07:55:02 RRSAgent has joined #sdw 07:55:02 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/03/11-sdw-irc 07:55:11 Zakim has joined #sdw 07:55:45 Meeting: SDW WG Face to Face, 11 March 2015 07:55:58 Chair: Kerry and Ed 07:56:03 jtandy has joined #sdw 07:56:05 RRSAgent, make logs public 07:58:32 Pvgenuchten has joined #sdw 08:00:24 Kyoungsook_Kim has joined #sdw 08:00:39 JohnHerring has joined #sdw 08:00:46 IngoSimonis has joined #sdw 08:01:16 kerry has joined #sdw 08:01:35 Linda has joined #sdw 08:01:51 Ioannis_Athanasiadis has joined #sdw 08:02:07 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/F2f_Barcelona 08:02:09 Good day! 08:02:12 phila has changed the topic to: Agenda: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/F2f_Barcelona 08:02:42 Seems that the GotoMeeting link for this morning is wrond. 08:02:50 Marie-Francoise has joined #sdw 08:02:58 Yes, Ed is looking into it 08:03:08 Thx :) 08:04:03 Ian_Holt has joined #sdw 08:04:13 Alejandro_and_Armin has joined #sdw 08:04:49 scribe: phila 08:04:57 Topic: Intros 08:05:06 kerry: Opens the meeting, runs through the agenda 08:05:09 JeanB has joined #sdw 08:05:21 http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/F2f_Barcelona 08:05:25 AZ has joined #sdw 08:05:29 scribenick: jtandy 08:05:34 scribe: Jeremy Tandy 08:05:42 agenda for today: http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/F2f_Barcelona 08:05:57 Rachel has joined #sdw 08:05:59 kerry: main job for today is to work through the use cases 08:06:06 -> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Working_Use_Cases Use Cases 08:06:25 ... we're going to organise those use cases and define the requirements 08:06:44 ... each use case will be set to the deliverables for the WG 08:07:00 aharth has joined #sdw 08:07:00 ManolisKoubarakis has joined #sdw 08:07:02 ... we finish the meeting with lightning talks 08:07:19 phila has changed the topic to: Trying to get the GoTo Meeting working. We hope to be with you soon 08:07:29 Same problem with pin code 08:07:47 ... introducing the use case editors; Frans K and Alejandro_and_Armin 08:08:24 ditto, problem with access code 08:08:25 phila: does anyone object (in the room) to me taking a picture and tweeting it 08:08:30 (no objections) 08:08:48 kerry: THE MEETING IS OPENED! 08:09:06 [ed returns ... hopefully the goto meeting is fixed?] 08:09:28 kerry: Welcome ... I'm Kerry, co-chair, work for CSIRO in Canberra 08:09:54 ... introducing Ed Parsons, fellow co-chair, works for Google in London 08:10:34 ... lots of people here - some new faces 08:10:44 the go to meeting access code is invalid 08:10:45 ... lets do some other introductions 08:10:58 353923093 08:11:59 ChrisLittle has joined #sdw 08:12:13 [going around the room here ... suggesting that if people want to say who they are - type into the IRC] 08:12:47 ... W3C staff is phila; OGC staff is IngoSimonis 08:13:00 Dimitri has joined #sdw 08:13:02 phila: Notes there are 36 people in the room, only 20 on IRC, not all of whom are in the room. We need to fix this 08:13:31 stlemme has joined #sdw 08:14:12 eparsons has joined #sdw 08:14:12 kerry: thanks - now we've got to get to work 08:14:42 Paulvg has joined #Sdw 08:14:42 phila: if you're not on IRC, you're not on the meeting ... please join [of course if you're not on - you can't read this!] 08:14:49 Erik_Guldberg has joined #sdw 08:14:50 xavier has joined #sdw 08:14:54 Jeff_Walter has joined #sdw 08:15:02 tom_ellett has joined #sdw 08:15:04 Carl_Reed has joined #sdw 08:15:08 voges has joined #sdw 08:15:24 BBlaabjergBisgaard has joined #sdw 08:15:26 eparsons: goto meeting is now working 08:15:29 Jeanne has joined #sdw 08:15:32 Sylvain_Grellet_BRGM has joined #sdw 08:15:39 kerry: will now introduce the use case chairs 08:15:42 zakim, this is SDWWG 08:15:42 sorry, phila, I do not see a conference named 'SDWWG' in progress or scheduled at this time 08:15:45 Saud has joined #sdw 08:15:49 ... Frans (sitting in the corner) 08:15:58 zakim, room for 2? 