18:03:00 RRSAgent has joined #social 18:03:00 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/01/13-social-irc 18:03:02 RRSAgent, make logs public 18:03:02 Zakim has joined #social 18:03:04 Zakim, this will be SOCL 18:03:04 ok, trackbot; I see T&S_SOCWG()1:00PM scheduled to start 3 minutes ago 18:03:05 Meeting: Social Web Working Group Teleconference 18:03:05 Date: 13 January 2015 18:03:12 Zakim, who is on the call? 18:03:12 T&S_SOCWG()1:00PM has not yet started, aaronpk 18:03:13 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Lloyd_Fassett, danbri, bblfish, jasnell_, AnnBassetti, eprodrom, tantek, shepazu_away, Arnaud, KevinMarks, rhiaro_, wilkie, Morbus, cwebber2, pdurbin, 18:03:13 ... bigbluehat, JakeHart, mattl, bret, Loqi, zz_nickstenn, oshepherd, rektide_, dwhly, kylewm, Tsyesika, jessica_lily, aaronpk, trackbot, sandro, wseltzer 18:03:20 zakim, this is socl 18:03:20 ok, Arnaud; that matches T&S_SOCWG()1:00PM 18:03:28 +[IPcaller] 18:03:29 Zakim, who is on the phone? 18:03:29 On the phone I see jasnell, eprodrom, Arnaud, ??P5, +1.541.410.aaaa, aaronpk, ??P0, ??P9, Sandro, [IPcaller] 18:03:39 -??P0 18:03:47 Zakim, mute ??P5 18:03:48 ??P5 should now be muted 18:03:55 +Ann 18:04:04 Zakim, mute ??P9 18:04:04 ??P9 should now be muted 18:04:19 since you can't hear me, I'm P9 :) 18:04:26 zakim, ??p9 is me 18:04:26 +tantek; got it 18:04:30 zakim, unmute me 18:04:30 tantek should no longer be muted 18:04:43 zakim, ??P5 is me 18:04:43 +cwebber2; got it 18:04:45 harry has joined #social 18:04:46 tantek++ 18:04:48 tantek has 139 karma 18:04:49 +??P10 18:04:52 hhalpin has joined #social 18:04:52 -q ??P5 18:05:31 scribenick AnnBassetti 18:05:42 Zakim, who is scribing? 18:05:42 I don't understand your question, tantek. 18:05:50 scribenick: AnnBassetti 18:05:50 scribenick: AnnBassetti 18:06:13 zakim, who is here? 18:06:13 On the phone I see jasnell, eprodrom, Arnaud, cwebber2 (muted), +1.541.410.aaaa, aaronpk, tantek, Sandro, [IPcaller], Ann, rhiaro_ (muted) 18:06:16 On IRC I see hhalpin, harry, Zakim, RRSAgent, Lloyd_Fassett, danbri, bblfish, jasnell, AnnBassetti, eprodrom, tantek, shepazu_away, Arnaud, KevinMarks, rhiaro_, wilkie, Morbus, 18:06:16 ... cwebber2, pdurbin, bigbluehat, JakeHart, mattl, bret, Loqi, zz_nickstenn, oshepherd, rektide_, dwhly, kylewm, Tsyesika, jessica_lily, aaronpk, trackbot, sandro, wseltzer 18:06:21 q+ 18:06:28 zakim, +1.541.410.aaaa is me 18:06:28 +Lloyd_Fassett; got it 18:06:35 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-01-06-minutes 18:06:36 blooby has joined #social 18:06:45 +??P11 18:06:56 me 18:07:06 Zakim, ??P11 is jessica_lily 18:07:07 +jessica_lily; got it 18:07:20 approve minutes .... no objections 18:07:25 thanks 18:07:50 no objections here, look good 18:07:52 approved 18:08:04 q? 18:08:11 ack eprodrom 18:08:21 also need to approve minutes from last meeting 18:08:24 18:08:36 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2014-12-16-minutes 18:08:40 Sorry, they were in the agenda 18:08:56 +1 18:09:09 Tantek: suggests postponing approval until next week, so people can have time to read 18:09:35 ... no objections; added to next agenda 18:09:47 ... next week's meeting on schedule per usual 18:09:52 next week: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-01-20 18:10:16 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-01-13#Discussion_of_media_objects_in_Activity_Streams_2.0 18:10:25 ... agenda: Media Objects 2.0 ... suggested by elf, but he's out sick 18:10:42 ... thus postponed 18:10:49 ... agenda: Activity Streams 18:11:00 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-01-13#Activity_Streams_2.0_publication 