SV_MEETING_TITLE -- 04 Apr 2014

<laufer> +laufer

<cgueret> hi there!

<laufer> -laufer

<laufer> +laufer

<PhilA> Steve: volunteers to scribe?

I can scribe

<PhilA> scribe: Ig_Bittencourt

<PhilA> scribeNick: Ig_Bittencourt

<laufer> +1

<PhilA> PROPOSAL: Accept last week's minutes https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-03-21

<cgueret> +1

approve last minutes

<deirdrelee> +1

<PhilA> +1

<BernadetteLoscio> 1

<ericstephan> +1

<JoaoPauloAlmeida> `=1

<BernadetteLoscio> +1

<JoaoPauloAlmeida> +1

<markharrison> +1

<PhilA> APPROVED: Accept last week's minutes https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-03-21

<adler1> PROPOSAL: accept this week's face to face meeting minutes

<JoaoPauloAlmeida> see the agenda

<PhilA> Minutes from Monday http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-03-31

<ericstephan> +1

<JoaoPauloAlmeida> http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-03-31

<deirdrelee> zamim [IPcaller] is me

<PhilA> Minutes from Tuesday http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-04-01

<JoaoPauloAlmeida> day 1: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-03-31

<PhilA> Supplmentary minutes 1 http://www.w3.org/2014/04/01-dwbp-DataUsage-irc

<JoaoPauloAlmeida> so let's leave this is as for next week

<cgueret> +1

<BernadetteLoscio> +1

<adler1> +1

adler1: I agree. Let's leave the aproval of the minutes for the next week.

<ericstephan> +1

<markharrison> +1

<laufer> +1

<adler1> APPROVED: postpone F2F meeting minutes approval to next week

<BartvanLeeuwen> +1 for not being there ;)

Feedback from the group - What went well? What didn't go well?

adler1: who would like to provide some feedback about the F2F meeting.

JoaoPauloAlmeida: in the next call, we should not try to participate remotely
... i thing the remote participation disturbes a lot.
... I will try to participate in the next not remotely.

adler1: some times we just missed that you were in the room.

JoaoPauloAlmeida: I was very hard to hear.
... it was very strange, because the sound was really bad.

<JoaoPauloAlmeida> the laptop mic is also very bad (it is only sensitive to those in front of the laptop)

markharrison: I think in the next meeting we could use separate rooms whe we split the groups.

<JoaoPauloAlmeida> Ideally, the rooms should have some professional teleconference infrastructure

markharrison: so that we don't have the background noisy.

<JoaoPauloAlmeida> (camera/mic)

adler1: what about the overall meeting itself.

<ericstephan> Sorry my mic isnt working :-(

adler1: how those in the meeting room felt about the overall quality of the work products.

<ericstephan> I was appreciative for the time people took to include the remote attendees. It was difficult to hear at times, but everyone took extra time to be inclusive.

Ig_Bittencourt: I really liked the overall quality of the meeting.

laufer: I agree with Ig_Bittencourt

<PhilA> scribe: PhilA

laufer: I think meeting f2f makes it easier to know everyone

<scribe> scribe: Ig_Bittencourt

<BernadetteLoscio> :)

<markharrison> Overall I think the meeting was quite productive and we have a clearer idea of where the group is heading

<ericstephan> Thank you for providing Google Chat

deirdrelee: in the second day I though maybe people produced more..

<PhilA> I've not been to a W3C WG f2f that included break outs - it worked well I thought. And incidentally allowed better remote participation

PhilA, can you scribe.

I can not hear very well.

<deirdrelee> deirdrelee: small groups were good as they allowed people to get into deep discussions

<markharrison> Yes, small sub-group discussions were productive. Also everyone behaved nicely and I think we reached consensus on most issues - no major disagreements and certainly no hostility

adler1: I am impressed with the many agrees and comments.
... does anyone have any other comment.

<ericstephan> I don't have mic access, but I want to keep the momentum going from the day 2 break out groups.

deirdrelee: I agree that we accomplished a lot.

<BernadetteLoscio> yes... i agree that it was very productive

PhilA: I liked it went well.
... happy we had sufficient inputs to the use case doc.
... it was a good meeting
... this was one of the big ones

<ericstephan> +1 PhilA

PhilA: due to the size of the meeting, I was pleased to see how it worked.
... when we come back together again, I am really impressed how the thought were similar

<JoaoPauloAlmeida> how will the results be compiled?

<JoaoPauloAlmeida> because the logs from IRC are too detailed

PhilA: altough we were in different groups in the second day, the ideas were very connected.

<ericstephan> My IRC queue QUESTION: Are more action items forthcoming from the breakout groups? What do we have left to do to tie up the lose ends?

<BernadetteLoscio> I think so!

adler1: deirdrelee and BernadetteLoscio, do you feel we had enough content

deirdrelee: I think we definetely have enough content

<BernadetteLoscio> me neither .... i arrived last night

<BernadetteLoscio> yes... thanks

<BernadetteLoscio> yes!

<vagner> Group works were very productive. I feel lack of action. A lot of good resolution, few actions

adler1: any other feedback

<ericstephan> I have no mic

<ericstephan> I have a comment I posted

adler1: ?

Review the actions to be completed for this week

<PhilA> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/open

<ericstephan> We might need to review the notes again in the coming week...

<PhilA> action-20?

<trackbot> action-20 -- Bernadette Farias Loscio to Document the situations/scenarios for the data usage vocab in the ucr -- due 2014-04-08 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/20

<ericstephan> BernadetteLoscio I think we might have a few more...

<BernadetteLoscio> 1 min

BernadetteLoscio: to be honest, I arrived last night
... so I could not work on this

<ericstephan> I can help as well

<markharrison> It's not due until 8th April anyway

<PhilA> action-17?

