<trackbot> Date: 15 June 2015

<scribe> scribe: Roger

<Arnaud> Proposal: Approve the minutes of the 1 June teleconf: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2015-06-01

<Arnaud> Resolved: Approve the minutes of the 1 June teleconf: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2015-06-01

Next meeting 29th June

<deiu> Action-162?

<trackbot> Action-162 -- Robert Sanderson to Send implementation comparison to public list -- due 2015-04-28 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/actions/162

Paging

In previous call we agreed to making a WG note from LDP paging.

After a few more updates to status section, it will be good to go.

LD Patch

Alexandre is trying to clarify the legal status of his LD patch implementation

once done this can progress us beyond CR

it is much better to do this before the charter expires

LDPNext

At the moment the support for the next version of LDP is a bit lacklustre

deiu suggests a community group.

to get the tools and framework to continue working, but without the some of formalities

<deiu> I think it's 10 people that have to OK it

Arnaud says there is a way to progress to a recommendation track - which takes care of patent policy.

bblfish suggests building a list of interested names. We could move to a CG if the interest isn't too high. The CG could be useful for a transition phase.

Arnaud encourages everyone to express their endorsement / support of LDPNext by dropping an email to the mailing list

<bblfish> Arnaud pointed out that the best way would be if all members expressed support on the public mailing list to the e-mail about the Working Group chater.

<bblfish> So we should answer this e-mail: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp/2015May/0007.html with +1's ?

<deiu> bblfish, that would be a good start

Ashok suggested that we could spin-off some of the specs to other working groups.

(right Ashok ?)

<Ashok> Yes, Roger, as a last resort!

bblfish requests a vote because silence isn't considered as endorsement in this case.

<bblfish> In fact we did quite a lot of work on the WebID CG ( well it's an XG too ) http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/spec/

all - bblfish makes a good suggestion.

Arnaud adds another voice to the CG is a

scribe: transitory way of organising ourselves whilst we build ourselves up to a WG

AOB

Annotations WG is using LDP, but. they are defaulting to JSON-LD, rather than turtle.

<deiu> +1 TallTed

TallTed suggests that the default document type should be HTML - not JSON-LD or turtle, or ..

lots of discussion about JSON, JSON-LD, ActivityStreams, etc ...

one thing to note is that we should think about updating the MUST statements about turtle in LDP in a future publishing

<bblfish> https://github.com/linkeddata/SoLiD/issues/30

<Arnaud> trackbot, end meeting

bblfish suggested a pattern of creation using PUT of a temporary resource (and then I didn't understand the rest Henry ....)

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.140  of Date: 2014-11-06 18:16:30  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found Scribe: Roger
Inferring ScribeNick: roger
Default Present: Arnaud, +33.6.66.52.aaaa, pchampin, Ashok_Malhotra, TallTed, Roger, +33.6.38.32.aabb, deiu, bblfish
Present: Arnaud +33.6.66.52.aaaa pchampin Ashok_Malhotra TallTed Roger +33.6.38.32.aabb deiu bblfish

WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Found Date: 15 Jun 2015
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2015/06/15-ldp-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.