14:55:22 RRSAgent has joined #html-a11y 14:55:22 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/06/19-html-a11y-irc 14:55:24 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:55:26 Zakim, this will be 2119 14:55:27 Meeting: HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 14:55:27 Date: 19 June 2014 14:55:27 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM scheduled to start 55 minutes ago 14:55:43 WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM has now started 14:55:50 +??P5 14:55:56 zakim, ??P5 is me 14:55:56 +janina; got it 14:56:01 agenda? 14:56:06 zakim, clear agenda 14:56:06 agenda cleared 14:56:14 Meeting: HTML-A11Y Task Force Teleconference 14:56:14 Chair: Janina 14:56:14 agenda+ Identify Scribe http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/index.php?title=Scribe_List 14:56:17 agenda+ Longdesc [See Below] 14:56:19 agenda+ Canvas 2D; Status, TF Liaison [See Below] 14:56:22 agenda+ ARIA in HTML [See Below] 14:56:24 Agenda+ PF's Strong Semantics Issue [See Below] 14:56:27 agenda+ Media Subteam 14:56:29 agenda+ HTML 5.1 Next Steps [See Below] 14:56:32 agenda+ Other Business 14:56:34 agenda+ Identify Chair and Scribe for the next TF teleconference http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/index.php?title=Scribe_List 14:56:37 agenda+ be done 14:56:52 zakim, next item 14:56:53 agendum 1. "Identify Scribe http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/index.php?title=Scribe_List" taken up [from janina] 14:58:03 ShaneM has joined #html-a11y 14:59:04 paulc has joined #html-a11y 15:00:25 +Mark_Sadecki 15:00:41 aardrian has joined #html-a11y 15:00:42 zakim, what is the code? 15:00:42 the conference code is 2119 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), paulc 15:00:55 +[Microsoft] 15:01:09 zakim, [Microsoft] is me 15:01:09 +paulc; got it 15:01:19 +Adrian_Roselli 15:02:36 +Cynthia_Shelly 15:03:02 zakim, who is here? 15:03:02 On the phone I see janina, Mark_Sadecki, paulc, Adrian_Roselli, Cynthia_Shelly 15:03:05 On IRC I see aardrian, paulc, ShaneM, RRSAgent, janina, Zakim, sivoais, hober, MarkS, cabanier, trackbot 15:03:08 Judy_clone has joined #html-a11y 15:03:14 scribe: MarkS 15:03:17 +Judy 15:03:38 zakim, take up next item 15:03:38 agendum 2. "Longdesc" taken up [from See Below] 15:04:09 JS: ->http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2014Jun/0042.html Longdesc CfC to transition to CR 15:04:13 ->http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2014Jun/0042.html Longdesc CfC to transition to CR 15:04:57 MS: Chaals and I made good progress on processing comments and tidying up loose ends in longdesc. Chaals issued a CfC last Friday, which closes tomorrow. 15:05:15 MS: Preparing documentation required for that transition. We would hope to schedule a tranisition call for the 3rd week in July with a publication date soon afterwards. 15:05:20 PC: That long? 15:05:35 pc: Any chance to do this sooner? Unfortunate to wait well into July? 15:05:41 pc: But, it is July! 15:05:44 ms: That's it. 15:06:17 MS: We've done preliminary scheduling and there are a lot of vacations 15:06:31 +John_Foliot 15:06:33 PC: LC for HTML closes August 15, so longdesc should still be ahead of that 15:06:51 JF has joined #html-a11y 15:07:09 zakim, take up next item 15:07:09 agendum 3. "Canvas 2D; Status, TF Liaison" taken up [from See Below] 15:07:47 ->http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2014Jun/0052.html Canvas Sub Group minutes 15:07:49 scribe: JF 15:08:00 MS: Canvas group met this week, good progress 15:08:16 ->https://codereview.chromium.org/300223009/ Issue 300223009: Implement basic parts of hit regions on canvas2d 15:08:20 Firefox and Chrome supporting DrawFocus and activity around Hit Regions 15:08:41 MS: hope to see implementations dropping soon 15:08:54 MS: testing on Safari as well, and tests passed 15:09:05 +[ApTest] 15:09:10 zakim, I am ApTest 15:09:10 ok, ShaneM, I now associate you with [ApTest] 15:09:29 MS: asked HTML WG about what to do with this highly functioning group. Suggestion to create a TF under the html wg 15:09:32 ->https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/Canvas_Task_Force/Work_Statement Draft Canvas Task Force Work Statement 15:10:06 MS: standard TRF work statement - mentions liasons with allyTF 15:10:35 scribe: MarkS 15:10:42 JS: this will cease being a sub-team of this TF, and will become a larger TF within HTML WG 15:10:53 JS: mostly management changes 15:11:05 JS: there is canvas in SVG2 15:11:09 ...learned this week 15:11:10 q+ 15:11:15 ack ju 15:11:27 s/standard TRF work/standard TF work 15:11:33 JB: How does that work? canvas in SVG. anything we need to watch out for? 15:12:05 JS: didn't go into details. Rich mentioned it as an example of how SVG is expanding past SVG 1 15:12:36 ...the PF interest is to continue to formalize relationship with SVG group and mapping, etc. 15:12:56 ...we've had a lot of interest in a11y people participating in that work 15:13:02 SVG2 has a section on embedded content at http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG2/single-page.html#chapter-embedded 15:13:46 JS: good to see implementations coming along 15:13:50 zakim, take up next item 15:13:50 agendum 5. "PF's Strong Semantics Issue" taken up [from See Below] 15:14:27 JS: this was a good exercise. teased out some details we needed. 15:14:50 ...wondering from Paul and Judy have to say regarding this issue and the future of html5 and html5.1 etc 15:15:27 ...as HTML exits CR and returns to 2nd LC, we took a look to make sure PF was happy. ARIA sub team people focused on strong semantics setction 15:15:38 ...worried that advise was not sufficient enough for developers 15:16:02 ...CfC in PF asked for testing results to validate, or mark section as informative 15:16:30 ...SteveF developed tests that proved good results, not 100% but about 90% passed 15:16:51 ...there is an email from steve with up to date test results and bugs that have been filed. 15:17:04 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2014Jun/0126.html 15:17:08 ...wondering if this is something we can still handle in html5.0 or 5.1 15:17:27 ...one of the other ARIA members noticed there were some missing aria-attributes 15:17:29 q+ 15:17:34 q+ 15:17:48 Q+ 15:17:52 ...wondering how we handle that 15:18:20 q? 15:18:23 q+ 15:18:23 I think we should file bugs and let the Editors process these and propose whether they will be included as LC bugs. Then the filers can decide if the processing is appropriate. 15:18:24 ...should we just mark the items currently at risk? 15:18:31 ack p 15:18:42 ack JF 15:19:17 PC: bugs may be moved into LC component by editors. Can talk to editors about that. Can be handled in LC 15:19:27 ack me 15:19:51 MS: I have already filed bugs on behalf of Brian 15:20:30 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26090 15:20:30 Implicit ARIA semantics for the
    and