17:58:04 RRSAgent has joined #social 17:58:04 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/12/16-social-irc 17:58:05 RRSAgent, make logs public 17:58:05 Zakim has joined #social 17:58:07 Zakim, this will be SOCL 17:58:07 ok, trackbot; I see T&S_SOCWG()1:00PM scheduled to start in 2 minutes 17:58:08 Meeting: Social Web Working Group Teleconference 17:58:09 Date: 16 December 2014 18:01:30 zakim, this is socl 18:01:30 ok, Arnaud; that matches T&S_SOCWG()1:00PM 18:01:36 Zakim, who's on the call? 18:01:36 On the phone I see jasnell, ??P1, +1.514.554.aaaa, Arnaud 18:01:44 Zakim, aaaa is me 18:01:44 +eprodrom; got it 18:02:04 -q 18:02:14 Zakim, ??P1 is me 18:02:14 +cwebber2; got it 18:02:16 -q 18:02:26 +??P4 18:02:29 -q ??P1 18:03:18 +Sandro 18:04:45 zakim, who's on the phone? 18:04:45 On the phone I see jasnell, cwebber2, eprodrom, Arnaud, rhiaro (muted), Sandro 18:04:50 +??P7 18:04:52 zakim, ??p7 is me 18:04:52 +tantek; got it 18:05:01 zakim, mute me 18:05:01 tantek should now be muted 18:05:14 zakim, unmute me 18:05:15 tantek should no longer be muted 18:05:19 + +1.541.410.aabb 18:05:23 everyone is winding down 18:05:33 brain slowly shutting down for the end of the year 18:05:56 +1 for skipping next week 18:06:27 +1 on skipping 2 weeks 18:06:31 +1 for skipping two weeks 18:06:55 zakim, who is here? 18:06:55 On the phone I see jasnell, cwebber2, eprodrom, Arnaud, rhiaro (muted), Sandro, tantek, +1.541.410.aabb 18:06:58 On IRC I see RRSAgent, eprodrom, jasnell, tantek, jaywink, bblfish, shepazu, KevinMarks, wilkie, Morbus, Arnaud, pdurbin, cwebber2, JakeHart, mattl, hadleybeeman, bret, bigbluehat, 18:06:58 ... Loqi, nickstenn, oshepherd, rektide_, dwhly, kylewm, rhiaro, jaakko, Tsyesika, jessica_lily, aaronpk, trackbot, sandro, wseltzer 18:07:12 who is calling from 541? 18:07:12 +bblfish 18:07:23 hi 18:07:27 +??P10 18:07:32 who just joined? 18:07:36 me 18:07:41 Zakim, ??P10 is me 18:07:41 +jessica_lily; got it 18:07:47 Zakim, mute me 18:07:47 jessica_lily should now be muted 18:08:09 I can scribe if nobody volunteers 18:08:24 Henry is presenting today 18:08:31 +[IPcaller] 18:08:39 I scribed last week 18:08:41 Zakim, IPcaller is me 18:08:41 +wilkie; got it 18:08:44 But I can share in the job 18:08:52 scribenick eprodrom 18:09:04 TOPIC: Approval of last week's minutes 18:09:10 no objection 18:09:14 no objections 18:09:29 RESOLVED: minutes of Dec 9 approved 18:09:35 TOPIC: when should we meet next? 18:09:42 Next meeting is the 23rd 18:09:49 Today is low, next two weeks will be lower 18:09:58 +1 for 2015-01-06 for next meeting 18:10:00 PROPOSED: skip 2 weeks for holidays, next meeting Jan 6 18:10:01 +1 to skipping two weeks 18:10:02 +1 18:10:05 +1 18:10:06 +1 for missing two weeks 18:10:07 +1 to skipping till jan 6 18:10:25 RESOLVED: next telecon Jan 6 2015 18:10:29 +1 18:10:44 TOPIC: schedule on the wiki 18:11:03 - +1.541.410.aabb 18:11:11 I think having deadlines helps a lot 18:11:13 elf-pavlik proposes removing dates from #sched section of socialwg wiki pages 18:11:16 + +1.541.410.aacc 18:11:20 even ones you fall behind on :) 18:11:23 Arnaud: we have a deadline 18:11:28 And we need to keep track of what's going on 18:11:31 i think deadlines are useful providing they're realistic 18:11:46 q+ 18:11:52 who just joined from 541? 18:11:55 ack eprodrom 18:13:13 eprodrom: Let's put small number of dates on the schedule 18:13:34 tantek: let's use the Tracker to keep dates and schedules 18:13:42 +Doug_Schepers 18:13:48 that makes sense 18:14:24 q+ 18:14:42 tilgovi has joined #social 18:15:10 ack eprodrom 18:15:33 ack sandro 18:16:43 sandro: we have a commitment to the dates on the charter and we need to update the charter if we don't make it 18:17:23 ShaneHudson has joined #social 18:17:42 note for the minutes, Milestones from the charter: http://www.w3.org/2013/socialweb/social-wg-charter.html#id-other-deliverables 18:17:49 Arnaud: we are at risk for running out of runway 18:18:24 Hi all, I've got IRC open but won't be paying too much attention. We are having an issue with water in the lights in my house :( sorry! 