08:54:12 RRSAgent has joined #lgd 08:54:12 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/03/06-lgd-irc 08:54:28 PhilA has changed the topic to: Linking Geospatial Data Day 2 08:54:40 Meeting: Linking Geospatial Data Day 2 08:54:45 Chair; PhilA 08:54:49 Chair: PhilA 09:04:59 peterisb has joined #lgd 09:07:20 Stuart has joined #lgd 09:07:31 giusepperizzo has joined #lgd 09:08:34 Alex_Coley has joined #LGD 09:09:16 Scribe: Alex_Coley 09:09:21 jtandy has joined #lgd 09:10:10 Stuart1 has joined #lgd 09:14:24 the first session today is: A Different Set of Problems chaired by Ed Parsons 09:15:36 Zhenning Shangguan - fromPitney Bowes has not been able to attend so we have a little longer for the other presenters and for discussions 09:16:24 jtandy has joined #lgd 09:16:48 raphael has joined #lgd 09:16:49 pezholio has joined #lgd 09:17:28 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/03/06-lgd-minutes.html raphael 09:17:41 Meeting: W3C Linking Geospatial Data Workshop Day 2 09:17:48 Ed Parsons introducing the session 09:17:51 Chair: Phil Archer 09:17:54 icm has joined #lgd 09:17:55 PeterRushforth has joined #lgd 09:18:11 Ed Parsons: looking a little more at the applications angle 09:18:29 Zhenning Shangguan - from Pitney Bowes has not been able to attend so we have a little longer for the other presenters and importantly more for discussions 09:18:33 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/03/06-lgd-minutes.html raphael 09:19:03 first up: Linked Geospatial Data, and the BBC, Chris Henden 09:19:25 Chris Hendon: thought we'd fixed mapping in 2005 09:20:24 Introducing the ways that maps were presented on the website 09:20:48 Chris Hendon: except we hadn't fixed it all... 09:21:18 Chris Hendon: moved out just from BBC Wales to cover all the BBC 09:21:48 Not just Wales, not just GB (slight joke at OS) all of UK and world wide interest 09:22:07 ocorcho has joined #lgd 09:22:33 Location built into news - alb location an important aspect - even if the public don't know it is there or available 09:23:09 Location used across the BBC Website estate to help localise the site for users 09:23:18 lindavandenbrink has joined #lgd 09:23:56 A good Vocab is key - 37 Languages, place names need to be right and display as a UK audience would expect 09:24:34 need to be able to express shapes to a thing theta is being described - to attach content 09:25:07 Movign to stable relationships 09:25:20 AndreaPerego has joined #lgd 09:25:28 now up Paul Rissen from the BBC 09:25:45 Paul Rissen: journalists don't like to do more than they have to 09:25:51 RRSAgent, draft minutes 09:25:51 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/03/06-lgd-minutes.html PhilA 09:25:54 tagging happens but try to limit 09:26:37 Predicate Analysis example... 09:26:53 Journalists are very used to tagging in traditional sense 09:27:20 not overly useful... investigating the use of predicates to make the user experience better 09:27:50 Ceremonial vs Admin counties - important but most people don't care or know 09:28:17 BBC needs to be accurate for elections but also need to present in a familiar way 09:28:28 PhilA: fwiw I have no idea what a ceremonial county is 09:28:42 boricles has joined #lgd 09:29:03 s/Movign/Moving/ 09:29:13 the BBC has had TV and Radio regions etc... does not mean much to audience 09:30:09 Chris Hendon: the future [of the BBC] 2022 strategy - key is user 09:30:25 Ed Parsons - highlighting questions will be at the end 09:30:57 pauljcripps has joined #lgd 09:31:00 Next a double act from the BGS - British Geological Survey 09:31:01 giusepperizzo has joined #lgd 09:31:07 Topic: Delivery and querying of 3D spatial models, John Laxton, 09:31:19 paper http://www.w3.org/2014/03/lgd/papers/lgd14_submission_11 09:31:21 John Laxton - Delivery and querying 3d 09:31:29 slides http://www.w3.org/2014/03/lgd/EarthServer 09:31:55 Earth Server - a FP7 project using coverage data over the web 09:32:53 GeoSciML - GML based data transfer standard for exchange of digital geoscientific data. conceptual model 09:32:56 LarsG has joined #lgd 09:33:19 What are BGS trying to do? Some use cases being highlighted: 09:33:51 1. to deliver geological 3d models over web - accessible to users both expert and not 09:34:05 need to be explicit 09:34:10 hugh has joined #lgd 09:34:31 2. to enable users to query the models 09:34:57 using Earth Server to help deliver this with partners 09:35:53 xWCPS being developed - xQuery enabled WCPS (web Coverage Processign Service) 09:36:17 s/Processign/Processing 09:36:20 WCPS: Web Coverage Processing Service 09:36:55 Used GeoSciML to describe bounding geological units in Glasgow 3d 09:37:25 looking if this (overall) is the best approach 09:37:57 looking now at how complex the querying can be and develop user-friendly interface 09:38:35 AndyS has joined #lgd 09:38:48 Next up: Tim Duffy (BGS) more on the INSPIRE side for BGS 09:39:16 in particular experiences with WFS2.0 services 09:39:37 Tim Duffy: feels already linkable data 09:40:57 WFS = Web Feature Service and have consistently found that implementation for real working SDIs is not great 09:41:15 often the optional bits in the standards are needed in the software to make it work 09:41:33 been working with Open Source and other software at BGS. 09:42:21 jtandy has joined #lgd 09:42:21 A lot of software doesn't meet all the needs (yet) 09:42:51 Need good testing facilities to test against OGC standards - these are coming 09:43:21 Complexity of Querying - this has been hard with rich and complex data 09:43:42 recognising need more dictionaries 09:44:26 Geology has heirachical dictionaries 09:45:04 Some aspects are their but not yet the tools to express or provide to users 09:45:33 Have had to use sub-optimal approaches such as altering schema 09:45:50 HadleyBeeman has joined #lgd 09:46:01 some query functions are VERY constrained or not well supported 09:46:47 HadleyBeeman1 has joined #lgd 09:47:04 Tim Duffy: recognising a disjoint generic requirements and complex information expression (information rich data) 09:47:26 This is common across Environmental Data - i.e. INSPIRE 09:48:04 move from URNs to URIs in INSPIRE is "great". Software to make this usable is behind 09:48:21 ajtucker has joined #lgd 09:48:32 *noting that there are some aspects in place* 09:48:40 HadleyBeeman2 has joined #lgd 09:48:43 Round of applause 09:49:23 Panel on stage with additions of: Peter Rushfort and Tomaž Žagar 09:50:25 Tomaž agar: from Slovenia (Stats Office) - learning about some aspects of Linked Data but linking Stats to Location 09:50:57 jtandy has joined #lgd 09:51:35 Publishing using WFS services but looking at other approaches 09:52:26 Peter Rushfort from GeoGratis ( Natural Resources Canada’s web portal) 09:52:51 developed an geospatial api to provide access 09:53:04 ATOM enhanced with linkable data. 09:53:18 The GeoGratis API uses a hypermedia approach to delivery of linked geospatial data 09:53:53 Each resource is offered in multiple formats either via standard content negotiation or via typed links to API query resources - have developed tools that are available on the web 09:54:38 Ed Parsons: a question to all... you have complex data but you have common requirements.... how happy are you with your technology choices (1-10)? 09:54:57 Peter Rushford [6] 09:55:20 Tomaž [8] some improving 09:56:17 John Laxton feedback from community is mixed, first steps [??? did i miss a number???] 09:56:43 Paul [7] 09:57:06 Chris Hendon [6] some ahhs 09:57:07 Bart has joined #lgd 09:57:24 Chris highlighted there are internal BBC issues that are not all the tools 09:58:16 getting what the BBC has across all uses and scale is not there yet 09:59:40 Tim Duffy - part the issue is the standards and tools keeping up with the standards. now catching up, over the next year performance will improve (open source) commercial software even slower. Now [7] 10:00:29 Questions.... 10:01:47 Peter Parslow: Publishing data to look at vs Processing. Persistent IDs are useful for both. How much of the technology stack (that is focused now on the publishing to look at) is also usable for distributed processing? 10:02:18 John Laxton: recognising the issue. Trying to unpick the issues a bit at a time 10:02:31 peterisb has joined #lgd 10:02:41 deliver the data service but also better descriptions of the data on top 10:03:09 individually not necessarily useful - together they will be. 10:04:21 Peter Rushford: Kiss principle is the basis of the web. Keeping things simple (i.e. hide the complexity) 10:05:27 Chris Hendon: Where meaning is worked out - slightly limited by the tools. Context is important and not all the tools are there to help users 10:06:15 Question - Jeremy Tandy: site and conformance testing - agreed with Tim for OGC. No such approaches or tools for Linked Data yet.... thoughts? 10:06:46 Q: it's crucial that we have tools to work with the data, but how might we apply conformance testing for server implementations when there is no agreed or endorsed practice, let alone standard method ...  10:07:03 Tim Duffy: Love or Loath standards - they are there... if keep inventing new ways there could be issues. 10:09:11 Phil Archer: in semantic web world.. there are w3c test suites for many of the standards. As part of the process it is key before a standard can be a standard. Deliberately a high bar. 10:09:56 ...there are works of fiction out there but they do try very hard 10:11:06 Andy Seabourne: victim of the W3c process. the w3c test are there before the standard is a standard. 10:11:43 AndyS: what are the interactions in the development of the standards (and open source software)? 10:11:46 s/Seabourne/Seaborne 10:12:36 Tim Duffy: change requests are fed back in OGC process. Subtle difference between reference tests and tests with real data 10:13:51 Bart (OGC): Implimentation of standards at the OGC and the parallel Interoperability Programme http://www.opengeospatial.org/ogc/programs/ip to try and mature standards 10:14:00 One final question: 10:14:49 We have this data... how do you share it? e.g. familiar with WFS 10:15:13 AdamL has joined #lgd 10:15:36 Tomaž agar: some raster data - note there yet. for some stats data it is less of an issue 10:16:05 Out of time: Applause 10:16:21 handing over to Stuart Harrison 10:16:33 Bill Roberts chairing this session 10:16:39 "Putting the data to work" 10:16:51 MichaelLutz has joined #lgd 10:16:54 Talking about tooling 10:17:10 hugh has joined #lgd 10:17:11 Three 10 minutes talks, followed by panel 10:17:18 John Goodwin from OS first up 10:18:13 Talking about research project done with University of Southampton 10:18:21 Project called RAGLD 10:18:33 We haven't have a dubious acronym for a while :) 10:18:50 18 month project 10:19:00 Allowing 'the great unwashed' to access linked data 10:19:14 Not that precious about linked data, more about open data 10:19:41 Talking about sameAs service. Linked Data is not very linked. 10:20:04 Went round the web of data, scraped the sameAs links 10:20:20 You can put in a URI and find equivalent URIS 10:20:25 URIs 10:20:52 http://sameas.org/ 10:21:08 Can we do this more generically? 10:21:23 http://apps.seme4.com/see-uk/ 10:21:35 Clikc on a ward, and see data about that area 10:21:45 Difficult to put together 10:21:58 You need a framework to make building this sort of thing easier 10:22:03 s/Clikc/Click/ 10:22:11 This is where RAGLD comes in 10:22:23 A whole suite of tools 10:22:51 Relationship management, spacial query services, as well as reconciliation services 10:23:14 People don't always want to get their hands dirty with SPARQL 10:23:32 Loaded wards into the service, and exposed some APIs 10:24:09 Loaded dummy data into a RAGLD service 10:24:47 Ingested and visualised a journey and did geospatial analysis on it 10:24:53 Added a buffer on a route 10:25:20 And then loaded in all the B&Bs in the buffer 10:25:57 Piping URIs to URIs, can end up with very complex queries easily 10:26:01 SimonEv has joined #lgd 10:26:20 John has his family tree as linked data 10:26:42 A colleague used RAGLD to build an application using RAGLD tools 10:26:59 (Didn't have much experience with linked data) 10:27:07 rhwarren has joined #lgd 10:27:43 Simple visualisation widget, also pulls in data from the web 10:28:25 Andrew Kevis from University of Madrid 10:28:28 next up 10:28:53 (May have misheard the name) 10:29:10 Alejandro Llaves 10:29:38 Talking about Map4RDF-ios 10:29:42 jtandy has joined #lgd 10:29:54 Allows visualising and browning linked geo data 10:30:10 Saw there was an increase in linked geospatial data 10:30:21 Not many tools out there 10:30:44 Developed in parallel with a web-based tool 10:31:32 Allows user to test their data, but also bring the linked data to non-ld people 10:31:45 Supports mobile devices running iOS 10:31:55 ocorcho has joined #lgd 10:31:56 Multiple map services (OSM, Google etc) 10:32:16 Allows visualisation of statistical data published using DataCube 10:32:34 Clustering also supported 10:32:41 JohnGoodwin has joined #lgd 10:32:42 Highly customisable 10:33:13 However, it only supports non-authenticated SPARQL endpoints 10:33:17 And only one at a time 10:33:44 Running a short video demo 10:34:34 scribenick: pezholio 10:34:39 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5Xq2e_IC7Y 10:35:33 Showing the DataCube functionality 10:35:48 Loading neighbourhood info 10:37:15 Offers an intuitive GUI to visualise LGD 10:37:25 Faster than the web-based version 10:37:36 Easy analysis 10:37:42 jtandy has joined #lgd 10:37:59 Now in the app store! 10:38:14 Round of applause for getting through Apple's approval process! 10:38:38 Future work 10:38:47 Save and share snapshots 10:38:50 Realtime data 10:39:25 Developing a module to feed back suggestions to data owners 10:40:24 Martin Hammitzsch next up 10:41:09 Talking about an Android app now! 10:41:26 HadleyBeeman has joined #lgd 10:41:49 Looking for advice and inspiration 10:42:11 Shows information about Geohazards 10:42:18 Such as volcanoes et 10:42:19 c 10:42:34 Details, reporting 10:42:42 Lots of configuration options 10:42:46 Useful for disaster tourism! 10:42:56 Define data sources and filters 10:43:31 Involved in a project involved in early warning crisis management 10:43:46 Trying to increase attractiveness to users 10:44:03 They may be potential eyewitnesses in the future 10:44:08 ManoMarks has joined #lgd 10:44:13 App is freely available in the Play Store 10:44:26 Various different data sources on geohazards 10:44:41 Pull only, then check what's new 10:44:55 Push isn't officially offered, unless you ask 10:45:24 Variety of formats - HTML, RSS (if you're lucky), so REST API. 10:45:35 Not many agencies know much about linked datas 10:45:43 Documentation can be poor 10:46:20 Showing an example of an RSS feed from the British Geological Survey 10:46:47 EMSC have RSS with custom namespaces 10:47:14 GDACS interesting as they have lots of resources and link, but only internal 10:47:37 GNS give encoded KML in RSS 10:47:37 whoopie has joined #lgd 10:47:51 Completely different formats 10:47:57 whoopie has left #lgd 10:48:03 Sometimes no location information at all 10:48:19 USGS give volcano information 10:49:08 NOAA have GeoRSS, but radius is badly expressed 10:49:30 Ushahidi being used in an international exercise 10:49:45 Has a REST API to feed in data, and get data out 10:49:54 It is a bit weak 10:50:01 So had to access the data directly 10:50:17 A lot of room for improvement 10:50:28 But there are opportunities 10:50:47 ESRI and Google Crisis response also have APIs 10:51:18 Is there a shift in front of us? 10:51:36 Geohazards affect us all 10:51:48 Standards have to be anchored in the community 10:52:18 Speakers coming back to the stage for the panel session 10:52:30 Andy Seabourne and ??? coming back 10:52:36 Sorry, missed second name 10:52:51 Herbert Schentz 10:53:12 Alex_Coley_ has joined #lgd 10:53:16 RRSAgent, draft minutes 10:53:16 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/03/06-lgd-minutes.html PhilA 10:53:24 Herbert is a member of the Environment Agency of Austria 10:53:35 Scientists collecting heterogeneous data 10:53:47 Integrating the data with LD technologies 10:53:57 Happy with the results, but had problems 10:54:02 SPARQL is slow 10:54:23 Missed a lot of applications for people not familiar with SPARQL, but want simple stats and maps 10:54:32 Andy from Epimorphics 10:54:33 peterisb has joined #lgd 10:54:39 But representing Apache 10:55:05 Introducing spatial data into Apache Jena 10:55:27 Audience is web developers who aren't familiar with geospatial data - big scary stuff! 10:55:38 Looking for something simple 10:56:18 Two constraints: Resourcing - had a student for three months 10:56:49 Licensing of software: Wanted to repackage and give it away 10:56:57 Wasn't a lot to build on 10:57:01 Used Lucene spatial 10:57:22 Had some resource from one of the Lucene spatial devs 10:57:40 Wanted a relatively simple index pattern 10:57:46 hugh has joined #lgd 10:58:06 Missed questioner's name 10:58:24 Why not use Android? 10:58:34 No funding 10:58:46 John's T-Shirt is game of Life themed today! 10:59:17 Question for Martin: is he aware of the Geo super sites? 10:59:34 They have selected a number of sites where they collect more data 10:59:57 Martin: Looking into it right now, but not in contact with the team 11:00:00 Some problems 11:00:18 Push would be really interesting. Would help with early warning 11:00:39 Accessing data directly is very important, but there may be some time lag 11:01:01 Stuart Williams: Question for John - How available is the RAGLD tool? 11:01:13 IP is owned by OS, Semaphone and UoS 11:01:23 Not sure what to do with it yet 11:01:24 s/semaphone/seme4 11:01:50 Quesiton for Alejandro and Martin 11:02:02 Which was the easiest linked data geometry to work with? 11:02:38 John: Built RAGLD to work with shape files and RDF 11:02:44 Used WKT 11:02:56 As well as W3G geo lat/lng 11:03:10 Alejandro goes for GeoSPARQL as he likes the model 11:03:20 Not supporting GeoJSON yet 11:03:29 But depends on the use case 11:03:50 John says they use GeoJSON on the client side 11:04:19 Andy - ordering of lat and long in W3C standards 11:05:24 Herbert Schentz: Which format is nice for the user, and what format has performance benefits? 11:05:45 Question from MET office 11:06:17 The target for tsunami warning messages is 2 seconds, but a lot of warnings aren't on the web because safety critical 11:06:41 Question for Herbert and Andy: We've heard that SPARQL is slow, but it can be optimised 11:07:15 Who's fault is it? The query writer, or the application developer 11:07:33 Herbert likes GeoSPARQL, but has great concerns over the performance 11:07:58 Andy can't speak for GeoSPARQL, but knows people who have worked on it 11:08:18 There is a trade off, but if you tell the system what your data looks like, it can be quicker 11:09:14 Optimising for data and geo queries is quite a difficult job 11:09:34 Missed question from Bill 11:10:15 John: With RAGLD, they wanted to provide RESTful layers on top of SPARQL queries - hiding SPARQL 11:11:04 Alejandro: Putting a visualisation on top of SPARQL does the same - non linked data people don't like SPARQL 11:11:25 Saves you the burden of creating your own querie 11:11:26 s 11:12:10 Andy: Mainly looking at the application writer, where there is some geospatail data, but other non-geo data 11:12:43 Martin: about putting the data to work. People generally are not interested in the technology, they want to see what's possilbe 11:12:56 s/possilbe/possible 11:13:27 Martin: SemWeb and SPARQL is scary - you have to demonstrate the advantages 11:14:05 Herbert: You have to cater for all audiences, shouldn't completely hide SPARQL endpoints. 