<trackbot> Date: 13 April 2015

admin

<Arnaud> Proposal: Approve the minutes of the 30 March teleconf: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2015-03-30

<Arnaud> Resolved: Approve the minutes of the 30 March teleconf: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2015-03-30

arnaud: next call on the 27th of April
... we only have one open action, to ericP, who is not here.
... I don't know if he did it.

ashok: Andrei and I have done most of it

arnaud: ok, I'll close the action

paging

arnaud: I was hoping Rob would be here to talk about caching and paging.
... Let's see if he comes later during the call.

LD Patch

arnaud: we have a spec, we have a test suite

<Arnaud> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/tip/tests/ldpatch/reports/ldpatch.html

arnaud: Pierre-Antoine considers that the test suite is more or less complete
... Why don't we have implementation reports yet?

pchampin: my implementation does pass the tests, I just have to publish the report

arnaud: Alexandre has changed job recently, he has an implementation, but I don't know how far he is in passing the tests
... Anyone else with an implementation?

tallted: an implementation should be coming from OpenLink, but no timeframe

ashok: I asked some people at Oracle, they answered "not quite yet"

LDP Primer

arnaud: we agreed to publish it as a note, and Nandana agreed to do it
... but he has not finished yet

Workshop

arnaud: it is next week
... thanks to Andrei for advertising it on different channels

ashok: we only got one very brief submission
... a lot of people have different ideas about what linked data is or should be
... that should generate informal discussion

sandro: is there any plan to allow remote participation?

ashok: that will be hard; no telephone, and internet connexion will be charged

<Arnaud> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2015Apr/0000.html

back to Rob's question about caching and paging

ericp: a HTTP cache should store cached response with a few header values
... the Vary header is here to specify which headers should be used

arnaud: should we says something in the spec?

sandro: I think that 'prefer' is by default used in cache, so 'vary: prefer' would be redundant

ericp: RFC7240 states that "a Vary header field MUST be included in the response listing the Prefer header field"
... which is good, because we can just remind that fact without normatively changing anything in LDP
... (as the constraint was already implicitly inherited from RFC7240)

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7240

arnaud: the two editors are gone, so I'm relunctant to go and modify the document
... let's reply to Rob and see what he thinks
... ADJOURNED

<Arnaud> trackbot, end meeting

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.140  of Date: 2014-11-06 18:16:30  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/Erik/ericP/
Succeeded: s/asholk/ashok/
No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: pchampin
Inferring Scribes: pchampin
Default Present: +33.6.66.52.aaaa, deiu, Arnaud, pchampin, Ashok, CodyB, MiguelAraCo, Sandro, TallTed, ericP
Present: +33.6.66.52.aaaa deiu Arnaud pchampin Ashok CodyB MiguelAraCo Sandro TallTed ericP

WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Found Date: 13 Apr 2015
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2015/04/13-ldp-minutes.html
People with action items: