13:59:49 RRSAgent has joined #ldp 13:59:49 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/05/19-ldp-irc 13:59:51 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:59:51 Zakim has joined #ldp 13:59:53 Zakim, this will be LDP 13:59:53 ok, trackbot, I see SW_LDP()10:00AM already started 13:59:54 Meeting: Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Teleconference 13:59:54 Date: 19 May 2014 14:00:08 +ericP 14:00:12 +JohnArwe 14:00:16 JohnArwe has joined #ldp 14:00:22 zakim, who is on the phone 14:00:22 I don't understand 'who is on the phone', pchampin 14:00:28 zakim, who is here? 14:00:28 On the phone I see ??P4, ericP, JohnArwe 14:00:29 On IRC I see JohnArwe, Zakim, RRSAgent, Ashok, pchampin, nmihindu, deiu, betehess, stevebattle11110, jmvanel, Arnaud, sandro, trackbot, Yves, ericP 14:00:33 zakim, ??P4 is me 14:00:33 +pchampin; got it 14:00:54 +Arnaud 14:01:21 SteveS has joined #ldp 14:01:34 +[IBM] 14:01:43 +Ashok_Malhotra 14:01:44 Zakim, [IBM] is me 14:01:44 +SteveS; got it 14:03:01 regrets: andrei, alexandre, sergio 14:03:32 zakim, who is here? 14:03:32 On the phone I see pchampin, ericP, JohnArwe, Arnaud, SteveS, Ashok_Malhotra 14:03:34 On IRC I see SteveS, JohnArwe, Zakim, RRSAgent, Ashok, pchampin, nmihindu, deiu, betehess, stevebattle11110, jmvanel, Arnaud, sandro, trackbot, Yves, ericP 14:04:40 +bblfish 14:05:08 bblfish has joined #ldp 14:05:33 -bblfish 14:05:37 oops 14:05:45 scribe: pchampin 14:05:56 topic: minutes of last meeting 14:06:06 http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2014-05-12 14:06:25 PROPOSED: approve the minute of last minutes 14:06:36 +bblfish 14:06:46 arnaud: we closed some issues re. paging 14:06:47 I just clicked on link 14:07:02 RESOLVED: approve the minute of last minutes 14:07:23 arnaud: can we meet next week? 14:07:53 SteveS: in US, national holiday (Memorial Day) 14:08:37 ...pchampin: also the EU semantic web conference 14:08:41 ... it is US memorial day, and in Europe, this is during ESWC 14:09:08 arnaud: so let's skip next week; next meeting on June 2nd 14:09:12 +??P26 14:09:29 Zakim, ??P26 is me 14:09:29 +nmihindu; got it 14:09:35 Zakim, mute me 14:09:35 nmihindu should now be muted 14:09:47 topic: tracking of actions and issues 14:10:50 ashok_malhotra: Henry and I have been working on the paging 14:10:55 ... would like some feedback 14:11:35 topic: LDP spec 14:12:12 arnaud: waiting for director's approval to move from CR 14:12:48 s/from CR/to CR/ 14:13:05 ... but that should not discourage people to work on implementation 14:13:19 ... there will be no major change now 14:14:00 ... We need 2 implementations, and we expire soon. 14:14:05 s/paging/Access Control/ 14:14:20 ... We will ask for an extension. 14:15:15 Arnaud: the only pending comment is from Guido about the null relative URI 14:15:24 topic: Status update 14:17:06 +[IPcaller] 14:17:31 SteveS: moving on 14:17:33 roger has joined #ldp 14:18:12 Zakim, [IPcaller] is roger 14:18:12 +roger; got it 14:18:17 Arnaud: are tests from Raul integrated? he claimed to check all the invariants (MUST) from the spec 14:20:42 SteveS: they are integrated, except for IndirectContainer tests 14:21:11 Arnaud: we welcome contribution to the test suite, but how do we decide when the test suite is complete? 14:22:06 ... what is left to do 14:22:34 SteveS: it is fairly complete for RDF sources, Basic containers and Direct containers, 14:22:56 ... but a few cases here and there are missing (inc. non-RDF sources) 14:23:49 q+ 14:24:01 ack Ashok 14:24:01 EricP: often during CR, we get questions, to which the answer is a new test 14:25:03 ashok: don't we want a test for every RFC2119 keyword? 14:25:13 SteveS: this is basically the idea 14:26:25 EricP: then depending on the SHOULD's and MAY's you chose to implement, you have to run a certain subset of the tests 14:26:58 ... It would be difficult to go to CR if we don't test all the MUST's 14:28:36 Arnaud: we agreed to have a link from the spec to the test suite, which will have its own status 14:29:42 EricP: for Turtle, we advertised the test suite as complete while we had one implementation (from withing the WG) that passed all the tests 14:29:59 ... but then we had to add a few afterwards, to remove some ambiguity 14:30:15 Arnaud: who is using the test suite, beyond SteveS? 