14:58:42 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #wai-wcag
14:58:42 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/03/31-wai-wcag-irc
14:58:44 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public
14:58:44 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #wai-wcag
14:58:46 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be WAI_WCAG
14:58:46 <Zakim> ok, trackbot, I see WAI_WCAG()11:00AM already started
14:58:47 <trackbot> Meeting: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference
14:58:47 <trackbot> Date: 31 March 2015
14:58:50 <AWK> Zakim, who is on the phone?
14:58:51 <Zakim> On the phone I see +1.617.766.aaaa, [IPcaller]
14:58:58 <AWK> Zakim, aaaa is AWK
14:58:58 <Zakim> +AWK; got it
14:59:19 <AWK> Zakim, IPCaller is Joshue
14:59:20 <Zakim> +Joshue; got it
14:59:45 <AWK> zakim, agenda?
14:59:45 <Zakim> I see nothing on the agenda
14:59:56 <AWK> agenda+ TPAC https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/24thMarch2015/results#x2673
15:00:11 <AWK> agenda+ Charter update - https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/2015WCAGSurvey/
15:00:44 <Zakim> -Joshue
15:00:45 <AWK> agenda+ New issue https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/86
15:00:51 <AWK> agenda+ Page structure tutorial https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/PageStructureTutorial1/
15:00:53 <marcjohlic> marcjohlic has joined #wai-wcag
15:01:01 <Kathy> Kathy has joined #wai-wcag
15:01:22 <Zakim> +Marc_Johlic
15:01:40 <Zakim> +Kathy_Wahlbin
15:01:59 <Zakim> +David_MacDonald
15:03:07 <Loretta> Loretta has joined #wai-wcag
15:03:55 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
15:04:05 <Loretta> zakim, IPcaller is Loretta
15:04:05 <Zakim> +Loretta; got it
15:04:08 <David> David has joined #wai-wcag
15:04:12 <yatil> zakim, call EricE-Skype
15:04:12 <Zakim> ok, yatil; the call is being made
15:04:13 <Zakim> +Katie_Haritos-Shea
15:04:13 <Zakim> +EricE
15:04:46 <yatil> zakim, nick yatil is EricE
15:04:46 <Zakim> ok, yatil, I now associate you with EricE
15:04:48 <yatil> zakim, mute me
15:04:48 <Zakim> EricE should now be muted
15:05:46 <Zakim> +Kenny
15:06:56 <Kenny> hi
15:07:05 <AWK> Zakim, who is on the phone?
15:07:05 <Zakim> On the phone I see AWK, Marc_Johlic, Kathy_Wahlbin, David_MacDonald, Loretta, Katie_Haritos-Shea, EricE (muted), Kenny (muted)
15:07:29 <marcjohlic> marcjohlic has joined #wai-wcag
15:07:50 <Zakim> +??P27
15:09:18 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
15:09:19 <Joshue108> zakim, [IPcaller] is Joshue
15:09:19 <Zakim> +Joshue; got it
15:09:21 <AWK> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Scribe_List
15:10:12 <Joshue108> zakim, who is on the phone?
15:10:12 <Zakim> On the phone I see AWK, Marc_Johlic, Kathy_Wahlbin, David_MacDonald, Loretta, Katie_Haritos-Shea, EricE (muted), Kenny (muted), Michael_Cooper, Joshue
15:10:53 <AWK> Zakim, take up item 1
15:10:53 <Zakim> agendum 1. "TPAC https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/24thMarch2015/results#x2673" taken up [from AWK]
15:10:57 <Ryladog> Ryladog has joined #wai-wcag
15:11:27 <Ryladog> Scribe: Katie Haritos-Shea
15:11:28 <Joshue108> zakim, agenda?