18:11:13 James Snell: 18:11:20 18:11:37 ... recommend we update working draft 18:11:53 -rhiaro_ 18:12:01 ... both vocabulary and core working drafts 18:12:19 +??P10 18:12:30 http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams2.html 18:12:35 q? 18:12:36 http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams2-vocabulary.html 18:12:37 q+ 18:12:46 http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams2.html 18:12:46 http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams2-vocabulary.html 18:12:46 ack eprodrom 18:13:05 Evan: any outstanding issues on 1st Working Draft? 18:13:14 JamesS: no ... 18:13:40 Evan: is next step to propose moving this to next Working Draft? 18:13:44 I've merged in the extended vocabulary work into the editor's drafts. I propose that we update the Working Drafts based on the current editor's drafts 18:13:55 Tantek: next step is to ask if there are any other outstanding issues 18:14:04 just ping me when moving things to Working Draft 18:14:14 .... I think, James, you asked me to do .... 18:14:21 ... re: microformats 18:14:22 and I'm happy to send it in and go through pubrules 18:14:31 danbri1 has joined #social 18:15:04 James: added but not an expert, would appreciate review 18:15:10 Tantek: will take a look 18:15:26 James: be aware there are over 900 examples, many of which are microformats! 18:15:31 Tantek: will look 18:16:26 ACTION: Tantek, review microformats, due Jan. 14, 2015 18:16:26 Error finding 'Tantek,'. You can review and register nicknames at . 18:16:51 AnnBassetti: "ACTION tantek blah blah blah" 18:17:11 ACTION: tantek review microformats due Jan 14, 2015 18:17:12 Created ACTION-26 - Review microformats due jan 14, 2015 [on Tantek Çelik - due 2015-01-20]. 18:17:35 AnnBassetti: can you add the URL to that action? 18:17:43 the_frey has joined #social 18:17:47 URLs 18:18:24 trackbot, 26? 18:18:24 Sorry, tantek, I don't understand 'trackbot, 26?'. Please refer to for help. 18:18:48 action-26? 18:18:48 action-26 -- Tantek Çelik to Review microformats due jan 14, 2015 -- due 2015-01-20 -- OPEN 18:18:48 http://www.w3.org/Social/track/actions/26 18:19:39 i just update the action with the urls 18:19:48 18:19:59 s/update/updated 18:20:29 +1 18:21:03 nicolagreco has joined #social 18:21:44 Tantek: proposal for James to prepare updated working drafts for Activity Streams specs on Friday 18:21:45 I added a countdown for 1/16 12:00am (#5576) 18:22:00 tiborKatelbach has joined #social 18:22:01 ... proposal ACTION team to review those drafts 18:22:01 +1 18:22:03 +1 18:22:05 +1 18:22:07 +1 18:22:09 +1 18:22:10 +1 18:22:10 +1 18:22:11 tantek, your mic seems to silence until you start speaking, so the first couple hundred milliseconds of your audio is dropped when you start speaking after a gap of silence 18:22:45 Tantek: better to capture explicit support 18:22:46 Zakim, who is here? 18:22:46 On the phone I see jasnell, eprodrom, Arnaud, cwebber2 (muted), Lloyd_Fassett, aaronpk, tantek, Sandro, [IPcaller], Ann, jessica_lily, rhiaro_ (muted) 18:22:48 On IRC I see tiborKatelbach, nicolagreco, the_frey, danbri1, blooby, hhalpin, harry, Zakim, RRSAgent, Lloyd_Fassett, jasnell, AnnBassetti, eprodrom, tantek, shepazu_away, Arnaud, 18:22:48 ... KevinMarks, rhiaro_, wilkie, Morbus, cwebber2, pdurbin, bigbluehat, JakeHart, mattl, bret, Loqi, zz_nickstenn, oshepherd, rektide_, dwhly, kylewm, Tsyesika, jessica_lily, 18:22:48 ... aaronpk, trackbot, sandro, wseltzer 18:22:49 +tiborKatelbach 18:23:13 I have a poor voip connection 18:23:19 Tantek: checking why people aren't indicating their support or rejection of proposal 18:23:23 +[IPcaller.a] 18:23:32 Zakim, IPcaller.a is me 18:23:32 +wilkie; got it 18:23:33 +1 sounds good 18:23:38 me. I joined. 