08:15:59 ok, phila; conference Team_(sdw)08:15Z scheduled with code 73994 (SDWWG) for 60 minutes until 0915Z 08:16:00 ... Alejandro_and_Armin (somewhere in the ether) 08:16:10 TedHabermann has joined #sdw 08:16:10 zakim, list participants 08:16:11 sorry, phila, I don't know what conference this is 08:16:19 Anyone having trouble with Goto Meeting ? 08:16:19 zakim, this is sdw 08:16:19 phila, I see Team_(sdw)08:15Z in the schedule but not yet started. Perhaps you mean "this will be sdw". 08:16:27 zakim, this will be sdw 08:16:27 ok, phila; I see Team_(sdw)08:15Z scheduled to start now 08:16:31 zakim, list participants 08:16:31 sorry, phila, I don't know what conference this is 08:16:33 Still the same "access code not valid" message 08:16:42 zakim, you are being awkward 08:16:42 I don't understand 'you are being awkward', phila 08:16:48 kerry: the main job for today is to organise the use cases into groups / categories & define the requirements from those use cases 08:16:55 ... let's kick off 08:17:01 phila has changed the topic to: Trying to get the GoTo Meeting working. Ed is working on it 08:17:09 same problem that AZ with gotomeeting via skype 08:17:17 ... we're going to split into subgroups at some point this morning ... 08:17:21 Payam has joined #sdw 08:17:47 Use this gotomeeting id https://www4.gotomeeting.com/join/182870253 08:17:52 BTW, AZ is Antoine Zimmermann 08:18:13 kerry: we have a few ways to organise ... by deliverable (that would make 4 groups) 08:18:23 ... alternative to organise by theme 08:18:27 lucvanlinden has joined #sdw 08:18:33 ... any ideas? 08:19:17 KymW has joined #sdw 08:19:23 [discussion - where are we going to put the subgroups] 08:19:25 Jb_henry has joined #sdw 08:19:27 AndreaPerego has joined #sdw 08:19:37 q? 08:19:38 present+ aharth, alejandro, Armin, AZ, BBlaabjergBisgaard, Carl_Reed, ChrisLittle, Dimitri, eparsons, Erik_Guldberg, Ian_Holt, IngoSimonis, JeanB, Jeff_Walter, JohnHerring, jtandy, kerry, Kyoungsook_Kim, Linda, lucvanlinden, ManolisKoubarakis, Paulvg, Payam, phila, Rachel, Saud, stlemme, Sylvain_Grellet_BRGM, TedHabermann, tom_ellett, voges, xavier 08:19:42 q? 08:19:49 ok, we are connected! 08:20:05 RRSAgent, draft minutes 08:20:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/03/11-sdw-minutes.html phila 08:20:08 Leif has joined #sdw 08:20:14 thanks, Ed! 08:20:15 present+ Leif 08:20:19 kerry: we could split up by themes ... e.g. IoT, Earth observation, 08:20:30 ... socially construed notions of place 08:20:39 ... discovery catalogue type use cases 08:20:45 present+ Jb_henry, KymW 08:20:56 ... probably easiest to organise by deliverables 08:21:31 Frans: could allow the sub-groups to self organise? 08:21:41 kerry: the deliverables are: 08:21:57 ... 1) (spatial) best practice 08:22:02 ... 2) Time 08:22:16 ... 3) SSN (semantic sensor network) 08:22:25 Leif_ has joined #sdw 08:22:25 ... 4) Coverage 08:22:39 [getting straw poll] 08:22:57 raphael has joined #SDW 08:23:24 jtandy: let's merge SSN and Coverage groups 08:23:28 kerry: OK 08:23:47 Frans has joined #sdw 08:24:10 chrislittle: not everyone voted 08:24:26 kerry: each sub-group will need to scribe 08:24:29 If you want to see what the IRC looks like as minutes, see http://www.w3.org/2015/03/11-sdw-minutes.html 08:25:22 phila: you can scribe on paper ... you don't necessarily need to use IRC 08:25:49 s/paper/paper or electronic form/ 08:26:04 phila: PLEASE DON'T USE A PROPRIETARY FORMAT 08:26:38 ... when you upload your notes 08:26:42 lucvanlinden has left #sdw 08:26:51 [discussion - local logistics] 08:27:10 kerry: any questions before we break up 08:27:23 RRSAgent, draft minutes 08:27:23 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/03/11-sdw-minutes.html phila 08:27:30 xavier: some of the UC's are very application specific 08:27:34 present+ Frans 08:27:36 ... some are technology centric 08:27:46 ... how should we proceed? 