17:54:05 RRSAgent has joined #logo 17:54:05 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/04/03-logo-irc 17:55:15 alex_antennahouse has joined #logo 17:57:50 Team_(logo)18:00Z has now started 17:57:57 +Doug_Schepers 17:58:53 +[IPcaller] 17:58:57 +??P2 17:59:29 I'm ipcaller 17:59:42 +[IPcaller.a] 18:00:20 +plinss 18:00:21 Zakim, ??P2 is MichaelN 18:00:22 +MichaelN; got it 18:01:10 Zakim, IPcaller is alex_antennahouse 18:01:10 +alex_antennahouse; got it 18:01:23 Michael_Nieling has joined #logo 18:01:56 +koalie 18:02:05 koalie has joined #logo 18:02:47 +[Apple] 18:02:55 dsinger has joined #logo 18:06:39 https://join.me/ocupopscreen 18:09:47 scribenick: koalie 18:10:07 Doug: We had some ideas, learned good and bad lessons from the HTML5 logo 18:10:12 ... pretty successful 18:10:20 ... we didn't have the stakeholders at the start 18:10:24 ... that's a downside 18:10:38 ... so we wanted to get you involved early on 18:10:55 ... Assets around the release; webpage, how to use 18:11:00 ... we want to do that again this time 18:11:14 leaverou has joined #logo 18:11:16 ... we had a gallery "send us how you use it" but that didn't work so well 18:11:23 ... we'll make a little video 18:11:32 ... about what went into the process 18:11:40 ... a shorter version of the presentation you are about to see 18:11:47 ... in terms of timing of release: 18:12:01 ... I don't know if there is a CSS milestone, anything relevant 18:12:08 ... I invite you to suggest things 18:12:26 ... failing that, I'd like to reveal that at the W3C W3Conf in July 18:12:36 ... it will be live-streamed 18:12:51 +Lea 18:13:03 ... it would be great if said milestone could be met at this time 18:13:07 [Lea arrives] 18:13:27 Doug: reminder: 18:13:36 ... we want a chance to refine this 18:13:45 ... and to present it to the world in one sweep of the hand 18:13:53 ... so please, keep this under embargo 18:14:09 ... Leaks would spoil the majesty of the thing 18:14:28 [Michael proceeds with https://join.me/ocupopscreen ] 18:14:56 q+ 18:15:29 Michael: I'm going to enlist your help on strategy 18:15:43 ... how to make it accepted universally, and how to make it evolve 18:16:08 ... we want the same enthusiasm around the HTML5 logo which people could remix 18:17:04 ... I'm hear to propose solution 18:17:08 ... what best communicates CSS 18:17:24 Zakim, who's on the phone? 18:17:24 On the phone I see Doug_Schepers, alex_antennahouse, MichaelN, [IPcaller.a], plinss, koalie, [Apple], Lea 18:17:34 Zakim, [ is dsinger 18:17:34 sorry, koalie, I do not recognize a party named '[' 18:17:45 Zakim, [A is dsinger 18:17:45 +dsinger; got it 18:18:24 Zakim, ??P2 is Renoirb 18:18:24 I already had ??P2 as MichaelN, renoirb 18:18:31 Michael: Keywords about CSS 18:18:48 + +1.617.583.aaaa 18:19:39 Michael: CSS == creativity, execution on the Web 18:20:03 Zakim, [I is renoirb 18:20:03 +renoirb; got it 18:20:27 Michael: It's evolving, it has improved, it's modular, etc. 18:20:37 ... it's a foundation on which powerful tools are being build 18:20:44 s/build/built/ 18:20:52 Michael: Moving from words to images... 18:21:35 ... in logo design we aim for instant reaction to it and understanding of it 18:21:45 ... one way it to leverage concept words 18:21:51 s/way it/way is/ 18:23:47 ... We produced a hundred sketches 18:23:53 ... moving on to solutions 18:24:00 ... here are the ideas that didn't make the cut 18:24:27 ... We wanted to convey the reality of CSS 18:26:00 ... we played on promises of functionalities, the shape of CSS code might be, 18:26:10 ... layers, modularity 18:26:27 ... we played with how to incorporate those 18:26:49 Michael: We wanted to highlight the sophistication of CSS 18:27:09 ... Also we wanted it to work well in colour and in single-colour 18:27:39 ... Early on, we wanted something more stylish than the HTML5 logo 18:28:05 ... This is a C and S, it looks like an ampersand 18:28:16 ... but you don't see the meaning right away 18:28:32 ... other ideas on CSS monogram in the shape of cascading water 18:28:47 ... more shapes 18:29:20 Michael: But all those didn't convey the power, depth, duality of styling of CSS 18:30:51 ... we played then we 6-edge shapes 18:31:03 ... and angular CSS monogram 18:31:19 s/then we/then with/ 18:31:51 ... We went from hard cross-roads to breaks in the line weight 18:32:06 ... to give a sense of how the lines are weaving into each other 18:32:18 ... This is in one-colour 18:32:23 ... back to the hexagon shape 18:32:53 ... we came up with shades of blue 18:33:20 s/with shades/with a cube in shades/ 18:34:10 ... it fits well side by side with the HTML5 logo 18:34:31 q? 