15:11:28 <Zakim> I see 4 items remaining on the agenda:
15:11:29 <Zakim> 1. TPAC https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/24thMarch2015/results#x2673 [from AWK]
15:11:29 <Zakim> 2. Charter update - https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/2015WCAGSurvey/ [from AWK]
15:11:29 <Zakim> 3. New issue https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/86 [from AWK]
15:11:30 <Zakim> 4. Page structure tutorial https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/PageStructureTutorial1/ [from AWK]
15:11:35 <Joshue108> zakim, mute me
15:11:36 <Zakim> Joshue should now be muted
15:11:38 <Ryladog> ScribeNick: Ryladog
15:11:48 <Ryladog> Meeting: WCAG Working Group Teleconference
15:11:57 <Ryladog> Chair: Andrew Kirkpatrick
15:12:46 <Ryladog> AWK: Two people will not be there, some will be there, many would like to be at TPAC 2015
15:12:54 <Ryladog> TOPIC: TPAC 2015
15:13:16 <Ryladog> AWK: Not sure if it will happen at this time
15:13:21 <AWK> Zakim, take up item 4
15:13:21 <Zakim> agendum 4. "Page structure tutorial https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/PageStructureTutorial1/" taken up [from AWK]
15:13:26 <Ryladog> DM: Unlikely that I will attend
15:13:27 <AWK> Zakim, take up item 5
15:13:27 <Zakim> I only see 4 items on the agenda
15:13:30 <Joshue108> q?
15:13:35 <AWK> Zakim, take up item 3
15:13:35 <Zakim> agendum 3. "New issue https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/86" taken up [from AWK]
15:13:55 <Ryladog> TOPIC: New Issues
15:14:55 <Ryladog> AWK: 1 new in GH #86 around keyboard heading navigation. Someone says heading supporting for UA is not existent - who can look into this
15:15:00 <Ryladog> DM: I can
15:15:17 <AWK> Zakim, take up item 4
15:15:17 <Zakim> agendum 4. "Page structure tutorial https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/PageStructureTutorial1/" taken up [from AWK]
15:15:30 <Ryladog> TOPIC: Page Structure Tutorial
15:15:33 <AWK> http://w3c.github.io/wai-tutorials/page-structure/
15:15:46 <Ryladog> AWK: Did you get a chance to review for technical issues
15:16:04 <Ryladog> AWK: Do not worry about the philosophical differences
15:16:31 <Ryladog> AWK; We just want to ensure that there is no erroneous info in here
15:16:54 <Ryladog> AWK: Loretta and and Mark J. , anyone esle?
15:17:12 <Ryladog> KW: I did but I do not have my notes. I will find them
15:17:21 <Ryladog> AWK: Any big errors?
15:17:40 <Ryladog> KW: A couple of small things in the code I forget but will review my notes
15:17:46 <Ryladog> AWK: Mark?
15:18:13 <Ryladog> MJ: Om initial pages I see no issue , but I have just started
15:18:28 <Ryladog> AWK: Lorreta, you thpught it was good
15:18:33 <Ryladog> LGR: Yes
15:18:52 <Ryladog> s/thpught/thought
15:19:26 <Zakim> + +1.313.390.aabb
15:19:32 <Ryladog> AWK: Eric would like to publish this tutorial - in a skim I did not see anything glaring. I like the content structure
15:19:39 <Mike_Elledge> Mike_Elledge has joined #wai-wcag
15:20:34 <Ryladog> AWK: Page section content has HTML5 and ARIA role content that is brought into the mix. I feel personally, with Loretta and my review that we should have much concern
15:20:47 <Joshue108> q?
15:20:49 <Ryladog> AWK: I think it is OK, how do others feel?
15:21:00 <Joshue108> q+
15:21:13 <Ryladog> DM: This look like a best practices document here...
15:21:27 <Ryladog> DM: where they have the navigation elements
15:21:28 <yatil> http://w3c.github.io/wai-tutorials/page-structure/sections/#labeling-sections
15:21:37 <yatil> ^^DavidMacD
15:22:07 <Ryladog> DM: Role=navigation, not many sites have just one navigation role. So I think it needs ARIA
15:22:21 <Joshue108> -q
15:22:50 <Ryladog> AWK: Should it add some text for multple naav to add ARIA label
15:23:02 <Ryladog> DM: Yes, at least we should have an example
15:23:07 <Joshue108> q+
15:23:18 <Joshue108> ack me
15:23:20 <Ryladog> DM: How important is having a role
15:23:51 <Ryladog> ...+ nav when you have an HTML5 nav with the role of Nav
15:24:06 <Ryladog> JO: OK I have the same concener
15:24:42 <Kathy> q+
15:24:47 <Joshue108> How about 'It can be used multiple times on a page, and aria-label can also be used to distinguish them appropriately'.
15:24:47 <Ryladog> DM: This will be come the quintessential way to do things...we have this opportunity here to do that
15:25:01 <Ryladog> DM: I am just taking a quick look at this time
15:25:13 <Joshue108> It can be used multiple times on a page, and aria-label should be used to distinguish them appropriately'
15:25:38 <Ryladog> DM: I do not rea;ly have time to review this, sorry
15:26:09 <Ryladog> AWK: I do not think it is Davids responsibility to reiveiw this
15:26:25 <Ryladog> AWK: Can we accept the revies we have
15:26:27 <AWK> CHange to "When the nav element is used multiple times on a page each nav element should be identified"  ?
15:26:44 <yatil> ack me
15:27:01 <Ryladog> JO: Eric is talking about issues ith IE11 and this nav issues, so we should include that info
15:27:18 <yatil> q+
15:27:46 <Ryladog> AWK: Maybe identify seconday labels
15:27:53 <Joshue108> ack Kathy
15:27:58 <AWK> Ack eric
15:28:03 <Ryladog> JO: I am not particularly a fan of primary secodary etc
15:28:15 <Ryladog> KW: I found my list of review
15:28:15 <Joshue108> s/secodary/secondary
15:28:45 <Ryladog> EE: It is clear that we should use aria-label and we could have some compatability info - as an option
15:28:46 <yatil> zakim, mute me
15:28:46 <Zakim> EricE should now be muted
15:28:54 <Ryladog> AWK: OK. Kathy
15:29:00 <Kathy> http://w3c.github.io/wai-tutorials/page-structure/headings/
15:29:36 <Joshue108> q?
15:29:55 <Ryladog> KW: In the headings section - my question is do it with H1, should we say ideally H1 and take out H2
15:30:01 <Ryladog> KHS: I agree
15:30:06 <Ryladog> +1
15:30:18 <Ryladog> DM: I agree
15:30:34 <Ryladog> AWK: Maybe we should remove this last senetnce entirely
15:30:49 <Joshue108> +1 to AWK
15:30:49 <Ryladog> AWK: Say use the highest heading avaible
15:30:56 <yatil> ack me
15:31:08 <Joshue108> s/avaible/available
15:31:24 <Ryladog> AWK; Is it OK to ask you to do what EO just asked you NOT to do?
15:31:25 <yatil> zakim, mute me
15:31:25 <Zakim> EricE should now be muted
15:31:32 <Zakim> +James_Nurthen
15:31:32 <Ryladog> EE: Sure. I amthe buffer
15:31:52 <Ryladog> AWK: What do we think?
15:32:05 <Ryladog> AWK: Changes can happen after it is published
15:32:56 <Ryladog> AWK: We may never be able to reach perfection.......:-) Are we comfortable for WCAG to say this is good enough to go?
15:33:17 <Ryladog> ...or should we review it and who?
15:33:26 <yatil> ack me
15:33:50 <Ryladog> DM: Maybe I can. Eric have you found any browser that supports the Q element? I havent.
15:34:24 <Ryladog> JO: We should keep it in for coverage and one day UA should support the specs that have it
15:34:27 <Zakim> -Loretta
15:34:57 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
15:35:06 <Loretta> zakim, IPcaller is Loretta
15:35:06 <Zakim> +Loretta; got it
15:35:10 <Ryladog> AWK: There is benefits for using it now - even though it might not be supported in SC, but it will be supported for other users
15:35:19 <yatil> ack me
15:35:23 <Ryladog> AWK: Do any SC read the CSS generated content
15:35:27 <Ryladog> DM: No
15:35:33 <Ryladog> JO: Of course they do
15:36:04 <Ryladog> JN: If it is just using the virtual buffer it will not, but other wise it should
15:36:16 <Ryladog> DM; But it did not show up in the DOM
15:36:27 <Ryladog> DM: But it is not reading it.
15:36:52 <Ryladog> JN: But it is in the AAPI
15:37:05 <Mike_Elledge> Trust, but verify!
