Edit ISSUE-180: Should IRI paths always be interpreted as predicates?

Nickname:

Title:

State:

Product:

Raised By:

Description:

Add notes (no markup allowed, URIs get automatically hyperlinked):

Related emails:

  1. Re: IRC log? (from eric@w3.org on 2016-11-18) (from eric@w3.org on 2016-11-18)
  2. Re: IRC log? (from eric@w3.org on 2016-11-18) (from eric@w3.org on 2016-11-18)
  3. Re: Remaining issues with impact on the syntax (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-11-16) (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-11-16)
  4. Re: Remaining issues with impact on the syntax (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-11-15) (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-11-15)
  5. Re: Remaining issues with impact on the syntax (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-11-15) (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-11-15)
  6. Re: Remaining issues with impact on the syntax (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-11-14) (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-11-14)
  7. Re: Remaining issues with impact on the syntax (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-11-14) (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-11-14)
  8. Re: Remaining issues with impact on the syntax (from eric@w3.org on 2016-11-13) (from eric@w3.org on 2016-11-13)
  9. Re: Remaining issues with impact on the syntax (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-11-13) (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-11-13)
  10. Remaining issues with impact on the syntax (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-11-11) (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-11-11)
  11. Re: ISSUE-180: Should IRI paths always be interpreted as predicates? [SHACL - Core] (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2016-09-29) (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2016-09-29)
  12. Re: ISSUE-180: Should IRI paths always be interpreted as predicates? [SHACL - Core] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-09-29) (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-09-29)
  13. Re: ISSUE-180: Should IRI paths always be interpreted as predicates? [SHACL - Core] (from eric@w3.org on 2016-09-29) (from eric@w3.org on 2016-09-29)
  14. Re: ISSUE-180: Should IRI paths always be interpreted as predicates? [SHACL - Core] (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2016-09-29) (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2016-09-29)
  15. Re: ISSUE-180: Should IRI paths always be interpreted as predicates? [SHACL - Core] (from eric@w3.org on 2016-09-29) (from eric@w3.org on 2016-09-29)
  16. Re: ISSUE-180: Should IRI paths always be interpreted as predicates? [SHACL - Core] (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2016-09-29) (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2016-09-29)
  17. ISSUE-180: Should IRI paths always be interpreted as predicates? [SHACL - Core] (from simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at on 2016-09-29) (from simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at on 2016-09-29)
  18. shapes-ISSUE-180 (Path bnodes): Should IRI paths always be interpreted as predicates? [SHACL - Core] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2016-09-29) (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2016-09-29)

Related notes:

RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-180, accepting Holger's proposed changes (in the issue description)
See https://www.w3.org/2016/11/16-shapes-minutes.html#resolution04

Arnaud Le Hors, 22 Nov 2016, 10:00:49


Ted Thibodeau <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>, Irene Polikoff <irene@topquadrant.com>, Chairs, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.325 2014-09-10 21:42:02 ted Exp $