14:16:29 RRSAgent has joined #dpub 14:16:29 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/10/06-dpub-irc 14:16:31 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:16:31 Zakim has joined #dpub 14:16:33 Zakim, this will be dpub 14:16:33 ok, trackbot; I see DPUB_DPUBIG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 44 minutes 14:16:34 Meeting: Digital Publishing Interest Group Teleconference 14:16:34 Date: 06 October 2014 14:16:59 i'll be on the phone in a moment 14:19:10 tzviya, there is still more than half an hour 14:19:38 tzviya, the edits are pushed to the repo btw 14:20:00 thanks to Ivan’s quick adding of me as a member 14:20:12 thank you 14:20:28 did you want to discuss rich's questions? 14:54:26 clapierre has joined #DPUB 14:55:17 Ayla-Stein has joined #dpub 14:57:49 DPUB_DPUBIG()11:00AM has now started 14:57:57 +astearns 14:58:09 +clapierre 14:58:30 +Markus 14:58:53 zakim, dial ivan-voip 14:58:53 ok, ivan; the call is being made 14:58:55 +Ivan 14:58:57 regrets: Luc Audrain, Michael Miller, Vladimir Levantovsky, Timothy Cole, Laura Fowler, Liza Daly 14:59:03 dkaplan3 has joined #dpub 14:59:20 +Tzviya 14:59:20 pkra has joined #dpub 14:59:33 +pkra 14:59:38 +astein 14:59:39 +[IPcaller] 14:59:59 zakim, code? 14:59:59 the conference code is 3782 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), Karen 15:00:01 +[Safari] 15:00:12 zakim, IPcaller is Bill 15:00:12 +Bill; got it 15:00:13 +dauwhe 15:00:16 philm has joined #dpub 15:00:22 bjdmeest has joined #dpub 15:00:28 +Karen_Myers 15:00:30 zakim, [Safari] is me 15:00:30 +dkaplan3; got it 15:00:31 +LauraD 15:00:40 Bill_Kasdorf has joined #dpub 15:00:49 zakim, Bill is Bill_Kasdorf 15:00:49 +Bill_Kasdorf; got it 15:00:50 +[Ugent] 15:00:55 murakami has joined #dpub 15:00:57 zakim, Ugent is me 15:00:57 +bjdmeest; got it 15:01:06 zakim, mute me 15:01:06 bjdmeest should now be muted 15:01:15 +philm 15:01:28 +??P26 15:01:42 zakim, ??P26 is me 15:01:42 +murakami; got it 15:02:15 +azaroth 15:02:19 azaroth has joined #dpub 15:02:29 zakim, who is here? 15:02:29 On the phone I see astearns, clapierre, Markus, Ivan, Tzviya, pkra, astein, Bill_Kasdorf, dkaplan3, dauwhe, Karen_Myers, LauraD, bjdmeest (muted), philm, murakami, azaroth 15:02:32 On IRC I see azaroth, murakami, Bill_Kasdorf, bjdmeest, philm, pkra, dkaplan3, Ayla-Stein, clapierre, Zakim, RRSAgent, tzviya, mgylling, fjh, dauwhe, Karen, ivan, liam, astearns, 15:02:32 ... plinss, trackbot 15:02:38 Scribe: Karen 15:02:50 + +1.201.783.aaaa 15:03:15 zakim, aaaa is pbelfanti 15:03:15 +pbelfanti; got it 15:03:35 pbelfanti has joined #dpub 15:03:38 last weeks minutes: http://www.w3.org/2014/09/29-dpub-minutes.html 15:03:39 Markus: Thanks everybody for joining today 15:03:46 Bert has joined #dpub 15:03:50 …Can we approve last week's minute? 15:03:56 tmichel has joined #dpub 15:03:58 …Please speak up if you do not want to approve 15:04:01 [Silence] 15:04:06 …Ok, perfect [approved] 15:04:10 TPAC agenda: http://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/TPAC2014-F2F 15:04:14 …Today we have a pretty stable agenda for TPAC 15:04:15 +??P4 15:04:20 …let's see what remains to do for meeting bookings 15:04:24 + +33.4.92.38.aabb - is perhaps Bernard 15:04:30 zakim, ??P4 is me 15:04:30 +tmichel; got it 15:04:43 zakim, aabb is Bert 15:04:43 sorry, ivan, I do not recognize a party named 'aabb' 15:04:55 Markus: So to TPAC agenda page 15:05:01 zakim, who is here? 15:05:01 On the phone I see astearns, clapierre, Markus, Ivan, Tzviya, pkra, astein, Bill_Kasdorf, dkaplan3, dauwhe, Karen_Myers, LauraD, bjdmeest (muted), philm, murakami (muted), azaroth, 15:05:05 ... pbelfanti, tmichel, Bert 15:05:05 On IRC I see tmichel, Bert, pbelfanti, azaroth, murakami, Bill_Kasdorf, bjdmeest, philm, pkra, dkaplan3, Ayla-Stein, clapierre, Zakim, RRSAgent, tzviya, mgylling, fjh, dauwhe, 15:05:05 ... Karen, ivan, liam, astearns, plinss, trackbot 15:05:08 …let's being with a check-in with the ones we are stable with 15:05:25 mailto:%6b%61%74%69%65@%74%68%65%72%65%61%6c%6b%61%74%69%65.