08:28:05 present+ TedHabermann 08:28:22 kerry: see the scope questions http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Scope_questions_and_Requirements 08:28:51 ... and the charter http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/charter 08:29:02 eparsons: the four scoping questions are: 08:29:17 Marie-Francoise has joined #sdw 08:29:21 ... 1) Is the use case specifically about Spatial data on the Web? 08:29:36 ... we had a lot of discussions about SPATIAL! 08:30:03 Jeanne has joined #sdw 08:30:07 ... 2) is the use case including data published, reused, and accessible via Web technologies? 08:30:18 ... 3) Has a use case a description that can lead to a testable requirement? 08:30:19 q? 08:30:30 ... 4) public vs private web 08:31:08 eparsons: all the requirements need to be hung on the use cases ... our requirements need to be grounded in reality 08:31:22 present+ raphael 08:32:14 peterbauman: please can we have W3C savvy folks in each group - because most of us are OGC folks? 08:32:35 kerry: don't think we need this ... most important thing is to SCRIBE 08:32:39 eparsons: ditto 08:33:13 Present+ Raphael (remote) 08:33:20 kerry: work to get consensus ... but we're not operating a formal decision making process today; discuss, be inclusive 08:33:41 kerry: [notes the PATENT RULE statement] 08:34:00 ... talk to IngoSimonis if you've got concerns 08:34:06 present+ AndreaPerego 08:34:24 Thanks AZ 08:34:34 phila: W3C and OGC have a slightly different method of dealing with IPR ... 08:34:34 Gianluca_Luraschi has joined #sdw 08:34:57 ... but both horrible processes mean that the standards are royalty free 08:35:07 -> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Patent_Call The OGC Patent Call 08:35:19 phila: BTW - the standards will be joint badged 08:35:37 kerry: who's going to lead the groups 08:35:57 ... best practice ... eparsons 08:36:17 ... time ... stefanstrobel 08:36:35 present+ Stefan 08:36:55 ... SSN & Coverage ... [Kerry gets self nominated] 08:38:08 jtandy: when to reconvene back into plenary 08:38:58 ChrisLittle has joined #sdw 08:39:34 kerry: let's get back to do sanity check / share discussions at 12:45 ... just before lunch 08:39:48 Present+ Christine Perey 08:40:05 cperey: I'll take an action to figure out if the big room will be ready 08:40:40 kerry: we'll meet in the big room at 12:45 (assuming all ok) 08:41:03 eparsons: at Google's great expense I've brought post-it notes ... 08:41:14 ... please don't write on the walls :-) 08:41:19 RRSAgent, draft minutes 08:41:19 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/03/11-sdw-minutes.html phila 08:41:36 Meeting breaks into sub groups 08:41:43 RRSAgent, pointer 08:41:43 See http://www.w3.org/2015/03/11-sdw-irc#T08-41-43 08:41:45 RRSAgent, pointer? 08:41:45 See http://www.w3.org/2015/03/11-sdw-irc#T08-41-45 08:45:48 tables and chairs moving around... 08:46:19 All, Goto Meeting shutting down now until presentations at 3pm CET 08:47:39 stlemme_ has joined #sdw 08:48:36 ok, is there a way to join the SSN group remotely? 08:50:10 thanks! 08:50:14 paulvg has joined #sdw 08:50:36 my skype id is ale21385 08:51:01 -> http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/charter Charter 08:51:03 AndreaPerego has joined #sdw 08:51:27 Payam has joined #sdw 08:53:42 kepeklian has joined #sdw 08:54:25 scribe: phila 08:54:29 scribeNick: phila 08:54:54 jtandy: Suggests to triage the use acases and calssify them into those that are relevant to SSN and Coverage 08:55:24 s/acases/cases/ 08:55:30 Much messing with equipment 08:55:38 s/calssify/classify/ 08:56:55 Topic: SSN and Coverage deliverables 08:57:10 kerry: Introduces Alejandro_and_Armin who have joined via Skype 08:59:32 kerry: Talks through the charter 08:59:58 kerry: SSN was created in W3C space but isn't a formal standard. 