18:35:02 Michael: Welcoming questions, focusing on what and why, less about how 18:35:06 ... which is our job 18:35:14 ack s 18:35:29 Topic: Feedback 18:35:31 Doug: Michael showed me an early version 18:36:03 ... We wanted to be able to leverage characteritics of CSS in the logo itself, for example hover effect or drop shadwo 18:36:09 s/dwo/dow/ 18:36:14 it would be cool to animate-assemble it, etc. too 18:36:26 ... and have a way to simplify the complex shape in small size 18:36:44 ... would that work? 18:36:58 Michael: We wanted the build it with CSS 18:37:04 ... We wanted it animated 18:37:12 ... Doug can share a link 18:37:17 http://codepen.io/jakealbaugh/full/7e67ee5e0dc5ccec87668bb5357a3379 18:37:35 Michael: as far as sizing goes, this is why we wanted the unique container 18:37:53 ... without the monogran, we have the cube; a box 18:37:57 ... it can play that role 18:38:05 q+ to talk about lines and blues 18:39:09 Am concerned about the number of lines, and that they are a bit ‘spindly’. Also wonder why the right two segments and bottom two are in different blues; it diminishes the ‘cube’ effect. 18:39:18 ack next 18:39:19 dsinger, you wanted to talk about lines and blues 18:39:50 dsinger++ for feeding the record with his comment 18:40:01 q+ 18:40:07 Michael: We added a diamond shape (the bottom of the cube) 18:40:20 ... because we want the eye to see the monogram inside the cube 18:40:46 ah, you want ambiguity between cube and gem. ok 18:40:47 ... the cube is not visible at first 18:41:39 Doug: How would you feel about showing the version that I saw? 18:41:54 Michael: We could. We made adjustments to simplify things 18:42:10 ... lighter line weight and addition @@ in the S 18:42:24 ... we moved away from that to simplify further and make it more iconic 18:43:04 q? 18:43:04 ack next 18:43:13 Lea: I really like how it looks 18:43:18 ... both cube and diamond 18:43:23 ... however it feels too frail 18:43:30 ... it doesn't have the boldness of the HTML5 logo 18:43:40 ... it feels a bit too complex for a logo 18:43:47 +1 to Lea 18:43:52 ... it might not contribute to a strong brand 18:44:11 Michael: It has far less negative space than the HTML5 logo 18:44:21 ... it is not fragile since it is in a container 18:44:31 would like to see it with the C heavier (and possibly then the C only can stay in small sizes?) 18:44:38 ... when presented next to HTML5 logo, there is a notion of yin and yang 18:44:57 ... weight could be refined 18:45:02 ... point taken 18:45:24 ... as far as brand, I think people will love to draw it 18:45:38 ... geometric pattern 18:45:58 ... I've been sketching it a lot; it's fun to draw 18:46:11 ... so, point well taken; we can make it more powerful 18:46:24 ... but not straw too far away 18:46:32 Lea: Making is a bit simpler would help 18:46:39 ... the first thought I have is: complex 18:46:51 I think it’s a fine balance between ‘elegant’ and ‘fragile’ or ‘spindly’. 18:47:01 ‘Complex’ is not usually a compliment. 18:47:02 ... CSS is complex, but I'm not sure it would be good if the logo contributed to reinforcing the idea that CSS is complex 18:47:40 Michael: It should not be intimidating 18:47:48 q? 18:47:50 ... we should aim at communicating it better 18:48:16 Lea: a small version would not be distinguishible 18:48:22 ... what's inside is the thing 18:48:28 ... hexagon has been done many times 18:49:12 Michael: Drawing the HTML5 logo analogy, you can't own the shape 18:49:25 ... the HTML5 logo was adopted because it was shared 18:49:58 ... There's a mark; the monogram, and the container 18:50:12 ... You will be able to leverage itself 18:50:23 ... the monogram itself doesn't need to be there at 16 px 18:50:29 Doug: Both points well taken 18:51:04 ... In the inner cube of the previous version, at the small icon size, you'd still be able to see the C inside 18:51:12 ... Maybe we can play with the idea of merging 18:51:16 Michael: Yes 18:51:31 ... and that might address the issue Lea raised 18:51:51 ... and how to make it extensible as much as possible 18:52:22 Doug: Is there anybody else who can give immediate impression 18:53:21 Coralie: David and I both realised there was a cube when you mentioned it; we had seen the diamond 18:53:34 ... I like it, this blew my mind and was representative of duality 18:53:54 q+ 18:54:10 Michael: Having adaptable shape allows modularity 18:54:16 ack next 18:54:33 David: I wonder if we could make the C a little heavier 18:54:42 ... that would remain in a smaller version 18:55:02 ... on the cub/gem ambiguity, only one side has lighter colour 18:55:09 s/cub/cube/ 18:55:19 ... it looks like we're looking at the inside of the cube 18:55:28 ... could we try to @@? 