11:15:19 Alejandro answering question as to why Linked Data is better than standard Geo 11:15:27 Linking is the definite benefit 11:15:50 Question on integrating spatial and statistical data - what's the best tool? 11:16:13 Where in the stack is the best way to do it? 11:16:51 Alejandro: Can visualise DataCube 11:17:11 Anything with a SPARQL endpoint can be integrated 11:17:25 Session over 11:17:31 Now, coffee! 11:18:45 AndyS has joined #lgd 11:19:33 RRSAgent, draft minutes 11:19:33 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/03/06-lgd-minutes.html PhilA 11:30:36 AndyS has joined #lgd 11:36:15 pezholio has joined #lgd 11:40:20 AndyS1 has joined #lgd 11:46:57 scribenick: AndyS 11:47:03 scribe: Andy Seaborne 11:47:07 Stuart has joined #lgd 11:47:16 icm has joined #lgd 11:49:00 HadleyBeeman has joined #lgd 11:49:28 subtopic: Implementation of the Fukushima radiation LOD framework // Isao Kojima, AIST (National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology) 11:49:30 ManoMarks has joined #lgd 11:49:56 TimDuffy has joined #lgd 11:50:08 rhwarren has joined #lgd 11:50:10 ocorcho has joined #lgd 11:50:35 pauljcripps has joined #lgd 11:51:18 Alex_Coley has joined #lgd 11:51:34 subtopic: Open Data-Logging for Bikes // Rich Boakes, University of Portsmouth 11:52:10 (reorder talks due to setup issues) 11:52:18 peterisb has joined #lgd 11:52:42 Rich: With Jacek Kopecky and Oliver Williams 11:52:57 ... Portsmouth is nearly an island 11:53:05 ... and very crowded 11:53:16 hugh has joined #lgd 11:53:45 ... sustainable transport ... now getting gridlock due to how busy things are becoming 11:54:13 ... bikes. Safety - actual and perceived 11:54:27 ... deaths in London up 18% 11:54:33 ... and 6 in 2 weeks 11:54:39 LarsG has joined #lgd 11:54:49 ... also perceived putting people off. 11:55:19 ... as scientists, there is no data 11:55:30 ... (video) 11:56:01 ... a close encounter of the bus kind 11:56:41 ... gather data and observe. Publish data and understand the reality. 11:56:50 ... and maintain data published 11:57:23 ... including the data gatherers : crowd, less good data vs curated data 11:58:13 ... bicycle with instruments : RasperberryPi+GPS+ultrasonic sensor 11:58:24 HadleyBeeman1 has joined #lgd 11:58:47 ... prototype 2 adds a panic button - records user experience 11:59:31 ... add a camera pointing backwards -- number plate recognition -- coordinate with history of the vehicle 11:59:43 ... better hardware - water proof 12:00:26 ... in the future - accelerometer ,... 12:01:02 ... example of heat map of a single bike journey. Proximity events. 12:01:17 ... aggregate by many journeys 12:01:20 Kostis has joined #lgd 12:01:49 ... effectively target council road funding - provides evidence of effect of spending 12:02:01 ... link to other data 12:02:27 ... http://picycle.io/ 12:02:39 ... license for software and for data to be decided 12:02:57 ... hardware hackday coming up 12:03:28 ... no funding currently ... looking for funding. 12:04:55 subtopic: Implementation of the Fukushima radiation LOD framework // Isao Kojima, AIST(National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology) 12:05:44 Isao Kojima: GeoSPARQL + ELDA 12:06:14 ... Monitor/construct/publish radiation database of the Fukushima area 12:06:56 ... role -- interface to database for integrating other open data 12:07:43 ... real time data (4K points, every 10 mins) 12:07:50 ... (more) 12:08:14 ... CSV to RDF for stats 12:08:27 .. Sesame + UseekMe 12:08:58 ... interlinked datatsets e.g. population, radiation, geo 12:09:34 ... ELDA endpoint + extend to WKT polygon display (no search in browser) 12:09:48 ... will contribute back to open source project 12:10:47 ... calculation of collective radiation dose combines different sources 12:11:17 ... issue 1 - schema design and query performance 12:12:00 ... query touches a lot of data to get all sub details of hierarchy 12:12:09 hugh has joined #lgd 12:12:37 ... geo data at the lowest level of hierarchy 12:13:20 ... issue 2 - support /combine two opee standards 12:13:35 s/opee/open/ 12:14:08 ... different stores for different data 12:14:36 ... create an aggregated database in PostGIS 12:14:57 ... maintaining consistency hard 12:15:15 ... been going for 6 months with RDF based framework 12:15:40 subtopic: A geospatial API for linking and distributing open data - researching new ways of linking similar objects from different data sets // Bert Spaan, Waag Society 12:16:18 Bert: CitySDK Linked Data API 12:16:34 ... EU project 12:16:55 ... XLS,SHP,XML,CSV,RDF.KML 12:17:20 ... collect these datasets and provide in a unified way 12:17:38 ... useful for city apps (mobile) 12:18:09 ... e.g. car park : capacity, location and name, from different silos 12:18:22 ... pin data to spatial location 12:18:37 ... (video) 12:19:08 ... info delivered in JSON 12:19:47 ... linking is quite static - want to be dynamic 12:19:59 ... add rules for connections within the data 12:20:17 ... example based on sameAs and geoproximity 12:20:47 ... categorize objects maybe by crowdsourcing 12:21:23 BartDeLathouwerOGC has joined #lgd 12:21:23 ... fuzzy URI -- e.g. a car park somewhere near XYZ 12:21:57 ... City Data Ontology 12:22:24 ... specific relationships for city data 12:22:45 subtopic: discussion 12:23:29 Q -- (from twitter) Licensing - legacy data under legacy licenses 12:23:48 Rich: most important is the data license 12:24:01 ... want to do it properly ... suggestions please 12:24:29 boricles has joined #lgd 12:24:38 check out the OGC Table Join Service (http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/tjs) for linking geospatial with tabular information 12:24:38 license question came in from Anthony Beck re this post on the DART project blog: http://antarch.calepin.co/dart-licences-and-the-ads.html 12:24:51 Q -- intermediate UML -- what experience did you have with using UML 12:25:19 Isao: no general tools but we were able to map the data 12:26:02 Q -- Privacy issues (car license plates) and what about errors in recognition 12:26:06 Rich: tricky 12:26:16 HadleyBeeman has joined #lgd 12:26:16 Alex_Coley has joined #lgd 12:26:35 ... if the gain is great than maybe should be done - wide debate 12:26:44 ... common issue that arises with open data 12:27:14 HadleyBeeman1 has joined #lgd 12:27:34 Q -- Parking data. Do you have real time data e.g occupancy 12:27:57 Bert: yes for Amsterdam , more coming 12:28:56 Q -- CSV to RDF -- could you please send use case to the CSV-WG? 12:29:01 AndreaPerego has joined #lgd 12:30:11 Q -- Privacy is getting more and more important. Does crowdsourcing change the situation? 