Edit ISSUE-224: Can we improve the language around the use of rdf:types for shapes

Nickname:

Title:

State:

Product:

Raised By:

Description:

Add notes (no markup allowed, URIs get automatically hyperlinked):

Related emails:

  1. shapes-ISSUE-224 (Improved shape type definitions): Can we improve the language around the use of rdf:types for shapes [SHACL - Core] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2017-02-05) (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2017-02-05)

Related notes:

RESOLUTION: CLOSE issue-224 by deleting two instances of "However, the presence of any rdf:type triple does not determine whether a node is treated as a node shape or not."; changing "should" to "is recommended, but not required," in the sh:NodeShape and sh:PropertyShape definitions; and by adding rdf:type statements to most if not all examples

https://www.w3.org/2017/02/08-shapes-minutes.html

Irene Polikoff, 9 Feb 2017, 22:50:17


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.326 2018/10/13 17:29:51 vivien Exp $