15:37:14 <Ryladog> AWK: David may have some time today
15:37:36 <Ryladog> DM: The only thing that stuck out was tis and caption - so I amy have a few
15:37:42 <Joshue108> zakim, mute ne
15:37:42 <Zakim> sorry, Joshue108, I do not know which phone connection belongs to ne
15:37:45 <Joshue108> zakim, mute me
15:37:45 <Zakim> Joshue should now be muted
15:38:07 <marcjohlic> +1
15:38:10 <Joshue108> +1 to AWK
15:38:11 <yatil> ack me
15:38:30 <Ryladog> AWK: Can we say that e are OK with this progressing towards being published - knoing that Davisd will provide some comment today. Are we commfortable with this?
15:38:43 <Joshue108> s/that e/that we
15:39:08 <Ryladog> EE: It is not about Publication today. There is still going to be another round of revieew before publishing
15:39:11 <Joshue108> q?
15:39:23 <Ryladog> AWK; OK great, I was misinformed
15:39:25 <yatil> zakim, mute me
15:39:25 <Zakim> EricE should now be muted
15:39:25 <Loretta> brb
15:40:11 <Joshue108> ack me
15:40:13 <Mike_Elledge> +1
15:40:20 <AWK> Zakim, take up item 2
15:40:20 <Zakim> agendum 2. "Charter update - https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/2015WCAGSurvey/" taken up [from AWK]
15:40:20 <Ryladog> AWK We provide comments - hopefully other will tale a look at it and provide comments - so that next time Eric asked for publication we will be ready to go
15:40:30 <yatil> 👍
15:40:35 <Ryladog> TOPIC: Charter DIscussion
15:40:46 <Joshue108> zakim, mute me
15:40:46 <Zakim> Joshue should now be muted
15:40:54 <yatil> s/DI/Di/
15:40:59 <Ryladog> AWK: This is the mail item that we talk about
15:41:07 <MichaelC> q+ to provide background on the non-web point
15:41:50 <Ryladog> rrsagent, draft minutes
15:41:50 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/03/31-wai-wcag-minutes.html Ryladog
15:42:02 <Joshue108> ack me
15:42:29 <Ryladog> AWK: There were several formal objection to WAI charters - with 7 formal objections - as a result there is alot of scrutiny.
15:42:56 <Ryladog> AWK: The consensus is that the world is ready for normative work in WCAG
15:43:04 <Joshue108> zakim, mute me
15:43:04 <Zakim> Joshue should now be muted
15:43:31 <Ryladog> AWK: We are not talking about WCAG 3 - but are talking about shorter documents that are extension docuiments. The first would be Mobile Touch
15:44:13 <Ryladog> ...that would extend WCAG> Perhaps in the future folks would say "I want to adopt WCAG2 plus X extension"
15:45:03 <Joshue108> s/docuiments/documents
15:45:06 <Ryladog> ....so that will free us up to do normative work. Technique and Understanding docs would be needed for the extensions
15:46:10 <Ryladog> AWK: You can see from the charter
15:47:12 <Ryladog> AWK: Also in scope is developing the normative extensions in several areas, we can add them. Badnwidth will be our limiter here
15:47:34 <Ryladog> AWK: LOw Vision needs a more defined affort
15:47:52 <Joshue108> q?
15:48:12 <Ryladog> AWK: Further ahead further down the road , more 2020, and then coordinating with other groups in W3C. We still can have task forces
15:48:46 <Ryladog> AWK: Deliverable: Tej Understanding and Techniques
15:48:56 <Ryladog> AWK: Editor REq by the end of the year
15:49:23 <Ryladog> AWK: We expect alot tto come from Cognitive and Mobile work. Targeting a Mobile Extension
15:49:39 <Ryladog> AWK: New REq by April 2018
15:49:40 <Kathy> q+
15:50:03 <MichaelC> ack me
15:50:03 <Zakim> MichaelC, you wanted to provide background on the non-web point
15:50:04 <AWK> ack m
15:50:40 <Ryladog> MC: I wanted to try to fast track the comments questioning excluding non-web content. I treid o look into the background of this
15:50:54 <MichaelC> http://www.w3.org/2013/05/14-wai-wcag-minutes
15:50:58 <MichaelC> http://www.w3.org/2013/06/04-wai-wcag-minutes
15:51:09 <Joshue108> s/I treid o look/I tried to look
15:51:14 <Loretta> q+
15:51:22 <Ryladog> MC: I though tthat Judy had asked us to add this. But I was wrong. It was the WG that wanted to add this. There were meerting where we talked about this
15:51:38 <Joshue108> s/though tthat/thought that
15:51:57 <Ryladog> MC: Judy wants to not have that limitation as well
15:52:21 <Ryladog> MC: And Loretta agrrees now
15:52:30 <AWK> ack k
15:52:32 <Joshue108> s/agrrees/agrees
15:52:33 <Kathy> q-
15:52:50 <Ryladog> MC: So I think we can come to consensus on this quickly to oepn up that limitation
15:53:02 <Ryladog> KW: WHat is the Mobile scope?