%6e%65%74 15:05:27 …on the Friday afternoon the presentation by Internationalization with Richard Ishida between 3-4pm is booked 15:05:47 …Tzviya, that meeting with Janina in Protocols and Formats WG is set? 15:05:55 Tzviya: She proposed two sessions 15:05:58 …2pm on Thursday 15:06:06 brady_duga has joined #dpub 15:06:15 …to talk for 90 minutes to talk about structural semantics and general accessibility concerns 15:06:33 …and then picking up at 4:00pm to talk about some of issues that ETF had raised about personalization 15:06:40 …May be good time to bring in people from SVG as well 15:06:46 …but we have not yet reached out to them 15:06:57 Markus: We had proposed a recap session at that time, but that is easy to move 15:07:05 …first one is 14:00-15:30 with P&F 15:07:07 …then break 15:07:10 +duga 15:07:14 …then 16:00 to when? 15:07:29 Tzviya: She [Janina] had proposed to 18:00 15:07:34 …but she has not yet discussed with others 15:07:41 Markus: I'll work on the SVG invitation 15:07:44 …Ok, great 15:07:55 …If that is what they are reserving, we should take the bait 15:08:00 …have you confirmed, Tzviya? 15:08:04 Tzviya: yes 15:08:06 Markus: Great 15:08:18 …Then where do we book the Books in Browsers recap session? 15:08:29 …It's likely to have presentations that we want to circle back on during our meeting 15:08:37 …We need a suitable slot for that 15:08:49 Ivan: I idid not realize P&F needed the whole afternoon 15:08:56 Tzviya: not sure if we need the whole time 15:09:08 Markus: Should we do 16:00-17:00 for the second slot? 15:09:11 Ivan: yes 15:09:22 …we cannot spend whole afternoon only on it 15:09:34 zakim, code? 15:09:34 the conference code is 3782 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), fjh 15:09:34 Markus: But we are doing pagination for the morning! [smiles] 15:09:40 Ivan: Yes, because it's core! 15:09:43 +[IPcaller] 15:09:45 zakim, ipcaller is me 15:09:45 +fjh; got it 15:09:53 Markus: Dave, speaking of pagination, how are things going for that Thursday morning sessions 15:10:03 Dave: I am working on it; brought it up to CSS on last call 15:10:17 …I am writing now and they asked to say who are most important people [for this session] 15:10:25 Bert: There will be people from CSS; I will be there, too 15:10:35 …Smart to send an email and see who will be there prceisely 15:10:44 Markus: Let me see…two outstanding things is invitations 15:10:51 …invitees from CSS for Thursday morning 15:11:03 …and I need to invite the SVG WG for second session with PF on Thursday afternoon 15:11:05 q+ 15:11:15 Markus: It says the Friday morning STEM session is a placeholder 15:11:21 …Peter, have you confirmed a pre-brief? 15:11:24 Peter: right 15:11:29 …i don't remember why we made it a place holder 15:11:35 …I can make the time and give an update 15:11:42 …on where we are and spawn a discussion 15:11:44 Markus: great 15:11:53 q+ 15:11:56 Peter: I remember now why it's a placeholder; I was not sure how much progress we would have 15:12:07 …it is still an open problem for me; speed is not what I would have liked 15:12:11 …would like to take it up 15:12:22 …no news on that end; have some calls this week, my own time is fuzzy 15:12:37 Markus: I just removed the placeholder marker, so consider yourself booked 15:12:46 …We have generous lunch breaks; three hours both days 15:12:57 …not about eating pastries for 3 hours; it's intended for ad hoc meetings 15:13:07 Ivan: and we are already using some of it on Thursday 15:13:16 Markus: yes, from 4 to 3 hours originally 15:13:25 …Any questions