18:18:34 aww, cheer up 18:18:58 tantek: we've missed API and Federation Protocol goals already 18:19:04 for FPWD 18:19:12 tantek: and we need to review as a group 18:21:25 ACTION eprodrom update schedule to show only milestones for approval on Jan 6 18:21:25 Created ACTION-23 - Update schedule to show only milestones for approval on jan 6 [on Evan Prodromou - due 2014-12-23]. 18:23:35 eprodrom: shoot for 3/15 for FPWD of Social API 18:23:40 tantek: probably too aggressive 18:23:54 Arnaud: editor's draft? 18:23:58 we don't necessarily need agreement on approach before getting a first editor's draft proposal 18:24:11 q+ 18:24:13 http://www.w3.org/Social/track/actions/open 18:24:18 ack eprodrom 18:24:33 q+ 18:25:36 zakim, mute me 18:25:36 tantek should now be muted 18:26:47 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/pump.io_API#HTTP_verb_stats 18:26:59 elf-pavlik has joined #social 18:27:22 evan is closing 3 actions as done 16, 17, 19 18:27:30 advertising action is still open 18:27:43 zakim, unmute me 18:27:43 tantek should no longer be muted 18:28:21 tantek: it says "replaced by" 21 :) 18:28:23 http://www.w3.org/Social/track/actions/20 18:29:10 eprodrom: closed Action 16, 17, 19 18:29:22 Action 20: scheduling for F2F 18:29:23 Error finding '20'. You can review and register nicknames at . 18:29:36 Action 20 is about scheduling for F2F 18:29:36 Error finding '20'. You can review and register nicknames at . 18:29:49 Action 21 and 20 are closed 18:29:49 Error finding '21'. You can review and register nicknames at . 18:30:05 ack jasnell 18:30:08 zakim, mute me 18:30:08 tantek should now be muted 18:30:38 -tantek 18:31:14 jasnell: leaving actions open for IBM connections API 18:31:25 cwebber2: can you fill in for me for a second? 18:31:43 eprodrom: yup 18:31:46 Thanks 18:31:51 scribenick cwebber2 18:32:19 there has been work on the activitystreams spec, there is a vocab draft separated from the other draft 18:32:30 this is Arnaud, right? 18:32:34 s/scribenick /scribenick: / 18:33:06 there's suggestion maybe there's a requirement between where we draw line between where we explore vocab at large, where we need something we can all rely on 18:33:28 jasnell: it's pretty straightforward, vocab I've been working on is sum of a most common use cases I could identify 18:33:35 across wide set of implementations 18:33:58 I catalogued what are the most common difficulty / artifacts, went back to base schema in AS 1.0 18:34:01 reconciled with what we have now 18:34:14 quite a few additional classes, but all represent real world use cases 18:34:30 main issue I've seen is there are issues with basic structure but with the objects themselves 18:34:36 some use schema.org, some use something else 18:34:44 which mean these implementations don't interoperate 18:34:57 at the very least, the goal is to represent the most common concepts in a basic way 18:35:01 so we can implement basic interop 18:35:14 I advocate that we implement those basic terms as part of base vocabulary 18:35:25 +??P7 18:35:28 zakim, ??p7 is me 18:35:28 +tantek; got it 18:35:29 jasnell has joined #social 18:35:31 later if IG wants to define some details, this provides some basic interop 18:35:37 that's where we're at now 18:35:41 +q 18:35:46 is this a WG item or a IG item 18:35:47 ack jasnell 18:35:50 ack eprodrom 18:36:04 eprodrom: yeah, so my basic feeling is this really is part of the working group 18:36:07 q+ to say vocab interop is WG item, per charter 18:36:28 our charter is to create a syntax for social data and I think that the social network info that jasnell has put together is what we need for interop at this level 18:36:44 if we have 5 different definitions of types for a person or a note or different verbs for following/friendly 18:36:46 friending 18:36:51 I don't think that can be called interop 18:37:04 zakim, who's on the phone? 18:37:04 On the phone I see jasnell, cwebber2, eprodrom, Arnaud, rhiaro (muted), Sandro, bblfish, jessica_lily (muted), wilkie, +1.541.410.aacc, Doug_Schepers, tantek 18:37:06 what jasnell has done so far is set a solid base for those of us who need to do social data to get started 18:37:16 ack tantek 18:37:16 tantek, you wanted to say vocab interop is WG item, per charter 18:37:23 but I have hesitancy to go out the door without some agreed upon vocab 18:37:40 tantek: I agree with eprodrom, WG needs to agree on interop 18:37:53 it's something implementers who have a strong say in, rather than the interest group 18:38:01 so +1 for keeping that 18:38:22 key is to scope so we can meet succuess: what is minimum subset do we need to meet interop? 