core, if it namespaceless then it has more chances to be understood by AT… is that really the case? Could AT not accept properties that keep dpub-? 13:14:11 janina: it could work both ways, AT is already picking up ARIA roles, OTOH DPUB space is also an attractive space, seems a rather easy thing to add 13:15:10 ivan: is it possible to say that we have the DPUB hyphenspace module, and somehow in the core ARIA spec there is a reference to DPUB properties, that we consider part of core, but defined in DPUB spec? 13:15:26 janina: probably the easiest one to move through to TR 13:15:54 ivan: the authors of an ebook would just know dpub- and nothing else, from that perspective we are fine 13:16:41 rich: which ones are we talking about? 13:17:06 matt: chapter and one or two others 13:17:32 ivan: we have the notion of chapter, aria value is dpub-chapter once and for all, but its still part of the core, and defined normatively in dpub spec 13:18:19 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/51 identifies the roles that Core is interested in harvesting 13:18:52 s/namespaceless/hyphenspaceless/ 13:19:17 ivan: pushing all dpub roles in the first seems to be too much 13:19:46 janina: rich is that true? 13:19:52 rich: we need to give them runway 13:20:31 … MS said we want to be able to support the ARIA spec, later we can support the publishing module 13:21:45 rich: getting some roles into core wouldnt buy you much 13:22:59 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: migrate nothing to ARIA core at this point 13:23:48 janina: agrees, keep it simple 13:25:18 matt: isnt in education issue? splitting would make life harder for publishers, we should make people aware that aria is expanding using modules 13:25:35 RESOLVED: migrate nothing to ARIA core at this point 13:25:50 topic: link roles 13:26:23 matt: noteref, glossref, biblioref, etc 13:27:39 markus: has link roles been discussed in ARIA before? 13:27:53 rich: no, but discussions is ongoing in cognitive @@@ 13:28:20 s/cognitive/the cognitive taskforce/ 13:28:45 http://microformats.org/wiki/rel 13:30:04 tzviya: if there was rel=description, then people would be a lot more comfortable using rel for descriptions 13:31:30 janina: is this only for HTML or also for SVG? 13:31:46 … think that would be the basis for supporting ARIA doing the same thing that rel does 13:32:00 … otherwise we have to answer why not use rel 13:33:19 rich: SVG does not have rel 13:33:22 https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/attindex.html 13:34:00 janina: we know we want to do this to SVG, and maybe other markup languages as well, there’s the argument for putting this into ARIA 13:34:37 rich: I dont think we’ll get this in SVG2 13:36:05 ivan: the only additional problem is that rel is also used in other settings in RDFa 13:36:15 markus: how does that impact us? 13:36:33 ivan: there may be default namespaceless properties, so there may be a low probability of clashes 13:38:09 RESOLVED: keep link roles in aria draft for now, await further input from the community 13:38:34 rich: AT doesnt currently make use of @rel 13:38:52 topic: additional dpub roles 13:39:50 markus: for me, tzviya matt and sanders to work on 13:40:23 tzviya: once we decide which roles to add it wont take long, but we need time to discuss things 13:45:32 tzviya: we'll aim to finish additional DPUB roles by latest mid-Oct 13:45:50 topic: update on DPUB AAM 13:46:21 rich: working on ARIA 1.1 and SVG, DPUB AAM is on the list 13:47:27 no meeting next week (10 Septemeber) 13:48:18 review period oF FPWD is coming to a close, we will close out the issues, all of which predate publication 13:48:24 rrsagent, make logs public 13:48:28 rrsagent, make minutes 13:48:28 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/09/03-dpub-aria-minutes.html tzviya 14:02:27 pkra has joined #dpub-aria 15:30:28 Zakim has left #dpub-aria 15:33:46 mgylling has joined #dpub-aria 15:37:03 janina has joined #dpub-aria 15:46:01 janina has joined #dpub-aria