suggestions or remarks 15:13:33 q? 15:13:36 ack Karen 15:13:36 ack Karen 15:14:10 karen: we are expecting some observer guests from organizations that are considering membership 15:14:52 Markus: We will give them a warm-hearted welcome 15:14:56 ...let's make sure we understand their role in terms of direct dialogue 15:15:06 ack tzviya 15:15:25 Tzviya: Peter, remind me, is there anyone you would like to invite to STEM meeting outside of DPub 15:15:37 Peter: I suggested the MathML group 15:15:41 …Inkling sounds great 15:15:46 …I think that is the only thing I mentioned 15:16:03 Tzviya: Markus, we had talked about possibly inviting people from HTML to the Thursday meetings 15:16:05 Markus: yes 15:16:14 q+ 15:16:19 …thought we might do that over one of the lunch breaks; with Michael Smith and one of the eidtors 15:16:21 s/editors 15:16:27 …we don't have a session dedicated to HTML 15:16:37 Ivan: If we get into the discussion on the paging 15:16:44 …I am not sure that everything will only be CSS 15:16:54 …then it becomes very much a topic that touches upon HTML, the DOM 15:17:09 …so maybe if we have some idea of the structure of the Thursday morning in this sense 15:17:22 …then getting someone from HTML to be around for that part of the discussion would be very helpful 15:17:32 Brady: I'm not sure if answer is because that it can all be done in CSS 15:17:41 …and we go down the @ model path 15:17:46 …I don't know who is necessary for this 15:17:53 Markus: Right 15:18:00 …I'm checking the attendee list 15:18:06 @ signed up to attend Friday 15:18:16 …so we don't have anyone from the [HTML] group at this time 15:18:17 s/@/Ted O'Connor/ 15:18:26 Markus: Dave, what do you think? 15:18:50 …This session is more about getting the IG oriented in the book 3 and functional requirements and use cases; does not feel like it's urgent to have HTML experts around 15:19:00 …but maybe I'm being pessimistic about the amount of progress being made 15:19:10 Dave: It does not feel like it's necessary at this stage 15:19:22 …more to give this group an idea of what is happening and what is likely to happen 15:19:32 …i have done searching across the mailing list; there is very little about this 15:19:40 …has been an undercurrent for a while 15:19:51 …some people may be afraid to address because it could be such a massive effort 15:19:52 Ivan; Ok 15:19:53 q? 15:19:58 Markus: Ok 15:20:01 ack pkra 15:20:04 ack Peter 15:20:12 Peter: maybe not quite the right message 15:20:30 …two weeks ago there was a short statement around improvement of tables to do decimal marker, alignment 15:20:34 …these kinds of these 15:20:36 s/things 15:20:45 …I jumped in to say they exist on the MathML spec 15:20:54 …and could be a conversation about how these things move up in the spec 15:20:57 …I wanted to bring this up 15:21:11 …at TPAC, or we could bring up at another time 15:21:21 …I think Dave or Tzviya brought this up a couple weeks ago 15:21:31 Ivan: I don't remember; I'm not sure I understand what the idea is 15:21:36 Tzviya: a joint effort 15:21:50 …I had given Dave an example of something that occurs frequently in books that includes math 15:22:03 …there is something that can be done with we align with decimals 15:22:11 …I think Dave has incorporated into the document 15:22:31 …i think Peter's question is that this crosses MathML and Pagination, perhaps this is an example of something that crosses other Working Groups 15:22:36 …and discuss where this should live 15:22:41 Peter: That is a great summary 15:22:51 Markus: Where improvements of table rendering should live 15:22:54 …is that the topic? 