18:38:49 calling out minimum subset because looking at some vocabs seem to have terms and prhases that look like people were making them up 18:38:55 we need to do some implementer getting heads together 18:39:07 tantek: which has terms that look "made up" to you? that wasn't clear 18:39:10 what is the minimum interop so that we can do this 18:39:16 and other stuff can be dropped 18:39:35 Arnaud: harry is not on call, so I wonder what he would say 18:39:43 we will have to make this decision 18:39:47 should we do a formal proposal? 18:39:51 I seem to hear agreement 18:39:56 +1 on having a proposal 18:40:04 tantek: if there's agreement, we shoud do proposal, see if there are objections 18:40:11 scribenick eprodrom 18:40:15 Arnaud: proposal is to keep working, continue jasnell's efforts 18:40:21 go for it eprodrom 18:40:34 jasnell - *most terms* e.g. most of schema is totally made-up and no-one uses (including Google) 18:40:41 PROPOSAL: Continue jasnell's effort to do an extended vocabulary for Activity Streams focused on social data 18:40:59 +1 18:40:59 +1 18:41:05 +1 18:41:07 +1 18:41:08 0 18:41:16 +1 18:41:47 jasnell: there are use cases in the wiki, which are what drives the extended vocabulary 18:41:52 +1 caveat subsetted for vocab terms that are each *essential* for specific documented use-cases. 18:42:15 jasnell: if there are parts of the vocabulary that don't depend on it, we can remove 18:42:24 tantek: we should link every term to a use case 18:42:38 Arnaud: there are steps in the process that make sure what is in the spec is justified 18:43:18 RESOLVED: Continue jasnell's effort to do an extended vocabulary for Activity Streams focused on social data 18:43:26 TOPIC: Linked Data Platform API 18:43:32 Let's start tghe Imeplemtnation Report *now* 18:43:35 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/LDP 18:43:42 bblfish will give us a preview 18:44:28 jeff has joined #social 18:44:29 page shows links between resources 18:44:40 s/URL/URLs 18:44:43 On reaching a resource, must know what he can do with the resource 18:45:11 bblfish: there are namespacing and URL requireements, e.g. TOR 18:45:25 bblfish: LDP is a simplification and generalization of Atom 18:45:41 No requirements on format e.g. XML 18:45:51 Turtle as a default, JSON-LD as a requirement 18:45:58 Reading a resource is extremely simple 18:46:31 zakim, mute me 18:46:31 tantek should now be muted 18:47:00 JSON-LD results come back if you request it 18:47:14 What relations would we want on a LDP seed? 18:47:17 q+ 18:47:37 Can create binary and data resources, POST on container 18:47:49 Some containers require binding 18:47:54 Basic container does not do that 18:48:11 Authentication not included 18:48:15 LDP Next does include it 18:48:19 Cert or other authentication 18:48:38 Binary resources can be posted 18:49:56 Arnaud: please wait until the end of the discussion for questions 18:49:59 eprodrom: oops 18:50:09 Arnaud: "binary" resources can be RDF or not 18:50:30 bblfish: DELETE is accepted 18:50:36 bblfish: PUT is also accepted 18:50:43 s/RDF or not/binary or anything else/ 18:51:14 PATCH is possible but no defined format 18:51:22 LDP WG is working on a simpler format 18:52:11 bblfish: spec also included conditional updates, ETags, etc. 18:52:22 bblfish: LDP Next is next steps 18:52:28 bblfish: including access control 18:53:05 bblfish: potential for queries 18:53:20 bblfish: may use query verb 18:53:45 bblfish: can invent protocols described by the relations 18:53:52 bblfish: how to send a friend request? 18:53:58 bblfish: no email or ask for change to file 18:54:04 q+ to explain LDP maturity and next 18:54:04 bblfish: ping-to relationship 18:54:19 bblfish: can add new things to the container 18:54:30 bblfish: in LDP-Next there's a notion of data shapes 18:54:41 bblfish: restrict the types of shapes in containers 18:54:51 bblfish: peer-to-peer protocol 18:55:04 Arnaud: status of LDP 18:55:11 Arnaud: is now proposed recommendation 18:55:40 Arnaud: much discussion on what to do next 18:55:51 Arnaud: working group has decided to ask for an extension of the existing charter 18:56:02 Arnaud: not to finish but to give everyone time to experiment with what already exists 18:56:15 ack sandro 18:56:15 sandro, you wanted to explain LDP maturity and next 18:56:35 bblfish: does LDP specify much as in terms of side effects from incoming data? 18:56:37 sandro: march or april workshop to discuss next version of LDP 18:56:49 q+ to ask what types of social content are people (e.g. presenters) posting on their websites using LDP? notes? articles? events? 