15:53:20 <Ryladog> KW: How will those dates flow together and where they came from?
15:54:00 <Ryladog> MC: We tried to toss some milestones into the air - because we have to have them in the document. We needd to now have those converstaions.
15:54:40 <Ryladog> Management likes to have Reqs completed in a charter cycle. Please give us nbetter suggestions
15:54:52 <Joshue108> s/nbetter/better
15:55:08 <Ryladog> MC: A fPWD dos not have to be super mature to publish. We can sgue for some later daye
15:56:05 <Ryladog> KW: We are working on techniques. We have something. As long as the expectation is something. A skeleton. Then that is OK
15:56:26 <Ryladog> MC: That is OK. The first draft might have a bifg section that is Requirements
15:56:57 <Ryladog> AWK: There is 23 months between FPWD and CR
15:57:13 <Ryladog> rrsagent, make minutes
15:57:13 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/03/31-wai-wcag-minutes.html Ryladog
15:57:30 <Ryladog> AWK: It is a new review process
15:57:48 <Ryladog> MC: I think it is better to have multiple WD to get pleny of feedback
15:58:01 <Ryladog> zakim, who is here?
15:58:01 <Zakim> On the phone I see AWK, Marc_Johlic, Kathy_Wahlbin, David_MacDonald, Katie_Haritos-Shea, EricE (muted), Kenny (muted), Michael_Cooper, Joshue (muted), +1.313.390.aabb,
15:58:05 <Zakim> ... James_Nurthen, Loretta
15:58:05 <Zakim> On IRC I see Mike_Elledge, Ryladog, marcjohlic, David, Loretta, Kathy, Zakim, RRSAgent, AWK, MichaelC, Joshue108, yatil, MarkS, trackbot, Kenny
15:58:58 <AWK> ack l
15:59:33 <Ryladog> Present: AWK, Marc_Johlic, Kathy_Wahlbin, David_MacDonald, Katie_Haritos-Shea, EricE, Kenny, Michael_Cooper, Joshue, Mike_Elledge, marcjohlic, David, Loretta, Kathy, MichaelC, Joshue108, yatil, MarkS, Kenny
16:00:11 <Ryladog> AWK: So, we have liaison in here - the WAI coordination is going to be removed
16:00:20 <Joshue108> q?
16:00:24 <Ryladog> AWK: Questions, comments, thoughts?
16:01:06 <Ryladog> MC: To answer David  we left that open on person as to who we would liaise with
16:01:09 <Ryladog> DM: OK
16:01:17 <Zakim> -James_Nurthen
16:01:18 <Zakim> +[Microsoft]
16:01:35 <Ryladog> AWK: MaryJo has a comment,
16:01:48 <Ryladog> MC: I dont know it might be a good comment
16:02:07 <Ryladog> AWK: Maybe review the WCAG2ICT note in light of exstensions
16:02:17 <CherieE> CherieE has joined #wai-wcag
16:02:23 <Ryladog> AWK: I worry about having enough time - it should be on th radar
16:03:17 <Ryladog> MC: If we are going to publish the charter wwith some escape langauge. If we think we might updayte WCAG2ICT then we should put in ino tht eRquirmenets with milestones
16:03:51 <Ryladog> AWK; We can re-invigorate a Task force to review that
16:04:12 <Ryladog> MC: We have to have something in the charet allowing us to publish it
16:04:46 <Ryladog> MC: It should be listed as the Understanding and Techniques
16:04:58 <Ryladog> KHS: I agree...but hate that I do
16:05:17 <Ryladog> AWK: What do others thinks?
