14:44:32 RRSAgent has joined #wai-wcag 14:44:32 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/03/11-wai-wcag-irc 14:44:34 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:44:34 Zakim has joined #wai-wcag 14:44:36 Zakim, this will be WAI_WCAG 14:44:36 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_WCAG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 16 minutes 14:44:37 Meeting: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference 14:44:37 Date: 11 March 2014 14:45:32 agenda + Draft responses for March 11th, 2014 14:45:32 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/11thMarch_2014/ 14:45:52 agenda + Review WCAG errata (http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/errata/) 14:46:01 agenda + Review available techniques (https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Working_Group_Techniques_Development_Assignments) 14:46:08 agenda + Call for collecting information published by others on WCAG 2.0 related to concerns or needed improvements 14:46:24 agenda + Publication Update 14:48:42 Chair: Joshue 14:49:43 regrets + Kathleen, Bruce, Adam Z, DavidMacD 14:53:15 Wilco has joined #wai-wcag 14:55:19 WAI_WCAG()11:00AM has now started 14:55:26 +[IPcaller] 14:55:35 zakim, [IPcaller] is Joshue 14:55:35 +Joshue; got it 14:56:05 zakim, mute me 14:56:05 sorry, Joshue, muting is not permitted when only one person is present 14:57:00 AWK has joined #wai-wcag 14:57:09 zakim, what meeting is this? 14:57:09 I don't understand your question, AWK. 14:57:42 +Katie_Haritos-Shea 14:57:49 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:57:49 On the phone I see Joshue, Katie_Haritos-Shea 14:57:51 jon_avila has joined #wai-wcag 14:57:55 BarryJohnson has joined #wai-wcag 14:58:00 ack me 14:58:15 Chair: Joshue 14:58:26 +AWK 14:58:46 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:58:46 On the phone I see Joshue, Katie_Haritos-Shea, AWK 14:58:50 Sorry, no phone today, but will follow IRC Chat 14:59:05 +jon_avila 14:59:52 regrets+ Bruce Bailey, Kerstin Probiesch, Kathleen Anderson 15:00:15 zakim, agenda? 15:00:15 + +31.30.239.aaaa 15:00:15 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda: 15:00:15 1. Draft responses for March 11th, 2014 [from Joshue] 15:00:15 2. Review WCAG errata (http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/errata/) [from Joshue] 15:00:15 3. Review available techniques (https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Working_Group_Techniques_Development_Assignments) [from Joshue] 15:00:15 4. Call for collecting information published by others on WCAG 2.0 related to concerns or needed improvements [from Joshue] 15:00:16 5. Publication Update [from Joshue] 15:00:42 adam_solomon has joined #wai-wcag 15:00:57 Zakim, agenda order is 2,3,4,5,1 15:00:57 ok, AWK 15:01:04 zakim, agenda? 15:01:05 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda: 15:01:05 2. Review WCAG errata (http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/errata/) [from Joshue] 15:01:05 3. Review available techniques (https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Working_Group_Techniques_Development_Assignments) [from Joshue] 15:01:05 4. Call for collecting information published by others on WCAG 2.0 related to concerns or needed improvements [from Joshue] 15:01:06 5. Publication Update [from Joshue] 15:01:06 1. Draft responses for March 11th, 2014 [from Joshue] 15:01:19 + +1.703.825.aabb 15:01:26 +[IPcaller] 15:01:45 zakim, [IPcaller] is adam_solomon 15:01:45 +adam_solomon; got it 15:01:59 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:02:00 On the phone I see Joshue, Katie_Haritos-Shea, AWK, jon_avila, +31.30.239.aaaa, +1.703.825.aabb, adam_solomon 15:02:12 +John_Foliot 15:02:13 -John_Foliot 15:02:26 +John_Foliot 15:02:29 zakim, +31 is Wilco 15:02:29 +Wilco; got it 15:02:47 zakim, +1.703 is Sailesh 15:02:47 +Sailesh; got it 15:02:53 +Kathy_Wahlbin 15:03:05 Zakim, agenda order is 5,2,3,4,1 15:03:05 ok, AWK 15:03:22 JF has joined #wai-wcag 15:04:04 Kathy has joined #wai-wcag 15:04:18 https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Scribe_List 15:07:33 zakim, take up item 1 15:07:33 agendum 1. "Draft responses for March 11th, 2014" taken up [from Joshue] 15:07:53 zakim, first item 15:07:53 I don't understand 'first item', Joshue 15:07:58 zakim, take up first item 15:07:58 I don't understand 'take up first item', Joshue 15:08:03 +[IPcaller] 15:08:08 Zakim, take up item 5 15:08:08 agendum 5. "Publication Update" taken up [from Joshue] 15:08:33 Loretta has joined #wai-wcag 15:09:06 zakim, who is here? 15:09:06 On the phone I see Joshue, Katie_Haritos-Shea, AWK, jon_avila, Wilco, Sailesh, adam_solomon, John_Foliot, Kathy_Wahlbin, [IPcaller] 15:09:08 On IRC I see Loretta, Kathy, JF, adam_solomon, BarryJohnson, jon_avila, AWK, Wilco, Zakim, RRSAgent, Joshue, wilhelm, trackbot, MichaelC 15:09:17 jo: publication update release of WCAG supporting documents 15:09:18 Congratulations, Josh and Andrew! 