15:02:47 RRSAgent has joined #html-media 15:02:47 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/03/18-html-media-irc 15:02:49 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:02:49 Zakim has joined #html-media 15:02:51 Zakim, this will be 63342 15:02:51 ok, trackbot; I see HTML_WG()11:00AM scheduled to start 2 minutes ago 15:02:52 Meeting: HTML Media Task Force Teleconference 15:02:52 Date: 18 March 2014 15:02:53 Zakim, who is on the phone ? 15:02:53 HTML_WG()11:00AM has not yet started, markw 15:02:54 On IRC I see RRSAgent, plh, johnsim, ddorwin, markw, jdsmith, paulc, wseltzer, trackbot 15:03:16 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2014Mar/0032.html 15:03:26 zakim, this is html 15:03:26 ok, plh; that matches HTML_WG()11:00AM 15:03:27 zakim, who is making noise? 15:03:43 paulc, listening for 14 seconds I heard sound from the following: MarkW (83%) 15:04:12 davide has joined #html-media 15:04:49 zakim, [Microsoft] is me 15:04:49 +paulc; got it 15:04:52 Zakim, MarkW is me 15:04:52 +markw; got it 15:05:16 +davide 15:05:26 zakim, [Microsoft.a] is jdsmith 15:05:26 +jdsmith; got it 15:05:32 zakim, aaaa is me 15:05:32 +ddorwin; got it 15:05:39 zakim, [microsoft] is me 15:05:39 sorry, johnsim, I do not recognize a party named '[microsoft]' 15:05:40 zakim, [Microsoft.aa] is johnsim 15:05:40 +johnsim; got it 15:06:15 scribenick johnsim 15:06:54 scribeNick: johnsim 15:07:07 Topic: rollcall 15:07:15 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:07:15 On the phone I see paulc, jdsmith, markw, ddorwin, johnsim, Plh, davide 15:07:35 Topic: Action Items 15:07:42 ACTION-61? 15:07:42 ACTION-61 -- Paul Cotton to Work with wendy to make sure we get a security review of eme -- due 2013-12-10 -- OPEN 15:07:42 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/media/track/actions/61 15:08:24 paulc: no progress due to lack of resources 15:08:30 ACTION-62? 15:08:30 ACTION-62 -- Paul Cotton to Report back about the plan for 20944 due 2013-12-15 -- due 2013-12-10 -- OPEN 15:08:30 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/media/track/actions/62 15:08:53 This action is pending 15:09:08 Topic: Agenda Item #5 - new EME bugs since the last meeting 15:09:42 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24951 15:10:07 Status: Blocks 17673 24673 24873 15:11:18 ddorwin: fell under the discussion with David Singer. 15:12:06 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17673 15:12:07 pal has joined #html-media 15:12:17 +pal 15:12:22 paulc: 17673 implementation is necessary - and last meeting Adrian agreed to implement 17673 15:13:08 ddorwin: need to fix the new bug 24951 first 15:13:51 adrianba has joined #html-media 15:13:59 David and Adrian need to figure out who is actually going to do the work on 24951 15:14:23 +[Microsoft] 15:14:26 zakim, [Microsoft] is me 15:14:26 +adrianba; got it 15:15:26 15:16:31 adrianba: 24951 is describing the solution that Adrian is planning for 17673. 15:16:48 Assign 24951 to Adrianba 15:17:05 paulc: deals with agenda item 5a 15:17:27 Subtopic: persistent license 15:17:52 paulc: don't know if there is a bug for this but since there is active discussion... 15:18:09 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2014Mar/0020.html 15:18:23 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24025 15:18:25 ddorwin: came out of a bug, two issues - load session with createsession and proposed persistent attribute is poorly defined 15:18:54 ddorwin: i have an action to break this bug into separate bugs with a better proposal for the persistent attribute, outlined in the email 15:19:08 24025 is the bug that started the email thread. 15:19:50 Topic: EME bugs for discussion 15:20:03 pladd has joined #html-media 15:20:30 paulc: eight items under this agenda 15:20:46 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24771 15:21:56 paulc: we have those actions done. Adrian, Jerry or John want more time since no clarity on who from MSFT was going to look at this according to the March 4th meeting 15:23:06 Microsoft will review and enter their position in the bug 15:23:31 Subtopic: 24873 15:23:36 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24873 15:24:18 paulc: as far as I know this bug has not been assigned, extensive dialog yesterday on this, can you summarize, David? 15:25:49 Looks ok to me 15:26:00 paulc: anyone else who wants to review this before we move forward? 15:26:05 looks okay to me 15:27:02 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24873#c0 15:27:44 pal: concrete example of how this would work? 15:28:03 ddorwin: examples for key systems and type, but not on capability 15:28:37 i continue to think the idea of an unspecified string is probably going to be problematic 15:28:38 pal: significant change, an attempt what this would look like with common combinations of container, content protection systems 15:28:48 ddorwin: are examples in the bug 15:29:44 paulc: up the priority on 24951 15:30:12 pal: this is suggesting that video - two proposals at the top 15:30:24 ddorwin: the first one is the primary one, not tied to either one of them 15:30:58 paulc: this bug is assigned for implementation to ddorwin 15:31:19 Subtopic: 24874 15:31:23 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24874 15:31:42 See https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24874#c1 15:32:02 paulc: best plan to ask for someone to review this? 15:32:05 ddorwin: yes 15:32:25 jdsmith will review 15:32:33 Subtopic: 24904 15:32:36 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24904 15:33:59 paulc: there is a recent update, 24687 was resolved by specifying a copy should be made, in the html5 specification - proposing the same solution? 15:34:25 ddorwin: just an observation 15:34:43 paulc: html5 has decided to take a copy, does anyone object to doing the same? 15:35:05 paulc: not hearing an objection, should put it on the implementation list - assigned to ddorwin 15:35:11 based on solution in html5 15:35:21 subtopic: 29718 15:35:34 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21798 15:35:57 paulc: pending, lower priority 15:36:00 s/29718/21798/ 15:36:17 subtopic: 24027 15:36:18 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24027 15:36:50 paulc: Mark, ready to be processed? 15:36:56 q+ 15:37:32 ack dd 15:38:34 ddorwin: read this when markw sent it. confused on content 15:38:45 markw: from new version of common encryption spec 15:39:05 ddorwin: will want to review in more detail 15:39:22 johnsim: johnsim will review that also 15:40:04 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24419 15:40:21 depends on https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27682 15:41:10 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17682 15:41:39 awaiting concrete proposal on solution which would have been used in 17682 15:42:20 Subtopic: 24419 15:42:32 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24419 15:42:45 Subtopic: 24673 15:42:50 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24673 15:42:55 depends on 24951 15:43:09 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24951 15:43:26 Topic: Implemented EME bugs awaiting review 15:44:05 Topic: 8. EME bugs awaiting Editor implementation or action 15:44:24 Topic: 9. EME bugs on hold or lower priority 15:44:57 rrsagent, generate minutes 15:44:57 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/03/18-html-media-minutes.html paulc 15:45:21 -jdsmith 15:45:22 -davide 15:45:22 -adrianba 15:45:22 -markw 15:45:23 -paulc 15:45:23 -Plh 15:45:27 -pal 15:45:30 -ddorwin 15:45:32 -johnsim 15:45:33 HTML_WG()11:00AM has ended 15:45:33 Attendees were +1.425.936.aaaa, Plh, paulc, markw, davide, jdsmith, ddorwin, johnsim, pal, adrianba 15:47:51 davide has left #html-media 15:56:52 plh has left #html-media 18:01:42 Zakim has left #html-media 19:49:07 jernoble has joined #html-media