12:30:57 Rich: Members of the public. We need to thing about it as the public.community. 12:31:24 ... is it a responsibility of owning a motor vehicle to have a public number plate? 12:32:43 Q -- what challenge as a community should be addressed? 12:33:09 Rich: data in geoJSON but how should we publish and use internally to maximise additional use 12:34:15 Bert: document the many datasets and feeds. Currently assumed knowledge. 12:34:45 subtopic: A word about the SmartOpenData project // Jesus Mª Estrada Villegas, TRAGSA http://www.smartopendata.eu/ 12:35:13 Jesus: FP7 12:35:47 ... first aim to work with data sources to make them open 12:35:54 ... environment sources 12:36:39 ... contacts on website 12:37:19 giusepperizzo has left #lgd 12:43:39 RRSAgent, draft minutes 12:43:39 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/03/06-lgd-minutes.html PhilA 12:51:51 LarsG has joined #lgd 12:59:42 Alex_Coley has joined #lgd 13:03:18 HadleyBeeman has joined #lgd 13:07:56 raphael has joined #lgd 13:12:16 HadleyBeeman has joined #lgd 13:21:01 pezholio has joined #lgd 13:21:04 ajtucker has joined #lgd 13:22:49 Alex_Coley has joined #lgd 13:24:16 peterisb has joined #lgd 13:25:41 raphael_ has joined #lgd 13:31:18 pezholio has joined #lgd 13:32:22 scribe: PhilA 13:32:27 scribeNick: PhilA 13:32:48 Topic: Bill Oates Help! Where next for sustainable statistics and geographies for Wales? 13:33:21 Bill: Asks for help by Twitter 13:33:32 rhwarren has joined #lgd 13:33:43 ... the Welsh Government produces data 13:34:05 ... work to civil code of standards etc. 13:34:19 ... concerned about security etc. 13:34:24 ... we're a Microsoft House 13:34:35 ... we're not data geeks 13:34:53 ... we produce reports. It remains the most used way of accessing our data 13:35:07 ... the stats page is the 2nd most used page after the jobs page on our Web site 13:35:13 ... we get FOI requests 13:35:40 ... if we publish our datasets that should fend off a lot of FOI requests. Stats Wales for example, 1k data cubes there 13:36:23 ... no new data in the user friendly app, but it's digested 13:37:10 ... we're being tempted by OData, and Google's offering 13:37:46 ... feel that same people are producing data and the apps 13:37:53 ... final slide shows what I need 13:38:27 Topic: How to move a relational Roads Dataset to a Roads Linked Data Dataset?, Alexander Ramage, Transport Scotland 13:38:35 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:38:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/03/06-lgd-minutes.html PhilA 13:39:20 AlexR: I'm and IT person, not an LD person. I'm convinced of LD. How dod I do it? 13:39:45 ... got lots of data, relational 13:40:35 ... we have a design manual for how you design roads and bridges. That includes some controlled vocabularies - we should give them URIs. That's easy 13:40:44 ... what about stuff that isn't finite 13:41:17 ... What about spatial information - most important slides for me 13:41:26 ... dunno how to move into the LD realm 13:41:35 ... what I do a lot of is to compare one bit of data with another 13:42:09 ... Two lines are identical but they're in different places, How can I prove that they represent the same thing? 13:42:24 ... Transport Scotland thinks this is the right way to go. 13:42:46 ... but we're not going to move to it quickly 13:43:00 ... putting building blocks in place is the next thing 13:44:03 Topic: Collaborative Geospatial Data, Stuart Harrison, The Open Data Institute 13:44:36 pezholio: We're planning to... 13:45:15 pezholio: Geodata collected by a range of organisations and they don't always use the same standards 13:45:22 ... this is a common problem 13:45:30 Alejandro_Llaves has joined #lgd 13:45:33 .... much of hte geo data that devs would like to use is not open 13:46:02 ... Open Street Map is one answer 13:46:20 ... but OSM is not the best way to show where your event is, for example 13:46:37 ... an OSM URI doesn't necessarily give you the data back from the URI 13:46:47 ... the Share Alike licence is not always what's needed 13:47:01 ... storing geo data in one central place may not be the best fit 13:47:12 ... there's lots of open data out there with geo data included 13:47:34 ... Green space data is very disparate 13:47:54 ... allows users to add in more data 13:48:24 ... can be done directly or can send us data that we can include (if unencimbered) 13:48:41 s/unencimbered/unincumbered/ 13:48:53 ... we want to build an open addresses database 13:49:19 ... the land registry is an invaluable data source. Every price paid for a house since 1996 13:49:27 ... add in Companies House, OS Locator 13:50:10 BartDeLathouwerOGC has joined #lgd 13:50:14 .... started some of this work - see project on github . Need more funding to do more 13:50:52 Topic: Many layers of thought: connecting INSPIRE and Linked Data, Peter Parslow, Ordnance Survey 13:50:58 ODI : using POI? (OGC OpenPOI) 13:51:02 [No slides] 13:51:46 PeterP: TimbL said OS is really important so people can put data on a map. Glad we haven't been talking about that here 13:52:06 ... I work in product development, things that will launch in 2 years or so 13:52:24 ... trying to get our linked data out of research and into normal ops 13:52:55 ... Do let us know if you use our LD, otherwise it might disappear 13:53:08 ... server logs only tell you numbers, nit how useful it is 13:53:14 s/nit/not/ 13:54:02 PeterP: Talking about history of triples, relational data, XML anda geo data 13:54:34 ... things have grown from small groups into large groups. 