15:09:38 http://www.w3.org/blog/2014/03/wcag-techniques-for-image-text-alternatives/ 15:09:40 zakim, [IPcaller] is Loretta 15:09:41 +Loretta; got it 15:09:44 Awk: two blog posts for ARIA10 and F65, read and point people to 15:09:45 marcjohlic has joined #wai-wcag 15:09:59 +Marc_Johlic 15:10:15 zakim, queue? 15:10:15 I see no one on the speaker queue 15:10:31 awk: new set of documents for techniques that are available and highlights that make it significant, ARIA techniques, and switch over to Github 15:11:16 Zakim, take up next item 15:11:16 agendum 2. "Review WCAG errata (http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/errata/)" taken up [from Joshue] 15:11:28 jo: good job everyone; updated documents; brilliant, thanks awk 15:12:05 jo: hae some errata to review, no substantive, some editorial; survey working groups to deal with them 15:12:45 zakim, queue? 15:12:45 I see no one on the speaker queue 15:12:46 awk: already surveyed and approved by working group; just wanted to mention to people and review; can publish edited version of WCAG 2 standard; escalate awareness 15:12:57 s/survey working groups to deal with them/ 15:13:32 KHS: Are we going to go into errata stuff now? 15:13:52 khs: possibility of moving high contrast to level A 15:14:21 jo: that would be substantial; 9 items in link provided 15:14:48 http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/errata/ 15:14:50 khs: important to talk about contrast 15:15:45 jo: Errata 1 - 1.1.1 - any objections to proposed? 15:16:43 awk: not trying to get all of them re-approved; want people to be familiar to respond from an informed perspective 15:16:56 zakim, mute me 15:16:56 Joshue should now be muted 15:17:09 Looks fine to me. 15:17:17 JO: gives group a minute to review errata items 1-9 15:17:31 ack me 15:18:32 +1 to the Errata stuff - looks good, bravo 15:18:32 jo: ok, editorial changes only; moving on. 15:18:37 Zakim, take up next item 15:18:37 agendum 3. "Review available techniques (https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Working_Group_Techniques_Development_Assignments)" taken up [from Joshue] 15:21:22 zakim, mute me 15:21:22 Joshue should now be muted 15:21:30 awk: tables used for techniques editing on wiki; techniques task force made list and progress to date; integrated in table 15:22:12 Q+ 15:22:27 awk: Names are already assigned to some techniques; some people may need to take on something not complete or assigned to person that is not currently active on TF 15:22:59 awk: question on firmness of names assigned to techniques; 15:23:28 ka: techniques can be re-assigned to different people 15:24:29 awk: Techniques TF be group that can help when we get stuck; figure out process; each row has technique; who assigned to; prioritization -- TBD; general items within a technique 15:24:31 q+ 15:24:32 ack me 15:25:05 awk: Space for original technique if modified; awk to add column for comment -- the idea is to give us a dashboard for tracking where we are at. 15:25:32 awk: add to survey once items are complete to find out how WG wants to respond. 15:25:39 zakim, mute me 15:25:39 Joshue should now be muted 15:26:09 awk: some new techniques, some modifications, ask everyone to sign up for two or three of these. If you have idea for a new one, feel free to add one. 15:26:27 ack me 15:27:00 ack JF 15:27:00 jo: if new tech -- ping awk or JO or list, leave editing table to AWK or JO 15:27:59 jf: where do code examples and test procedures live? I'm trying to get hack-a-thon done at CSUN - could write on Saturday. 15:28:21 +??P31 15:28:35 zakim, ??P31 is Michael_Cooper 15:28:35 +Michael_Cooper; got it 15:28:36 zakim, mute me 15:28:36 Michael_Cooper should now be muted 15:28:51 awk: additional instructions for where to write them to come - some are authored in wiki -- directly as links initially authored in wiki (goal to make it clear that author them in Github) 15:29:35 awk: techniques to be pull requests in github to allow for less editing. Currently have a source format -- could be more user friendly -- one goal at f2f to reformat for editing. 15:30:11 ack me 15:30:35 jf: request awk to put github info on wiki page; JF to grab some of these cases. 15:30:44 ack marc 15:30:55 ACTION: AWK to remember to not forget to update the https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Working_Group_Techniques_Development_Assignments page with how-to information 15:30:56 Created ACTION-240 - Remember to not forget to update the https://www.w3.org/wai/gl/wiki/working_group_techniques_development_assignments page with how-to information [on Andrew Kirkpatrick - due 2014-03-18]. 