00:00:23 jernoble has joined #html-wg 00:13:16 lgombos has joined #html-wg 00:22:01 jernoble has joined #html-wg 00:30:42 mjs has joined #html-wg 01:26:27 jernoble has joined #html-wg 01:54:28 lgombos_ has joined #html-wg 02:04:22 jernoble has joined #html-wg 02:12:13 jernoble has joined #html-wg 02:29:31 glenn has joined #html-wg 02:41:09 lgombos has joined #html-wg 03:01:48 glenn has joined #html-wg 03:37:35 jernoble has joined #html-wg 03:51:36 tantek has joined #html-wg 04:40:00 tantek has joined #html-wg 05:25:58 mjs has joined #html-wg 06:10:10 Lachy has joined #html-wg 08:07:45 IanPouncey has joined #html-wg 09:45:42 SteveF has joined #html-wg 10:14:57 Lachy has joined #html-wg 10:18:37 Lachy has joined #html-wg 15:58:34 RRSAgent has joined #html-wg 15:58:34 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/10/16-html-wg-irc 15:58:36 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:58:37 Zakim has joined #html-wg 15:58:38 Zakim, this will be html_wg 15:58:39 Meeting: HTML Weekly Teleconference 15:58:39 Date: 16 October 2014 15:58:39 ok, trackbot; I see HTML_WG()12:00PM scheduled to start in 2 minutes 15:58:45 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-announce/2014OctDec/0004.html 15:59:22 zakim, what is the code? 15:59:22 the conference code is 4865 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), paulc 15:59:49 HTML_WG()12:00PM has now started 15:59:56 +[Microsoft] 16:00:05 zakim, [Microsoft] is me 16:00:05 +paulc; got it 16:00:59 Chair: Sam Ruby 16:01:04 Scribenick: paulc 16:01:15 janina has joined #html-wg 16:01:17 rubys has joined #html-wg 16:01:35 +??P12 16:01:42 zakim, ??P12 is me 16:01:42 +janina; got it 16:01:58 +Sam 16:02:11 +Plh 16:02:44 I wonder what number you need to call to get "plh-play"? 16:03:18 gregDavis has joined #html-wg 16:03:26 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:03:26 On the phone I see paulc, janina, Sam, Plh 16:03:50 +[IPcaller] 16:04:02 zakim, [IPCaller] is me 16:04:02 +gregDavis; got it 16:04:18 Scribe: paulc 16:05:00 http://dev.w3.org/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm 16:05:20 Topic: ACTION items due by Thursday, October 16 16:05:24 None 16:05:39 Topic: CfC: Request transition of DOM4 to Proposed Recommendation 16:05:55 The CfC failed with an objection and there are two bugs being worked on. 16:06:07 See also: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2014Oct/0066.html 16:06:19 Topic: Draft [URL] reference update to informative text 16:06:34 Four minor changes were made and discussion has died down. 16:06:46 See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2014Oct/0023.html 16:06:52 Topic: longdesc CR 16:07:10 Janina: no news from the Director on the Apple Formal Objection decision 16:07:16 Janina: We are still waiting. 16:07:31 Topic: Text alternatives request for heartbeat referred to task force 16:07:55 janina: The TF discussed this today and we expect the document will be published on Thu Oct 23. 16:08:14 ... TF and PF WG will do a CfC on the candidate document 16:08:35 Sam: Excellent plan 16:09:01 See TF minutes at http://www.w3.org/2014/10/16-html-a11y-minutes.html#item04 16:09:26 Topic: HTML WG F2F and TPAC, Oct 30-31 16:09:41 Sam: Reminder that we will be meeting F2F on Thu-Fri Oct 30-31 16:10:17 Paul: Registration may be possible but some groups are very over booked. 16:10:29 plh: There are over 500 registrants 16:10:58 ... When the registration closed it was at 499 and plh made it 500 ;<) 16:11:45 paulc: We are still receiving very late observer requests 16:12:36 paulc: here is the message I sent to the 50 observers: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2014Oct/0003.html 16:12:58 ... observer seats will be FCFS 16:13:11 ... Paul and Janina will coordinate seats for the joint meetings 16:13:13 +??P20 16:13:30 Zakim, ??P20 is me 16:13:30 +tantek; got it 16:13:30 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/wg/2014-10-Agenda 16:13:39 Regrets for the TPAC f2f meeting 16:13:46 I will be in AB/AC meetings :/ 16:14:01 Topic: Future meetings 16:14:07 Sam: No telecon next week (October 23nd), or during TPAC (October 30). 