18:56:58 so in some sense this Social Web WG would be able to help define what LDP needs next 18:56:59 sandro: has been working on update controls 18:57:04 or is the protocol more of a distributed database, which is side-effect agnostic? 18:57:05 sandro: need real-time updates 18:57:33 ack eprodrom 18:57:41 9 implementations of LDP https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/tests/reports/ldp.html 18:57:54 bblfish - are they well deployed? 18:58:17 ack tantek 18:58:18 tantek, you wanted to ask what types of social content are people (e.g. presenters) posting on their websites using LDP? notes? articles? events? 18:58:21 well if some folks here join, they could be very well deployed :-) 18:58:21 eprodrom: seems like common patterns 18:58:32 tantek: what types of content are currently being posted using LDP? 18:58:43 tantek: are there activity streams types currently being used? 18:59:08 bblfish: building a blogging engine 18:59:13 bblfish: mostly FOAF 18:59:24 http://www.foaf-project.org/ 18:59:44 bblfish: also AS, images, videos 18:59:46 for my personal blog implementation, I'm starting to use LDP. Using Article, Note, Person, Image, Mention, Post, Respond, Like, Dislike so far 18:59:48 q+ 19:00:21 jasnell: that's interesting! 19:00:36 tantek: other examples have real implementations 19:00:44 tantek: people are posting on their own sites today 19:01:00 hoping to have the implementation ready by the face to face, as well as hopefully be able to switch my personal blog over to self-hosted by then 19:01:02 ack sandro 19:01:08 will depend on how much time I have to implement it 19:01:18 sandro: just starting to be implemented 19:01:27 Arnaud: out of time 19:01:33 Arnaud: thanks bblfish for presentation 19:01:39 ditto! Thanks, bblfish! 19:01:58 Arnaud: thanks all for joining! 19:02:01 thanks ! 19:02:03 Lloyd_Fassett has joined #social 19:02:04 -jasnell 19:02:05 wooo \o/ 19:02:08 thanks! 19:02:10 happy holidaze 19:02:10 Thanks Arnaud ! 19:02:11 -Doug_Schepers 19:02:12 thanks bblfish 19:02:15 -cwebber2 19:02:16 -Sandro 19:02:17 Enjoy your holidays folks 19:02:17 -bblfish 19:02:18 -Arnaud 19:02:20 -tantek 19:02:20 happy holidays! 19:02:20 and thx for scribing eva 19:02:20 Good times to hack! 19:02:23 eprodrom: 19:02:25 -eprodrom 19:02:26 -jessica_lily 19:02:26 -rhiaro 19:02:29 cwebber2: thanks for covering me 19:02:29 - +1.541.410.aacc 19:02:45 np 19:02:47 thanks everyone. 19:02:54 -wilkie 19:02:55 T&S_SOCWG()1:00PM has ended 19:02:55 Attendees were jasnell, Arnaud, +1.514.554.aaaa, eprodrom, cwebber2, rhiaro, Sandro, tantek, +1.541.410.aabb, bblfish, jessica_lily, wilkie, +1.541.410.aacc, Doug_Schepers 19:03:05 elf-pavlik has changed the topic to: Social Web WG: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg - Next meeting agenda: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-01-06 - logs: http://socialwg.indiewebcamp.com/irc/social/today 19:03:12 btw for those in the bay area - the last Homebrew Website Club meetup is tomorrow night @MozSF: https://indiewebcamp.com/events/2014-12-17-homebrew-website-club 19:07:07 RRSAgent, draft minutes 19:07:07 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/12/16-social-minutes.html Arnaud 19:07:13 trackbot, end meeting 19:07:13 Zakim, list attendees 19:07:13 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is 19:07:21 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 19:07:21 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/12/16-social-minutes.html trackbot 19:07:22 RRSAgent, bye 19:07:22 I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2014/12/16-social-actions.rdf : 19:07:22 ACTION: 20 to scheduling for F2F [1] 19:07:22 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/12/16-social-irc#T18-29-22