W3C

- DRAFT -

Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Teleconference

27 Apr 2015

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
azaroth, Ashok_Malhotra, Arnaud, ericP, +33.6.43.93.aaaa, bblfish, TallTed, Roger, pchampin, nmihindu
Regrets
Chair
SV_MEETING_CHAIR
Scribe
Roger

Contents


<trackbot> Date: 27 April 2015

<bblfish> hi

<bblfish> yes

<Arnaud> deiu, any progress on the charter update?

<bblfish> I can scribe

<scribe> Scribe: Roger

<Arnaud> Proposal: Approve the minutes of the 13 April teleconf: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2015-04-13

<Arnaud> Resolved: Approve the minutes of the 13 April teleconf: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2015-04-13

<pchampin> link is broken, no?

There are two open actions

Recent Workshop

Ashok has sent a draft report to the mailing. Please read and provide feedback. It was a productive and useful.

Many presentations. Exchange of ideas. People are implementing and using LDP !!

It was great to see that people are using it.

People have requirements for extensions.

List of extensions and requirements evolved during the course of the meeting.

<Ashok> Here is the list of the top 5

<Ashok> 1. Extensibility and Discovery 2. Inlining on Get 3. Query/Search 3.1 SPARQL on LDP (resource-centric) – Queries in SPARQL are either triple oriented (CONSTRUCT) or table oriented (SELECT). We need to be able to speak about resources such as the members of a container. 3.2 RDF Source-scoped – being able to query LDP-Rs. Perhaps each LDPR could be considered as its own SPARQL endpoint. 3.3 Paging of query results 4. Client-based paging 5. Access Control inc[CUT]

Rob took an action to produce some documentation about features present in the existing implementations.

Andrei took an action to update the charter.

<azaroth> Minor correction: one of my colleagues has already done a lot of work in comparing LDP implementations, so the action on me was just to send that on to the list

The LDP re-chartering requires a new Chair, because Arnaud will not be available for the job (for a number of reasons)

<bblfish> don't forget that many people perhaps did not come due to distance, so there must be more people out there interested

<Ashok> Yes, Henry, I'm sure that's true!

<bblfish> very nice.

TallTed: Don't forget about paging. It's important !

<Ashok> Ted ... also paging with inlining of member contents

<nmihindu> bblfish, https://github.com/jasnell/specs/blob/master/httpbis/draft-snell-search-method-00.txt

<Zakim> azaroth, you wanted to suggest just including Vary in all the examples

<Ashok> Thanks, Nandana, please all respond on the w3c-ietf mailing list expressing support

<azaroth> ACTION azaroth to send edits for paging to include Vary header in examples, consider also non-normative sentence in the text

<trackbot> Created ACTION-163 - Send edits for paging to include vary header in examples, consider also non-normative sentence in the text [on Robert Sanderson - due 2015-05-04].

Arnaud: after Robs edits we could thinking about publishing a working group note from the LDP Paging document.
... Two common comments about paging. 1. paging on it's own doesn't do enough - I need querying as well. 2. some have a preference for paging to be more "client-driven"

LD PATCH

<pchampin> https://github.com/pchampin/ld-patch-testsuite/blob/master/README.rst#implementation-reports

<pchampin> https://github.com/pchampin/ld-patch-testsuite/blob/master/README.rst

<Ashok> Sorry! Gotta go!

<pchampin> https://github.com/pchampin/ld-patch-testsuite/blob/master/reports/

pchampin: the content is being maintained at github.

implemention reports are welcome, as well as using the test suite

Primer

Primer is published as a working group note. Thanks to Eric.

<ericP> resolution of i18n-ISSUE-409: What are the string matching rules in the delete operation

<ericP> ack on resolution of i18n-ISSUE-410: Language tags should reference BCP 47

<ericP> ack on resolution of i18n-ISSUE-411: Definition of whitespace should come from Unicode

Any other business ?

henry: how fixed is the scope for the LDP.next ?

arnaud: plenty of time for evolution

although the list is better when it is _short_

one more thing .... modules better than monolith

<Arnaud> trackbot, end meeting

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.140 (CVS log)
$Date: 2015/04/27 15:07:43 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.140  of Date: 2014-11-06 18:16:30  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/Resolvedl/Resolved/
Found Scribe: Roger
Inferring ScribeNick: roger
Default Present: azaroth, Ashok_Malhotra, Arnaud, ericP, +33.6.43.93.aaaa, bblfish, TallTed, Roger, pchampin, nmihindu
Present: azaroth Ashok_Malhotra Arnaud ericP +33.6.43.93.aaaa bblfish TallTed Roger pchampin nmihindu

WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Found Date: 27 Apr 2015
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2015/04/27-ldp-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]