14:55:44 RRSAgent has joined #webizen 14:55:44 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/04/10-webizen-irc 14:55:45 Zakim has joined #webizen 14:56:04 Zakim, this will be 93249 14:56:04 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, koalie 14:56:10 Zakim, list conference 14:56:10 I don't understand 'list conference', koalie 14:56:19 Zakim, help? 14:56:19 Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot for more detailed help. 14:56:21 Some of the commands I know are: 14:56:21 xxx is yyy - establish yyy as the name of unknown party xxx 14:56:21 if yyy is 'me' or 'I', your nick is substituted 14:56:21 xxx may be yyy - establish yyy as possibly the name of unknown party xxx 14:56:22 I am xxx - establish your nick as the name of unknown party xxx 14:56:22 xxx holds yyy [, zzz ...] - establish xxx as a group name and yyy, etc. as participants within that group 14:56:22 xxx also holds yyy - add yyy to the list of participants in group xxx 14:56:22 who's here? - lists the participants on the phone 14:56:23 who's muted? - lists the participants who are muted 14:56:23 mute xxx - mutes party xxx (like pressing 61#) 14:56:23 unmute xxx - reverses the effect of "mute" and of 61# 14:56:23 is xxx here? - reports whether a party named like xxx is present 14:56:23 list conferences - reports the active conferences 14:56:24 this is xxx - associates this channel with conference xxx 14:56:24 excuse us - disconnects from the irc channel 14:56:24 I last learned something new on $Date: 2013-03-03 19:18:47 $ 14:56:26 Zakim, list conferences 14:56:26 I see MM_MMI(EMMA)10:00AM active 14:56:27 also scheduled at this time are I18N_CoreWG()10:00AM, SW_HCLS(TMO)11:00AM, WAI_ERTWG(Eval TF)10:00AM, Math_IG()10:00AM, SYMM_TTWG()10:00AM, XML_QueryWG(XSLT)11:00AM, 14:56:27 ... DIG_weekly()10:00AM, Team_Global(review)8:00AM, SW_HCLS()11:00AM, XML_XSLWG()11:00AM, UW_DAP()10:00AM, WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM 14:57:27 Zakim, this will be Team_Jeff 14:57:27 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, koalie 14:58:16 zakim, this will be webiz 14:58:16 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, veronica 14:58:48 I just told Ralph on &sysreq 15:00:43 jeff has joined #webizen 15:01:01 AnnBassetti has joined #webizen 15:01:29 Zakim, this will be Team_Jeff 15:01:29 ok, koalie, I see Team_JEFF(WEBIZEN)11:00AM already started 15:01:30 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webizen 15:01:52 +Veronica 15:02:27 zakim -- 15:02:29 +koalie 15:02:40 +Ann 15:02:55 meeting: Webizen 15:03:38 -> http://www.w3.org/2014/03/27-webizen-minutes.html Previous (2014-03-27) 15:05:05 Jeff: [overview of https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webizen ] 15:05:17 Jeff: Maybe we should modify the "background" section a little bit 15:05:52 ... since it's been written we changed that we're going some benefits 15:06:04 ... let's live change in the wiki ... 15:06:16 jcverdie_ has joined #webizen 15:07:38 Jeff: reload to see proposed tweak 15:07:41 +Jean-Charles 15:08:04 https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?title=Webizen&diff=72876&oldid=72873 15:08:47 [proposed tweak: "The current proposal provides certain privileges for example participation (via representation) in the AC. "] 15:09:03 Ann: For those already participating, the distinction might be too subtle 15:09:05 Jeff: OK 15:09:59 Ann: It needs to be clear (it's explained further down) 15:10:05 Jeff: I have a new proposal 15:10:30 Ann: I'm happy to come back to it later, let's keep going 15:10:43 Jeff: OK, we can do it offline also 15:10:56 [Jeff continues with overview of wiki content] 15:11:39 q+ 15:11:56 Topic: Section on Concept 15:12:10 Jeff: When do we work on the developing country piece? 15:12:16 ... Can it wait until later 15:12:31 Veronica: Confusing use of term Membership. 15:12:52 Jeff: The only terminology we have thus far is "webizen" 15:13:05 Ann: In the intro, it says "individual membership" several times 15:13:20 JEff: Maybe we should make clear over there that we're not going individual membership. 15:13:23 Ann: Yes 15:13:26 Veronica: Yes 15:13:51 Ann: "affiliation"? 15:13:54 Jeff: I like 15:13:55 +1 affiliation 15:14:00 veronica: I like it too 15:15:45 Ann: Let's get to concept and clean up later if there is redundancy 15:16:37 Ann: re: developing countries, I don't want this to appear demeaning 15:16:51 ... I want to be sensitive about it 15:17:46 Ann: I don't want to give different benefits to different people. 