15:53:43 RRSAgent has joined #wai-wcag 15:53:43 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/12/02-wai-wcag-irc 15:53:45 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:53:47 Zakim, this will be WAI_WCAG 15:53:47 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_WCAG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 7 minutes 15:53:48 Meeting: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference 15:53:48 Date: 02 December 2014 15:54:30 Chair: Josh 15:54:44 zakim, clean agenda 15:54:44 I don't understand 'clean agenda', Kenny 15:54:48 zakim, clean agenda? 15:54:48 I don't understand your question, Kenny. 15:54:59 zakim, clear agenda 15:54:59 agenda cleared 15:55:56 agenda+ add input on the Quickref update https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Resource_Redesign/Quickref/Analysis 15:56:17 Joshue has joined #wai-wcag 15:56:31 zakim, agenda? 15:56:31 I see 1 item remaining on the agenda: 15:56:32 1. add input on the Quickref update https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Resource_Redesign/Quickref/Analysis [from Kenny] 15:56:58 agenda+ survey review 15:57:22 hi, Joshue, item added, and kick start trackbot 15:57:48 WAI_WCAG()11:00AM has now started 15:57:55 +[IPcaller] 15:57:58 zakim, [IPcaller] is Joshue 15:57:58 +Joshue; got it 15:58:08 Chair: AWK 15:58:12 Scribe list:https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Scribe_List 15:58:20 zakim, call EricE-Skype 15:58:20 ok, yatil; the call is being made 15:58:21 +EricE 15:58:37 + +1.617.766.aaaa 15:58:44 +??P5 15:58:45 - +1.617.766.aaaa 15:58:49 zakim, nick yatil is EricE 15:58:49 ok, yatil, I now associate you with EricE 15:59:02 + +1.617.766.aabb 15:59:17 Zakim, aabb is AWK 15:59:17 +AWK; got it 15:59:44 zakim, mute me 15:59:45 EricE should now be muted 15:59:55 Zakim, agenda? 15:59:56 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda: 15:59:57 1. add input on the Quickref update https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Resource_Redesign/Quickref/Analysis [from Kenny] 15:59:57 2. survey review [from Kenny] 16:00:52 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2014OctDec/0135.html 16:01:44 +Kenny 16:01:52 +Marc_Johlic 16:01:59 marcjohlic has joined #wai-wcag 16:02:06 Mike_Elledge has joined #wai-wcag 16:02:28 +Katie_Haritos-Shea 16:02:43 zakim, mute me 16:02:43 Joshue should now be muted 16:02:54 + +1.313.390.aacc 16:03:34 Zakim, who is on the phone? 16:03:34 On the phone I see Joshue (muted), EricE (muted), Michael_Cooper, AWK, Kenny, Marc_Johlic, Katie_Haritos-Shea, +1.313.390.aacc 16:03:54 Zakim, aacc is Mike_Elledge 16:03:55 +Mike_Elledge; got it 16:04:08 Ryladog_ has joined #wai-wcag 16:05:07 Scribe: Katie Haritos-Shea 16:05:08 Scribe: Katie 16:05:16 ScribeNick: Ryladog 16:05:24 Meeting: WCAG Working Group Teleconference 16:05:31 Chair: Andrew Kirkpatrick 16:05:47 rrsagent, pointer? 16:05:47 See http://www.w3.org/2014/12/02-wai-wcag-irc#T16-05-47 16:06:01 rrsagent, set logs world-visible 16:06:05 Kathy has joined #wai-wcag 16:06:18 TOPIC: US Section 508 Access Board 16:06:38 Loretta has joined #WAI-WCAG 16:07:00 Update: "We are still in dialog with OMB on the regulatory impact analysis" 16:07:04 +Kathy_Wahlbin 16:07:05 AWK: Update from the Access Board is that there is still work to do 16:07:39 AWK: No obstructions just more due diligence 16:08:03 MoeKraft has joined #wai-wcag 16:08:25 +[IPcaller] 16:08:35 zakim, IPcaller is Loretta 16:08:35 +Loretta; got it 16:08:50 AWK: Settlement from DOJ in March 2015 - they are asking PeaPod to address Accessibility on their website and that WCAG is the way for Peapod to do that 16:09:07 Zakim, take up item 1 16:09:07 agendum 1. "add input on the Quickref update https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Resource_Redesign/Quickref/Analysis" taken up [from Kenny] 16:09:18 ack me 16:09:26 zakin, next item 16:09:33 ack me 16:09:39 zakim, next item 16:09:39 agendum 1 was just opened, Ryladog_ 16:10:12 + +1.978.899.aadd 16:10:28 JO: Erik did a tidy up 16:10:56 EE: I have put the use cases into tasks 16:10:59 Zakim, aadd is Kathy 16:10:59 +Kathy; got it 16:11:25 https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Resource_Redesign/Quickref/Analysis#Tasks 16:11:26 EE: also added some functionality 16:12:03 AWK: Does anyone want to add comments to this document 16:12:10 q+ 16:12:10 Zakim, aadd is MoeKraft 16:12:11 JO: On maybe Thusday yes 16:12:12 sorry, MoeKraft, I do not recognize a party named 'aadd' 16:12:25 JO: There are sections you want us to look at 16:12:42 Zakim, 978.899.aadd is MoeKraft 16:12:43 EE: Yes, we want filks to look at the tasks - that would be helpful 16:12:43 sorry, AWK, I do not recognize a party named '978.899.aadd' 16:12:51 Zakim, who is on the phone? 16:12:51 On the phone I see Joshue, EricE, Michael_Cooper, AWK, Kenny, Marc_Johlic, Katie_Haritos-Shea, Mike_Elledge, Kathy_Wahlbin, Loretta, Kathy 16:13:03 Zakim, Kathy is MoeKraft 16:13:03 +MoeKraft; got it 16:13:04 EE: We should put the progress into prototyoes 16:13:11 thanks 16:13:42 s/Erik/Eric/ 16:13:55 AWK: Great. Did people get a chance to look thru this? Do you know what we expected of you? What would be helpful? 16:14:02 q+ 16:14:08 ack m 16:14:52 ME: I would like some context. Are we thinking of developing an umbrella for introductory method onhow people would find things 16:15:07 zakim, mute me 16:15:07 Joshue should now be muted 16:15:08 http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/quickref/ 16:15:09 redesign of http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/quickref/ 16:15:09 q? 16:15:13 AWK: This is for the redesign of How To Meet WCAG document - the Quick Ref 16:15:54 q+ 16:15:56 AWK: One of the challenges - redesign opens up other questions. But we need to be careful of scope. We may identify that we need to make 16:16:13 KHS: One of the big issues in the US in trying to get ppl to use WCAG is 16:16:28 ...that the people freak out 16:16:43 ...BB and I have a course to help people 16:16:55 jon_avila has joined #wai-wcag 16:16:56 ...will be 100s of K ppl looking at this once 508 refresh is out 16:17:18 +jon_avila 16:17:20 ... especially with WCAG2ICT bringing in SW also 16:17:34 ack me 16:17:35 ack j 16:18:09 JO: Question Eric I see that you have a list of 12 or 13 tasks. Are you thinking we might need to add more tasks? 16:18:20 EE: Yes and we need to do a prioritization 16:18:42 +1 16:18:49 JO: I see #3 - AWK thought this was a good idea - a check-off thing - I like this idea. Thanks Eric 16:19:18 +1 16:19:19 JA: Yes for like images , form etc 16:19:49 AWK: I am doing a site - I dont have tables, I do have forms, I di have images, etc. Getting techniques specific to their content 16:20:04 q+ 16:20:14 ack mi 16:20:18 AWK; I amnot sure how gradular we want this to be. Do others think this is a good idea? 16:20:32 s/amnot/am not 16:20:39 KHS: Absolutely 16:21:06 ME: What about the WCAG 2.0 database - does it have a good search function? 16:21:14 zakim, mute me 16:21:14 Joshue should now be muted 16:21:17 q+ to say something about the implementation details 16:21:58 ack erice 16:21:58 EricE, you wanted to say something about the implementation details 16:21:59 AWK; We could do a directory search capability - I am not sure W3C will allow us to have a Google search box in the DB 16:22:11 ack me 16:22:13 JE: Yes that is the functionality I was thinking of 16:22:48 EE: Well that is what we want but I am unsure that we can do that. We are working on an approach - for some type of exchange format 16:23:16 EE: I am working on a tool. BUt we do not hvae a search functionality capability right now - but we have to loo into that 16:23:20 q+ 16:23:25 s/loo/look/ 16:23:27 ack mi 16:24:33 ME: Techniques section and how to make it more useful - part of the issue is putting information into context - good website format - for sceening out things that werrent relevant. Something like a mock webpage 16:25:04 ME: for