18:23:39 :) 18:23:45 sorry I'm late 18:23:50 Seems like pretty strong consensus with no objections 18:24:19 Agreed! 18:24:23 Tantek: declares consensus; would prefer more responses 18:24:55 if anyone finds any issues before friday, post them to the mailing list as well as github 18:25:19 jasnell: I think we're about to do that in the next section 18:25:23 ACTION: James Snell to update http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams2.html by Jan 16, 2015 18:25:23 'James' is an ambiguous username. Please try a different identifier, such as family name or username (e.g., jsnell, jktauber). 18:25:36 yes, jsnell 18:25:58 ACTION: jasnell to update http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams2.html by Jan 16, 2015 18:25:58 Error finding 'jasnell'. You can review and register nicknames at . 18:26:11 'jsnell' 18:26:30 ACTION: jsnell to update http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams2.html by Jan 16, 2015 18:26:30 Created ACTION-27 - Update http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams2.html by jan 16, 2015 [on James Snell - due 2015-01-20]. 18:27:09 here is the URL http://www.w3.org/Social/track/actions/27 18:27:21 maybe trackbot should post the URL of the action after it creates it? 18:27:52 ACTION: jsnell to prepare working draft for publication based on http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams2-vocabulary.html by Jan 16, 2105 18:27:53 Created ACTION-28 - Prepare working draft for publication based on http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams2-vocabulary.html by jan 16, 2105 [on James Snell - due 2015-01-20]. 18:27:54 q+ 18:28:07 I will go update 27 18:28:12 q? 18:28:16 ack jasnell 18:28:44 -rhiaro_ 18:29:00 James: these Working Drafts have been stable for awhile, thus would like to consider moving to Last Call 18:29:07 Tantek: yes, that will be the next step 18:29:12 +??P10 18:29:33 ... having stability on the editor's working draft is important for moving to next steps 18:30:19 James: if anyone sees an issue in the spec(s), please raise issue on GitHub, but copy the mailing list 18:30:27 ... will ensure James sees it promptly 18:30:36 Tantek: anything else on this topic? 18:30:38 18:30:38 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-01-13#Microsyntaxes 18:30:46 q+ 18:30:49 ... next topic: Microsyntaxes 18:30:51 +Wendy 18:30:55 .... Evan's topic? 18:31:07 Evan: actually elf's, but happy to speak to it 18:31:08 ack eprodrom 18:31:20 ... issue came up on mailing list 18:31:29 q+ 18:31:44 ... number of diff systems doing microsyntaxes 18:32:07 ... example: with Twitter you put @name to mention a particular user 18:32:33 ... Twitter then routes that tweet in a special way 18:33:01 Instagram also handles @-references like that 18:33:02 ... Facebook, Google do similar, with diff syntaxes 18:33:17 ... discussion about how to recognize this 18:33:23 ... via our mailing list 18:33:43 ... how to handle "magic" symbols 18:33:52 ... receiver should not have to do special parsing 18:34:07 ... To: and Cc: properties should handle 18:34:59 ... perhaps add note in Activity Streams that microsyntax in content for other properties should not have to be parsed by the processor 18:35:25 ... will check if there's a github issue; will check 18:35:37 Tantek: do you want this to be in the Friday draft? 