13:58:37 RRSAgent has joined #ldp 13:58:37 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/05/12-ldp-irc 13:58:39 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:58:39 Zakim has joined #ldp 13:58:41 Zakim, this will be LDP 13:58:41 ok, trackbot; I see SW_LDP()10:00AM scheduled to start in 2 minutes 13:58:42 Meeting: Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Teleconference 13:58:42 Date: 12 May 2014 13:59:32 SW_LDP()10:00AM has now started 13:59:39 +??P7 13:59:48 Zakim, ??P7 is me 13:59:48 +deiu; got it 13:59:59 +Arnaud 14:01:10 Zakim, mute me please 14:01:10 deiu should now be muted 14:01:31 +[IBM] 14:01:41 Zakim, [IBM] is me 14:01:41 +SteveS; got it 14:02:03 JohnArwe has joined #ldp 14:02:19 +JohnArwe 14:03:25 +OpenLink_Software 14:03:40 Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me 14:03:40 +TallTed; got it 14:04:51 regrets: ashok, pierre-antoine, sergio 14:06:30 scribenick: TallTed 14:06:40 Zakim, who's here? 14:06:40 On the phone I see deiu (muted), Arnaud, SteveS, JohnArwe, TallTed 14:06:42 On IRC I see JohnArwe, Zakim, RRSAgent, nmihindu, betehess, deiu, TallTed, stevebattle1119, SteveS, jmvanel, Arnaud, sandro, trackbot, Yves, ericP 14:07:32 Zakim, unmute me please 14:07:32 deiu should no longer be muted 14:07:40 +Sandro 14:08:25 Zakim, mute me please 14:08:25 deiu should now be muted 14:09:00 Proposal: Approve the minutes of the 5 May teleconf: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2014-05-05 14:09:22 looks fine to me, after quick scan 14:09:44 good enough for commonscribe, good enough for me 14:09:54 RESOLVED: Approve the minutes of the 5 May teleconf: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2014-05-05 14:10:30 RESOLVED: next meeting: May 19, usual time 14:10:44 TOPIC: Open Actions & Issues 14:10:51 action-138? 14:10:51 action-138 -- Sandro Hawke to Follow up on resolution about moving rel=describedby text -- due 2014-04-22 -- OPEN 14:10:51 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/actions/138 14:11:19 +ericP 14:11:38 action-118? 14:11:38 action-118 -- Eric Prud'hommeaux to Report to timbl: some pref for reverting to 303, 200+header still on the table, henry considering 200+location -- due 2013-12-23 -- OPEN 14:11:38 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/actions/118 14:12:24 +??P12 14:12:38 Zakim, ??P12 is me 14:12:38 +nmihindu; got it 14:12:44 Zakim, mute me 14:12:44 nmihindu should now be muted 14:13:33 http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp 14:13:49 http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp.ttl 14:14:26 +bblfish 14:14:37 the intent is to serve /ldp + Accept headers as things other than html? 14:14:52 bblfish has joined #ldp 14:14:57 [ chatter about css tweaks and other adjustments to namespace docs ] 14:14:59 hi sorry for being later 14:17:07 Arnaud, Ashok has completed the action-70 probably he will confirm in the next call 14:17:13 s/later/late/ 14:17:23 Zakim, unmute me please 14:17:23 deiu should no longer be muted 14:18:31 Zakim, mute me please 14:18:31 deiu should now be muted 14:18:32 [ conversational review of various works in progress ] 14:18:38 TOPIC: LDP Spec 14:19:07 Arnaud: drafted Transition Request - http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/LDP_CR_Transition_Request 14:20:36 ... LC comments and associated resolutions have been carefully reviewed, and editorial application to doc confirmed 14:21:45 ... most comments have been addressed to satisfaction of commenters; Reto's comments on null URI are all that lack confirmation of satisfaction 14:23:38 ACTION: ericP to schedule concall for LDP Spec transition to CR 14:23:39 Created ACTION-140 - Schedule concall for ldp spec transition to cr [on Eric Prud'hommeaux - due 2014-05-19]. 14:23:45 TOPIC: Test Suite 14:25:31 SteveS: licensing review in progress; test item development moving forward... 14:26:25 TOPIC: Access Control 14:26:59 ericP, fetching of namespace docs looks right 14:27:32 bblfish: will work with Ashok to integrate feedback, wondering about feedback on feedback... 14:27:41 Access control doc seems like it's on the right track. Sent in some comments and need to work with Ashok on that, but should be ok. 14:27:53 TOPIC: Best Practices & Guidelines 14:28:06 Mhh, should read that too 14:28:07 tx for the looksee, SteveS 14:28:14 I think it's ready to be published 14:28:31 if the issue that was raised by Sandro is resolved 14:29:03 the issue which was about relative URIs 14:30:22 TOPIC: LDP Primer 14:30:53 we had feedback from bblfish about the introductory text 14:31:10 http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/tip/ldp-primer/ldp-primer.html 14:31:26 q+ 14:31:26 Roger is planning to address those 14:31:44 ack bblfish 14:32:23 bblfish: these are big docs, and take some time and effort to review properly 14:32:55 bblfish, it is already in the repo 14:33:09 bblfish, any minor corrections you can do it directly there 14:34:00 bblfish, but if you want to change the text that was introduced by Roger drastically, you have to check with Roger first 14:34:20 bblfish, I think we all have write access to those documents 14:35:16 bblfish, or may be you can use a branch as you suggested 14:36:21 TOPIC: status of 209 code 14:37:05 ericP: TAG said they were going to send something; I'll follow up on that 14:37:26 TOPIC: LDP Paging spec 14:37:41 Arnaud: draft is at http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp-paging.html 14:38:07 ... 2 open issues (94 and 96) 14:38:18 issue-94? 14:38:18 issue-94 -- Stable vs lossy paging -- open 14:38:18 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/94 14:38:23 issue-96? 14:38:23 issue-96 -- Can we define ordering for LDPRs? -- open 14:38:23 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/96 14:39:09 http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2014-04-17#resolution_3 14:39:23 ... Sandro had made a rough proposal as of F2F5, which we resolved to work from 14:43:00 [ discussion - Issue-94 seems resolved, but needs action created in order to close ] 14:43:34 PROPOSED: Close Issue-94 based on http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2014-04-17#resolution_3 with Action on Arnaud to follow up 14:43:50 +1 14:43:50 +1 14:43:55 +1 14:43:58 +1 14:44:09 +1 14:44:19 +1 14:44:27 RESOLVED: Close Issue-94 based on http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2014-04-17#resolution_3 with Action on Arnaud to follow up 14:44:29 regarding paging editing…I don’t know if I can get to any of it in coming weeks, still learning about what workload is coming back from week off 14:44:51 maybe ashok can help 14:44:53 Action: Arnaud to follow up with Paging Spec editors to implement http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2014-04-17#resolution_3 14:44:53 Created ACTION-141 - Follow up with paging spec editors to implement http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2014-04-17#resolution_3 [on Arnaud Le Hors - due 2014-05-19]. 14:44:57 Action: Arnaud to follow up with Paging Spec editors to implement http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2014-04-17#resolution_4 14:44:57 Created ACTION-142 - Follow up with paging spec editors to implement http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2014-04-17#resolution_4 [on Arnaud Le Hors - due 2014-05-19]. 14:46:38 Arnaud: since paging was moved from only LDPCs to all LDPRs, some things need to be revisited to make them handle LDPRs 14:46:46 q+ 14:46:55 ack sandro 14:46:57 so we're now on issue-96 14:47:01 issue-96? 14:47:01 issue-96 -- Can we define ordering for LDPRs? -- open 14:47:01 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/96 14:47:43 sandro: in general the answer for graphs is, just don't do it. graphs should just be designed to be smaller. 14:48:31 ... general advice is to keep resources to under 10 MB 14:49:52 +1 to sandro 14:49:54 sounds like a good compromise: paging on graphs, ordering on containers 14:50:42 we choose not to 14:50:43 PROPOSED: close issue-96 with ordering undefined when paging LDPRs 14:50:57 +1 14:50:58 +1 14:51:05 +0 14:51:06 +0.5 14:51:07 +1 (non-LDPC LDPRs, of course.) 14:51:12 +1, seeing no clear proximate need to go beyond what we have now 14:51:16 +0 I'll go with what others agree with 14:51:37 RESOLVED: close issue-96 with ordering undefined when paging LDPRs 14:51:43 scribe: deiu 14:52:12 Arnaud: as of now, all issues seem to be closed, so we just need to reflect all the resolutions in the specs 14:52:15 ... we can have a review cycle and publish it as LC 14:52:17 I do like the notion of not standing in the way of someone else/ourselves in the future if they want to re-use the concept AND the syntax on resources/for uses we don't see clearly today. 14:52:34 ...the editors may not be available now, so we're taking volunteers 14:52:47 ...otherwise we'll have to wait 14:53:04 ...this is the end of the agenda, so unless anyone has something they want to bring up, we can close early 14:53:11 ...no other business? guess not 14:53:17 ...let's close the call 14:53:24 -Sandro 14:53:25 thanks all 14:53:26 -SteveS 14:53:37 -nmihindu 14:53:46 -JohnArwe 14:53:47 -deiu 14:53:48 -TallTed 14:53:49 -bblfish 14:53:49 -Arnaud 14:53:54 -ericP 14:53:55 SW_LDP()10:00AM has ended 14:53:55 Attendees were deiu, Arnaud, SteveS, JohnArwe, TallTed, Sandro, ericP, nmihindu, bblfish 16:45:10 bblfish has joined #ldp 16:53:51 Zakim has left #ldp 17:06:08 deiu has joined #ldp 17:34:34 stevebattle1119 has joined #ldp 17:48:07 deiu has joined #ldp