some one using a web editor - this is just a thought 16:25:13 AWK: I like the before and after 16:25:46 ack me 16:25:47 +James_Nurthen 16:25:55 ME: Something that is more interactive - like if you were working on a ttable you could click on it and it would take you to techniques for table etc 16:26:15 EE: That is the plan but we need resources 16:26:52 EE: We want to get to an intuitive UI so filks dont have to know where to go - which they have to do right now 16:27:04 q? 16:27:07 q+ 16:27:46 AWK: Eric to clarify the task for the WG - they should first look at the list of tasks or should they just go top to bottom? 16:27:55 EE: top to bottom is the way to go 16:28:02 ack me 16:28:17 JO: I think so as well the tasks are the most important 16:28:42 jamesn has joined #wai-wcag 16:29:00 AWK: Do we have a define list of everthing we think the current QuickRef does? 16:29:14 rrsagent, make minutes 16:29:14 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/12/02-wai-wcag-minutes.html jamesn 16:29:37 JO: Eo said that it doesnt actually do what it was designed to do - but I didnt get what that idea was 16:29:38 ack me 16:29:54 s/Eo/EO WG/ 16:29:57 MC: stuff we can point to 16:30:28 rrsagent, set logs world-visible 16:30:49 AWK; a 10 minute exersize for a first stab 16:30:59 ack me 16:31:08 AWK: a 10 minute exersize for a first stab 16:31:11 s/AWK;/AWK:/ 16:31:18 Brent has joined #wai-wcag 16:31:20 scribeNick: Ryladog_ 16:31:37 rrsagent, make minutes 16:31:37 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/12/02-wai-wcag-minutes.html yatil 16:31:42 MC: We can look thru meeting minutes from 10 years ago - but I think it was like a checklist which is what we did with WCAG 1.0 16:31:57 MC: But perhaps we should not worry about that too much 16:32:13 JO: But we should look at that so we do not make any missteps 16:32:25 zakim, mute me 16:32:25 Joshue should now be muted 16:32:31 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:32:31 On the phone I see Joshue (muted), EricE, Michael_Cooper (muted), AWK, Kenny, Marc_Johlic, Katie_Haritos-Shea, Mike_Elledge, Kathy_Wahlbin, Loretta, MoeKraft, jon_avila, 16:32:35 ... James_Nurthen 16:32:41 survey 16:32:49 + +1.512.276.aaee 16:33:00 AWK: OK we will go with putting our comments on the wiki 16:33:00 zakim, aaee is Brent 16:33:00 +Brent; got it 16:33:17 zakim, next item 16:33:17 agendum 2. "survey review" taken up [from Kenny] 16:33:20 Zakim, next item 16:33:20 agendum 2 was just opened, AWK 16:33:27 z mute 16:33:33 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:33:33 On the phone I see Joshue (muted), EricE, Michael_Cooper (muted), AWK, Kenny, Marc_Johlic, Katie_Haritos-Shea, Mike_Elledge, Kathy_Wahlbin, Loretta, MoeKraft, jon_avila, 16:33:36 ... James_Nurthen, Brent 16:33:46 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/surveyReview/results 16:33:53 TOPIC: Survey 16:34:11 Zakim, mute me 16:34:11 EricE should now be muted 16:34:14 s/z mute// 16:34:51 AWK: Thanks to those who submitted comments 16:35:03 TOPIC: 1. Please provide any comments on the visual design or informational structure that you feel particularly help or hinder use of the techniques document or of individual techniques. 16:35:18 AWK: Loretta what did you want to say? 16:36:00 LGR: Lots of folks find it hard to navigate, and different kinds of feedback on the design of the docs 16:36:07 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:36:07 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/12/02-wai-wcag-minutes.html yatil 16:36:16 q+ 16:36:19 AWK: Did you get a sense - what is critical to chamge? 