15:31:16 ACTION: Josh to update WG techs wiki with general how to info. 15:31:19 Created ACTION-241 - Update wg techs wiki with general how to info. [on Joshue O Connor - due 2014-03-18]. 15:31:43 zakim, queue? 15:31:43 I see no one on the speaker queue 15:32:04 marc: question on how to find links for wiki pages 15:32:32 zakim, who is speaking 15:32:32 I don't understand 'who is speaking', jon_avila 15:32:36 ack me 15:32:50 https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Comments_Needing_Responses 15:34:08 I added my name to a few of them 15:34:25 q+ 15:34:28 jo: ask for people to take some techniques 15:34:50 q+ 15:35:02 q- 15:35:51 ack kathy 15:35:55 q- 15:35:56 ack Lor 15:36:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/03/11-wai-wcag-minutes.html MichaelC 15:36:28 kw: should we include techniques in mobile task force? 15:36:54 jo: question to discuss on how we define relationships, awk? 15:37:11 zakim, queue? 15:37:11 I see no one on the speaker queue 15:37:55 +James_Nurthen 15:38:19 awk: talk about mobile techniques- no answer yet. 15:38:36 zakim, queue? 15:38:36 I see no one on the speaker queue 15:38:38 +q 15:38:38 kw: Mobile TF talking about new techniques and changes to techniques -- it will get complex 15:38:46 ack me 15:39:36 jo: definitely be a mobile component -- error on the side of not creating really long document 15:40:01 q+ 15:40:03 kw: provide link to mobile page from techniques to see what each task force is working on 15:40:10 ack me 15:40:16 jamesn has joined #wai-wcag 15:40:23 rrsagent, make minutes 15:40:23 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/03/11-wai-wcag-minutes.html jamesn 15:40:42 zakim, mute me 15:40:42 Michael_Cooper should now be muted 15:41:09 mc: create links to the work of each TF's techniques they are currently working on. 15:42:05 -Sailesh 15:42:48 https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Working_Group_Techniques_Development_Assignments 15:43:43 jo: complete list at f2f - try to get people to comment on list 15:44:00 jf: send out note to list to get people to respond and then action item for f2f 15:44:03 AWK will send a reminder to the list that everyone should sign up for 2-3 techniques before next week. 15:45:01 jo: people can cooperate on techniques, thanks to awk for putting it together. 15:45:03 zakim, agenda? 15:45:03 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda: 15:45:04 3. Review available techniques (https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Working_Group_Techniques_Development_Assignments) [from Joshue] 15:45:04 4. Call for collecting information published by others on WCAG 2.0 related to concerns or needed improvements [from Joshue] 15:45:04 1. Draft responses for March 11th, 2014 [from Joshue] 15:45:38 zakim, next item 15:45:38 agendum 4. "Call for collecting information published by others on WCAG 2.0 related to concerns or needed improvements" taken up [from Joshue] 15:45:44 awk: f2f will address how to write good techniques to allow people to get through process to get WG approval - Loretta is excellent guide on this topic. 15:46:19 jo: next item is to get other info people have published on wcag - aggregate overviews, comments, thoughts, etc. on what's right and wrong. 15:46:59 If people know about a blog post/article/etc on this topic please add to https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Post_WCAG_2 15:47:40 zakim, mute me 15:47:40 Joshue should now be muted 15:47:57 ack me 15:48:04 awk: talk about post wcag page - need to collection of all comments, please put on the wiki page just shared on irc 15:48:49 zakim, next item 15:48:49 agendum 1. "Draft responses for March 11th, 2014" taken up [from Joshue] 15:48:56 jo: any comments or questions about current topic? None heard. 15:49:16 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/11thMarch_2014/results 15:50:11 jo: lc2882 discussed comments from survey 15:50:51 jo: any objection to adding Loretta's suggested text? 15:51:03 awk: we already accepted last week, can be edited 15:51:31 jo: this is a clarification on what something means to be deprecated? 15:52:15 jo: Accept LC2882 - no objections 15:53:21 -John_Foliot 15:53:34 zakim, queue? 15:53:34 I see no one on the speaker queue 15:54:44 as: was not strong enough for keyboard users? 