15:22:57 Peter: I guess, yes 15:23:06 azaroth_ has joined #dpub 15:23:11 s/Peter/Dave: there is a whole group of equations 15:23:13 …that may not align 15:23:18 this same issue comes up in poetry 15:23:23 …although talking about aligning on particular objects 15:23:34 …not sure if its' about table case and table column alignment 15:23:40 …table case is pretty specialized 15:23:46 q+ 15:23:49 …I know there have been some things in CSS to align 15:23:54 …but have been removed or depricated 15:24:15 Markus: how is this different from all the other things in LatinrRec? 15:24:17 q+ to say there will be nobody from MathML, except me. (But PeterK is as good an expert on MathML as anybody in the Math WG, I expect...) And table alignment in CSS is something for the long term... 15:24:20 …what stands out? 15:24:38 Dave: From broader perspective, table alignment is a requirement for people who make lots of different kinds of books 15:24:50 …it seems quite rational to mention this in LatinRec 15:24:59 …how we bring this capability into the OWP, I am less sure about 15:25:07 q? 15:25:09 ack Pkra 15:25:11 ack pkra 15:25:15 Peter: My perspective 15:25:22 …when this first came up two weeks ago 15:25:38 …it seems perfect example of a common need that could also help the STEM and Math side 15:26:09 …MathML's tables are more powerful than HTML tables…results in implementations being a pain the a** 15:26:16 …cannot have such a powerful table model 15:26:20 …why I jumped on this 15:26:33 …seems like a great opp to have a conversation about how STEM and Math could help inform CSS and HTML 15:26:38 …and move these forward more quickly 15:26:46 …might just be a few simple things that could be done in CSS and HTML 15:26:56 ack Bert 15:26:56 Bert, you wanted to say there will be nobody from MathML, except me. (But PeterK is as good an expert on MathML as anybody in the Math WG, I expect...) And table alignment in CSS 15:26:56 …that could help to reduce the complexity today 15:26:57 q? 15:26:59 ack Bert 15:26:59 ... is something for the long term... 15:27:05 Bert: Aligning tables is indeed an old topic 15:27:10 …CSS2 was not implemented 15:27:17 …for the moment, no one is against it 15:27:23 …it will be in some other module 15:27:32 …it's a low priority item, but nobody is pushing for it either 15:27:38 …you will need a lot of lobbying 15:27:44 …Other thing I wanted to say 15:27:50 http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-MathML3-20140410/chapter3.html#presm.malign 15:28:07 …is I don't think it's useful to schedule a session on MathML since except for me, there won't be anyone at TPAC 15:28:10 …and Peter is more expert 15:28:13 Markus: Right 15:28:13 q+ 15:28:18 Ivan: I think that writing these things down 15:28:19 right. That doesn't make sense then... 15:28:21 …what Peter talked about 15:28:27 …very clearly would be very interesting 15:28:35 …and also maybe become part of our report 15:28:41 …that we would use to talk to various people 15:28:46 …I see Alan making a comment 15:28:51 …on irc that this should be done 15:28:59 …and if we have to lobby with CSS or HTML WGs, I don't know 15:29:02 …we an try it 15:29:08 …but we cannot do it at TPAC; it's too close now 15:29:24 Markus: Peter, can you consider taking on Alan's suggestion to compare the models? 15:29:30 Peter: yes, I can 15:29:47 [light scribing :)] 15:29:55 Tzviya: not before TPAC 15:30:01 thanks, Karen :-) 15:30:11 Action: Peter to compare MathML tables with HMLT 15:30:11 'Peter' is an ambiguous username. Please try a different identifier, such as family name or username (e.g., pkra, plinss). 15:30:14 s/HTML 15:30:25 Markus: anything else about the agenda? 15:30:25 q- 15:31:05 Action: pkra to compare MathML tables with HTML, and write it up on a wiki page 15:31:05 Created ACTION-27 - Compare mathml tables with html, and write it up on a wiki page [on Peter Krautzberger - due 2014-10-13]. 