16:37:11 s/ScribeNick: Ryladog/ScribeNick: Ryladog_/ 16:37:12 LGR: I would say people were giving their reactions to the questions. Less white space, shorter lines. But in general more things about what is difficlut about the documents 16:37:14 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:37:14 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/12/02-wai-wcag-minutes.html yatil 16:37:31 LGR: I tried to group them in my summary 16:37:37 AWK: Yes I see them 16:37:51 LGR: customization 16:38:24 TOPIC: 2. Please provide any suggestions you have for changes to make the techniques document more useful or easier to use 16:38:47 AWK: Kathy and Tim. What Tim got was that it was too difficult to search 16:39:00 ack me 16:39:11 AWK: I am using Chrome that puts everything in this fat font 16:39:14 me too 16:39:32 q+ 16:39:36 ack mik 16:39:46 ack m 16:39:50 zakim, mute me 16:39:50 Joshue should now be muted 16:40:15 ME: On the first question - it was hard for popel o find the information they were looking for in a quick way 16:40:55 ME: they are not sure how to find the techniques. You have many people coming in with different needs 16:41:38 ME: Most commnets wee about the problems with finding things in WCAG period 16:41:47 AWK; Bacjk to number 2 then... 16:42:35 AWK: Tim said - Users Guide, maybe clearer on how to find techniques, 16:42:39 s/AWK; Bacjk/AWK: Back/ 16:42:41 AWK: Kathy? 16:43:23 Kathy: Archived noticed, want more techniques for documents (word, ppt) 16:43:38 Kathy: I summarized 16:44:16 AWK: What I hear out of 1 and 2 are similar stuff - better simpler organizaation. Which validates what we think we know 16:44:27 AWK: This is 16:44:48 TOPIC: 3. Do you have any suggestions for improvements to the Introduction to Understanding WCAG 2.0 section? 16:44:49 ack me 16:45:30 JO: The take away - there is too much information - more relevant info - shorter - 16:45:56 JO: and some specific - use introductory space for how to use 16:46:12 TOPIC: 4. Do you have any suggestions for improvements to the Understanding Techniques for WCAG Success Criteria section? 16:46:25 AWK: Too long to read 16:46:39 JO: Stop letting academics write documentation 16:47:26 Andrew: a question was Why aren't their failure for everything? 16:48:06 JO: I got that there was a lot of wishful thinking folks wanted more techniques and failures 16:49:00 JA: I think we should have a documented failure for each thing that could be a failure. They wanted to see updating and modernizing 16:49:23 Folks didnt want to see techniques mapped to GL they only wanted to see it mapped to SC 16:49:51 q+ 16:50:42 KHS: I think we need to cintinue to do that where we have little choice 16:51:12 AWK: We do not want tto have to do that - maybe we will be able to addess this in the neext veersion of out GL 16:51:54 ack ry 16:52:02 q? 16:52:05 JO: It would be interesting for us to document thoe tech/failure that dont map to specific SC and we are mapping to GL - to work on those gaps 16:52:25 TOPIC: 5. Please provide any comments on the visual design or informational structure that you feel particularly help or hinder use of the Understanding document. 16:52:55 AWK: Overwhelming was the profound noise. Many said dont change it 16:53:11 TOPIC: 6. Please provide any suggestions you have for changes to make the techniques document more useful or easier to use. 16:53:15 zakim, mute me 16:53:15 Joshue should now be muted 16:53:37 ack me 16:53:40 AWK: Reer by handles, not sections. Organized by tasks 16:54:04 MC: The wording was by HTML elements - I would generalize that to tables etc 16:54:19 TOPIC: 7. Do you have any suggestions for improvements to these sections (of How To Meet)? 16:54:21 ack me 16:54:45 EE: Some details they are not interested in. 16:55:22 AWK: People want to filter and customize and this is in Erics document already as a task 16:55:58 TOPIC: 8. When customizing the How to Meet WCAG 2.0 resource to show only a specific technology, such as CSS, general techniques are also included. Do you like this? Please provide any comments or thoughts on this behavior you would like to share. 16:56:02 Nothing 16:56:21 TOPIC: 10. Please provide any comments on the visual design or informational structure that you feel particularly help or hinder use of the How to Meet WCAG 2.0 resource 16:57:01 EE: People have a desire to have detail,