18:36:21 q? 18:36:21 Evan: this wasn't proposed by me ... nice to have by Friday, but not a crisis if added later 18:36:37 ack jasnell 18:36:38 Tantek: agrees 18:36:52 James: I'm the one who started this on mailing list 18:36:57 caseorganic has joined #social 18:37:04 ... won't be prob to add by Friday to the spec 18:37:28 ... I don't see any normative changes; should be just editorial 18:37:33 Evan: agrees 18:37:41 danbri has joined #social 18:37:59 Tantek: sounds as if we're resolved on how to handle microsyntax 18:38:06 ... any issues, Evan or james? 18:38:10 18:38:19 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-01-13#OpenSocial_Press_Release 18:38:25 Tantek: last agenda item ... Open Social announcement 18:38:41 ... press release issued shortly after last meeting 18:38:45 q+ 18:39:09 ... want to ensure people are aware of this occurence 18:39:22 +[IPcaller.a] 18:39:30 .... Open Social has formally moved their work to W3C 18:39:31 Zakim, IPcaller.a is hhalpin 18:39:31 +hhalpin; got it 18:39:38 q? 18:39:38 q+ 18:39:45 q+ 18:39:47 ... and expect this WG, plus the Social Web IG to do any follow-on work 18:40:19 ack jasnell 18:41:02 James: notes that Press Release raised some issues for some ... 18:41:25 ... he cannot speak for 18:41:41 ... believes any add'l resources they had, they donated to W3C and decided to close themselves down 18:41:59 ... does not believe there are any implications that this WG would work on anything specific to that work 18:42:02 s/ q? 18:42:14 ack eprodrom 18:42:34 we can hear you evan 18:42:38 -rhiaro 18:43:12 we have no formal commitment to existing OpenSocial specs, although we hope this work and membership can feed into the Social WG's new work. 18:43:15 Evan: I wondered, did this announcement mean that we are expected to maintain current or new version of OpenSocial spec? 18:43:18 no, there are no obligations with regards to the opensocial specs themselves. 18:43:20 +??P10 18:43:31 ... worried that this implied we might be taking on a big amount of new work 18:43:37 there is no change to the charter, nor any proposal or request to do so 18:43:53 Yep, no additional charter items 18:43:55 so, this doesn't change what we are doing 18:44:00 ... appears that OpenSocial gave us their "seal of approval", but without any new charter or additional work 18:44:08 ... seems positive 18:44:17 q+ 18:44:35 Tantek: I agree 18:44:50 ... I cited our charter in the announcement for that reason 18:45:08 ... maintaining the OpenSocial spec is NOT in our charter; we need to be clear about that 18:45:22 ... if anyone thinks we should do that, it needs to be added to our charter 18:45:31 to be clear, no one has suggested that the social wg ought to maintain the opensocial specs 18:45:41 q+ 18:45:45 ... does anyone think we need to add that to our charter? 18:45:59 q? 18:46:14 ack harry 18:46:57 Harry: we had to keep the announcement secret until announced .. apologizes for no preceding discussion with WG 18:47:27 ... no formal obligation 18:47:37 ... hope some of them might join this WG 18:48:18 Tantek: 18:48:22 Harry: 18:48:35 q? 18:48:43 again, if anyone is worried or has concerns, do feel free to email 18:48:46 ack Arnaud 18:49:05 Arnaud: no change to the charter, and no one has asked for change to charter 18:49:06 we thought that since there would be no change to the charter, this is more a big +1 to the existing work and a chance to get new folks involved than anything else. 18:49:09 ... good news 18:49:20 Also, this clarifies the space. 