15:31:14 Bill: the alignment issue is also important in poetry; so not just for Maths; want it to be seen as a more general alignment 15:31:21 Markus: the agenda is beginning to look stable 15:31:24 …next thing we have 15:31:28 …looking at agenda 15:31:35 …and we will spend time at TPAC with PF 15:31:48 …we have been working with Janina and others to prepare a document 15:31:58 …We thought that we would take some quality time here to look at the document 15:32:01 -> http://w3c.github.io/dpub-content-and-markup/ document on the repo 15:32:07 …and ask Tzviya to describe the input she has had from PF 15:32:19 …and from our side, have a firm idea of where we should be when TPAC ends 15:32:23 …regarding the actual work 15:32:39 …and make sure we use time before TPAC to get this [document] published, that would be really great 15:32:47 …we'll look forward to learning more in the next half hour 15:33:00 Tzviya: We have been looking to find a way to do structural HTML 15:33:14 …we are familiar with EPUB structural semantics vocab 15:33:30 …this document includes a proposal to work with PF to create a digpub vocab of a module of ARIA 15:33:39 …and earlier version of doc was shared with Protocols and Formats 15:33:42 …we cleaned up a bit 15:33:54 ..mostly linguistic clarity about responsibilities of this group 15:34:00 …than how it fits with ARIA 15:34:11 …and more clearly delineate the benefits of the structural semantics vocab 15:34:16 …I think the intro is pretty clear 15:34:18 q+ 15:34:23 …Sorry I just sent out the doc 15:34:36 …historically this has been a problem to provide accessible content 15:34:45 …and to create HTML content that is reusable and easy to write 15:34:58 …So what we hope to accomplish is to sit down with PF WG to work through issues 15:35:16 …Setting up this voca; taking look at existing @ vocab; sort out what needs to be there; duplicates 15:35:20 …tags that are associated 15:35:32 …and then we will…there is a lot of work 15:35:43 …needs to have an exact mapping to technologies; to each of these tags 15:35:52 q+ 15:35:55 …if I say "chapter" I need to define, what behavior that iplies 15:35:58 s/implies 15:36:07 …there is an existing set of terms defined by IDPF 15:36:10 …list of 200 terms 15:36:15 …we may need to winnow that down 15:36:19 q+ 15:36:23 …but make sure we have a clear definitation of those terms 15:36:31 …hopefully have marching orders to do that out of TPAC 15:36:37 …and write it up in the ARIA style 15:36:42 …here's what it means; here's how it works 15:36:52 q? 15:36:56 ack Deborah 15:36:57 ack dkaplan 15:37:05 dkaplan: I have feedback about the document 15:37:15 …should I bring it up now, or is this more of a structural conversation? 15:37:32 Tzviya: If brief, yes; otherwise, I will take email comments on GitHub 15:37:39 ack ivan 15:37:40 Deborah: ok, I'll send on GitHub 15:37:46 ivan: two things 15:37:53 …one is that it's my understanding 15:38:12 …if we do not define assistive technology for a particular term 15:38:17 …then the enclosed tag is valid 15:38:25 …if we do not define for each and every 200 terms 15:38:33 …for assistive technologies, that is sort of ok? 15:38:43 Tzviya: I'll let Markus answer 15:38:48 Markus: that's the idea, yes 15:38:57 …these 200 terms may be a misleading thing 15:39:04 …One of problems we struggled with in IDPF voca 15:39:07 …is core set 15:39:17 …of domain-agnostic terms everyone can recognize 15:39:24 …but also have domains... 15:39:42 …we have engaged with educational publishers who want to have hundreds of their terms recognized 15:39:50 …Twofold; a publishing vocabulalry 15:39:55 …a core set of common terms 15:40:07 …and then this unfinished space, called distributed extensitbility 15:40:10 …the ideal solution 15:40:28 …we would have to embrace core common terms and other domains 15:40:37 …what you just asked is critical 15:40:50 …If assistive tech encounters a term it does not recognize, then it is not a major issue 15:40:56 Ivan: that is very important 15:41:04 …I have a second, different question 15:41:12 …Who will "own" this specification? 