16:05:58 <Ryladog> MC: This is a level of baeocracy that most peoeple dont worry about
16:06:48 <Ryladog> AWK: With WCAG 2 being stable. This is just an update - and WCAG 2 WCAG2ICT Extension
16:07:34 <Ryladog> MC: Maybe we should put in updated guidance on HOw do WCAG guidance extend to non-web items - that might give us some protection
16:08:30 <Joshue108> zakim, mute me
16:08:30 <Zakim> Joshue was already muted, Joshue108
16:08:32 <Joshue108> q?
16:08:33 <Ryladog> MC: Last bullet at the end of Item 2 in the Scope section
16:09:21 <Ryladog> MC: Guidance for how WCAG 2.0 extensions could apply to non-web content if needed
16:09:31 <Ryladog> AWK: Where would this go
16:09:45 <Ryladog> AWK: A new bullet right before # 3 in the Scope section
16:10:03 <Ryladog> CM: I giess as needed is good
16:10:15 <Ryladog> MC: I think this will give us coverage if needed
16:10:25 <marcjohlic> +1
16:10:31 <Ryladog> +1
16:10:34 <AWK> s/CM: I giess/MC: I guess
16:10:50 <AWK> Zakim, who is on the phone?
16:10:50 <Zakim> On the phone I see AWK, Marc_Johlic, Kathy_Wahlbin, David_MacDonald, Katie_Haritos-Shea, EricE (muted), Kenny (muted), Michael_Cooper, Joshue (muted), +1.313.390.aabb, Loretta,
16:10:54 <Zakim> ... [Microsoft]
16:10:55 <Ryladog> AWK: Any thoughts or questions?
16:11:20 <Kenny> +1
16:11:27 <MichaelC> zakim, aabb is Mike_Elledge
16:11:27 <Zakim> +Mike_Elledge; got it
16:11:33 <MichaelC> zakim, Microsoft is Cherie_Eckholm
16:11:33 <Zakim> +Cherie_Eckholm; got it
16:11:45 <Ryladog> zakim, who is here?
16:11:45 <Zakim> On the phone I see AWK, Marc_Johlic, Kathy_Wahlbin, David_MacDonald, Katie_Haritos-Shea, EricE (muted), Kenny (muted), Michael_Cooper, Joshue (muted), Mike_Elledge, Loretta,
16:11:48 <Zakim> ... Cherie_Eckholm
16:11:48 <Zakim> On IRC I see Mike_Elledge, Ryladog, marcjohlic, David, Loretta, Kathy, Zakim, RRSAgent, AWK, MichaelC, Joshue108, yatil, MarkS, trackbot, Kenny
16:12:44 <Ryladog> AWK: This week there is the first meeting with W3C team and trying to resolve the comments that were made that resulted in formal objections
16:13:07 <Ryladog> AWK: What are the suggestions for WCAG, ATAG, UAAG, etc
16:13:51 <Ryladog> AWK: If we can say at that meeting we can say through our charter that - that we could address all of th formal objection commenst that came in against WAI
16:14:42 <Ryladog> AWK: The most point was WCAG2 is falling behind and think we need new normative work - we want to satisfy those needs with our new charter text
16:15:07 <Ryladog> AWK: We need to be prepared to say yes, we are willing to do this
16:15:47 <Ryladog> MC: With these changes it would go for a review with the Advisory Committee which will be more than a months
16:16:17 <Joshue108> ack me
16:16:19 <Ryladog> MC: If it goes through - all mmebers will be asked to re-join the working group.Be prepared for that
16:16:38 <Joshue108> zakim, mute me
16:16:38 <Zakim> Joshue should now be muted
16:16:56 <Ryladog> MC: My experience we end up losing important participants
16:17:13 <Ryladog> MC: So please prepare for this with your comapnies
16:17:21 <yatil> s/p.B/p. B/
16:17:30 <Ryladog> AWK: Are there any objection to this charter?
16:17:58 <Ryladog> RESOLUTION: WE will sned this Chater to the W3C Advisory Commitee for firther revie
16:18:19 <Ryladog> s/Chater/Charter
16:18:31 <Ryladog> s/sned/send
16:18:50 <Ryladog> s/Commitee/Committee
16:18:58 <AWK> s/firther/further
16:19:18 <Ryladog> s/firther revie/further review
16:19:30 <Ryladog> AWK: It is very exciting. Thank you.