18:55:45 Michael: Yes 18:55:51 can we have this pdf to look at later in case we have more comments/suggestions later? 18:56:05 ... And Doug, the cube within a cube, we had a C-letter form 18:56:18 I think the outer S feels "wobbly", but the inner S is really good 18:57:11 Doug: Comparing with older version, I like the spacing and the letter forms 18:57:21 ... there is an arabic quality to them 18:57:31 agree, I like the international nature of it. rather callipgraphic 18:57:46 s/callipgraphic/calligraphic/ 18:57:50 Doug: maze-like, crystalin, pathways but also ... arabic, beautiful script. I like that refinement. 18:58:03 ... spindiness is thus decreased 18:58:38 realizes he forgot to say anything +ve, there is a lot to like here!! 18:58:41 Michael: yes, we liked that it looked like it had been done with a calligraphic pen 18:59:11 ... to the point of complexity, it has a number of twists and turns, 18:59:16 ... they are repetitive 18:59:23 ... allow modularity 18:59:31 ... this is weighing in 18:59:38 ... I appreciate the useful feedback 19:00:31 Doug: Can you show something next week? 19:00:35 Michael: yes 19:00:43 Doug: Can I distribute slides? 19:01:05 Michael: yes with the caveat that I want to inform this process with what we learned with the HTML5 logo 19:01:21 ... big splash as it arrived without warning contributing to its success 19:01:27 realizes it looks more like a Knot Garden than a Maze 19:02:01 ... caveat: let's not share with the community; it's not as inclusive, which is why we here now, but please, let's keep it close to the vest 19:02:14 thinks we should find an arabic calligrapher to comment on how they would write it 19:02:18 ... especially as we're continuing to refine it. 19:02:36 Doug: Michael/ocupop are doing this pro bono, by the way 19:03:07 ... I'd like for us to be comfortable. let's try to strike a balance between how decisive we can be about this process 19:03:15 ... I'll be in touch with everybody about next steps 19:03:24 ... Any open questions? 19:03:27 [nope] 19:03:36 Doug: thanks everybody for showing up 19:03:48 ... we'll schedule another round, hoping more people join 19:04:31 I already like it better than the HTML5 logo :-) 19:04:32 Michael: We don't care if you like it. Ultimately, what we care about is if it's effective. 19:04:54 ... I want people to be excited about 19:05:08 [thanks all] 19:05:11 -Doug_Schepers 19:05:13 -alex_antennahouse 19:05:15 -MichaelN 19:05:15 -Lea 19:05:16 Michael_Nieling, I like it a lot, well done 19:05:17 -plinss 19:05:18 -dsinger 19:05:20 - +1.617.583.aaaa 19:05:20 -renoirb 19:05:32 Zakim, list attendees 19:05:32 As of this point the attendees have been Doug_Schepers, plinss, MichaelN, alex_antennahouse, koalie, [Apple], Lea, dsinger, +1.617.583.aaaa, renoirb 19:05:34 -koalie 19:05:34 Team_(logo)18:00Z has ended 19:05:34 Attendees were Doug_Schepers, plinss, MichaelN, alex_antennahouse, koalie, [Apple], Lea, dsinger, +1.617.583.aaaa, renoirb 19:05:40 RRSagent, make minutes 19:05:40 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/04/03-logo-minutes.html koalie 19:06:04 koalie, public, I think 19:06:26 eventhough you pasted a link to the pen? 19:06:52 koalie, ok, member :) 19:07:10 no, member is fine for now 19:07:17 RRSAgent, set logs member 19:07:43 meeting: CSS logo/branding 19:07:46 I have a knee-jerk reaction toward public/open, which is in conflict with my no-spoilers mode 19:07:47 chair: Doug 19:09:53 koalie, up to you 19:10:19 s| http://codepen.io/jakealbaugh/full/7e67ee5e0dc5ccec87668bb5357a3379|| 19:10:21 RRSagent, make minutes 19:10:21 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/04/03-logo-minutes.html koalie 19:10:44 RRSAgent, make logs public 19:10:54 s/koalie, public, I think// 19:10:59 Florian has joined #logo 19:11:01 s/eventhough you pasted a link to the pen?// 19:11:05 s/koalie, ok, member :)// 19:11:10 s/no, member is fine for now// 19:11:16 s/I have a knee-jerk reaction toward public/open, which is in conflict with my no-spoilers mode// 19:11:21 s/koalie, up to you// 19:11:22 RRSagent, make minutes 19:11:22 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/04/03-logo-minutes.html koalie 19:12:07 s|I have a knee-jerk reaction toward public/open, which is in conflict with my no-spoilers mode|| 19:12:20 s|s/I have a knee-jerk reaction toward public/open, which is in conflict with my no-spoilers mode//|| 19:12:24 RRSagent, make minutes 19:12:24 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/04/03-logo-minutes.html koalie 19:12:54 RRSAgent, bye 19:12:54 I see no action items