<trackbot> action-17 -- Phil Archer to Contact leigh dodds wrt exchangeable licences etc. -- due 2014-04-08 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/17

PhilA: I wrote to leigh to get some feedback.
... he think actually dcat has probably we need.
... when I have something more to tell

<PhilA> close action-17

<trackbot> Closed action-17.

PhilA: I 'll report.

<adler1> action-16?

<trackbot> action-16 -- Carlos Laufer to Distil uri vs api discussion into general challenges as far as possible -- due 2014-04-04 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/16

<PhilA> action-16?

<trackbot> action-16 -- Carlos Laufer to Distil uri vs api discussion into general challenges as far as possible -- due 2014-04-04 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/16

laufer: I did one first version
... the arguments for APIs and arguments for URIs

<laufer> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/URIs_versus_APIs

laufer: I think now we have a good summary

<PhilA> Laufer's work

<adler1> close action-17

<trackbot> Closed action-17.

<adler1> action-10?

<trackbot> action-10 -- Manuel Tomas Carrasco Benitez to Will explain why is importat to talk about acccess to data is on the web and why data preservation is out of the scope of this group -- due 2014-02-28 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/10

<adler1> action-13?

<trackbot> action-13 -- Yaso Córdova to Add notes on the http://retratodaviolencia.org/ case into the use cases wiki -- due 2014-03-21 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/13

<adler1> action-15

<trackbot> action-15 -- Bernadette Farias Loscio to And deirdrelee to prepare a first version of extraction -- due 2014-03-28 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/15

BernadetteLoscio: we can close action 15
... it was did during the f2f

<adler1> close-action 15

<deirdrelee> +1

<adler1> close action-16

<trackbot> Closed action-16.

<BartvanLeeuwen> +q

<adler1> action-19?

<trackbot> action-19 -- Phil Archer to Create mailing list for vocabulary work -- due 2014-04-08 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/19

<PhilA> I sent mail to the list earlier http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2014Apr/0005.html

<deirdrelee> close action-15

<trackbot> Closed action-15.

<markharrison> It seems that what we're typing here in Zakim does not automatically update details in https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/open That's a pity

PhilA: my action was separate mailing list for working in the vocabs

<adler1> close action-19

<trackbot> Closed action-19.

PhilA: if you want to talk about a specific vocab, then you have to assign in the mailing list

<adler1> action-20?

<trackbot> action-20 -- Bernadette Farias Loscio to Document the situations/scenarios for the data usage vocab in the ucr -- due 2014-04-08 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/20

<PhilA> close action-19

<trackbot> Closed action-19.

BernadetteLoscio: I think we need more.

<ericstephan> Let me know how I can help BernadetteLoscio

BernadetteLoscio: more time

<adler1> action-21?

<trackbot> action-21 -- Deirdre Lee to Create first draft of ucr in respec -- due 2014-04-08 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/21

<BernadetteLoscio> thanks Eric!

<adler1> action-24?

<trackbot> action-24 -- Phil Archer to Draft uml diagram for vocab(s) -- due 2014-04-08 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/24

deirdrelee: I really did not have the chance to look.

<BernadetteLoscio> we're gonna work on this next week ;)

<Zakim> vagner, you wanted to say Group works were very productive. I feel lack of action. A lot of good resolution, few actions

vagner: I just would like to talk about the f2f meeting
... I would like to congratulate BernadetteLoscio and deirdrelee
... they did a very good work by preparing the material
... before the meeting it was not clear to me what we should do in that doc, and during the meeting it was very clear.

<BernadetteLoscio> thanks Vagner!

vagner: so BernadetteLoscio and deirdrelee were very helpful.
... during the participation in the BP group, we had lot of resolutions
... and I just to register we had few actions
... and perhaps we could good faster to the BP doc.

Review of the actions for next week. (Some of these came from the Face-to-face)

<ericstephan> I think we might be done.

PhilA: I think is really useful to get the feedback
... I hope to come back to some actions in the next meeting.

<ericstephan> thanks to all!

<deirdrelee> http://www.opengovpartnership.org/sites/default/files/attachments/ODWG%20Draft%20Workplan.pdf

<PhilA> deirdrelee: Talking about Fridays at the ODI talk today which was about anonymisation which was very interesting today. They generally post recordings and slides

<BernadetteLoscio> thanks Deirdre!

<ericstephan> Thank you yes I'd be interested deirdrelee

thanks PhilA.

<markharrison> http://theodi.org/lunchtime-lectures

<deirdrelee> odi lecture; http://theodi.org/lunchtime-lectures/friday-lunchtime-lecture-why-anonymity-fails

<BernadetteLoscio> thank you!!!

<cgueret> ok!

<BartvanLeeuwen> thx and have good weekend ! bye

<ericstephan> bye

<cgueret> bye bye

<JoaoPauloAlmeida> thanks,bye

<laufer> bye

<vagner> thanks adler1

<BernadetteLoscio> thanks!!!

<adler1> ciao

<deirdrelee> they usually put up slides/recording after

<laufer> -laufer

<markharrison> bye

<BernadetteLoscio> nice weekend!

<BernadetteLoscio> -BernadetteLoscio

<deirdrelee> have a relaxing weekend everyone!

<BernadetteLoscio> thanks ;)

- DRAFT -

SV_MEETING_TITLE

04 Apr 2014

Attendees

Contents

approve last minutes

Feedback from the group - What went well? What didn't go well?

Review the actions to be completed for this week

Review of the actions for next week. (Some of these came from the Face-to-face)

Summary of Action Items

Scribe.perl diagnostic output