18:49:36 ... Open Social Foundation acknowledged that the "social web" work is happening here, in this W3C WG 18:49:56 ... OSF had some $$ left, which they donated to us 18:50:04 q+ 18:50:13 ... perhaps towards a F2F dinner or some such 18:50:17 ack eprodrom 18:50:36 So if you are a developer, you can just go to Social WG 18:50:41 for standards, IG for use-case 18:50:48 q+ 18:51:00 that's something I can talk to Matt about 18:51:02 Evan: re: Harry's point ... wonder if our WG chairs might reach out to former OSF members, inviting them to participate here 18:51:04 I can take that action 18:51:14 yes please 18:51:20 otherwise I'll forget :-) 18:51:22 Yes, it would be good to invite OSF people here 18:51:36 We've seen some emails from Matt Marum from SugarCRM but a lot aren't here 18:51:55 participants 18:52:04 We'd want all the Open Social member organizations and their contact people 18:52:21 jsnell will reach out to previous opensocial members to solicit participation in the Social WG 18:52:38 ACTION: jsnell to reach out to Open Social Foundation participants to invite them to join the W3C Social Web WG 18:52:38 Created ACTION-29 - Reach out to open social foundation participants to invite them to join the w3c social web wg [on James Snell - due 2015-01-20]. 18:52:48 q? 18:52:50 ack wseltzer 18:52:54 q- hhalpin 18:52:57 q- harry 18:53:09 Wendy: thanks Evan and James for the outreach! good collaboration! 18:53:31 ... with "lawyer hat" on, notes W3C has not yet seen the $$ 18:53:45 q? 18:54:05 ... does not know how much $$ there will actually be 18:54:20 ... actual conclusion and transfer is still in work 18:54:47 Tantek: notes OpenSocial.org domain name now redirects to one W3C blog post 18:55:07 ... wonders if any of the OSF content will be archived and preserved? 18:55:29 Sandro: in the past, W3C has occasionally taken on a web site for archival purposes 18:55:44 ... not sure if it's appropriate here 18:55:53 Ann: what is process to make that happen? 18:55:56 I think TimBL is not needed 18:56:01 I can file a sysreq@w3.org 18:56:13 Sandro: TimBL thought it was important and got SysTeam to do it 18:56:14 but I think it's just in the backlog 18:56:22 Arnaud: thinks this was part of the negotiation 18:56:46 ... that they would keep the domain and single page 18:56:55 nicolagreco has joined #social 18:56:55 for example this document on opensocial.org just redirects to the blog post: http://docs.opensocial.org/display/OSF/OpenSocial+State+of+the+Union+2011+~+May+12%2C+2011 18:57:13 the specs are archived on github 18:57:18 https://github.com/OpenSocial/spec 18:57:40 Wendy: .. if this group thinks there is specific content to be saved, we should point it out 18:58:21 ... we should identify the crucial content, so W3C can look into it 18:58:58 IMHO its probably ok to just keep OpenSocial on github 18:59:17 Tantek: modest request: it would be nice if at least blog posts from OSF could be preserved, to be referenced as history 18:59:28 ... including permalinks 18:59:30 I'll take that action item to follow up on also 18:59:40 I'm happy to ask Systems Team if ex-OSF people 18:59:42 meaning that I'll ask the opensocial folks about it and report back 18:59:45 are ok with that 19:00:33 ACTION: jsnell to ask OpenSocial folks about W3C archiving their blog posts 19:00:33 Created ACTION-30 - Ask opensocial folks about w3c archiving their blog posts [on James Snell - due 2015-01-20]. 19:00:34 got an answer from andy 19:00:50 Andy Smith says, "we have backed all of them up, and they can be made available if necessary" 19:01:06 will go to me 19:01:06 "but we felt given the direction of the work and community it was not necessary to manage the migration over" 19:01:17 "In terms of twitter and social media, that will gradaully shift over to the w3c exclusively over the next 6 months or so" 19:01:19 simple request from the Social Web WG: can W3C at least archive the social content (e.g. blog posts) from opensocial.org? 19:01:26 ACTION: harry will ask W3C SysTeam about prospect for archiving OSF blog posts and perhaps other content 19:01:26 Created ACTION-31 - Will ask w3c systeam about prospect for archiving osf blog posts and perhaps other content [on Harry Halpin - due 2015-01-20]. 