16:14:33 aside: Thanks for the work on http://dev.w3.org/html5/2014/10/url-ref.html 16:14:45 it does seem like an improvement - per what I brought up a few weeks ago 16:15:04 ... we'll likely not have a meeting the week after TPAC (November 6) and will meet next on Thu Nov 13 16:15:19 paulc: Be aware of DST changes in November 16:16:34 Janina: Europer changes off DST the week before TPAC 16:17:09 Paul: This will impact the start time of the F2F meeting in Europe for remote participants 16:17:27 Paul: I will add the timeandate.com information to the F2F Agenda 16:17:43 Topic: Adjournment 16:17:55 -Plh 16:17:57 Meeting was adjounred at :17. See everyone at TPAC. 16:17:57 -Sam 16:17:59 -tantek 16:18:00 -janina 16:18:02 -gregDavis 16:18:04 rrsagent, generate minutes 16:18:04 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/10/16-html-wg-minutes.html paulc 16:18:16 -paulc 16:18:17 HTML_WG()12:00PM has ended 16:18:17 Attendees were paulc, janina, Sam, Plh, gregDavis, tantek 16:18:49 tantek: by "-per what I brought up", did you mean "-over what I brought up"? 16:19:20 rubys: I meant on the topic of what I brought up 16:19:59 linking to the live URL spec does seem better than the static snapshot since there are still changes / fixes that need to be made, per all the research/tests you posted about 16:20:46 This I found a bit funny though: 16:20:48 "Most of the URL-related terms used in the HTML specification (URL, absolute URL, relative URL, relative schemes, scheme component, scheme data, username, password, host, port, path, query, fragment, percent encode, get the base, and UTF-8 percent encode) can be straightforwardly mapped to the terminology of [RFC3986] and [RFC3987]." 16:20:53 that link is indeed in the recommendation. I'll note that Mozilla's official feedback to the AC was different than this. 16:21:16 per my own research about that http://tantek.com/2011/238/b1/many-ways-slice-url-name-pieces#ud 16:21:16 tantek: funny? 16:22:08 as in - I do not find it to be "straightforwardly" 16:22:32 that reminds me that I need to add a row to that table for the URL spec 16:23:12 In many cases, the URL spec uses both sets of terms (DOM like and IETF like) 16:23:38 As a concrete example, you will find both scheme and protocol in the URL Standard. 16:25:56 indeed - I had a long discussion with annevk about that early on. 16:26:05 he's quite aware of my blog post on the subject 16:33:19 BTW, my latest results include nodejs and rust-url, and more accurate data on IE: http://intertwingly.net/stories/2014/10/16/urltest-results/ 16:34:43 And resulted in multiple bugs being field against ie, one such example: https://twitter.com/annevk/status/522762335774330881 16:37:10 awesome - nicely done 16:39:44 mjs has joined #html-wg 16:43:48 jernoble has joined #html-wg 16:53:35 janina has left #html-wg 16:57:38 mjs has joined #html-wg 16:59:59 nicolasbadia has joined #html-wg 17:11:48 nicolasbadia_ has joined #html-wg 17:21:09 mjs has joined #html-wg 18:04:31 johndrinkwater has joined #html-wg 18:07:19 mjs has joined #html-wg 19:29:16 Zakim has left #html-wg 19:37:26 tantek has joined #html-wg 19:39:18 SteveF has joined #html-wg 19:40:17 rubys has joined #html-wg 20:04:12 SteveF has joined #html-wg 21:21:06 jernoble has joined #html-wg 21:23:11 ShaneM has joined #html-wg 21:29:28 SteveF has joined #html-wg 21:46:56 tantek has joined #html-wg 23:10:04 mjs has joined #html-wg 23:49:30 tantek has joined #html-wg