15:41:24 …on the one hand, we have to have a clear consensus of the user community 15:41:37 …which means that the terms themselves should be defined by IDPF 15:41:48 …on the other hand, I assume PF wants to have that as a rec coming from PF 15:41:54 …to reinforce its validity for HTML 15:42:03 …I am not sure how this whole thing will play out in practice 15:42:19 ..I would be very concerned if the definition of all the terms is in the hands exclusively of PF 15:42:23 …we need IDPF 15:42:44 Markus: I think it has been the common pre-conception that this ARIA @ will be published under W3C IP process 15:42:54 …it wants to become part of ARIA 15:43:06 …whether terms and conditions are in line or external has not been decided yet 15:43:10 …we need to figure out how to do it 15:43:22 …if we duplicate a subset in @ space, we would have synchronization issues 15:43:28 q- 15:43:36 …if we have PF module to subset elsewhere, it could be cleaner 15:43:41 …not sure if it would lead to IP issues 15:43:51 Ivan: That is not a problem in case of IDPF 15:44:00 …process is such that it should not create a problem 15:44:06 …i don't think we need to decide this here 15:44:30 …If we could find a way to get 3-4 people sitting down, like Ralph, to have a clean setup for processes that would not lead to problems later 15:44:31 q? 15:44:38 Tzviya: This is also a question that Rich asked me 15:44:53 Ivan: So involving Ralph and Ian during one of the lunch periods on Friday is a good idea 15:45:10 Markus: clarify; document would be published under W3C IP 15:45:24 Tzviya: he asked about clarification of IP and stated partnership with IDPF 15:45:37 Ivan: As an IG, we are not chartered to produce formal recommendations 15:45:51 …we an participate in the work, but it has to be published as a recommendation by a Working Group 15:45:54 …all the iP issues 15:45:59 …Wiley, formally should join 15:46:05 Tzviya: we did on Friday 15:46:18 great news about Wiley joining!! 15:46:28 Ivan: We need a clear space for IDPF 15:46:39 Markus: And we need to discuss the vocab terms 15:46:40 -duga 15:46:43 …in terms of a document 15:46:50 …we need to figure out how to squeeze that part in 15:47:02 …don't need to decide that now, but answer those questions in the document 15:47:15 …that IDPF is in the doc and is contributing its vocab in more detail 15:47:18 …that is one thing 15:47:18 q? 15:47:33 Markus: I have a question 15:47:36 …Chapter two 15:47:43 …about assistive technologies 15:48:00 …one of the eye openers I had working with educational publishers is the importance of semantic richness 15:48:06 …@ time and repurposing time 15:48:14 …I don't think we have authoring and repurposing 15:48:18 …should we add that? 15:48:23 Tzviya: That makes sense 15:48:34 Markus: Maybe remove 1-5 to clear space and add a section 4 15:48:53 …in-house processing or processing behaviors 15:48:54 q? 15:49:02 Tzviya: all right 15:49:10 Markus: Anything else you would like to bring up? 15:49:27 Tzviya: the meeting we have with PF is about broader accessibility issues 15:49:42 …Deborah, you had a comment, and also Charles is on phone…other issues? 