15:54:54 http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG-TECHS/H69.html 15:56:00 LC-2882: Add a warning about the poor support for this technique h69 15:56:27 s/LC-2882: Add a warning about the poor support for this technique h69/TOPIC: LC-2882: Add a warning about the poor support for this technique h69 15:56:47 as: lc2882 text ok 15:57:59 RESOLUTION: Accepted as amended 15:58:53 -James_Nurthen 15:59:22 TOPIC: Comment LC-2884: This technique should be generalized h90 15:59:44 jo: discussion of survey results for lc2884 16:01:16 awk: incorporate option 2 as proposed amended - could add additional technique h90 16:01:52 jo: can all see awk's updated text in survey? Maybe to long. Any objection? 16:02:33 RESOLUTION: Accepted as amended 16:02:53 jo: lc2877 discussion 16:02:57 http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20140107/2877 16:04:04 s/jo: lc2877 discussion/TOPIC: Comment LC-2877: The technique should mention input type = file 16:04:33 q+ 16:04:45 lgr: could leave open to get input from Cynthia 16:05:20 lgr: no need to contact Cynthia 16:06:01 jo: genuine oversight - 16:06:39 ack w 16:06:54 awk: could respond and ask for example -- we agree we can do this and assigned to someone on techniques development list 16:07:49 q- 16:07:50 awk: need to process in due course and respond to it publically 16:08:02 RESOLUTION: leave open 16:08:19 jo: lc2905 discussion 16:08:24 http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20140107/2905 16:08:48 TOPIC: Comment LC-2905: Techniques F17 procedure #1 and F77 both check for duplicate ID values (#15) 16:09:49 q+ 16:09:54 http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/F17.html 16:09:58 ack awk 16:10:32 awk: several comments are on f17 - general consensus is that editing needs to be done. 16:11:06 awk: perhaps leave open and have one person take action on editing F17 and integrating what is in F77 if people agree these are redundant 16:11:18 http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/F77.html 16:12:39 awk: comments 5, 6 and 8 are related 16:12:56 jo: Need someone to look through and aggregate comments and create new language? 16:13:04 -adam_solomon 16:14:07 lgr: Adam would be good candidate, could contact to see if he is willing? 16:14:20 +Andrew_Kirkpatrick 16:14:25 -AWK 16:14:29 q+ 16:14:56 ack jon 16:15:14 JA: I was looking through the techniques. They are inconsistent. 16:15:41 JA: They say if x situation is true and false - the logic methods are not consistent. 16:15:46 JOC: I've noticed this too. 16:16:22 JA: Should we lean towards one particular method? 16:16:31 ja: checks logic structure were inconsistent in general 16:16:35 JOC: +1 to consistent logic method 16:17:02 lgr: check were written over time and by different people and our work evolved over time - sometimes it hard to phrase things in a certain way 16:18:34 jo: in replying to these comments should we have Adam review 5,6, and 8, then them review 16:19:45 RESOLUTION: 2907, 2904, 2880 leave open 16:19:46 +Cooper 16:20:04 -Michael_Cooper 16:20:16 jo: lc2879 for discussion - comment 7 16:20:17 LC-2879: Move the logic away from How to meet and into the technique 16:20:22 http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20140107/2879 16:21:23 awk: provide comment saying it's implemented -- it will be in github but it won't be on active page 16:21:46 awk: until next publication 16:22:25 lgr: should go through understanding document that use language "in combination" and fix them all with appropriate reference. 16:22:58 awk: we can accept response but changes won't be seen until next publication - whole bunch of small editorial changes. 16:23:19 RESOLUTION: accept as amended 16:23:26 zakim, queue? 16:23:26 I see no one on the speaker queue 16:24:05 -Cooper 16:24:13 -Katie_Haritos-Shea 16:24:14 -Loretta 16:24:46 rrsagent, list attendeees 16:24:46 I'm logging. I don't understand 'list attendeees', jon_avila. Try /msg RRSAgent help 16:24:56 zakim, list attendeees 16:24:56 I don't understand 'list attendeees', jon_avila 16:25:03 zakim, list attendees 16:25:03 As of this point the attendees have been Joshue, Katie_Haritos-Shea, AWK, jon_avila, +31.30.239.aaaa, +1.703.825.aabb, adam_solomon, John_Foliot, Wilco, Sailesh, Kathy_Wahlbin, 16:25:06 ... Loretta, Marc_Johlic, Michael_Cooper, James_Nurthen, Andrew_Kirkpatrick, Cooper 16:25:11 zakim, bye 16:25:11 leaving. As of this point the attendees were Joshue, Katie_Haritos-Shea, AWK, jon_avila, +31.30.239.aaaa, +1.703.825.aabb, adam_solomon, John_Foliot, Wilco, Sailesh, 16:25:11 Zakim has left #wai-wcag 16:25:14 ... Kathy_Wahlbin, Loretta, Marc_Johlic, Michael_Cooper, James_Nurthen, Andrew_Kirkpatrick, Cooper 16:25:23 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:25:23 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/03/11-wai-wcag-minutes.html jon_avila 17:42:15 Joshue108 has joined #wai-wcag 18:12:13 Joshue108 has joined #wai-wcag 20:18:25 Joshue has joined #wai-wcag 21:53:02 Joshue108 has joined #wai-wcag