15:56:33 RRSAgent has joined #dnt 15:56:33 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/10/01-dnt-irc 15:56:35 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:56:37 Zakim, this will be TRACK 15:56:37 ok, trackbot, I see T&S_Track(dnt)12:00PM already started 15:56:38 Meeting: Tracking Protection Working Group Teleconference 15:56:38 Date: 01 October 2014 15:56:46 npdoty has changed the topic to: 1 Oct agenda: http://www.w3.org/mid/1809FFA4-4FB9-4451-B48E-C0C13E0127DF@w3.org 15:56:53 chair: justin 15:57:22 regrets: schunter, fielding, dsinger, wileys, johnsimpson 15:58:42 +[FTC] 15:59:40 +hefferjr 16:00:31 Zakim, who is on the phone? 16:00:31 On the phone I see rvaneijk, [FTC], hefferjr 16:00:41 justin has joined #dnt 16:00:55 +npdoty 16:01:17 +Wendy 16:01:24 eberkower has joined #dnt 16:01:31 + +322548aaaa 16:01:36 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:01:36 On the phone I see rvaneijk, [FTC], hefferjr, npdoty, Wendy, +322548aaaa 16:01:48 zakim, aaaa is me 16:01:48 +justin; got it 16:02:01 volunteer to scribe? 16:02:09 +eberkower 16:02:17 scribenick: wseltzer 16:02:22 +ChrisPedigoOPA 16:02:23 moneill2 has joined #dnt 16:02:26 Justin: this will be a short meeting 16:02:35 ... identify what people think we still need to discuss on TCS 16:02:40 ChrisPedigoOPA has joined #dnt 16:02:52 ... Only two related issues I know about, ISSUE-24 and ISSUE-235 16:02:54 ChrisPedigoDCN has joined #dnt 16:02:59 trackbot, ISSUE-24? 16:02:59 ISSUE-24 -- Possible exemption for fraud detection and defense -- pending review 16:02:59 http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/24 16:03:00 +[IPcaller] 16:03:19 zakim, [IPCaller] is me 16:03:23 +moneill2; got it 16:03:29 justin: we were close to consensus on 24, and then Shane noted an objection re: graduated response 16:03:36 trackbot, ISSUE-235? 16:03:36 ISSUE-235 -- Auditability requirement in Reasonable Security section -- raised 16:03:36 http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/235 16:03:48 justin: related issue-235, auditability 16:04:00 I don't think graduated response was actually required in the acceptable text. just preferred. 16:04:13 ... proposal from Jack, strike language re: make sure use of data is auditable, 16:04:28 ... Shane objected to any reference to graduated response 16:04:32 .... Take to mailing list. 16:04:48 ... Does anyone want to run with Jack's issue, given he's no longer participating? 16:04:55 ... Or do we let it slide? 16:05:10 ... I've gone through rest of issues, and don't in personal opinion see things we need to discuss. 16:05:18 ... Anyone else have a read-through? 16:05:20 does anyone know what the argument was about auditability? is that unlikely to be implemented? 16:05:21 q? 16:05:28 q+ 16:05:45 ack npd 16:05:48 issue-32? 16:05:48 issue-32 -- Sharing of data between entities via cookie syncing / identity brokering -- pending review 16:05:48 http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/32 16:06:03 npdoty: I haven't necessarily done a full audit, but a few updates 16:06:04 Zakim, mute me please 16:06:04 eberkower should now be muted 16:06:12 ... I've marked pending-review the things I've addressed 16:06:23 ... A few I'm not sure what to do 16:06:36 ... e.g. personalization, defining new terms re browsing history 16:06:40 ... these might just be editorial 16:06:52 q? 16:06:55 q+ 16:07:04 justin: If we're not going to use a term, no point in defining it 16:07:11 ... so we can drop web browsing history 16:07:13 +1, don't need to define terms that we don't use. 16:07:14 ack rva 16:07:15 ack rvaneijk 16:07:23 rvaneijk: Separate issue: data append 16:07:33 ... I was reviewing proposals on 3d-party compliance 16:07:50 thanks, rvaneijk, for looking at those proposals in detail 16:08:07 ... Is data append still a separate issue, or accounted for in what text? 16:08:28 justin: we had a cfo on data append, and I think we decided not to add language prohibiting data append 16:08:37 ... schunter drafted, I haven't yet reviewed 16:08:50 ok, fair 16:08:52 q? 16:08:56 https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/170 16:08:59 ... We announced the decision, that proposal to add prohibition on data append faced strong objections 16:09:12 .... A couple Euro-specific issues I'm not sure what to do with 16:09:17 which I think is now currently reflected in the editor's draft, and would be present in either of the issue-203 responses 16:09:24 ... a definition of DNT:0, an additional tracking header 16:10:05 rvaneijk: We