13:54:55 ... now want to get back to troiple model that we actually started with 13:55:35 PeterP: It's not possible to create an ontology of everything 13:56:35 ... INSPIRE made a lot of effort to get semantics into the model, LD people should use it. INSPIRE shouldn't try to do more semantics 13:57:22 Topic: Representing and Reasoning over Spatial Relations in OWL: A Rule-Based Approach, Sotiris Batsakis, University of Huddersfield 13:57:30 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:57:30 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/03/06-lgd-minutes.html PhilA 13:57:38 ocorcho has joined #lgd 13:58:54 Sotoris: Talking about need to update a lot of things when changing one thing 13:59:23 ... shows the RCC5 relations 14:00:11 ... you can draw inferences from known relations 14:00:16 ... we use Path Consistency 14:00:35 richboakes has joined #lgd 14:00:56 ... using SWRL to encode rules 14:01:18 ... allows us to deal with incomplete info 14:01:50 slides reflect the notes full 14:01:56 s/full/fully/ 14:03:31 Q & A session 14:04:12 Gianfra has joined #lgd 14:04:35 hello 14:04:37 question: Your open space project, pezholio - a lot of local gov data includes Ordnance Survey data, how can you move into open data 14:05:03 StuartH: Derived data and licensing is a challenge 14:05:35 richboakes has joined #lgd 14:05:58 PeterP: TOIDS are free to reuse. If local councils want to provide the data they need to talk to us. They give info about paths which they draw on our maps 14:06:41 sorry that question re licensing was from me. 14:06:50 Gothwin: A question on RCC5 reasoning - can you do it in OWL? I tired and couldn't 14:07:13 Sotoris: The full reasoning is incomplete. So we restricted it - 2 triecks used 14:07:34 s/triecks/tricks 14:07:42 Alex_Coley has joined #lgd 14:07:44 (lost the details) 14:09:03 question - you need to sweet talk your local authorities to ask OS for exemption. With luck they'll say yes 14:09:09 (this for StuartH) 14:10:04 Some discussion of the difference between Open Gov Licence and Open Licence for Ordnance Survey, only diff is that you must credit OS 14:10:26 orcho: You've been exploring using LD for stats (Bill) 14:10:36 ... have you looked at using it in the pipeline 14:10:45 Bill: I'd be intersted in case studies into those benefits 14:11:10 Bill: I think it's not just about external apps, it's the benefits internally that I'm equally interested in 14:11:30 ... the challenge is dealing with civil servant's addiction to Excel 14:12:09 ... how can people benefit from LD within the organisation via desktop tools where we're locked down 14:12:14 Hum... Bill is leading the lynching mob againts excel! 14:12:44 PeterP: What about sustainability, Bill? 14:13:00 Bill: The key point for me is not doing Linked geospatial Data, it's doing it again x lots 14:13:26 ... if people download our data and so stuff, great, but will they be there next year, the year after? 14:13:41 ... what's the first thing I do to move from Excel to open data publishing 14:14:11 ... the retention period on gov data is 20 years. After that we have to follow one of a few routes 14:14:43 question: Lots of people dealing with the validity of data, called ??? science?? 14:15:11 ... several years ago I was reading about folksonomies. Are you working on that 14:15:57 bill: all the issues around provenance and reliability of the data are important. 14:16:23 laurent_oz has joined #lgd 14:16:24 AndyS has joined #lgd 14:16:35 I meant citizen science 14:16:36 BillRoberts: On the issues of digital preservation... standard desktop tools are part of the problem. Publishing LD gets around a lot of preservation probs. 14:17:11 s/??? science??/citizen science/ 14:18:42 SteveP: I'm an OD person, I'm also an OSM enthusiast - people at OSM are cross referencing physical things on the ground with boundaries 14:18:52 richboakes has joined #lgd 14:19:12 AlexR: That's not happening in Scotland. Only seed points open in Scotland, not available nationally 14:19:54 RRSAgent, draft minutes 14:19:54 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/03/06-lgd-minutes.html PhilA 14:20:46 scribe: hadleybeeman 14:20:50 scribenick: hadleybeeman 14:20:58 topic: Panel: Show Me The Way 14:21:10 chair: stuart 14:21:55 richboakes has joined #lgd 14:21:55 pezholio has joined #lgd 14:22:00 Stuart Kerry Taylor will be speaking on behalf of herself and Simon Cox (who isn't here) 14:22:07 s/stuart/stuart: 14:22:40 subtopic: Geospatial standards and linked geospatial data (Kerry Taylor) 14:23:24 Kerry: Subtitle of my talk is "Simon Says" 14:23:54 … I'm standing in for Simon today. 14:24:15 … Simon wanted to present to this community, esp W3C audience, state of work in the OGC and ISO. 14:24:34 … OGC has developed a URI scheme and a naming authority. A definitions service. 14:24:49 … ISO/TC11: rules for using OWL, ontology management group. 14:24:59 … URIs for all OGC artefacts 14:25:19 … ISO/TC211: rules for developing ontologies in OWL as a draft international standard 14:25:45 … Preview at http://def.seegrid.csiro.au/isotc211 14:26:04 … Includes rules for translation from UML modelling into our modelling 14:26:08 jacek has joined #lgd 14:26:24 richboakes has joined #lgd 14:26:28 … Not geospatial data. Can help modelling and classifying it though. 14:26:50 … End of Simon's points. This is Kerry speaking now. 14:27:00 … These are technical as well as cultural bridges. 14:27:20 … The OGC community has lots of knowledge in spatial data, and industry consumers. 14:27:34 … The W3C has a good profile, high uptake, and semantic web knowledge to contribute. 14:27:52 … Specifically, we can get inside complex data representations. 14:28:19 … Finally, with W3C hat on towards OGC world: keep the geo-location and geometry out of other stuff that goes with it. Don't put these things in single packages. 14:28:28 … Hardly anyone here belongs to both W3C and OGC. 14:28:38 … Needs to be considered for the sake of interoperability. 14:29:00 subtopic: Keith Jeffery 14:29:18 Keith: I come from the big data world 14:29:46 … 2 projects: EPOS - volcanoes (?) and Engage - research data. 14:30:01 … I'm interested in relationship between linked open data and heavy big data. 14:30:21 … Linked open data isn't new. Used to call it 'interoperability'. Goes back to the 1960s. 14:31:02 … Triple stores: IBM in the 1970s. In the 80s: 9 column store. Triples RDF + spatial + temporal + modal 14:31:13 … Dealing with stuff modelled into RDF can be hard. 2 problems: 14:31:36 … Danger of losing referential and functional integrity. Queries can produce wrong results or not be computable. 14:32:35 … Metadata: important to let you do something with data. Critical. 1. If good, contextual metadata, helps end user to judge quality and applicability. 2. Allows disambiguation. 3. provides lowest common level across datasets to combine. 14:32:54 … Way forward: I go back to Tim's view of the Web: to publish and share information. 