15:49:45 Deborah: sure 15:49:51 …my issue was about… in the document 15:50:03 …section on improved navigation, locating print artifacts 15:50:13 …I was thinking about ability to ignore print artifacts 15:50:28 …sometimes those artifacts can get loud and distracting 15:50:35 …you should be able to ignore them, too 15:50:41 Markus: page numbers for example 15:50:45 Tzviya: ok 15:50:53 q? 15:50:55 Markus: Anything else? 15:51:01 Deborah: That was my initial feedback 15:51:18 …I think this conversation has been very useful to me on how to re-read this document for feedback 15:51:26 …about how it will be used 15:51:29 …this has been helpful 15:51:38 Markus: Good, please keep it coming 15:51:46 Tzviya: yes, this is not final by any means 15:51:54 Markus: Meant to be a joint statement 15:52:08 Tzviya: I need to pass these comments along to PF, but not today due to my schedule 15:52:13 …I will get it to them soon 15:52:30 Markus: Anyone else? 15:52:42 …if no more questions, we can end early 15:52:44 q+ to ask about next week, as holiday in US 15:53:07 Markus: Ivan mentioned specifying IP expectations 15:53:15 q? 15:53:18 …if there is a standard way to express that, please let us know 15:53:25 Ivan: not sure I understand what you are asking 15:53:48 Tzviya: Rich commented if this is work of joint TF, we need to explain how content was generated 15:53:56 Ivan: you mean the document you produce right now? 15:54:00 Tzviya: yes 15:54:08 Ivan: that will be a Note; not so relevant 15:54:22 …but eventual module needs to be published by WG 15:54:30 Markus: yes, and we wanted to suggest stating that clearly 15:54:43 Ivan: We make it clear that goal is to produce a rec published by PF WG 15:54:52 …with contributions from this IG 15:54:56 …then that by itself is clear 15:55:06 …and it comes under IP protection of PF WG 15:55:12 …does not require a pre-defined statement 15:55:17 ack azaroth 15:55:17 azaroth, you wanted to ask about next week, as holiday in US 15:55:19 Tzviya: A week from today is a holiday 15:55:22 Rob: yes 15:55:30 Markus: holiday again! 15:55:54 Tzviya: It's for Christopher Columbus 15:56:03 Rob: Will we have call or not? 15:56:05 http://theoatmeal.com/comics/columbus_day 15:56:07 How can you discover a continent that already has people there? We should meet in protest! 15:56:12 Markus: I am leaning towards doing it? 15:56:16 j/k 15:56:19 but not really 15:56:27 Ivan: I need to send regrets but for other reasons 15:56:35 regrets as well I will be out of town. 15:56:37 @: Office is open, but sending regrets 15:56:42 Markus: Let's do the call 15:56:45 Regrets from me as well 15:56:52 (Possible regrets from me also. Not sure yet.) 15:56:53 …but we may change our minds end of week 15:56:56 …Thanks everyone 15:57:01 …talk to you hopefully next week 15:57:03 -dkaplan3 15:57:04 -LauraD 15:57:04 -philm 15:57:04 -Markus 15:57:05 -pbelfanti 15:57:05 -Ivan 15:57:06 -astearns 15:57:06 -Tzviya 15:57:07 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:57:07 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/10/06-dpub-minutes.html Karen 15:57:08 -dauwhe 15:57:08 -clapierre 15:57:09 -astein 15:57:09 -Bert 15:57:09 -murakami 15:57:10 -bjdmeest 15:57:10 -pkra 15:57:11 -azaroth 15:57:12 -fjh 15:57:16 -Karen_Myers 15:57:19 -Bill_Kasdorf 15:57:26 welcome! 16:01:55 clapierre has left #dpub 16:05:00 disconnecting the lone participant, tmichel, in DPUB_DPUBIG()11:00AM 16:05:02 DPUB_DPUBIG()11:00AM has ended 16:05:02 Attendees were astearns, clapierre, Markus, Ivan, Tzviya, pkra, astein, dauwhe, Karen_Myers, dkaplan3, LauraD, Bill_Kasdorf, bjdmeest, philm, murakami, azaroth, +1.201.783.aaaa, 16:05:02 ... pbelfanti, +33.4.92.38.aabb, tmichel, Bert, duga, fjh 16:06:00 clapierre has joined #DPUB 16:07:10 clapierre has left #dpub 16:25:05 dauwhe_ has joined #dpub 17:26:36 Bert has left #dpub 17:44:32 ShaneM has joined #dpub 18:07:01 pkra has joined #dpub 18:12:38 Zakim has left #dpub 18:12:56 dkaplan3 has left #dpub 18:13:57 ShaneM has joined #dpub 18:25:31 pkra has joined #dpub 18:56:53 dauwhe has joined #dpub 19:45:25 ShaneM has joined #dpub 20:29:36 clapierre has joined #DPUB 20:44:26 Karen has joined #dpub 21:27:38 ShaneM has joined #dpub 22:21:39 clapierre has left #dpub