expressed from Article 29 that we were looking for technical building blocks 16:10:09 ... most coming together 16:10:19 ... if it's tied ot specific issues, probably ok 16:10:44 q+ 16:10:46 justin: these may be TPE issues 16:10:51 pmagee has joined #dnt 16:10:52 ack npd 16:11:14 http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_DNT_0 16:11:18 npdoty: we have a change proposal on DNT:0, dwainberg suggested we remove text 16:12:10 justin: I think Jonathan's language is tautological. can go to the group 16:12:26 I was fine with the existing text 16:12:30 ... I haven't gone through change proposals. Will do after the call to see if anyone wants to pursue it. 16:12:42 issue-200 16:12:42 issue-200 -- Transitive exceptions -- open 16:12:42 http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/200 16:12:52 I understand dwainberg's proposal as being related to not having a sufficient definition, but hopefully the work on defining tracking has resolved that concern 16:13:00 justin: one other issue, David Singer was working on, transitive exceptions 16:13:02 ... don't recall the state 16:13:33 npdoty: I think the tracker had it in compliance-next 16:13:39 ... not urgent 16:13:41 issue-32? 16:13:41 issue-32 -- Sharing of data between entities via cookie syncing / identity brokering -- pending review 16:13:41 http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/32 16:13:52 justin: two other issues 16:13:59 ... old one (2011) cookie syncing 16:14:11 ... whether we need specific language? my inclination is it should be clear without 16:14:15 q? 16:14:54 issue-223? 16:14:54 issue-223 -- Define criteria now for the test/implementation phase of the compliance spec -- raised 16:14:54 http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/223 16:15:11 justin: dwainberg raised this issue-223 16:15:29 q+ 16:15:34 ack npd 16:15:50 npdoty: as a reminder, when we get to Candidate Recommendation phase, we call for implementatoins 16:16:05 ... then at the end of that phase, we test the implementations for compliance 16:16:17 ... we should take it up in CR, not now 16:17:02 q? 16:17:11 ... David might have had a different idea, but the purpose of testing is to see whether there are implementations 16:17:25 since some things are done through internal systems, testing implementations from the outside may be non-trivial 16:17:34 justin: Do folks have other issues against TCS? 16:17:39 I've seen WGs in the past use privacy policies, or statements from companies, to evaluate whether a spec is being implemented 16:17:54 ... otherwise, I'll send a note to the list that the only open issues are reasonable security and potentially auditability 16:17:57 q? 16:18:18 justin: Next week, back to closing out TPE 16:18:28 ... potentially a few TCS issues 16:18:32 q? 16:18:34 reminders 16:18:39 Audience Measurement Call for Objections closes October 9th. 16:18:39 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/49311/tpwg-audience-25/ 16:18:40 ... Hope to have all outstanding issues on TPE addressed 16:18:59 justin: there are open CFOs: audience measurement, closing in 8 days 16:19:10 ... deidentification closed 16:19:27 nice 16:19:30 ... only objections to the Jack Hobaugh proposal, no objections to the language we'd worked out on the call 16:19:37 ... thanks. 16:19:39 -ChrisPedigoOPA 16:19:40 -[FTC] 16:19:42 -moneill2 16:19:43 safe travels 16:19:44 [adjourned] 16:19:45 -justin 16:19:48 -hefferjr 16:19:49 -npdoty 16:19:53 -eberkower 16:19:55 -rvaneijk 16:19:56 -Wendy 16:19:58 T&S_Track(dnt)12:00PM has ended 16:19:58 Attendees were rvaneijk, [FTC], hefferjr, npdoty, Wendy, +322548aaaa, justin, eberkower, ChrisPedigoOPA, moneill2 16:20:01 trackbot, end teleconf 16:20:01 Zakim, list attendees 16:20:01 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is 16:20:09 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:20:09 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/10/01-dnt-minutes.html trackbot 16:20:10 RRSAgent, bye 16:20:10 I see no action items 16:20:58 RRSAgent has joined #dnt 16:20:58 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/10/01-dnt-irc 16:21:03 rrsagent, pointer? 16:21:03 See http://www.w3.org/2014/10/01-dnt-irc#T16-21-03 16:21:10 rrsagent, make logs public 16:21:17 rrsagent, make mintues 16:21:17 I'm logging. I don't understand 'make mintues', wseltzer. Try /msg RRSAgent help 16:21:26 rrsagent, make minutes 16:21:26 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/10/01-dnt-minutes.html wseltzer 16:54:08 WMichel has joined #DNT