14:30:29 I'll try to get going on the test suite in the next few weeks 14:30:40 I haven’t heard any feedback, Sergio I think has played with it a bit 14:32:16 EricP: Steve, how far do you think you are? 14:32:56 SteveS: it is rather complete (even if it can still be improved) 14:33:29 +??P30 14:33:43 Arnaud: we could prompt Sergio for an update by an e-mail 14:33:45 Zakim, ??P30 is me 14:33:45 +nmihindu; got it 14:33:53 Zakim, mute me 14:33:53 nmihindu was already muted, nmihindu 14:34:37 ... I don't want to block the CR transition for this 14:35:35 nmihindu, have you had a chance to look at ldp-testsuite? 14:35:47 ... By the time the document gets publish, we will hopefully be done. 14:36:32 subtopic: access-control 14:36:54 ashok: I'm happy with the current state of the page 14:37:06 ... We would like other people from the WG to comment on it. 14:37:44 BartvanLeeuwen has joined #ldp 14:38:04 q+ 14:38:28 +??P31 14:38:35 ack bblfish 14:38:41 Zakim, ??p13 is me 14:38:41 I already had ??P13 as SteveS, BartvanLeeuwen 14:38:45 Zakim, ??p31 is me 14:38:45 +BartvanLeeuwen; got it 14:39:00 Arnaud: Ted has already an action to do that 14:39:08 Ashok: I'll also ask Serena to have a look 14:39:34 SteveS, we are planning to publish our LDP impl, LDP4j, available this week and we will try to use ldp-testsuite for testing the conformance 14:39:44 can't find the wiki page 14:40:11 https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebAccessControl 14:40:17 Arnaud: Ashok will reformat the wiki page in Respec, so that by June 2nd we can vote on it 14:40:27 nmihindu, ok good 14:40:43 Ah found it : https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/AccessControl 14:41:12 Ashok: at the end of the page, I propose a charter for an Access Control WG; is it ok? 14:41:20 Arnaud: yes, this is a good idea 14:41:46 Arnaud, I can follow up with him via email to check 14:41:51 subtopic: Best Practice and Guidelines 14:42:01 Arnaud, there was one issue about relative URIs 14:42:36 https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp-bp/ldp-bp.html 14:42:44 SteveS: I think Cody sent an e-mail saying that the document was ready for review by the WG 14:42:55 I think it is better to wait 14:43:11 Arnaud: do we want to publish it now, or wait until June 2nd? 14:43:30 I'd like to read it 14:43:57 ... It has already been reviewed. Is anyone planning to reviewit by then? 14:44:25 Cody’s email on April 27th “Status of BP&G” http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2014Apr/0086.html 14:44:26 Miguel did a very thorough review on it 14:45:05 bblfish: I'd like to read it by June 2nd 14:45:15 Arnaud: ok, then we'll vote on June 2nd 14:45:19 subtopic: Primer 14:45:38 https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/tip/ldp-primer/ldp-primer.html 14:46:08 q+ 14:46:10 Roger: got feedback from Ashok and Henry 14:46:13 ack bblfish 14:46:25 ... It is not quite finished, but we are getting there. 14:47:31 bblfish: as many people as possible should review this document, as it where most LDP users will start 14:47:43 yes, we welcome all the feedback and we will surely address them as soon possible 14:47:44 Arnaud: I agree, but we must progress 14:48:00 subtopic: 209 status 14:48:21 EricP: no progress, but I'll hopefully be able to work on it next week 14:48:30 subtopic: paging 14:48:40 I put the list of outstanding resolutions into the prolog. 14:48:46 https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp-paging.html 14:49:55 subtopic: LD-Patch 14:52:31 https://github.com/pchampin/rdfpatch/ 14:53:06 pchampin: the syntax is quite stable now 14:53:23 ... available in the README in the github repository above 14:53:36 -Ashok_Malhotra 14:53:38 thx bye 14:53:47 -BartvanLeeuwen 14:53:49 -JohnArwe 14:53:53 ... We'll hopefully port it in the mercurial repo during the next 2 weeks 14:53:53 -SteveS 14:53:54 -ericP 14:53:55 -bblfish 14:53:56 -roger 14:53:58 -nmihindu.a 14:53:59 Arnaud: meeting adjourned 14:53:59 -Arnaud 15:04:16 MiguelAraCo has joined #ldp 15:32:35 bblfish has joined #ldp