16:19:35 <Joshue108>  ack me
16:19:39 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/03/31-wai-wcag-minutes.html MichaelC
16:19:53 <Ryladog> I have that same excitement
16:20:15 <AWK> zakim, agenda?
16:20:15 <Zakim> I see 4 items remaining on the agenda:
16:20:16 <Zakim> 1. TPAC https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/24thMarch2015/results#x2673 [from AWK]
16:20:16 <Zakim> 2. Charter update - https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/2015WCAGSurvey/ [from AWK]
16:20:16 <Zakim> 3. New issue https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/86 [from AWK]
16:20:17 <Zakim> 4. Page structure tutorial https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/PageStructureTutorial1/ [from AWK]
16:20:20 <Ryladog> AWK: That might cover our agenda
16:20:48 <Ryladog> AWK: Thank you everyone, We ill keep providing updates
16:20:56 <MichaelC> s/further revie/further review/
16:21:17 <Ryladog> AWK: We are not meeting next Thursday - but Teusday wew will at this time
16:21:52 <Ryladog> AWK: There are comments that can be revieiwed etc until we know
16:22:42 <Ryladog> MC: The working group is formally extended until May 18th
16:22:43 <jamesn> jamesn has joined #wai-wcag
16:22:56 <jamesn> rrsagent, make minutes
16:22:56 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/03/31-wai-wcag-minutes.html jamesn
16:23:02 <Ryladog> AWK: May 19th is a Tuesday....
16:23:10 <Joshue108> zakim, mute me
16:23:10 <Zakim> Joshue should now be muted
16:23:13 <Ryladog> AWK: Thanks All!
16:23:14 <Mike_Elledge> Bye!
16:23:18 <Zakim> -Kathy_Wahlbin
16:23:22 <Zakim> -Joshue
16:23:25 <Zakim> -Mike_Elledge
16:23:27 <Zakim> -AWK
16:23:27 <yatil> zakim, drop me
16:23:27 <Zakim> EricE is being disconnected
16:23:28 <Zakim> -EricE
16:23:28 <Zakim> -Loretta
16:23:28 <Zakim> -Katie_Haritos-Shea
16:23:29 <Zakim> -Marc_Johlic
16:23:29 <Zakim> -David_MacDonald
16:23:32 <Zakim> -Michael_Cooper
16:23:34 <Zakim> -Kenny
16:23:41 <Ryladog> rrsagent, make minutes
16:23:41 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/03/31-wai-wcag-minutes.html Ryladog
16:23:56 <AWK> trackbot, end meeting
16:23:56 <trackbot> Zakim, list attendees
16:23:56 <Zakim> As of this point the attendees have been +1.617.766.aaaa, AWK, Joshue, Marc_Johlic, Kathy_Wahlbin, David_MacDonald, Loretta, Katie_Haritos-Shea, EricE, Kenny, Michael_Cooper,
16:23:59 <Zakim> ... +1.313.390.aabb, James_Nurthen, Mike_Elledge, Cherie_Eckholm
16:24:03 <Ryladog> trackbot, status?
16:24:04 <trackbot> RRSAgent, please draft minutes
16:24:04 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/03/31-wai-wcag-minutes.html trackbot
16:24:05 <trackbot> RRSAgent, bye
16:24:05 <RRSAgent> I see no action items
18:01:31 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #wai-wcag
18:01:31 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/03/31-wai-wcag-irc
18:01:40 <MichaelC> rrsagent, make log world
18:02:11 <MichaelC> present: AWK, Joshue, Marc_Johlic, Kathy_Wahlbin, David_MacDonald, Loretta, Katie_Haritos-Shea, EricE, Kenny, Michael_Cooper,
18:02:11 <MichaelC>  James_Nurthen, Mike_Elledge, Cherie_Eckholm
18:02:32 <MichaelC> present: AWK, Joshue, Marc_Johlic, Kathy_Wahlbin, David_MacDonald, Loretta, Katie_Haritos-Shea, EricE, Kenny, Michael_Cooper, James_Nurthen, Mike_Elledge, Cherie_Eckholm
18:02:37 <MichaelC> rrsagent, make minutes
18:02:37 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/03/31-wai-wcag-minutes.html MichaelC
18:24:45 <jnurthen> jnurthen has joined #wai-wcag