09:00:01 ... widely used 09:00:29 ... being asked for help with encoding the data so that might be what this WG does (which will create a formal standard) 09:00:48 present+ Gianluca_Luraschi 09:00:59 present+ Ioannis_Athanasiadis 09:01:22 -> http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/charter Charter 09:01:24 http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/charter 09:01:58 kerry: Concept is coverage over space. Gridded data over space, how you might link to other data 09:02:14 ... WaterML is mentioned to be able to handle time at a specific point in space 09:02:26 s/WaterML/WaterML2/ 09:02:28 ... RDF Data Cube http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube/ 09:03:01 PeterBauman: OGC already has well defined defn of coverage 09:03:32 ... distinction between discrete and continuous understood 09:03:45 ... consensus should be absed on existing defn of the word 09:03:51 (the charter says: "expressing discrete coverage data conformant to the ISO 19123 abstract model") 09:04:19 jtandy: Points to wording in charter to help clarify what is and isn't in scope 09:04:30 present+ Peter Baumann 09:04:39 s/absed/based/ 09:05:43 jtandy: I suggest we look at the use cases we have. 09:05:55 PB: Distinction between the coverage and the services that operate on it 09:06:48 JohnHerring: Do you know the difference between discrete and continuous 09:06:55 ... all data is discrete at its core 09:07:09 ... continuous are intrpolated, discrete is not 09:07:42 s/intrpolated/interpolated/ 09:07:43 PB: If you're working on an image then you do have pixels. Coverage describes both in a uniform way 09:08:01 kerry: My understanding is that we're working on discrete, not interpolating 09:08:46 PB: Gives an example where interpolation doesn't make sense 09:09:07 JohnHerring: There's no interpolation between and oak and a pine 09:09:43 jtandy: In a gridded daatset - in meteo, we represent each individual point as you need to know when to interpolate and when not to 09:10:24 PB: If it's the case that it can be interpolated then it can be seen as continuous but you won't necessarily provide the interpolation method 09:10:47 JohnHerring: We need to know what you're trying to do before we decide 09:10:55 kerry: Yes we need to look at the UCs! 09:10:56 (the interpolation in meteorology is really quite complicated - so if you're going to do interpolation, proceed with caution!) 09:12:02 pebau has joined #sdw 09:12:04 KymW has joined #sdw 09:12:13 cperey has joined #sdw 09:12:28 kerry: Hands the chair to Jeremy 09:12:32 chair: jtandy 09:13:36 laurent-oz has joined #sdw 09:14:38 jtandy: We're trying to pull out the requirements from each UC. Please read through the first UC 09:14:44 ... starting with https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Working_Use_Cases#Meteorological_Data_Rescue_Use_Case_.28Best_Practice.2C_Time.2C_SSN.2C_Coverage.29 09:15:08 Jeremy hands out post-it notes to write the reqs on as we'll have the smae reqs multiple times 09:15:55 kerry: I can see multilingual search as a requirement 09:17:52 Jb_henry_ has joined #sdw 09:18:13 Phila: this is now 'mdr' https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Working_Use_Cases#mdr 09:18:14 are we using any google document or something similar? 09:18:42 Ted: Do we have a quality metric? 09:18:51 Discussion leads to some quality and prov reqs 09:19:15 Kyoungsook_Kim has joined #sdw 09:19:26 JohnHerring: If the data is tabular-numeric that may not be stats 09:19:30 stefan has joined #sdw 09:19:34 ... we don't know what the data is 09:19:59 jtandy: These would be reports from a specific station. It's a time series 09:20:06 JohnHerring: One station or multiple stations 09:20:17 jtandy: Each station has its own time series 09:20:43 JohnHerring: So the user might have a consistent set across whichshe could interpolate 09:20:57 jtandy: It's a continuous phenomenon so if you know what you're doing you can interpolate 09:21:08 jtandy: And we normally use quite complicated models to do that 09:21:28 s/whichshe/which she/ 09:21:53 jtandy: We have time series records for observations at a point 09:22:02 kerry: WaterML is relevant here then 09:22:42 s/PB:/pebau/ 09:22:46 #time The OGC TemporalDWG has already put together a list of useful links wrt time defenitions