14:33:23 … Use the LOD semantic web for browsing/discovery, close to user interface. Need high throughput systems for real world data processing. Link together with metadata. 14:33:29 … Virtualise on cloud infrastructures 14:33:52 … Use it all to look for potential links in data. Use to generate converting software to bring together data sets at lower level, high volume. 14:34:13 subtopic: John Goodwin, in place of Raj Singh 14:34:35 Isn't LOD is more that interoperability? Interoperability suggests (to me) that services/data are designed to be used together. The challenge of good LOD is to design data so that it can be used _somehow_, but we may have no idea what it might one day be used for. 14:34:47 s/that/than 14:34:49 gothwin: 3 years ago, we wanted to publish linked data for 3 of our products. Best practice was to use ontologies, or extend existing ones. 14:35:19 … I needed ontologies for modelling spatial info, but they didn't exist. Had to write mine own. Nothing to model geometries apart from WGS84. 14:36:00 … At a Geocamp, got to brainstorming with database vendors… ended up being what GeoSPARQL looked like. 14:36:17 … A few things missing from GeoSPARQL. I'd like other predicates, not just geometry. Boundary, extent, centroid. 14:36:35 … Also missing metadata re spatial data quality. 14:36:43 … I invented my own, but I don't really like it. 14:37:04 … As a data consumer, I work in a research dept. Look at: how do we ingest other linked data? 14:37:29 … We need simpler ways to ingest it. 14:38:07 … People say linked data is a steep learning curve. But it's actually really simple. 14:38:23 … How do we remove that perception that this stuff is hard? 14:38:42 subtopic: Steve Peters 14:39:14 Steve: I'm a publisher and a hobbyist developer, so looking at this from both roles. 14:39:41 … Start with a question: Is the spatial planning system encouraging or discouraging the building of new homes in flood risk areas? 14:40:04 … Ask a floating voter , they'll say "place" means "my local village/community". 14:40:30 … Ask a policy person in central government, they'll say "place" means "the nation." Want to compare different areas and regions, suceptibility to flooding. 14:40:55 … Need data from different sources: local authority, Environment Agency, nationally. Need to link those sources together. 14:41:08 … This is much more than maps. Need spatial intelligence and insights about those areas. 14:41:17 lindavandenbrink has joined #lgd 14:41:35 … Gaps: Do we need new standards? We probably have enough. I've been hearing here that standards exist and we aren't useing them. 14:41:46 … We need to better understand what's out there, how to reuse the patterns. 14:42:10 … Re GeoSPARQL, looks promising as a publisher. But not many examples of where it's running in the real world. 14:42:21 … To make standards stick, we have to put them in procurement processes. 14:42:39 … We have legacy systems, with third party suppliers. How to educate them on these benefits? 14:43:02 … Re INSPIRE, it's a focal point for action. Maybe we can use this agenda to drive out the new standards? 14:43:13 … But INSPIRE is hard to get into, as a developer. 14:43:41 … Re culture and language: if you're a geospatial developer, AJAX is not a domestic cleaning product. If you're a web dev, a polygon is not a dead parrot. 14:44:07 … I see the emergence of open layers, leaflet JS, etc. Good stuff. 14:44:29 … Linked data IS the answer, bridging the geospatial conventional world and the stuff we need to know about it. 14:44:43 subtopic: Raphael Troncy 14:45:19 raphael_: Andreas was supposed to take this slot, but it's me. 14:45:26 … We agree on what the future work should be. 14:45:55 … Re vocabs for describing features, geometries: Need more predicates 14:46:24 … We start with the existing vocabularies — no controversies in them. We need more properties to express the relationships 14:46:29 … I agree with gothwin 14:47:02 Stuart has joined #lgd 14:47:17 … We talked about how we could structure the representations (nodes and points) 14:47:24 … We talked about GeoJSON output 14:47:38 … We need a vocab for precision of maps. 14:47:52 … Many maps charge when you get below a certain resolution. 14:48:08 … A vocabulary for the semantics there would be useful. 14:48:32 … SPARQL and GeoSPARQL are nice, along with APIs. 14:48:42 subtopic: Alex Coley 14:49:06 alexrcoley: I'm with the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs in the UK 14:49:29 … We have 39 arms-length bodies connected to Defra, small to large organisations. 14:49:53 … Most of them use data to drive their business, most of it is environmental and attached to a place. Location is important. 14:50:00 … We're the lead department for INSPIRE in the UK. 14:50:20 … Open data and maximising the use of our data are also key. 14:50:43 … We're learning about interoperability from our incidents (like current flooding). Sharing data is easy. 14:51:12 … Money is tight. For us, moving away from the silos. The problem is duplicative standards. 14:51:30 … If different communities are doing things in parallel, and we have to do things more than once — that's not good for us. 14:51:32 mseiler has joined #lgd 14:51:42 sharing data is easy ... but hard if you want to do it now 14:51:57 richboakes has joined #lgd 14:52:00 … There isn't necessarily always one way. We have a lot of existing standards we can reuse, but it's hard to know which to use when. 14:52:13 … We should be a bit more coordinated. 14:52:21 … Less is better than more. 14:53:05 … I may have come to this a little biased, and I've learned through our discussions. 14:53:28 … We have the traditional Web community, and the Geospatial community: discussing the same things, but with different words. 14:53:36 … Coming together would be useful. 14:54:02 … What's the best way, for data available on the web (as opposed to through the web)? Still not convinced we've demonstrated one way. 14:54:20 … Joint W3C/OGC working group? Or just a community group? 14:54:30 subtopic: Panel Q&A 14:54:59 Stuart: One pass down the line of panelists before we open up to questions from the audience. 14:55:21 … What is on the top of your shopping list for some combined OGC/W3C effort? 14:55:54 Steve: Helping me as a user navigate through the maze of standards, best way to prepare, publish and encourage reuse of data. Best practice, support, peer networking. 14:56:13 Keith: Standardising terminology of metadata. 