15:17:58 Jeff: We can't afford to lose money on it. 15:18:10 Ann: I understand, but let's figure out a way to avoid this. 15:18:19 http://www.ieee.org/membership_services/membership/join/join_dues.html 15:18:20 Jeff: I did study IEEE 15:18:25 ... over there ^^, 15:18:37 ... they have developing nation e-membership 15:18:50 ... you have a choice to pay the full or the e-membership 15:19:17 ... maybe you don't get their publications with the latter, I don't know. 15:19:32 Ann: Maybe we should revisit the foundational goals? 15:19:41 ... and aim toward whatever that goal is. 15:19:44 Jeff: good point 15:19:51 [+1 from Coralie] 15:20:03 Jeff: Maybe we need a section 15:20:19 s/a section/a section call "Goals"/ 15:20:22 Ann: Good idea 15:20:24 +1 15:20:31 +1 to that 15:20:46 Jeff: Let's just create a bullet list 15:20:52 ... anyone wants to suggest some goals? 15:21:09 Ann: One of the most important things is we need more participation in the technical work, 15:21:18 ... although I'm not sure this is the goal of webizen 15:21:30 Jeff: How about increase the general public review? 15:21:38 [Jeff writing in the wiki, live] 15:25:12 Jeff: "closer linkage between W3C spec writer and that ecosystem that relies on W3C recommendations"? 15:25:28 Jeff: Reload the wiki 15:25:43 -> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webizen#Goals Goals section 15:26:39 Ann: "reports" not the technology in general? 15:26:50 ... "increase affilisation" is the top one in my mind 15:27:23 Jeff: Thank you. [minor editing and reorganisation in wiki] 15:27:30 q? 15:27:35 ack vero 15:27:38 -> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webizen#Package_of_benefits Package of Benefits 15:28:30 costless except for chckis 15:29:59 Ann: add "outsource, contest" next to item "Annual Webizen T-shirt. " ? 15:30:03 Coralie: Good idea 15:30:34 Ann: Some in the list will appeal more to some than others 15:30:56 Jeff: Do we think this is a sufficient set to start with? 15:31:03 q+ 15:31:04 Ann: Yes, it's a good list. 15:31:06 ack jc 15:31:16 JC: I think it's a good list 15:31:21 ... I'll question the organisation of the list 15:31:32 ... t-shirt much less important than having a voice 15:31:40 q+ 15:31:47 [the list is currently not ordered by importance] 15:32:17 Jeff: OK, it's been changed 15:33:34 Jeff: Shall we remove the developing countries section since it's already mentioed before and since it's demeaning? 15:33:37 Ann: Yes! 15:33:49 +1 15:33:52 +1 15:34:21 -> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webizen#Participation_Benefits_and_Non_Benefits Participation Benefits and Non Benefits 15:34:29 Jeff: This section describes the electoral college 15:34:38 ... this is the most controversial part of the proposal 15:34:59 ... I felt an obligation to surface it to the W3C Advisory Board that we're having next monday 15:35:22 ... I value on this call the input from two people who are on the AB (Ann and JC) and others on this call 15:35:46 ... and look fwd to your support on monday if grouchy AB members grouch 15:36:05 Ann: I like the concept of limited electoral college 15:37:52 JC: I support this proposal 15:38:12 q? 15:38:18 q- 15:38:29 q+ 15:38:42 Jeff: Let's go back to the discounts in the package of benefits 15:39:06 JC: question on college -- 15:39:20 ... would the privileges extend to running to AB or TAG? 15:39:26 JEff: see paragraph 5 15:40:04 ... "The reps would have some, but not all rights of an AC Member. They review Charters and REC track deliverables, participate in ac-forum discussions, may attend AC meetings, may nominate for the TAG and AB, and vote in TAG and AB elections. " 15:40:17 ... and " They may accept Member confidential information, but may not distribute Member confidential information within their companies (since their companies are not Members) or among Webizens (because re-distribution to all Webizens means it is no longer in Member space). They cannot nominate themselves or anyone else to participate in Working Groups. " 15:40:22 JC: thanks 15:40:30 JEff: Veronica, discounts? 15:41:02 veronica: I initially proposed to offer 20% discounts on Validator Suite, W3C Training and W3Conf 15:41:22 ... MCf and Bernard feel that's a bit too generous 15:41:40 ... and recommended we don't give a bigger discount than that we offer to w3c members 15:41:47 ... they offered 10% for training and VS 15:42:15 ... for w3conf, I had suggested 15% and Doug Schepers thought it wasn't generous 15:42:28 ... now 20% for w3conf 15:42:59 Ann: Would a chart of member benefits and Invited Experts and webizen and other participation categories, be helpful? 