19:01:33 q+ 19:01:50 q? 19:01:52 ack jas 19:01:55 ack jasnell 19:02:53 James: other content might be the OSF Twitter account, ... 19:03:08 ... right person to ask is Andy Smith, who is my colleague at IBM 19:03:18 ... I will liaise with him 19:03:38 jasnell, let's co-ordinate when you are ready to publish those drafts! 19:03:39 Tantek: past our closing time .. any thing else? 19:03:46 ... end of meeting 19:03:48 Thanks Tantek! 19:03:52 ... thanks all! 19:03:55 harry +1 19:04:00 -eprodrom 19:04:02 thanks AnnBassetti ! 19:04:03 trackbot, end meeting 19:04:03 Zakim, list attendees 19:04:03 As of this point the attendees have been jasnell, eprodrom, Arnaud, aaronpk, Sandro, [IPcaller], Ann, tantek, cwebber2, rhiaro_, Lloyd_Fassett, jessica_lily, tiborKatelbach, 19:04:07 ... wilkie, rhiaro, Wendy, hhalpin 19:04:07 -Sandro 19:04:09 -cwebber2 19:04:11 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 19:04:11 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/01/13-social-minutes.html trackbot 19:04:12 RRSAgent, bye 19:04:12 I see 9 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2015/01/13-social-actions.rdf : 19:04:12 ACTION: Tantek, review microformats, due Jan. 14, 2015 [1] 19:04:12 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/01/13-social-irc#T18-16-26 19:04:12 ACTION: tantek review microformats due Jan 14, 2015 [2] 19:04:12 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/01/13-social-irc#T18-17-11 19:04:12 ACTION: James Snell to update http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams2.html by Jan 16, 2015 [3] 19:04:12 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/01/13-social-irc#T18-25-23 19:04:12 ACTION: jasnell to update http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams2.html by Jan 16, 2015 [4] 19:04:12 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/01/13-social-irc#T18-25-58 19:04:12 ACTION: jsnell to update http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams2.html by Jan 16, 2015 [5] 19:04:12 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/01/13-social-irc#T18-26-30 19:04:12 ACTION: jsnell to prepare working draft for publication based on http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams2-vocabulary.html by Jan 16, 2105 [6] 19:04:12 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/01/13-social-irc#T18-27-52 19:04:12 ACTION: jsnell to reach out to Open Social Foundation participants to invite them to join the W3C Social Web WG [7] 19:04:12 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/01/13-social-irc#T18-52-38 19:04:12 ACTION: jsnell to ask OpenSocial folks about W3C archiving their blog posts [8] 19:04:12 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/01/13-social-irc#T19-00-33 19:04:12 ACTION: harry will ask W3C SysTeam about prospect for archiving OSF blog posts and perhaps other content [9] 19:04:12 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/01/13-social-irc#T19-01-26 19:04:14 -jessica_lily 19:04:16 bye 19:04:17 Note that there will be a 2-4 day delay between jasnell finishing edits and us publishing on W3C site 19:04:19 -Arnaud 19:04:25 -rhiaro 19:04:27 -aaronpk 19:04:31 -tiborKatelbach 19:04:33 -Wendy 19:04:36 -jasnell 19:04:42 -Lloyd_Fassett