14:56:24 richboakes has joined #lgd 14:56:32 Alex: Lots of parts of the picture. Bringing those together to demonstrate a whole way it can be done. 14:56:45 John: +1 to what's been said. 14:56:54 … Agreement on best practice and the standards, tools to implement them. 14:57:09 Kerry: Shared spatial vocabulary. Useful and easy to do. 14:57:14 Raphael: +1 to Kerry. 14:58:04 Question: Bill Roberts: My wishlist: I think we have enough standards, but I don't know how to use them. So: design patterns where people can document how they use standards. 14:58:22 Raphael: For GeoSPARQL, hard to see good examples of endpoints. More would be great. 14:59:03 Steve: To convince my bosses to fund this, evidence of the benefits are important. Case studies, evidence of take-up. What you can do now that you couldn't do before. 14:59:56 Question: Peter: +1 to last point re management oriented business benefit. On previous point, sounds like the SDI cookbook of 10 years ago or so. Maybe an update? SDI was good for publishers, but not for consumers. 15:00:05 pauljcripps has joined #lgd 15:01:09 Question (Bill Oates): open standards gain traction. Last year, we published what we thought was WMS, and also published WFS because we forgot to switch it off. Therefore, didn't need to make a business case to implement it. 15:01:16 rhwarren_ has joined #lgd 15:01:36 bill Oates: Tools can fall behind the standards. Would they help here, or make it worse? 15:02:32 Alex: I agree. That balance: new standards? tweaks to the standards to make things easier? How to link between different approaches? And when to? Doesn't necessarily mean changing the implementations. 15:03:34 Keith: Horses for courses. Linked open data is good for somethings. We need to build up experiences and case studies. Share experience. Reflect that back into the standards bodies. Bring things forward with the whole community, not just us in this room. 15:05:05 Question: Jack Kareski(?): Many say linked data is hard. We have to reuse ontologies. When building an SQL database, you don't have to make a schema with others. One good practice could be: do it in SQL, give us a read view in RDF. 15:05:17 PhilA: D2RQ. 15:06:17 Question: Jeremy Tandy: We've identified 4 geospatial vocabs for identifying geometry. Could we get it down to 1? Agree it? NeoGeo? Core location? GeoSPARQL? W3C Geo? Can we have a vote? 15:07:00 Raphael: I'm not sure of OGC practice, re GeoSPARQL vocab. More familiar with W3C. Now, small sets of properties we want to add are being discussed in the Core Vocab group. 15:07:18 … We should add these to that discussion, or feed back to OGC for their process. 15:07:46 Question (Tim Duffy): +1 to Jeremy's point. 15:07:59 Stuart: Any dissenting views? 15:08:02 Audience: none 15:08:26 Question: Chris Little: As an outsider, is it possible to get to just one? 15:08:32 TimDuffy has joined #lgd 15:09:54 Question: PhilA: When we began this workshop, we didn't know what the outcome would be. However, reasonable to think now in terms of a chartered working group. Now need to discuss legalities and practicalities. Outputs jointly badged W3C & OGC. 15:10:14 PhilA: It needs an actual charter, which fits both orgs. Members are in control. 15:10:37 … Pretty quickly, we could standardise GeoJSON. Been around a long time. 15:10:52 … Cry for a shared spatial vocabulary. We can do that. May need converters/mapping. 15:11:01 … cookbooks, best practices… we can do tht. 15:11:19 … Usage studies are harder. Perhaps an EU-funded H2020 project? We could learn from it? 15:12:00 … Do we need to take a wicket literal and split into semantic bits with predicates. Is that useful? 15:12:08 Raphael: yes, though there are different ways to write it. 15:12:12 PhilA: K 15:12:28 DickyWH has joined #lgd 15:12:41 … sometimes you need the metadata for each value in a coordinate pair. Can some of this be standardised? 15:12:57 … Compression may be an issue as well. Some of this data is big. 15:13:06 … SPARQL performance increases, etc. 15:13:18 Bart: My notes are similar as PhilA's. 15:13:51 … It's not PhilA or me who make the standards, it's you. We help you and guide you through the procedures. 15:14:20 … To bring the experience of using the standards back to the standards bodies — to make the standards better. That's the way to go. 15:14:49 … That's an action item for all of you. 15:15:25 … Action item for me: OGC's upcoming technical committee meeting, 3 weeks from now: I'll report back to working groups what happened today. Will start looking into taking on this work. 15:15:41 … I get great value from this. We have to work out how to keep the momentum going. 15:15:46 … Thanks to the panel. 15:15:54 DickyWH has joined #lgd 15:16:24 Kerry: Geospatial data is not a European issue, travels further outside. Plea for us further away. We have a lot to contribute. 15:16:55 Bart: Upcoming TC meeting is worldwide. It's in the US, next one is in Geneva, then Tokyo. 15:16:59 PhilA: W3C is worldwide. 15:17:14 Stuart: Lots of us are from small companies. Global travel can be hard. 15:17:29 Jeremy: most of the work happens between meetings, remotely. You can participate remotely. 15:17:35 Kerry: in the middle of the night. 15:19:06 Question: to add to Bart's comment re OGC looking into spatial vocab: there is a group already discussing this issue. Until this joint W3C/OGC group starts, could we have the discussion there? 15:19:15 -> http://www.w3.org/community/locadd/ The Cg that Michael talked about 15:19:37 Raphael: We're glad to support this as W3C members. 15:19:59 jtandy has joined #lgd 15:20:15 Alex: Most positive thing I heard was Bart's list is similar to Phil's. There are definitely things we can do together. 15:20:47 Keith: +1 to phil. Horses for courses. Layered metadata. Interesting thing is the relationships between those layers ensuring consistency and integrity. 15:21:21 Steve: Rapid incremental progress is good. Quick visible fixes to JSON or JSON-LD. 15:21:34 Stuart: thanks to the panelists. 15:22:21 richboakes has joined #lgd 15:37:05 Stuart has joined #lgd 15:55:55 pezholio has joined #lgd 15:56:04 peterisb has joined #lgd 15:58:54 pezholio has joined #lgd 16:04:29 pezholio has left #lgd 16:05:16 PhilA has joined #lgd 16:05:29 RRSAgent, generate minutes 16:05:29 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/03/06-lgd-minutes.html PhilA 16:05:51 ajtucker has joined #lgd 16:13:42 Gianfra has joined #lgd 16:16:38 richboakes has joined #lgd 16:46:17 richboakes has joined #lgd 17:14:21 Gianfra has joined #lgd