15:43:42 [feeling in the "room" is that 10% is a little low] 15:44:10 Ann: I understand the concern that we don't want to lose money; perhaps the table of comparisons would help? 15:44:19 q+ 15:44:23 s/a little/very/ 15:44:28 veronica: We want people to join; there is perceived benefit and tangible and intangible 15:44:39 ack jc 15:44:53 JC: I expect and hope that 10% is not the margin cap of these services 15:44:58 ... otherwise we're in trouble 15:45:52 ... @@@ 15:46:42 Jeff: in the entries of that table, you can put "TBD" 15:46:45 Veronica: Yes 15:46:51 q? 15:47:00 s/@@@/Our goal is to bring new people who do not have enough money to become full members, so discounting 10% won't change anything. On the other hand allowing these people to use such tools will bring new exposure to them. As long as we don't lose money I don't mind paying more than people who can't afford 15:47:11 -> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webizen#Webizen_voting_for_the_AC Webizen voting for the AC 15:47:21 Jeff: I propose we tackle that one last 15:47:30 +1 15:47:32 ... it's a hope we can possibly never escape from... 15:47:35 Ann: Yes! 15:47:58 Jeff: I'll edit the "goal" section to make clear one thing... 15:48:12 s/new people who do not have enough money to become full members/a new class of people 15:48:40 RRSagent, make minutes 15:48:40 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/04/10-webizen-minutes.html koalie 15:49:08 Jeff: The Goals section, which was missing thus far, I'd appreciate if people could review it 15:49:30 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webizen#Low-key_launch 15:49:33 Topic: Low-key launch 15:49:59 Koalie: We don't know how big, so we won't invest too much 15:50:01 ... Here's the proposa; 15:50:05 s/;/l/ 15:50:09 ... Landing page 15:50:24 ... Pointers to landing page from select pages 15:50:34 ... Bonus for early adopters 15:50:45 ... posts, blogs, tweets, emails 15:50:56 ... mail to people in WGs 15:50:57 q+ 15:51:07 ... lots of tweets and retweets 15:51:22 ... e.g. from Tim 15:51:33 ... ISOC/IETF/web platform 15:51:40 ... of course W3C Memes 15:51:46 q+ jj to discuss ISOC 15:51:53 ... Alex Russell 15:52:00 ... media guys (Shankland) 15:52:13 ... Tim O'Reilly 15:52:56 ... Target audiences: WG people, validator users, alumni 15:53:04 ... No spam 15:53:23 ... and of course huge twitter influencers like JC Verdie 15:53:41 Ann: great list 15:53:55 ... Add tweeter: whiteafrican 15:53:59 Ann: Add Eric Hurzman 15:54:11 q? 15:54:11 ... he's followed by thousands of geeks in Africa 15:54:29 s/Eric Hurzman/Erik Hersmann/ 15:54:33 ack jeff 15:55:18 Jeff: We should reach out to those in Work group who are not affiliated already with us through W3C Members 15:55:32 ... -1 on reaching out to sister orgs like ISOC and IETF 15:55:48 ... it can be awkward for a variety of reasons 15:55:49 s/Hersmann/Hersman/ 15:55:53 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_Hersman 15:55:57 ... we should try to do it ourselves 15:56:31 Coralie: OK, makes sense 15:57:19 Jeff: about pitch 15:57:35 Jeff: characterizing as an obligation might not work 15:57:40 ... doesn't match all the goals 15:58:01 ... one of the goals is to give the world an opportunity to give back, you can say that 15:58:22 ... action item for someone to align the goals with pitch 15:58:47 Ann: I'm interested for somebody to get back with Alex Russell what he thinks about that 15:58:58 Jeff: I did offer him the opportunity to participate in this TF 15:59:12 ... he said he'd love to but has this project that takes 100% of his time 15:59:27 ... I could send him the current wiki and ask if he has any thought on it 15:59:54 Ann: Anne van Kesteren tweeted something negative a while ago; I replied he should contribute; he didn't reply 16:00:08 ... Maybe other geeks who aren't participating 16:00:24 https://twitter.com/koalie/status/451680917564968960 16:01:56 Jeff: I reached out and Anne replied 16:02:10 ... I don't know if he's satisfied with the current proposal 16:02:40 Ann: It might be useful to put "draft" on the wiki 16:02:43 Jeff: Yes 16:03:01 Ann: "draft" or "help us out!" 16:03:30 darobin has joined #webizen 16:03:53 Jeff: Veronica needs to update the wiki with discounts proposal 16:04:16 Jeff: Any other business that we should be idscussing? 