http://external.opengeospatial.org/twiki_public/TemporalDWG/WebHome#TemporalDWG_Web_Utilities 09:22:53 s/PeterBaumann/pebau/g 09:22:56 s/PB:/pebau/g 09:24:09 Further general discussion about the use case 09:24:16 jtandy: We need to know where the data is related to 09:24:23 pebau: Yes, it must be referenced in space and time 09:26:37 jtandy: Summarises the clusters - when and where 09:26:55 ... on the Web we need tro be able to find the info - so discvovery metadata 09:27:00 ... need to be able to cite it 09:27:03 ... its quality 09:27:09 ... handle multi-lingual 09:27:27 ... so in terms of coverage, we're looking at metadata of it 09:27:39 s/we need tro/we need to/ 09:27:42 kerry: Need to be able to insert it in a catalogue 09:28:26 s/discvovery/discovery/ 09:28:29 Sylvain_Grellet_BRGM: So she's processing the data? 09:28:38 kerry: No, she's just publishing what she finds 09:28:56 +q on adding requirements to spreadsheet 09:29:33 -> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Working_Use_Cases#hzv Next USe case 09:29:37 chair: kerry 09:29:43 jtandy: Summarises his use case 09:29:48 David_Burggraf has joined #sdw 09:29:50 ... based on coastal habitat zones 09:30:18 ack nex 09:30:23 ack next 09:30:24 Alejandro_and_Armin, you wanted to comment on adding requirements to spreadsheet 09:32:44 Looking at https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Working_Use_Cases#hzv 09:33:13 jtandy: We don't want to describe the zone itself, we need line of sight to the info that someone used to designate the protected zone 09:33:19 ... so it's really about provenance 09:33:31 ... we have a bunch of complex data that may be used 09:33:42 ... side scan sonar can be many GB 09:33:58 ... Cameras towed behind a boat to show the different plants and fish etc 09:34:09 ... person will record what type of fish is seen where 09:34:20 JohnHerring: So we're talking about GeoReferecned video 09:34:30 JohnHerring: Frame by frame georef 09:34:56 present+ David_Burggraf 09:35:14 present+ Marie-Francoise 09:35:18 s/GeoReferecned/GeoReferenced/ 09:35:27 present+ laurent-oz 09:35:50 jtandy: So all the metadata is in the observation model. Where and when the pic was taken 09:36:30 jtandy: The interesting thing for me is, a link to a big side scan sonar dataset - that's too much 09:36:37 ... we need to access a small part of the data 09:37:10 jtandy: Politicians need to know whetehr the fish was seen in or outside the zone 09:37:17 ... but activists will want more detail 09:37:33 ... so we need a provenace record like "I used this chunk" 09:38:06 Ted: Is that a subsetting requirement? 09:38:28 ... If I understand the charter correctly - this coverage data is really big so we need ways to share smaller pieces of it 09:38:33 s/provenace/provenance 09:38:52 Ted: That's a server side requirement? 09:38:59 jtandy: I was thinking about the citation angle 09:39:09 ... they may have had the whole thing 09:39:26 s/whetehr/whether/ 09:39:42 Jeff_Walter: You need to be able to express that you used array indices 60-80 09:39:45 ... for example 09:39:52 O_Morel has joined #sdw 09:39:57 pebau: We have subsetting in coverage 09:40:08 present+ O_Morel 09:40:33 Discussion focuses on referencing part of a coverage 09:40:51 #time agreed on the necessity to define a harmonized OWL model for time and test it with the provided use cases 09:40:56 jtandy: And you, pebau, said you wanted to be able to describe it such that someone else can execute that in future 09:41:19 q+ to talk about Data Cube and DCAT 09:41:43 jtandy: I'm going to suggest we break for coffee? 09:41:50 christine: No, 10 mins to go yet 09:42:21 jtandy: There are things in this UC related to BPs and time but we're not looking at those here 09:42:30 JohnHerring: You need to be careful when you say georeference 09:42:47 ... every observation has its own location associated with it 09:42:53 q- 09:43:15 pebau: raises the issue of CRSs 09:43:25 Sylvain_Grellet_BRGM: raises identifiers 09:43:42 jtandy: We said in the previous UC that we needed to be able to cite