16:04:31 ... Electoral college voting technic 16:04:34 s/ids/dis/ 16:04:50 Ann: Special category is required, for those who want to discuss voting :) 16:07:03 Ann: Who do we think are our webizens? 16:07:30 Jeff: Some of them are those we like to complain about W3C (because they care) 16:08:08 Jeff: Next meeting? 16:08:23 ... AB discussion next Monday 16:08:36 ... this is in TF mode until June AC meeting 16:08:50 ... at the AC meeting we'll discuss this, not sure in main tent for breakout session 16:09:02 ... then July woods meeting, where W3M decides to approve it or not 16:09:12 ... we need to get something out within the next 2 months 16:09:40 action: koalie to align pitch phrases with goals as stated in section created today 16:09:54 Ann: I'm not a good judge of what would be a compelling benefit 16:10:08 ... I'd like to float them with someone 16:10:29 ... could people in the Offices identify likely candidates and see what the reactions are? 16:10:32 Jeff: Great idea 16:10:46 ... and how they would be able to socialise it. 16:11:20 Jeff: That's principally comm related; Coralie, action to get this on the Offices calendar? 16:11:24 Coralie: yes 16:12:02 action: koalie to get W3C Offices to identify likely candidates and seek their reactions 16:12:21 May 1 16:12:33 Jeff: re: next meeting: I propose in two weeks 16:13:47 how about an 'intro' club - starters to help 'develop' the webizen pool 16:13:58 May Day! 16:14:03 [I reckon that people on the Responsive Images CG could be a good part of an intro club] 16:14:23 [I'm happy to reach out to a few of them] 16:15:06 Jeff: Monday May 5th? 16:15:20 s/th?/th/ 16:15:32 Jeff: Thanks all for good suggestions today 16:15:38 bye 16:15:41 -Veronica 16:15:42 -Jean-Charles 16:15:43 -Ann 16:15:45 -Jeff 16:15:47 -koalie 16:15:47 Team_JEFF(WEBIZEN)11:00AM has ended 16:15:47 Attendees were Jeff, Veronica, koalie, Ann, Jean-Charles 16:15:51 [adjourned] 16:15:56 Zakim, list attendees 16:15:56 sorry, koalie, I don't know what conference this is 16:16:12 add DAROBIN as semi-participant 16:16:18 (so to speak) 16:17:13 RRSagent, make minutes 16:17:13 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/04/10-webizen-minutes.html koalie 16:17:58 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:18:22 chair: Jeff 16:18:38 s/ ->/ ->/G 16:18:39 RRSagent, make minutes 16:18:39 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/04/10-webizen-minutes.html koalie 16:19:12 i|I just|scribenick: koalie| 16:19:33 i|Jeff: When do we|scribenick: jeff| 16:19:49 i|Jeff: The only term|scribenick: koalie| 16:20:05 i|Koalie: We don't|scribenick: jeff| 16:20:22 i|Ann: great list|scribenick: koalie| 16:21:33 RRSagent, make minutes 16:21:33 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/04/10-webizen-minutes.html koalie 16:23:08 present+ Robin[viaIRC] 16:23:52 i|Jeff: [ov]Topic: Section on Background| 16:25:01 i|Jeff: Maybe we need|Topic: Create section on Goals| 16:26:00 i|costless|Topic: Section on Package of Benefits| 16:26:22 i|Jeff: This section describes|Topic: Section on Participation Benefits and Non Benefits| 16:26:56 i|Jeff: Let's go back to|Topic: Discounts in the package of benefits| 16:27:46 s/hope we can/hole we can/ 16:28:56 s/No spam/No spam, prefer customer-relation approach/ 16:29:54 s/technic/technique/ 16:30:57 i|Ann Special|Topic: Who do we think are our Webizens?| 16:31:35 i|Jeff: Monday May|Topic: Next meeting| 16:31:39 RRSagent, make minutes 16:31:39 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/04/10-webizen-minutes.html koalie 16:36:04 i|Jeff: [ov]|Topic: Section on Background| 16:36:20 i|Ann: Special|Topic: Who do we think are our Webizens?| 16:36:22 RRSagent, make minutes 16:36:22 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/04/10-webizen-minutes.html koalie 16:37:03 RRSAgent, bye 16:37:03 I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2014/04/10-webizen-actions.rdf : 16:37:03 ACTION: koalie to align pitch phrases with goals as stated in section created today [1] 16:37:03 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/04/10-webizen-irc#T16-09-40 16:37:03 ACTION: koalie to get W3C Offices to identify likely candidates and seek their reactions [2] 16:37:03 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/04/10-webizen-irc#T16-12-02 16:37:07 Zakim, bye 16:37:07 Zakim has left #webizen